GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News University of Missouri chancellor, president resign amid race backlash (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1178369)

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20631454)
coaching a college football team is a choice. once the choice is made, then how to coach (lead) the team decisions need to be made. just like all adult decisions.

Difference is, you said the coach had no choice but to show support for the protesting players.

nico-t 11-10-2015 12:50 PM
The resident racist strikes again!

dyna mo 11-10-2015 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631636)

Difference is, you said the coach had no choice but to show support for the protesting players.
that's right. he/they didn't have a choice. the only smart choice was to show solidarity with the team. it would have been foolish to take a stand against the players or to try and be neutral to their actions re: racism on campus.

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20631662)
that's right. he/they didn't have a choice. the only smart choice was to show solidarity with the team. it would have been foolish to take a stand against the players or to try and be neutral to their actions re: racism on campus.
Oh wait, now you are comparing a choice versus a "smart choice". The coach has numerous choices available to him. Whether any of the alternatives were "smart choices" is merely your opinion.

dyna mo 11-10-2015 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631782)
Oh wait, now you are comparing a choice versus a "smart choice". The coach has numerous choices available to him. Whether any of the alternatives were "smart choices" is merely your opinion.

smart people managers know what i'm talking about

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20631787)
smart people managers know what i'm talking about

More of your opinions I see...

Horatio Caine 11-10-2015 04:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631632)

Oh *now* you introduce variables to exclude the other choices...LOL.

Yeah he had no choice but to drive 50mph....if there were road hazards and if he wanted to make his appointment, or if his gas pedal was stuck, or if there was someone tailgating him, or if....LOL
Im not introducing anything. Its a simple equation so let me use the methods I used in math lab as a TA.

You and I went to a party. You drank 5 times more glasses of Boones Farm than I.
so if I drank 5 glasses we would be looking at this.

X=2 x Y
where X is you. This is called dependent variables.

Now lets introduce our friend brassmonkey in to equation and say that both of you had 5 times more than I did. Not you have what we call independent variables. Because (pay close attention) you could have 1 glass on Boones and BM 24. Or you could have 2 and BM 23. You see the difference?

X + BM = 5 x Y
Consider this to be you GED test.

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20631825)
Im not introducing anything. Its a simple equation so let me use the methods I used in math lab as a TA.

You and I went to a party. You drank 5 times more glasses of Boones Farm than I.
so if I drank 5 glasses we would be looking at this.

X=2 x Y
where X is you. This is called dependent variables.

Now lets introduce our friend brassmonkey in to equation and say that both of you had 5 times more than I did. Not you have what we call independent variables. Because (pay close attention) you could have 1 glass on Boones and BM 24. Or you could have 2 and BM 23. You see the difference?

X + BM = 5 x Y
Consider this to be you GED test.


Yes you did when you said: "Not if the solution is to make it from point A to B in shortest amount of time." No one said anything about shortest amount of time until you introduced it.

Horatio Caine 11-10-2015 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631827)


Yes you did when you said: "Not if the solution is to make it from point A to B in shortest amount of time." No one said anything about shortest amount of time until you introduced it.
No, wrong again "boy was I reluctant to have to do that!" This expressed guaranty that he was in the hurry to get some place. Had he said he was reluctant to stop at the bar and get a beer you'd have an argument. Right now you look stupid once again.

dyna mo 11-10-2015 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631801)

More of your opinions I see...
not unlike your opinion that those coaches put their jobs on the line because the chancellor didn't handle a couple racial slurs like the 19 year old football players thought he should.

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20631839)
not unlike your opinion that those coaches put their jobs on the line because the chancellor didn't handle a couple racial slurs like the 19 year old football players thought he should.

Except I never said that was the reason the coaches acted the way they did.

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20631837)
No, wrong again "boy was I reluctant to have to do that!" This expressed guaranty that he was in the hurry to get some place. Had he said he was reluctant to stop at the bar and get a beer you'd have an argument. Right now you look stupid once again.

Read it again. He said, "boy was I reluctant to have to do that" because he was not reluctant to drive 50mph. That's called sarcasm. And just because he was not reluctant to drive 50mph does not necessarily communicate that he was intent on making it top his destination in the shortest amount of time. That what you introduced.

Horatio Caine 11-10-2015 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631850)

Read it again. He said, "boy was I reluctant to have to do that" because he was not reluctant to drive 50mph. That's called sarcasm. And just because he was not reluctant to drive 50mph does not necessarily communicate that he was intent on making it top his destination in the shortest amount of time. That what you introduced.
Once again, that WAS my point. Never did he mention driving 30 mph or stopping by for coffee. Should we do another 'intro to algebra' task with train leaving point A to point B and elephant walking on rail tracks. Because Im getting this feeling my theory of Cocker Spaniel could be true.

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20631861)
Once again, that WAS my point. Never did he mention driving 30 mph or stopping by for coffee. Should we do another 'intro to algebra' task with train leaving point A to point B and elephant walking on rail tracks. Because Im getting this feeling my theory of Cocker Spaniel could be true.

I know he never mentioned 30mph...that's why I said it was his choice to drive 50mph.

dyna mo 11-10-2015 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631844)

Except I never said that was the reason the coaches acted the way they did.
i know that. i was paraphrasing.

facts:

1. the players were walking out due to the chancellor's lack of action they felt proper.

2. the coaches smartly acted in solidarity with those players.

3. you exclaimed the coaches supported (implication: agreed with) the players.

conclusion: your view is {paraphrased} the coaches supported the players re: their view of the chancellor.

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 05:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20631894)
i know that. i was paraphrasing.

facts:

1. the players were walking out due to the chancellor's lack of action they felt proper.

2. the coaches smartly acted in solidarity with those players.

3. you exclaimed the coaches supported (implication: agreed with) the players.

conclusion: your view is {paraphrased} the coaches supported the players re: their view of the chancellor.

You're just jumping to conclusions regarding the reasons for my statement that the coaches supported the players. There could be other reasons why the coaches supported the players. They could be supporting the players because they don't want to forfeit future games (lose money). Or maybe they supported the players because they don't want to lose/turn-off black future recruits. Or it could be a combination of numerous reasons. I have never excluded any possible reason.

Horatio Caine 11-10-2015 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 20631885)

I know he never mentioned 30mph...that's why I said it was his choice to drive 50mph.
Once again you being racist. Thats like saying you have an opportunity to work your way up yet instead you chose to be a bottom feeder. Most of us wouldn't even think about it but you have it marked down as "choice". What does it tells us? I think you are racist :2 cents:
And I think its extremely racist!

Horatio Caine 11-10-2015 10:37 PM
You see homie, its like "Me was trying to make some $$$ befo I gets arrested". You feeling it? There wasn't such thing as I was trying to make some less money for books I was going to get at U on M store. Not 30 dolla not 50.. It was "I waz trying to make moneys". Feeling it? The Crips way.

TCLGirls 11-10-2015 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20632041)
Once again you being racist. Thats like saying you have an opportunity to work your way up yet instead you chose to be a bottom feeder. Most of us wouldn't even think about it but you have it marked down as "choice". What does it tells us? I think you are racist :2 cents:
And I think its extremely racist!

So it's racist to say he made the choice to drive 50mph. Ok if you say so.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:33 AM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc