GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Chris Christie throws his aids under the bus.. er bridge.. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1165919)

dyna mo 05-02-2015 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465057)
Umm you do realize that Iraq did not attack the US don't you? al Qaeda aka bin Laden whom was very much in "Afghanistan" not in Iraq whom had absolutely not a fucking thing to do with attacking the US.

Please tell me you understand that Iraq did not attack the US..


Umm, you do realize Benghazi is in Libya right?

please tell me you understand that the attack on the American Embassy in Benghazi was an attack on America.

crockett 05-02-2015 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465063)
Umm, you do realize Benghazi is in Libya right?

please tell me you understand that the attack on the American Embassy in Benghazi was an attack on America.

Once again.. 13 attacks on embassies (American soil) with 60 deaths mean nothing to you why? Why are those previous 13 attacks and 60 deaths less important than 4 Americans and 7 Libyans? Why do you not have any questions about those other attacks and only Benghazi?

Why do you not care as much about the 4,491 US servicemen killed in Iraq in a war which was started based on lies? Why is it you only care about Benghazi? What is so special about it and why does it deserve so much more scrutiny than all those other attacks and a entire war based on lies?

Why do you just blow off over 4 thousand deaths, yet support a witch hunt over 11?


See the difference is with me, you and your conservative nutjob friends. I've seen that there has been multiple investigations by guys whom "want" to find something to blame Obama/Hillary over. Yet even these guys whom want to find something to blame Obama & Hillary for, can't find anything to blame them for. That to me sends a pretty clear message that if they can't even find anything to blame them over there there is "nothing" to blame them over..

Meanwhile investigations have very much shown us that the Bush admin clearly and knowingly misled the American public and the world, yet you seem to be ok with that.. despite the deaths of 4,491 American troops.

dyna mo 05-02-2015 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465066)
Once again.. 13 attacks on embassies (American soil) with 60 deaths mean nothing to you why? Why are those previous 13 attacks and 60 deaths less important than 4 Americans and 7 Libyans? Why do you not have any questions about those other attacks and only Benghazi?

Why do you not care as much about the 4,491 US servicemen killed in Iraq in a war which was started biased on lies? Why is it you only care about Benghazi? What is so special about it and why does it deserve so much more scrutiny than all those other attacks and a entire war based on lies?

Why do you just blow off over 4 thousand deaths?

see, this is why it's no fun debating you libs, it's too easy. i just pointed out how you hand-wave off Benghazi for any reason imaginable, and you counter-point that by, yup, hand-waving off Benghazi AGAIN. this time claiming it's A-OK on account of your assuming dyna mo didn't ask questions about previous attacks on America.

dyna mo 05-02-2015 06:00 PM

Inquiry harshly criticizes State Department over Benghazi attack | Reuters

thanks Obama and Hillary!

crockett 05-02-2015 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465069)

Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com

Why do you not care about the lies which cost 4,491 American lives?

crockett 05-02-2015 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465068)
see, this is why it's no fun debating you libs, it's too easy. i just pointed out how you hand-wave off Benghazi for any reason imaginable, and you counter-point that by, yup, hand-waving off Benghazi AGAIN. this time claiming it's A-OK on account of your assuming dyna mo didn't ask questions about previous attacks on America.

I see how you conveniently "leave out" my answer to your question about Benghazi then go on to pretend as if I said nothing about it.

Also your entire point is stupid because the topic of this form post is about Christie and his bridge scandal yet you right wingers drag into talking about Benghazi. Seriously you can't be so dense as to try to make the argument that i'm changing the subject while you are debating in a topic in which you have changed the subject..

SuckOnThis 05-02-2015 06:35 PM

http://whatwouldjackdo.net/images/Embassy.jpg


http://www.bartcop.com/issa-benghazi-parade_n.jpg


http://s3.amazonaws.com/dk-productio...jpg?1384032580

dyna mo 05-02-2015 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465079)
I see how you conveniently "leave out" my answer to your question about Benghazi then go on to pretend as if I said nothing about it.

Also your entire point is stupid because the topic of this form post is about Christie and his bridge scandal yet you right wingers drag into talking about Benghazi. Seriously you can't be so dense as to try to make the argument that i'm changing the subject while you are debating in a topic in which you have changed the subject..

the comparison to Benghazi was made and you replied to it, with typical lib BO apologist hand-waving by posing the silly question - what was BO supposed to do?. the answer has been determined. Not by me but by investigations that show he and Hillary's State Department were asleep at the wheel. Hillary was prolly distracted doing a CLinton foundation deal with Russia or something, but that's beside the point.

certainly you are not going to pull the you can reply to Benghazi comments but I can't card.

