|
Air Force may send top-line fighters to Europe - CNNPolitics.com
Nice to see the US wants to de-escalate the situation...... (dripping with sarcasm) |
Quote:
Let's ask Kim Jung .. Oh, he kept them and still can answer .... :2 cents: |
Quote:
Quote:
https://laluchasigueysigue.files.wor...y-lai-2jpg.jpg http://maghis.oxfordjournals.org/con...4/F2.large.jpg http://sovserv.ru/KA6AH/usatruth/usa.../pics2/a45.jpg http://sovserv.ru/KA6AH/usatruth/usa...les/4-4287.jpg http://svpressa.ru/p/115658/l-115658.jpg http://www.usinfo.ru/pics/viet-head.jpg WARNING: graphic content. |
Quote:
By the way, North-Korea probably don't even have capability to transfer the nuke.. well.. except by truck or something like that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know that your army lacks compared to western counterparts, but it is that bad? And there has to be war in the first place that this would be an issue. |
Quote:
If you remember, the nuclear weapon was invented by the USA. And the only country which used it was the USA. They dropped two nuke bombs to civilian (as usually) cities in Japan, but the real target was Soviet Union. They wanted to show their power to the USSR. This is not a secret actually. So go educate yourself, kid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Totality. The only reason they haven't implemented that plan is clearly described here: Wikileaks on plan "TOTALITY" and similar ones in the past - so who's the real assessor, ah? |
Quote:
Quote:
Ever heard of Allied Joint Force Command? Many countries have armies in other countries... German army has bases in France. Netherlands had one i Germany, etc... It's Allied Joint Force Command.... Most of US bases oversees have to do with obligations regarding to NATO... not with vassal-states...So.. go back to school... please... Hey ... this is not my quote: Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks View Post Here in Eastern Europe there has been only one country in recent history that was an occupying force for over 40 years and it wasn't the Americans. More people died under Soviet rule than Nazi Germany. So explain to me why I should want Russia to win anything ever? |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
sound familiar?: Racketeering refers to criminal activity that is performed to benefit an organization such as a crime syndicate. Examples of racketeering activity include extortion, money laundering, loan sharking, obstruction of justice and bribery. :2 cents::2 cents::thumbsup:thumbsup |
Quote:
yugoslavia was doing fine, middle of europe, and got turned in to a war zone... as for US bases its as simple as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_racket if you think the USA put military bases for altruistic reasons then you are very amusing indeed...you truly believe that the USA is some sort of good will organization LOL...don't know what to say to something like that I really dont.... |
iraq and iran were quite civilized before USA? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
they were riding fucking camels before the USA, you dumbfuck east eurotard |
Quote:
|
Quote:
what the USA gave them, with the failed puppet government in iran, and the consequent injection by means of USA of saddam in to the conflict is the US foreign policies "civilized" contribution to the region...you fucked the region up not them... nice job btw you guys really win at foreign policy...you should look up the words "peace" and "liberation" I dont think you know what those words actually mean :1orglaugh:1orglaugh Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_sharing american double standard LOL...the only nation in the world to actually drop nukes, installs nukes near russia but goes apeshit when the russians want to reciprocate :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh...if it werent for double standards, americans would have no standards at all trololol :1orglaugh http://makeameme.org/media/created/double-standards.jpg http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...psae2deb05.jpg https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...0dfdcb83b1.jpg http://gpfarah.com/gpfarahcom/wp-con...e-w760h760.jpg |
Quote:
Russia is the nazi country literally, not the other way around. And just about 25 years ago, it was the holy motherland of Russia that had all the plans to invade the whole Europe. And as you laugh Ukraine, etc. being so poor and miserable, losing those countries from under your rule shouldn't matter budget wise. |
Quote:
you are fucking insane to think that a region plagued by religious wars, military coups, civilian unrest and brutal supressions by dictators over the centuries is populated by just a bunch of nice educated folks before, you know, 'Merica. what a fucking nitwit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You feel more free if you can pick up much stuff? |
Quote:
Ever heard of a tail gate party? |
Quote:
So, what the reasons are? I am not unfamiliar to countryside and my family has a farm. But there aren't that much pickups. Trailers are used, not pickups. |
Quote:
Have a party with your tail gate down, cook food, have drinks and enjoy the out doors. You'll see a lot of this at sporting events. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...57cd616be1.jpg We use pick up's to pull trailers |
Quote:
i have yet to figure out why they seem to think otherwise lol |
Quote:
|
Useless article, as usual.
