Rochard is wrong -- People in fact ARE scared of Trump. In a group debate, if you consider someone to be irrelevant, a non-threat, a non-factor, "stupid", etc, the last thing you're going to do is acknowledge their presense much less address anything they have to say. Yet in this most recent debate every single one of Trump's fellow GOP candidates went after him or otherwise focused much or most of their attacks his way. "No one is scared of Trump"... I beg to differ. At this point he is their largest threat and every one of them knows it.

Rochard is RIGHT -- If the election were held tomorrow, given a Hillary vs Trump scenario, it's MRS President the White House staffers will be uttering for at least the next 4 years.

But a lot can change in 13 months.

Well, Mark Prince is an okay doctor.
{Those who are 'in the know' get the joke...}

I agree with that. It's getting closer. But over all, most of the polls say Clinton is winning.

Right now it's all about Trump. Clinton and the entire Democratic party has been quiet as a mouse. I think when the Democratic party turns up the heat Trump is going to fall fast. If I was Trump, I would be studying up on world politics and memorizing names.

Everything will change in the next 13 months.

When Hillary ran for President last time, no one knew who Obama was. It was all Hillary, and suddenly a little known Senator with zero track record stomped her ass.

While I am dead set against Trump, I have serious reservations about Hilary. She seems qualified - perhaps even over qualified - but has she ever had an accomplishment her entire life?

"qualified"? What makes these other clowns qualified? That they all grew up and have experience in the world of and as lying dirty politicians? Any outsider, even a monkey, would be more qualified than for example Hillary, the Bushes or any other of those simple puppets.

And it isn't about 'republicans love the guy' and 'shaking up the entire republican establishment'. You are still thinking party politicis, which is a facade.

He shakes up the entire establishment, total, period. It has nothing to do with the artificial parties which are exactly the same.

Medical "science" changes constantly.

The flu vaccine almost never works...it's usually outdated by the time we get it and the flu virus has already mutated beyond it.

As for spacing out childhood vaccinations...THAT is what Trump was saying. Carson agreed with him.

********** you can try to say that medical science is "settled", just like you do about "manmade" climate change.

But the fact is...it's rarely ever settled.
A few decades ago, doctors would tell you that smoking wasn't bad for you.
Then they decided that studies showed that drinking alcohol was bad. Then they decided that "no", only drinking too much is bad for you (duh)
Eggs were bad for you...then they changed that and they are good for you.
Same with coffee.
And the list goes on and on.

As they learn new things...the "science" changes. What doctors thought 500 years ago isn't what they do now.

Do I think vaccines are "bad". No.
Do I think it's possible that some kids might react to them differently than most people and possibly have severe side effects?
Yes.

Did Trump call for an end to vaccinations? No.

Are you (once again) over-exaggerating (see your thread title)?
Yes.

Yep. This makes it like the 1000000000000000000th the MEDIA says Trumpmania is over.

These establishment clowns don't understand the real issue. The real issue is TRUMP's polling success indicates that most AMERICANS ARE PATRIOTS.

Is it a CRIME to put One's country first as far as that country's policies go? Is it a SIN to believe that America should put the welfare of Americans and LEGAL residents first?

We tried the other approach under Obama. The rise of Isis, the erosion of median household incomes, the high labor non-participation rates, and the disrespect shown by China in the West Philippine Sea is proof that the Obama/Left approach doesn't work.

RESPECT IS EARNED. You don't earn it by bowing and playing 'nice'

Donald has no idea about politics

That's why he's winning and all the politicians with their million dollar advisors scripting their every word...are losing.

so you guys are 100% behind Bush? If I was repub I would want a change

Hilary Clinton has very little in the way of accomplishments outside of being Bill Clinton's wife and a hero to aging female Baby Boomers. She had no major accomplishments as Secretary of State, and she now has baggage from Benghazi and her handling of her email. She's no more or less qualified than any number of candidates or potential candidates. Joe Biden's experience dwarfs Clinton's. Hilary Clinton is a celebrity, as is Donald Trump.

Obama didn't have much experience before becoming President himself. Community organizer/lawyer, rookie senator.

Trump if he really is in this to win has to sit down and become conversant on all the foreign policy matters and domestic issues that face a president, he can't just continue to bluster and insult his way along promising he'll have the best people on his team to do the real work.

you have the option with your doctor to get them spaced out. our doctor knew we had the time to do it and let us come for the shots over a longer time period. some people just do it all at once.

I have mixed thoughts about Hillary. On one hand no one is more qualified. Governor's wife, First lady, Senator, Secratary of State. I've also read she was "just the President's wife" but was really involved, pulling the strings behind the scenes. On the other hand, what real accomplishments has she had? She was a Senator and Secratary of State, yet I cannot name a single thing she did.

I also believe that the Clintons moved to NY state because it was the easiest path to her going to the White House - but grabbing a Senator's seat.

The crap about Bengazi is just silly. She did nothing wrong at all. The email crap I could care less about. You can argue about what was classified and when but it's a pretty dumb discussion when the email systems of the White House have been violated anyhow.

I just don't think she would make a good President.

I don't get the Republican party at all. They know exactly what their faults are - Women, Hispanics, and expanding their party. Attacking Hillary on Bengazhi and the emails isn't going to help. That stirs up the Republican base into a frenzy, but does nothing for anyone else. They need to attack her on her record - and her lack of accomplishments.

which makes him a 1000 times more qualified.

All the other politicians know too, but Trump is the only one with the balls to say it

I think you misunderstand something. Living in the US is really easy and nice. No one wants change. So why elect a wild card just to stir the pot. What if the pot really does get stirred?