2MuchMark 05-02-2015 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465031)
it's bizarre to me how libs hand-wave off benghazi. every investigation into it has concluded it was preventable/the state department fucked up by reducing security there when they had intelligence showing it was vulnerable and ripe for attack. and afterwards, the BO admin tried to misrepresent all that.

Don't tell me, let me guess - you're a birther too, right?

crockett 05-02-2015 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465107)
the comparison to Benghazi was made and you replied to it, with typical lib BO apologist hand-waving by posing the silly question - what was BO supposed to do?. the answer has been determined. Not by me but by investigations that show he and Hillary's State Department were asleep at the wheel. Hillary was prolly distracted doing a CLinton foundation deal with Russia or something, but that's beside the point.

certainly you are not going to pull the you can reply to Benghazi comments but I can't card.

Don't try to lie.. Dvae went off in Right wing nut job mode about Benghazi. I replied to and asked why he didn't care about the previous attacks.


Then you went off to join him in Right wing lala land..

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465031)
it's bizarre to me how libs hand-wave off benghazi. every investigation into it has concluded it was preventable/the state department fucked up by reducing security there when they had intelligence showing it was vulnerable and ripe for attack. and afterwards, the BO admin tried to misrepresent all that.

Even with you and him trying to divert the topic into your right wing lala land, I've held the same stance all the way through. Yet neither of you can do anything but Benghazi, Benghazi.. you whine about me somehow "changing the subject" yet it was you and then you can't even answer a question but whine once again claiming I don't answer yours.

I'v asked you multiple times why is it that Benghazi is more important than the lies told which got us into the Iraq war, leading to 4,491 American deaths. Why is you you don't bat an eye about the 13 attacks of embassies which happened under Bush again causing 60 deaths. Again why is Benghazi so special to you?

Here I'll answer because I already know the answer. You guys don't care about anything but "getting" Obama or Hillary.. you don't care about the negative effects your witch huts cause this country or the money spent. You only care about the Republican Party. Everything else is second fiddle including the country it's self.

The simple fact is you right wingers are sore loosers and you don't care how much your butt-hurt harms this country. You put party above anything and everything.

2MuchMark 05-02-2015 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465058)
ONLY Conservitards can take a topic about creating a traffic jam and try to somehow blame it on liberals & Benghazi.

It's what they do: Deny, deny, deny, then change the topic, then quote themselves, forever and ever.

dyna mo 05-02-2015 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20465124)
Don't tell me, let me guess - you're a birther too, right?

we all know that you guess at everything. and we all know that you always guess wrong, just like this time.

dyna mo 05-02-2015 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465125)
Don't try to lie.. Dvae went off in Right wing nut job mode about Benghazi. I replied to and asked why he didn't care about the previous attacks.


Then you went off to join him in Right wing lala land..



Even with you and him trying to divert the topic into your right wing lala land, I've held the same stance all the way through. Yet neither of you can do anything but Benghazi, Benghazi.. you whine about me somehow "changing the subject" yet it was you and then you can't even answer a question but whine once again claiming I don't answer yours.

try to lie? knock it off. if you hadn't jumped on the Benghazi topic, neither would I. IN FACT, I couldn't have because I replied to YOU.

dyna mo 05-02-2015 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20465126)
It's what they do: Deny, deny, deny, then change the topic, then quote themselves, forever and ever.

mark prince, usually people like you realize by now they are trying to chat with the big boys and can't, they are in over their heads. but you're even more dumb than the usual libtard. you have absolutely no clue you are in over your head.


dumbfucking canaduhian.

crockett 05-02-2015 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465129)
try to lie? knock it off. if you hadn't jumped on the Benghazi topic, neither would I. IN FACT, I couldn't have because I replied to YOU.

I didn't jump on the Benghazi topic.. I just replied to his post with a question.. You brought up Benghazi and whined about liberals.. Also you did not reply to me.. You replied to Dvae about Benghazi..

dyna mo 05-02-2015 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465058)
ONLY Conservitards can take a topic about creating a traffic jam and try to somehow blame it on liberals & Benghazi.

you apologized for Obama and Hillary's State Department abject failure in Benghazi and I commented on that.

I've already commented on the OP and that is sounds just like a soprano episode with a bunch of fat jersey mob fuckwads.

come on!

crockett 05-02-2015 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465140)
you apologized for Obama and Hillary's State Department abject failure in Benghazi and I commented on that.

I've already commented on the OP and that is sounds just like a soprano episode with a bunch of fat jersey mob fuckwads.

come on!

I didn't apologize for anyone. I asked why is it that Benghazi is so important but a war and 13 other attacks get no notice.

Again.. the question still stands but all you do is try to avoid it and talk in circles..

dyna mo 05-02-2015 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465147)
I didn't apologize for anyone. I asked why is it that Benghazi is so important but a war and 13 other attacks get no notice.

Again.. the question still stands but all you do is try to avoid it and talk in circles..

you are trying to answer a factual comment with a rhetorical question.


Moreover, your rhetorical question is fundamentally flawed, because if you think that the attacks on USA and the wars under Bush's watch have gone unscrutinized, you're only kidding yourself, and that dumbfuck mark prince prolly.

crockett 05-02-2015 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465149)
you are trying to answer a factual comment with a rhetorical question.


Moreover, your rhetorical question is fundamentally flawed, because if you think that the attacks on USA and the wars under Bush's watch have gone unscrutinized, you're only kidding yourself, and that dumbfuck mark prince prolly.

Bullshit.. Republicans did everything possible to try and stop investigation into the Iraq war.. They activity blocked oversight committees and investigation panels even fired a fellow Republican lawyer whom uncovered fraud within the war contracts..

The Right has done everything possible to stop investigations on Iraq.. Meanwhile Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!!!

House blocks Democrats' resolution on Iraq war - The Boston Globe

The Raw Story | Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman rebuffs attempts to interview Administration officials in pre-war Iraq probe

House Blocks Democrats' Iraq Resolution

Chairmen Hunter, Goss Block Probes of Torture

Bush Used the IRS, FBI, CIA and Secret Service to Go After Opponents -- Where Was the Fox and GOP Outrage? | Alternet



No GOP or GFY Right Winger outrage over any of this!!! Dat diffrant!!

dyna mo 05-02-2015 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465168)
Bullshit.. Republicans did everything possible to try and stop investigation into the Iraq war.. They activity blocked oversight committees and investigation panels even fired a fellow Republican lawyer whom uncovered fraud within the war contracts..

The Right has done everything possible to stop investigations on Iraq.. Meanwhile Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!!!

House blocks Democrats' resolution on Iraq war - The Boston Globe

The Raw Story | Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman rebuffs attempts to interview Administration officials in pre-war Iraq probe

House Blocks Democrats' Iraq Resolution

Chairmen Hunter, Goss Block Probes of Torture

Bush Used the IRS, FBI, CIA and Secret Service to Go After Opponents -- Where Was the Fox and GOP Outrage? | Alternet



No GOP or GFY Right Winger outrage over any of this!!!


crockett. look. you know me. you know i'm the guy that came up with the crockett science moniker. so i know you know i'm smarter than this. 10 year old links? please. i live on Earth, in America, i update my self on pertinent topics.

so, come on, knock it the fuck off. !

crockett 05-02-2015 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465173)
crockett. look. you know me. you know i'm the guy that came up with the crockett science moniker. so i know you know i'm smarter than this. 10 year old links? please. i live on Earth, in America, i update my self on pertinent topics.

so, come on, knock it the fuck off. !

umm how long ago do you think the Iraq war started? I'm pointing out that as usual you right wingers claim "liberals this", "liberals that" yet time and time again you guys are the ones whom play party politics above all else. You complain or blow it off if investigations are launched against Republicans but beat a dead horse like Benghazi where nothing of note has ever turned up as far as wrong doing. Yet you guys go on and on.. and completely ignore any wrong doing on your team..

I mean serious look at all the wasted money during the Clinton years with Kenneth Star.. it was investigation and investigation until they scored with the BJ scandal. Bush comes to office "no investigations" you are anti American if you don't support this war.. ect..ect.. Obama's in office investigation, investigation, investigation..

You guys do nothing but play party politics and constantly drag the entire country into the mud for your own political gain.

Just today.. a Republican House member states "if we can't impeach Obama we can block everything"

GOP Congressman: Since We Can't Impeach Obama, We're Not Going To Confirm Anyone - BuzzFeed News

This is the mentality of the Right Wing.. tear everything down if they can't win..

SuckOnThis 05-03-2015 07:53 AM

The teabillies in action.....

https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hp...a5&oe=55C7B353

dyna mo 05-03-2015 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465188)
umm how long ago do you think the Iraq war started? I'm pointing out that as usual you right wingers claim "liberals this", "liberals that" yet time and time again you guys are the ones whom play party politics above all else. You complain or blow it off if investigations are launched against Republicans but beat a dead horse like Benghazi where nothing of note has ever turned up as far as wrong doing. Yet you guys go on and on.. and completely ignore any wrong doing on your team..

I mean serious look at all the wasted money during the Clinton years with Kenneth Star.. it was investigation and investigation until they scored with the BJ scandal. Bush comes to office "no investigations" you are anti American if you don't support this war.. ect..ect.. Obama's in office investigation, investigation, investigation..

You guys do nothing but play party politics and constantly drag the entire country into the mud for your own political gain.

Just today.. a Republican House member states "if we can't impeach Obama we can block everything"

GOP Congressman: Since We Can't Impeach Obama, We're Not Going To Confirm Anyone - BuzzFeed News

This is the mentality of the Right Wing.. tear everything down if they can't win..


you keep proofing my OP, which was it's bizarre to me how liberals can simply hand-wave off Benghazi for whatever reasons you can dream up, this time it's on account of, you know, Bush/republicans bad, see here's a bad republican link.

again, none of that has anything to do with the fact that Benghazi was an attack on USA and Americans were killed. Obviously, you don't care about that and trying to do better by examining it and learning from it, obviously neither does BO or Hillary, but many of us do.

2MuchMark 05-03-2015 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465534)
you keep proofing my OP, which was it's bizarre to me how liberals can simply hand-wave off Benghazi for whatever reasons you can dream up, this time it's on account of, you know, Bush/republicans bad, see here's a bad republican link.

again, none of that has anything to do with the fact that Benghazi was an attack on USA and Americans were killed. Obviously, you don't care about that and trying to do better by examining it and learning from it, obviously neither does BO or Hillary, but many of us do.

Dynamo, people aren't "simply" waiving off Bengazzi. There have been investigations and many many hearings by whatshisname. It has been very thoughly looked at by your republican party as I'm sure you would agree, and nothing was found.

2MuchMark 05-03-2015 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 20465527)

Wow that's just sad...

Can you imagine being the President and having to put up with this kind of nonsense?

dyna mo 05-03-2015 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20465536)
Dynamo, people aren't "simply" waiving off Bengazzi. There have been investigations and many many hearings by whatshisname. It has been very thoughly looked at by your republican party as I'm sure you would agree, and nothing was found.

you missed the link i posted earlier showing plenty was found and the attack could have been prevented.

you also missed crockett blowing off Benghazi in this very thread as well as plenty of liberals that do the same here and elsewhere.

dyna mo 05-03-2015 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20465536)
Dynamo, people aren't "simply" waiving off Bengazzi. There have been investigations and many many hearings by whatshisname. It has been very thoughly looked at by your republican party as I'm sure you would agree, and nothing was found.


also, you're forgetting about the email from BO's gang to the WH press secretary at the time listing talking points to distract from the attack.

crockett 05-03-2015 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465534)
you keep proofing my OP, which was it's bizarre to me how liberals can simply hand-wave off Benghazi for whatever reasons you can dream up, this time it's on account of, you know, Bush/republicans bad, see here's a bad republican link.

again, none of that has anything to do with the fact that Benghazi was an attack on USA and Americans were killed. Obviously, you don't care about that and trying to do better by examining it and learning from it, obviously neither does BO or Hillary, but many of us do.

You keep going on and only about liberal "hand-waving Benghazi" yet I answered you what I thought about Benghazi.. Added to this you are being a hypocrite because I have asked you a half dozen times now why is Benghazi so special compared to the Iraq war or the 13 attacks before Benghazi..

