Fiddy reasons the Tubes do so well in search...



& i like poo...

is this post from 2008? this is all really old, basic SEO knowledge. and non-seo friendly URLs rank just fine as long as they arent changing... google is smart enough to know any route can change at any time.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

youtubew uses ugly urls, pornhub uses ugly urls.,
yet both are top sites.
many big site using ugly urls., it doesnt matter , if user likes the site, google can sense it and favors the site./

one more thing i learned hard way, is dont give google a fucking sitemap., keep pages interlinked, and let the google bot find internal pages . it will take time, but its worth it, uploading sitemap, makes us look desperate and google does not like it. maybe after 4-5 months of launch , but not right away

So you make iot easier for the ones who don't know that. Or none of this is of any value.

I would have thought guys of a certain size would employ their own people to do it.


Not everyone here is in the paysite business.


No we didn't. we were brighter that to give away business knowledge. If it was worth anything. Also the sharing was one to one. Not 5 to 500 or even 5,000.

I left the walled garden years ago. what I didn't was to give my map away.

I understand the intrepid will know all this. The danger is keeping novices going long enough so they learn and become major competitors. Best to let newbies flounder than help them learn, grow and become competitors for those top spots.

Before piracy and Tubes, the biggest effect on people's income was the other people trying to do exactly the same. 1,000s fighting for a TGP spot, fighting to get sites up and all fighting to get 100 views to make a sale. Then 10,000 views to make a living. With the only filter being knowledge, giving it away is business suicide.

Even telling people where the information is, is more than I would do. I never told anyone to go out and find brand new girls, because magazines would buy someone else's work instead of mine.

Google tries to give people what they want and when it comes to porn they want the tubes.

As this thread demonstrates, when people find deficiencies in what they do they'll often just not act on it.

Some have pointed at tubes not having user friendly URLs seemingly as justification for pay sites or affiliate not having them.

Very few people commenting in this thread even understand what schema is, or see any benefit in it.

What people do is up to them, however I started this thread to discuss where blatant opportunity is being squandered. I suspect this thread won't change that.

I found this thread by searching site:gfy.com structured data

this is the only thread returned :P

Opinions are like assholes -- there is no shortage here :laughing-

However is anyone having any notable success with

<script type='application/ld+json'>
{
"@context": "http://www.schema.org",

...

</script>