I think Scott Tadych is the older Dassy brother are hiding something. The combined alibi is suspect for sure.

See theory #1

?Making A Murderer?: 5 theories about what really happened | Fusion

Quoted for truth.
The point is not to know if he's guilty or not, and I don't think we will ever know since - apparently - the police never looked in anything not connected to Avery.
It's just pointing out the fact that evidence was planted and that the police purposefully didn't check some leads.
In that matter, I think the documentary did a pretty good job.

It's also indirectly a very strong case against death penalty because this dude would have had the needle for sure. :2 cents:

As said higher, I reckon some leads pointed towards Avery (bad luck or he actually did it) and they were too happy to pin it on him.
They then made sure to plant whatever evidence was needed to back up their claims.

I've always been a good mediator and hear both sides of the story. After watching this Netflix doc, I was furious. I wanted to sign a petition just like the +300k other people. :) After digging deeper into this case with some of the missing evidence, it seems as though Avery is guilty. The *67 phone calls, specifically requesting for her, listening to Dassey's confession that was NOT in the series. I hope he is guilty. Just doesn't make any sense when he is suing for millions of dollars and has attention on him at the time. He's obviously not bright, but was he really that stupid to commit this crime?

My insane, off the wall but not too far fetched theory is that the cops paid Teresa millions of dollars to disappear because they could not afford the $36 million. Highly doubtful, but would you disappear and not tell your family if you were offered a few mil? Would make for an interesting twist in the movie remake anyway.

Oh man, oh man. Makes GFY seem like it is made up of Rhodes Scholars.

What kind of good mediator arrives at your conclusions listening to half a story? I presume that's just your impression of yourself.

I just meant that I WANTED to sign the petition like the other 300k who only saw the show and think Avery is innocent/framed because it brought out a lot of emotion. Instead, I dug deeper to hear more of the prosecutions side. My realistic conclusion is that he did it but the cops tampered with evidence to ensure a conviction. My off the wall theory in my post is just from one too many movies. :)

Watched all 10 in one day consecutively :1orglaugh

***SPOILER ALERT***

Initially thought innnocent as just too much shady shit unanswered...

A) Why announce to your family auto trader chick coming over if your gonna wack her
B) Why wack auto trader chick if your about to get fat settlement and could buy any pussy ya want
C) Why did cop call in license plate of her car days before found on his lot, did they find it elsewhere first and then plant it
D) Why did dude from search crew hand her a camera, did he know she would find car there, didn't take her long to find it on that massive lot
E) Why wouldn't he crush the car if guilty?
F) Unsupervised original cops had plenty of time to plant shit, how does car key appear in open view after place has been searched previously multiple times, they shouldn't have been on property period after original fucked up case
G) If he killed her where's the blood, splatter, nothing in bedroom/on mattress or garage 2 places they say it happened, no trail of blood from dragging
H) Tampered Blood Vial

Could probably post about 10 more things. Found it weird 2 people hacked her voicemail so easily as well. Think the things that had we sway back to could be guilty is the back and forth yes/no confession from his partner in crime and why not take the stand if your innocent. So I could swing either way but kinda shifted from innocent to possibly guilty. Would I vote Guilty probably not as enough shit to form reasonable doubt. Would have to hear 100% of it and then decide. :2 cents:

I just finished the first episode and the only thing I'm thinking is how in the fuck is this 10 episodes long!?!?! Yeah it's compelling shit, but 10 hours of it? They could have condensed it into a 2 hour documentary, or even a 4 hour 2-part series...but 10 hours? Ain't no one got time for that! I really want to watch it, but can't justify wasting 10 hours of my life watching someone wrongfully (or rightfully) accused of crimes, and wasting his life in prison.

Of course they set his ass up. Political careers and pensions were in jeopardy, possible charges and breaking the town itself financially. They HAD to take him down. As far as the argument of how would the police know about her coming? She was there often. In addition he was suing them.. There's no doubt in my mind they watched his every fucking move and tapped every phone line he had as soon as he mentioned "lawsuit" trying to get him on anything they could..