While we're on the topic - anyone know the specific details of what method Eddie Van Halen used to cure his tongue cancer? He used no chemo or radiation.

I listened to his interview on Howard Stern, but he refused to give specifics because the method was apparently "illegal" (in North America, at least). Eddie funded a clinic with a partner in upstate New York that does cancer research and therapy.

Interesting interview on YT from 9 yrs ago.




fiddy cancer cells

You are not qualified to have a medical opinion on anything
You are not qualified to give medical advice
You are not a scientist and not even qualified to draw conclusions from a study
You are not a medical professional who specializes in the field of the studies
You are not a doctor
You have no education in medicine
You have no understanding of basic anatomy and physiology, much less the complex biochemistry of the body

and the list goes on and on and on and on.

You clearly need help but conveniently, like most schizphrenics you've rationalized that the only people who could help you are the enemy, are against you, will only hurt you etc.

He couldn't cure his cancer "naturally".

He wanted to.

He tried.

He could have easily been saved as his cancer was detected at the earliest possible time.

He ignored all medical advice.

He then later started heading medical advice it when it was too late.

He had organ transplants (apparently trusting those lying doctors and big pharma propaganda)

He then died unnecessarily.

Thanks.

Got it.

That was my point.

And... there are many many types of cancer that work inn different ways. You keep saying "cancer" which in itself demonstrates how completely ignorant you are of the topic.

Further, most are now treatable

And most importantly, risk for most cancer types, comes down largely to diet, exercise and stress management - which you never mention because you are clueless.

TheSquealer you've 100% given away that you're trolling so I won't keep feeding you.

Smart move dumbass.

Which natural remedies cure leukemia?

I know several people that had leukemia (family included) that have essentially been cured using modern medicine. These are cases that are 22+ years old.

Treatments here Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) - Cancer Tutor

Here's how modern medicine gets on, these are the dead within 5 years %'s

He had some of his tongue removed and went down the natural route, he doesn't want to get his doctor struck off so he's got to keep it quiet, Big Pharma make it illegal for doctors not do use the mainstream techniques, this is another dirty trick they play, keeping your doctor as a puppet on a string

"If theory could cure"...

So, he immediately resorted to traditional medicine and has the cancer removed. Once it was removed, he "went the natural route"?

You're a funny guy.

so what - 50 years ago probably 100% of all of them would have been dead within 5 years

now show me your stats to all these types of cancer and how the survival rates are for people that treated their cancer with Vitamin C and fasting

As stated, he avoided the conventional chemo and radiotherapy, went natural instead

Depends on the Cancer, some survival rates have improved a lot, others not so much. We have to be careful though, Breast Cancer for example has a lot of false positive detections, so you end up with perfectly healthy people being treated, thereby making the survival rates look better than the reality. Another problem is that because we are detecting the Cancers earlier then the date the survival length starts from is automatically earlier than it would have been previously with a late detection.

The big problem is that Cancer rates are going up, all the vaccines have warnings on them that they are Carcinogenic, X-Rays are Carcinogenic, we're being put on pills that are known to increase Cancer rates, Chemo is Carcinogenic, Radiotherapy is Carcinogenic, Monsanto Round-Up which gets into the food supply is Carcinogenic, the list goes on and on.

Big Pharma are not interested in studying anything which they cannot patent, so you won't be given any official statistics for Vitamin C

Yeah, he went natural by removing the cancer from his body through a conventional surgery/treatment.

Then he didn't have cancer anymore

You are clearly not a genius

There was no poisoning involved

Here's 1975 compared to 2007, as you can see the situation is not changing much, this because the goal posts are in the wrong place, it's not in the interest of Big Pharma to cure Cancer, they would be shooting their industry in the feet. :2 cents:

"In 1975, the incidence rate for all cancers combined in the United States was 400 new cases for every 100,000 people in the population; the mortality rate was 199 deaths for every 100,000 persons. "

"In 2007, the latest year for which we have updated statistics, the U.S. incidence rate for all cancers combined was 461 new cases diagnosed for every 100,000 people in the population; the mortality rate was 178 deaths for every 100,000 persons."

There was no natural cure involved dipshit.

nice how you leave out things that don't suit your agenda

but that's a common thing for whackjobs like you and your pseudo science

marijuana.

Babylon.

The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies.

The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies. - PubMed - NCBI

Conclusion:

"As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required."

I used to get angry and respond to this turd and his bullshit.

Now I have wised up.

I realised you cannot defeat a simpleton with logic.

However I do dispair at the damage that he causes.

Free speece is not all it is cracked up to be.

And the survival rate is now over 60% because of modern, traditional medicine. And it simply raises the question "now that we have radically improved survival rates, through a variety of means, we need to look at aggressive treatments and their use.

Thank you.

More and more wins for traditional medicine.

I am assuming you are so fucking stupid you see suffix's like "toxic" or terms like "justify their continued use" and cinch up your tinfoil hat because you have no clue what you are reading.