|
Quote:
On the surface maybe... because of mass oppression by dictators... Iraq; iran; Yugoslavia: all internally heavilly divided by differences of it's inhabitants. Take away the regime in such countries and it will show it's true face [read: no face] and it will fall apart because it was never "one". Learn to read... i never thought of America as an altruistic- or a good will organization... Like i said... Many countries have many bases all over the world... US is not the only one who has military across the world. Learn to understand what NATO is... what Allied Joint Force Command is.... NATO members have obligations towards eachother. Their militaries work together closely.... Calling Western European countries US vassal states is a lack of understanding Western Civilization. US has no jurisdiction in Europe. But the two continents are closely culturally related. Share the same political interests, etc... Quote:
|
Quote:
dindu seriously now, you are a fool who has never been outside the USA...I can not blame you for thinking other people are uneducated because you are a victim of US education and you are simply unaware of your unawareness :1orglaugh:1orglaugh your bacon hugging brain wash can not accept that americans are nothing special, you just print hella money and enforce it on others, make others follow suit or be left behind, and then claim to be ultra progressive and successful and democratic LOL...you are to the world what tubes are to porn... this is why I find dindus so amusing...you guys should vote in berine madoff as president LOL he is the most american american there is :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time baller economy my ass LOL |
Quote:
Iraq: saddam got stoked by US to fix mess made in iran then the US invade former best boy yugoslavia: LOL one of the most peaceful countries in the world, we had more peace than the USA at any time in its history before the USA gave support to actual terrorists (who tried to blow up the statue of liberty LOL attacked embassies in USA hijacked US planes, you cant make this shit up) and to muslim separatists (2 muslim countries in europe) LOL Quote:
remember the UK backed the US over invading iraq because WMD LOL just an example... Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Iraq: I don't approve what happend in Iraq... that's not the issue here... But without Sadam you see what a divided shithole it was under the surface of his dictatorship. Yugoslavia(1918-2003): If you look at the history of the area... you understand that Yugoslavia was never a natural "thing".... You can't blame the West for the different peoples who live in that area wanted to seperate and become independent... and start a war over it... Quote:
Quote:
So... that kinda fucks up your Europe-vasal-state-of-US-theory.... doesn't it? Quote:
|
Quote:
|
For real; nuclear war wouldn't destroy whole Earth or even humans, but USA and Russia would be quite blasted (if those are the only participants), though probably for example Siberia and Alaska wouldn't be so much blasted.
But maybe Russia would blast whole Europe too, who knows, that was the plan before. Still, Earth is large. To sum it up: keep your asshole games in your ass. No need to blast big part of Earth because of two fucking countries. Two fucking countries; there are about 200 countries in total. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or is Russia such asshole country that you plan to nuke every inch on Earth? |
Quote:
as for yugoslavia you are completely wrong, we lived in peace, the west gave support to actual terrorists, the people got stoked with promises of a better life, and even after than a peace deal was signed by ALL sides, then the fighting miraculously broke out :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh the war was basically the entire world, against the serbian minority in bosnia and croatia, mainland serbia did not take any part in the war, you are left with 2 conclusions: 1) a minority wanted to fight the whole world after they signed a peace deal 2) the USA makes hella money starting wars... Quote:
World Debt Clocks notice how JUST the EU countries are in hella debt and not for example russia,china,india...its like a game of poker where the USA can not lose because it prints more and more money and the others have to follow suit or leave the game...leaving the game is not an option of course...its like what the tubes did to porn, this is what the USA is doing to the world....printing money and calling themselves "successful" yet even with the printed money they are like 18trillion$ in debt and 100trillion in unfunded liabilities... |
Quote:
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.o...ar-figures.gif Once again a have a feeling you are a little kid. Have no idea what are you doing on the adult board... |
Quote:
|
You are so naive my friend, if you think you are smarter than all those scientists who made models of global nuclear war. Let me repeat: Google is your friend - use it sometimes :)
Start with this: 'Nuclear winter' may kill more than a nuclear war - environment - 01 March 2007 - New Scientist Some more articles for you, if Goggle is not reachable for you: What would nuclear winter be like? - HowStuffWorks Climatic Consequences of Nuclear Conflict https://www.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/88spp.html etc.. http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/nu...BCabsopred.gif |
Quote:
"By contrast, a regional exchange where adversaries target each others' megacities would ignite huge urban firestorms. Toon calculates the smoke released per kilotonne of explosive yield would be 100 times greater than in the Cold War scenarios." "This is partly because modern scenarios aim at different targets. Toon says most of the huge US and Russian nuclear warheads are aimed, in a first strike, at missile silos in wilderness or suburban military installations. There is not much to burn, and after the first warhead hits, subsequent explosions do not release much additional smoke." 'Nuclear winter' may kill more than a nuclear war - environment - 01 March 2007 - New Scientist So, millions dead, but there are billions of people and the later quote says exactly what I said before. Millions dead isn't doomsday. WWII alone killed about 60-80 million people. Of course it would suck, I am not saying it wouldn't. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Pfff... ok one more time...
Quote:
Jesus Christ... Quote:
Quote:
I see a patern in you posts...: you only post what supports you view... everything else that contradicts or does not fit your view... you just not mention it. That would make you a bad scientist! |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc