GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Business Pornhub ignoring DMCA's - Content producers contact me (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1167140)

Jel 05-24-2015 02:50 PM

Porn Nerd... just to put my unasked for 2 cents worth in..

If I had an affiliate that wasn't a tube, and amongst their domains had my videos, unwatermarked, and monetizing my content with zero to me, even though they send me plenty of other sales the right way - I'd soon get pissed about that, especially if I had to keep asking them every day or two to remove it but having to wait 3 days or more. I'd understand their biz model if they allowed UGC, and actually give them more leeway if they were a one man band.

If they were a multi-million dollar concern, with plenty of staff to quite rightly handle their operations, and still acted like they were a one man band dragging their heels etc, I'd be more pissed off at their lack of business competence. I have nothing against tubes these days, anyone with half a brain can see they exploited a bunch of circumstances in their favour, and while their early days were an ass rape, we are where we are. They have the traffic, and can and did dictate to most what to do, but that doesn't mean I have to swallow that *and* the fact they monetize my content in numerous ways which mean I never see a penny of it. The offset of that is the type-in traffic of which they don't see a cut, so it kinda balances out anyway.

Dare I say it, you probably aren't aware of the internal 'you cunts' emotive response that is ingrained, even if only a tiny amount these days, in those who were around prior to the tubes and the truly gargantuan traffic grab they've accomplished. That's no dig - if you haven't experienced situation A, then obviously situation B is all you've ever known and A is just a concept, but that's most likely where others are coming from.

And for those who were around for situation A, similarly it's hard for you guys to see Porn Nerd's position because you don't know what it's like to have not experienced the before and after, and the erosion of monetization as we've seen it (not that there aren't other monetization methods of course).

So, group hug?

The Porn Nerd 05-24-2015 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 20481759)
Oh ok cool you must have changed company names or report someone other than your corp as the copyright owner now.

I would honestly have to check on that aspect. The corporate name is the same but maybe the contact info has changed.

I have used RYC for years now but their searches are limited to only certain sites. I do not use them for all my sites as that would be too expensive and not really worth it so they stick to the 'whales'. :)

The Porn Nerd 05-24-2015 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 20481760)
Porn Nerd... just to put my unasked for 2 cents worth in..

If I had an affiliate that wasn't a tube, and amongst their domains had my videos, unwatermarked, and monetizing my content with zero to me, even though they send me plenty of other sales the right way - I'd soon get pissed about that, especially if I had to keep asking them every day or two to remove it but having to wait 3 days or more. I'd understand their biz model if they allowed UGC, and actually give them more leeway if they were a one man band.

If they were a multi-million dollar concern, with plenty of staff to quite rightly handle their operations, and still acted like they were a one man band dragging their heels etc, I'd be more pissed off at their lack of business competence. I have nothing against tubes these days, anyone with half a brain can see they exploited a bunch of circumstances in their favour, and while their early days were an ass rape, we are where we are. They have the traffic, and can and did dictate to most what to do, but that doesn't mean I have to swallow that *and* the fact they monetize my content in numerous ways which mean I never see a penny of it. The offset of that is the type-in traffic of which they don't see a cut, so it kinda balances out anyway.

Dare I say it, you probably aren't aware of the internal 'you cunts' emotive response that is ingrained, even if only a tiny amount these days, in those who were around prior to the tubes and the truly gargantuan traffic grab they've accomplished. That's no dig - if you haven't experienced situation A, then obviously situation B is all you've ever known and A is just a concept, but that's most likely where others are coming from.

And for those who were around for situation A, similarly it's hard for you guys to see Porn Nerd's position because you don't know what it's like to have not experienced the before and after, and the erosion of monetization as we've seen it (not that there aren't other monetization methods of course).

So, group hug?

Hugfest!! :)

Thanks for your thoughts, I always welcome them. Since I began late in this game it's true I only know a life with tubes. But I also understand the bad feelings and where they come from.

But I am a highly pracitcal individual. As I have said many times on GFY, PLEASE show me how to get 50k uniques a DAY (without cost) to my Network of Paysites that is PROFITABLE and I will drop all tubes immediately. But you can't, no one can, all the major traffic is sewn up now.

Sure you can pay for media buys and shit traffic and somehow, after losing thousands along the way, find a mathmetical formula where you can make a profit. But I have zero interest in that game. LOL So all I know is I try and keep my relationships as strong as I can and then "adapt" in areas I myself can control. That's how I've grown and survived.

But maybe others have great traffic sources, more resources and better insights than me. In fact I'm sure they do! My nature is to try and understand both sides but I agree after x number of days I would get roayally pissed too.

Are the videos still up tho?

Bladewire 05-24-2015 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 20481765)
Since I began late in this game it's true I only know a life with tubes.

There's the disconnect. The last 15 years of my life has been spent creating my own content, and living solely off my content via my sites. 15 years of hard work.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 20481765)
Are the videos still up tho?

The question isn't if my DMCA was finally honored, the question is why does PornHub feel it's acceptable to not honor takedown requests for days, or a week, or longer?

On May 2nd a takedown request for my content was sent to PornHub and ignored. 6 days later a second DMCA for the same content was sent to PorhHub and I see a message on May 12th, and then a response Status:Closed, which means it was taken down.

I'm curious if anyone has sent a DMCA to PornHub from May2nd to May12th and had their content taken down in that timeframe, or if everyone was put off for those 10 days.

10 days to act on a takedown request is not expeditious, neither is not responding to the first take down request after 6 days.




Bladewire 05-24-2015 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 20481760)
Porn Nerd... just to put my unasked for 2 cents worth in..

If I had an affiliate that wasn't a tube, and amongst their domains had my videos, unwatermarked, and monetizing my content with zero to me, even though they send me plenty of other sales the right way - I'd soon get pissed about that, especially if I had to keep asking them every day or two to remove it but having to wait 3 days or more. I'd understand their biz model if they allowed UGC, and actually give them more leeway if they were a one man band.

If they were a multi-million dollar concern, with plenty of staff to quite rightly handle their operations, and still acted like they were a one man band dragging their heels etc, I'd be more pissed off at their lack of business competence. I have nothing against tubes these days, anyone with half a brain can see they exploited a bunch of circumstances in their favour, and while their early days were an ass rape, we are where we are. They have the traffic, and can and did dictate to most what to do, but that doesn't mean I have to swallow that *and* the fact they monetize my content in numerous ways which mean I never see a penny of it. The offset of that is the type-in traffic of which they don't see a cut, so it kinda balances out anyway.

Dare I say it, you probably aren't aware of the internal 'you cunts' emotive response that is ingrained, even if only a tiny amount these days, in those who were around prior to the tubes and the truly gargantuan traffic grab they've accomplished. That's no dig - if you haven't experienced situation A, then obviously situation B is all you've ever known and A is just a concept, but that's most likely where others are coming from.

And for those who were around for situation A, similarly it's hard for you guys to see Porn Nerd's position because you don't know what it's like to have not experienced the before and after, and the erosion of monetization as we've seen it (not that there aren't other monetization methods of course).

So, group hug?


Yeah group hug :) Thanks for your input, well said.

I've created this thread to bring us together and openly discuss what's acceptable and what's not.

I've said many times here that I admire what PornHub has done as a company (aside from stolen content on their site). As a business, their structure has allowed them a solid growth. I'd have no problem working with them in any capacity.

As you pointed out, they're a multi million dollar company , not a one man show. They have all the resources they need to honor DMCA's within 24 hours, especially from content partners they know aren't giving false take down notices. :thumbsup

The Porn Nerd 05-24-2015 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 20481778)
There's the disconnect. The last 15 years of my life has been spent creating my own content, and living solely off my content via my sites. 15 years of hard work.



The question isn't if my DMCA was finally honored, the question is why does PornHub feel it's acceptable to not honor takedown requests for days, or a week, or longer?

On May 2nd a takedown request for my content was sent to PornHub and ignored. 6 days later a second DMCA for the same content was sent to PorhHub and I see a message on May 12th, and then a response Status:Closed, which means it was taken down.

I'm curious if anyone has sent a DMCA to PornHub from May2nd to May12th and had their content taken down in that timeframe, or if everyone was put off for those 10 days.

10 days to act on a takedown request is not expeditious, neither is not responding to the first take down request after 6 days.


Producing your own content then seeing it scattered amongst the tubes, so often 'user uploaded', must suck big time and be incredibly frustrating. And 10 days is way too long to respond, I agree.

The issue too is many do NOT fear repurcussions if DMCAs are not honored. There needs to be more teeth in the DMCA process.

Bladewire 05-24-2015 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 20481798)
Producing your own content then seeing it scattered amongst the tubes, so often 'user uploaded', must suck big time and be incredibly frustrating. And 10 days is way too long to respond, I agree.

Seeing my content on tubes isn't as frustrating as it used to be. My focus isn't 'user uploaded'.

For the last few months my focus has been tracking the organized crime happening within my members area.

I started doing this when an uploader started posting my newest updates within hours of release each week. ( at times 1 hour ) Then seeing how a new "member" takes his place, and does the same, only with the videos the tagged member wasn't able to get. My videos followed a specific, well documented path after leaving my sites. My adult industry attorney has been communicating with their attorney and I'm confident I'll be even less frustrated in the future. (No relation to PornHub)

To make it clear, these aren't regular members, and they aren't uploading something here or there. I love my regular members and would never do anything to harm them :kisskiss


:warning Again, this post is off topic and not related to PornHub in any way :warning



AdultKing 05-24-2015 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 20481139)
[LEFT]This thread is about Pornhub DMCA's being ignored past the 24 hour takedown deadline, usually 2-4 days or more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 20481626)
Nobody claimed the DMCA gave a 24 hour takedown deadline. What's your point?

I was just trying to correct your initial comment in case you had been operating under the assumption there was a fixed period of time that was mandated for a service provider to act on a DMCA notice.

Bladewire 05-24-2015 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 20481833)
I was just trying to correct your initial comment in case you had been operating under the assumption there was a fixed period of time that was mandated for a service provider to act on a DMCA notice.


That's not what you're trying to do. You're using semantics to derail the focus of the thread and insinuating that tubes can do whatever they want. Don't be a dick. Try being supportive and finding solutions. Thanks in advance :thumbsup











Bladewire 05-25-2015 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20481468)
They will take them down and then some "porn surfer" will upload again. Not their fault :)

ManTHIEF.

Let's hope that's not the case

The Porn Nerd 05-25-2015 08:33 AM

FIDDY takedown requests. :)

JFK 05-25-2015 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 20481333)
This

....

This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^:thumbsup

CDSmith 05-25-2015 10:19 AM

Just yakking out loud here but it's really a shame that the giants of the tube world aren't willing to work with content/paysite owners to try and identify (and ban) chronic illegal uploaders. But of course they aren't willing to do anything to upset their wonderful "business model" either.

But in an ideal world...

AdultKing 05-25-2015 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 20482291)
Just yakking out loud here but it's really a shame that the giants of the tube world aren't willing to work with content/paysite owners to try and identify (and ban) chronic illegal uploaders. But of course they aren't willing to do anything to upset their wonderful "business model" either.

But in an ideal world...

There's not a great deal of motivation for the tubes to do anything. The reason for this is that you could count on one hand the number of rights holders willing to take legal action against them and you'd still have several fingers left to count with.

Bladewire 05-25-2015 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 20482453)
There's not a great deal of motivation for the tubes to do anything. The reason for this is that you could count on one hand the number of rights holders willing to take legal action against them and you'd still have several fingers left to count with.

Most content producers don't post on GFY.

I've posted this here in the hope's Pornhub will realize they're slacking in the DMCA department and correct the situation. I've also posted resources for copyright holders who feel hopeless or helpless against any tube, blog, filesharing site, etc.

Pornhub wants to stay number one, that's their motivation. They know from experience that errors can cost them a company ( Manwin ). You are very distant from the content side of the industry AdultKing and have no realization of settlements and deals that are done behind the scenes for people who have a valid legal case, or you simply would not have said "you could count on one hand the number of rights holders willing to take legal action". False on an epic level

Obviously your goal in my thread is to deflate the hopes of copyright holders. It's unfortunate you can't support me like I supported you here, when nobody else would.










plaster 05-25-2015 06:03 PM

Fiddy Six spitballs at a knife fight

Captain Kawaii 05-25-2015 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 20482525)
Most content producers don't post on GFY.

I've posted this here in the hope's Pornhub will realize they're slacking in the DMCA department and correct the situation. I've also posted resources for copyright holders who feel hopeless or helpless against any tube, blog, filesharing site, etc.

Pornhub wants to stay number one, that's their motivation. They know from experience that errors can cost them a company ( Manwin ). You are very distant from the content side of the industry AdultKing and have no realization of settlements and deals that are done behind the scenes for people who have a valid legal case, or you simply would not have said "you could count on one hand the number of rights holders willing to take legal action". False on an epic level

Obviously your goal in my thread is to deflate the hopes of copyright holders. It's unfortunate you can't support me like I supported you here, when nobody else would.










Good posts, good thread. :2 cents:

Matyko 05-28-2015 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 20481542)
Please don't point out reality or facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 20482197)
FIDDY takedown requests. :)

Sorry guys, call me partykiller, but I am not joining the group hug :2 cents:

The Porn Nerd: I don't really know you but what you did in this thread [I've just read the entire thread from A-Z..] is not my cup of tea. Especially posts of yours I quoted above. Using THIS thread for spamming your sig was not a good decision imo, but maybe there are people around here who share your views. I feel you have a strong intention to reply to this, but please do not. Hit me up on ICQ or email me or whatever, but don't continue hijacking this important thread. Please. :pimp

Big Thank You to those who quoted my long post, it means a lot to me. :2 cents: :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123