So why is it Dyna-Mo "hand-waves" those 13 other attacks and the lies which sent us to Iraq? Why do they mean nothing to you? Why do you just make excuses and ignore what I've asked you several times and then go on to complain about Benghazi?

crockett 05-03-2015 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 20465527)

That's like common day talking points for the average tea bagger right wing extremist. Go read some of the commits on articles at places like CBS News.. it's insane what goes through the minds of some of these guys.

crockett 05-03-2015 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465544)
you missed the link i posted earlier showing plenty was found and the attack could have been prevented.

you also missed crockett blowing off Benghazi in this very thread as well as plenty of liberals that do the same here and elsewhere.

The only person blowing shit off is you. Why are you a hypocrite?

This was my answer to you about Benghazi a page and a half ago..

Quote:

I've seen that there has been multiple investigations by guys whom "want" to find something to blame Obama/Hillary over. Yet even these guys whom want to find something to blame Obama & Hillary for, can't find anything to blame them for. That to me sends a pretty clear message that if they can't even find anything to blame them over there there is "nothing" to blame them over..
Yet a page and a half later you still dodge it every time I ask you why you care nothing about the deaths of Americans killed in Iraq due to lies or the 13 attacks prior to Benghazi.

See the difference is just like with Global Warming.. you are un willing to accept a answer which doesn't fit your preconceived ideas. It's the same with Benghazi the same with Global Warming and everything thing else you can turn into a left vs right argument. It doesn't matter what science says or what the investigations say you will always claim Obama & Hillary caused Benghazi and that Global Warming is a Hoax to make Al Gore rich. That solar energy is useless ect..ect.. Anything that is turned into a right vs left argument, you always side with the right no matter what the evidence shows.

The worst part is, you are actually kind of tame in this mentally. There are other right wing GFYers whom are far worse, but this aditude is pretty much the norm for all conservatives. It would be a rare fucking unicorn to see any conservative whom doesn't believe the same shit.

dyna mo 05-03-2015 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465592)
The only person blowing shit off is you. Why are you a hypocrite?

This was my answer to you about Benghazi a page and a half ago..



Yet a page and a half later you still dodge it every time I ask you why you care nothing about the deaths of Americans killed in Iraq due to lies or the 13 attacks prior to Benghazi.

See the difference is just like with Global Warming.. you are un willing to accept a answer which doesn't fit your preconceived ideas. It's the same with Benghazi the same with Global Warming and everything thing else you can turn into a left vs right argument. It doesn't matter what science says or what the investigations say you will always claim Obama & Hillary caused Benghazi and that Global Warming is a Hoax to make Al Gore rich. That solar energy is useless ect..ect.. Anything that is turned into a right vs left argument, you always side with the right no matter what the evidence shows.

wrong as per usual. i'm unwilling to accept YOUR answer over the official conclusions of investigations that state the attack could have been prevented but both BO WH and HIllary's State Department were asleep at the wheel then tried to spin the story into some Muslim bullshit.

but again, I get it, attacks on USA are not important to you, i'm not trying to convince you they are, I'm pointing out the fact you don't care.

as for you're little temper tantrum you are throwing here, exclaiming i turn pollution into a political argument and that solar is worthless is what a child does when some other kids trumps him in the playground, making shit up to try and find something to insult.

the simple fact is i have much more experience, knowledge and expertise in both curbing pollution and solar power than both you and mark prince combined x 500.

keep squirming.

dyna mo 05-03-2015 10:08 AM

New Documents Blow Lid Off Obama/Clinton Benghazi Scandal - Breitbart


rather than admitting that they caused an Islamist conflagration in Libya by ousting and killing Gadhafi – Obama/Clinton preferred to ignore pleas for increased security from Ambassador Stevens; to abandon him and his colleagues to rampaging terrorists; refused to follow up with force against those who attacked us; and to lie to the American people about the nature of the attack.

Rather than admit that it was a planned attack by a terrorist group in league with al Qaeda, the Obama/Clinton machine knowingly put out the lie that the killings were the result of a spontaneous demonstration in response to an obscure Internet video supposedly offensive to radical Islamists. The message: don’t blame us – blame those who offend Islamists (conservatives, Republicans, etc.). Indeed, rather than sending our military to eliminate the enemy in Libya, the Obama administration arrested the poor sap who made the offending video.

dyna mo 05-03-2015 10:14 AM

State Department Benghazi Ops Alert FOIA - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch recently struck smoking-gun gold in another cache of documents we forced out of the State Department. The documents show that top aides for then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including her then-chief of staff Cheryl Mills, knew from the outset that the Benghazi mission compound was under attack by armed assailants tied to a terrorist group. The documents we’ve extracted from the Obama administration only through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01511)).

crockett 05-03-2015 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465600)
wrong as per usual. i'm unwilling to accept YOUR answer over the official conclusions of investigations that state the attack could have been prevented but both BO WH and HIllary's State Department were asleep at the wheel then tried to spin the story into some Muslim bullshit.

but again, I get it, attacks on USA are not important to you, i'm not trying to convince you they are, I'm pointing out the fact you don't care.

as for you're little temper tantrum you are throwing here, exclaiming i turn pollution into a political argument and that solar is worthless is what a child does when some other kids trumps him in the playground, making shit up to try and find something to insult.

the simple fact is i have much more experience, knowledge and expertise in both curbing pollution and solar power than both you and mark prince combined x 500.

keep squirming.

Again.. Why are you squirming and avoiding the same question I've asked you over half a dozen times? You go on and on rambling like a lunatic. Why do you blow off the lies told about Iraq and why are the 13 previous attacks on embassies not targeted for the same scrutiny which you place on Benghazi..

Seriously this is going to be my only reply to you in this topic. I will just repete the same question over and over until you quit squirming and trying to hide behind Benghazi.

You are just like Dave., he claimed Obama, Obama, Obama.. So I asked him what could Obama have done diffrent.. He has yet to answer.. I assume he's just staring in the mirror dumbfounded.

dyna mo 05-03-2015 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465626)
Again.. Why are you squirming and avoiding the same question I've asked you over half a dozen times? You go on and on rambling like a lunatic. Why do you blow off the lies told about Iraq and why are the 13 previous attacks on embassies not targeted for the same scrutiny which you place on Benghazi..

Seriously this is going to be my only reply to you in this topic. I will just repete the same question over and over until you quit squirming and trying to hide behind Benghazi.

You are just like Dave., he claimed Obama, Obama, Obama.. So I asked him what could Obama have done diffrent.. He has yet to answer.. I assume he's just staring in the mirror dumbfounded.

I didn't ignore Iraq and such. When those evants happened, you know, over a decade ago and with an entirely different adminstration, I involved myself.

But, hey, I get it, you need to cling to the past in order to ignore the current.

crockett 05-03-2015 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20465635)
I didn't ignore Iraq and such. When those evants happened, you know, over a decade ago and with an entirely different adminstration, I involved myself.

But, hey, I get it, you need to cling to the past in order to ignore the current.

It's the same thing and I bet you can't show us posts where you critiqued the Bush admin over the 13 attacks prior to Benghazi nor of the lies he and his admin told about Iraq.

Also, the Benghazi attack was Sept 11, 2011 if 10 years ago is in the past.. Why do you keep complaining about 4 years ago? What is the cut off point when you no longer care? Was it when Obama got elected.. Ie you only care because of Obama...

Tom_PM 05-03-2015 11:17 AM

So this thread is about........... benghazi. Awesome. Lets get Benghazi to the top of search results for bridgegate!

Bladewire 05-03-2015 11:38 AM

Chris Christie, such a Gay name

crockett 05-03-2015 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom_PM (Post 20465639)
So this thread is about........... benghazi. Awesome. Lets get Benghazi to the top of search results for bridgegate!

Everything is about Benghazi.. They have nothing positive to point at from their own team. Their team has done nothing in the past 6 or 7 years (however long Obana has been in office). They can't point to any real leadership, they can't even point to Geoge Bush's leadership. All they have is Benghazi and Ronnald Reagan.. And even he sucked at running the country.

I mean really the hero of the GOP.. Let a military Officer go to jail because he himself (Reagan) wouldn't own up to his actions as commander in chief.. Kinda like Christe and letting his aides take the fall for him..

Meanwhile they were outraged that Clinton lied about getting a BJ.. There really is no figuring out the logic of the consertive mind. It's all for the team or nothing it seems..

Bladewire 05-03-2015 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20465647)
Everything is about Benghazi.. They have nothing positive to point at from their own team. Their team has done nothing in the past 6 or 7 years (however long Obana has been in office). They can't point to any real leadership, they can't even point to Geoge Bush's leadership. All they have is Benghazi..

Chris Christie, such a Gay name


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc