GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hey Mark Prince, crockett, bronco67...Check Out How Shady The DNC Is: (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1184575)

crockett 02-12-2016 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20728162)
You are delusional. I started this one topic with your name in it because I thought it would be of great interest to you.

The other thread that was making fun of you (and you got your ass roasted alive by EonBlue) was not started by me.

You are pretty much projecting what you THINK is happening with no reality to back it up.

And oh by the way...the number one proggresive candidate for President is being fucked over by the establishment of the DNC.

But I'm sure you are too busy obssessing over me to worry about that.

You truly are a fake liberal.

One agian.. I've never claimed to be a liberal. You have to be dense as fuck to ignore me saying those same words about 20 times now.. Yet you still call me a "fake liberal" lol you got me..

As far as delusional have you looked at your self in the mirror? Seriously...

Robbie 02-12-2016 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20728167)
One agian.. I've never claimed to be a liberal. You have to be dense as fuck to ignore me saying those same words about 20 times now.. Yet you still call me a "fake liberal" lol you got me..

As far as delusional have you looked at your self in the mirror? Seriously...

You are delusional. You just claimed I have started multiple threads with your name in them. I did not.

And now let me get this straight: You do not consider yourself a "liberal"?
Good, because you don't act like one for damn sure.

I will mark you down as a "conservative". But not a "right wing" "extreme" or "nut" (that's your thing to call people that...not mine).

Robbie 02-12-2016 05:51 PM

Oh and by the way crockett...you might be interested in what I linked to about the DNC fucking Sanders over and trying to give the nomination to Hillary.

Thought it might interest you in between your incessant posting about me.

crockett 02-12-2016 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20728164)
By the way everyone...THIS is the "crockett thread" that he is hallucinating thinking that I started:
https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...eal-world.html

Nope, I didn't start it...but I damn sure finished it! lol!

EDIT: Notice how crockett is all in that thread (just like EVERY thread he is in) calling anyone that doesn't agree with his insane ideas a bunch of "right wingers".

He just keeps repeating the same stupid shit over and over and over. So predictable in every thread. Never joins in a real discussion without insulting everyone right off the bat.

Also once again I have to prove you wrong.. You started this topic a few months ago.. Almost tje same moronic theme as this current topic...

Crockett, Mark Prince, Etc. I Haven't Heard Anyone Address This Yet: - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

crockett 02-12-2016 05:55 PM

Humm perhaps Robbie can claim this new topic is totally different because he added bronco7 to his list.

..or perhaps he will deny it like he denies global warming and pretend it doesn't exist like his brain..

Robbie 02-12-2016 05:56 PM

Well there ya go crockett!

You found a thread I forgot about from a year and a half ago!

And again, it was a thread that I was pretty sure you would want to see since it was about a subject we had argued so many times.

And looking back at that thread...you immediately started attacking me and then claimed I "attacked" you first because your name was in the topic! Then you started calling me a "hater" for showing you a link to CBS news that didn't fit with your little perceptions.

Wow. Are you going to tell me that you can't see that you follow the same pattern of hatred and vitriol in every thread you post in?

Robbie 02-12-2016 05:58 PM

Oh, and I hate to interrupt you when you are ignoring the topic (as usual)...but did you see this:
how many delegates does clinton have? - Google Search

dyna mo 02-12-2016 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20728111)
What an amusing thread

But plankton!

dyna mo 02-12-2016 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20728179)
Oh, and I hate to interrupt you when you are ignoring the topic (as usual)...but did you see this:
how many delegates does clinton have? - Google Search

But plankton?

crockett 02-12-2016 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20728178)
Well there ya go crockett!

You found a thread I forgot about from a year and a half ago!

And again, it was a thread that I was pretty sure you would want to see since it was about a subject we had argued so many times.

And looking back at that thread...you immediately started attacking me and then claimed I "attacked" you first because your name was in the topic! Then you started calling me a "hater" for showing you a link to CBS news that didn't fit with your little perceptions.

Wow. Are you going to tell me that you can't see that you follow the same pattern of hatred and vitriol in every thread you post in?

It was Nov of last year, just a few months ago.. There I go proving you wrong again..

2MuchMark 02-12-2016 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20727791)
Mark...where in this thread am I talking about my "agenda"?

My only "agenda" is that I see the RNC and the DNC working together to push THEIR agenda at the expense of the people.

In this thread I posted a direct link to the FACTS. crockett has yet to even address that. He just keeps attacking me. You have yet to address that either.

You both ignore it because you don't WANT to know the shady shit that your beloved Democrat Party is doing.

I've been attacking the Republican Party since last summer for what they are trying to do to manipulate the vote away from Trump. You and crockett attacked me about that as well.

It amazes me that neither of you seem to really give a damn about the people....but only wish to defend the establishment. And Mark, the establishment of both the RULING party's is corrupt through and through.

But Robbie, what does it all mean?


Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20728109)
i knew there'd be some pushback on this thread but plankton? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

it's like when ********** the canadian exclaimed that Sanders is his guy and i replied, that's great, here's a link to his donation page. **********'s reply to that was a demand for me to prove to him that i've donated. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Dynamo. Sanders can never be "my guy" as much as I would want him to be. As you endlessly like to point out, both in normal conversation and in your bigoted rants, I'm Canadian. I can have absolutely no choice in who becomes your next president. I can't vote.

Since the race started, you have said that Bernie is "your guy", and you are the one who obviously searched for and found the link to donate to his campaign, and you are the one who asked me to donate.

But when I asked you Dynamo if you did, you didn't reply. Instead, you reply with a nervous laugh, just like when you got caught photoshopping tar balls, got caught lying to other GFY'ers, got caught changing the text inside of other peoples quotes, etc. Nervous laughter is laughter evoked from embarrassment, alarm, discomfort or confusion, rather than amusement. Have something to admit?

dyna mo 02-12-2016 07:30 PM

I never asked anyone to donate jack shit to anyone, I simply said good for you and provided a link. You're the one desperately trying to spin that

That's just you on the defense for exclaiming Sanders is your guy when that means absolutely jack shit coming from a canaduhian.

Robbie 02-12-2016 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20728182)
It was Nov of last year, just a few months ago.. There I go proving you wrong again..

You are mistaken, that was Nov. of 2014

crockett 02-12-2016 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20728236)
You are mistaken, that was Nov. of 2014

whooho Robbie got me I was wrong.. see I can admit when I'm wrong.

However, I was still right about you starting the topics.. :1orglaugh

Robbie 02-12-2016 08:38 PM

By the way crockett...what do you think about Bernie losing all 6 coin flips in Iowa?

And what are your thoughts about him basically tying Hillary in Iowa and then beating her in a landslide in New Hampshire...and waking up to find himself behind by 350 delegates already?

twinvisible 02-12-2016 08:47 PM

While superdelegates are pure buffoonery when did they ever tip an election towards someone that had less "bound" delegates? You realize that superdelegates are not bound to any nominee at this point correct?

crockett 02-12-2016 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20728254)
By the way crockett...what do you think about Bernie losing all 6 coin flips in Iowa?

And what are your thoughts about him basically tying Hillary in Iowa and then beating her in a landslide in New Hampshire...and waking up to find himself behind by 350 delegates already?

I didn't watch them flip the coins, Robbie. I have no clue on the delegates, my opinion on what happens isn't going to change anything, so I don't spend my days worrying about the race between Bernie & Hillary..

I've always said I assume Hillary will get the nomination. Just like I still say Jeb Bush will get the Republican nomination. Everything else is a side show.

I like Bernie, but he will need to be way ahead of Hillary to get the nomination, not neck and neck.

I suspect Bernie will eventually go the way of guys like Ron Paul or Ross Perot. Have lots of support for a while but the establishment pick gets the cake..

Why is it you never raised an eyebrow to the election fraud which went on in FL during the Bush elections, but suddenly you are worried about coin tosses which mean little to nothing?

Coup 02-12-2016 09:28 PM

No, Clinton Doesn't Really Have More Delegates Than Sanders After Losing New Hampshire | VICE News

TL;DR you're all fucking retarded

twinvisible 02-12-2016 09:51 PM

In 2008 Clinton v Obama superdelgate count after New Hampshire was 154 for Clinton and 50 for Obama. The rest is...

dyna mo 02-12-2016 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 20728266)



From the article you linked::::

"And it's true that of 712 superdelegates that will cast their votes at the Democratic National Convention in 2016, 362 of them have already said that they support Clinton, according to an Associated Press analysis. Sanders has eight."


I like you so I'm not going to trip on your retarded comment

TCLGirls 02-12-2016 09:53 PM

I am sure Bernie is happy some people are focusing on the Superdelegate issue screwing him...because obviously its impossible for Bernie to bring it up himself during the debates. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Coup 02-12-2016 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20728274)
From the article you linked::::

"And it's true that of 712 superdelegates that will cast their votes at the Democratic National Convention in 2016, 362 of them have already said that they support Clinton, according to an Associated Press analysis. Sanders has eight."


I like you so I'm not going to trip on your retarded comment

Quote:

These superdelegates have said that they support Clinton's campaign, not that they will vote to nominate her at a convention five months away in the face of hypothetically massive support for Sanders when all of the primaries and caucuses are over. These are mayors and senators and governors and party leaders, not morons. Voting to nominate Clinton if Sanders enters the convention with a big lead among regular delegates would handicap her as the party's nominee, as would the opposite. Democrats want voters to show up in the general election and vote for whomever they have nominated. Going over their heads to back a candidate who has lost the support of a majority of voters is not the way to do that.
The super-delegate count is meaningless at this point. Y erbody so mad tho

Robbie 02-13-2016 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20728265)

Why is it you never raised an eyebrow to the election fraud which went on in FL during the Bush elections, but suddenly you are worried about coin tosses which mean little to nothing?

How would you know if I "raised an eyebrow" or didn't raise it at that?

Number one....you didn't know me in 2000.
Number two... GFY didn't exist yet, so there was no discussion here.
Number three..."crockett science"


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc