Sorry. I was under the impression that offensive words are not an excuse for violence. You obviously think different. Like most liberals, offending justifies violence.

& of course a black girl was attacked at a Trump rally
I'm sure she was there with her Trump shirt on, right?

:1orglaugh

I'm not down for electing Trump for POTUS and I'm not liberal.

Trump set the tone for this election.

What happened to that pretty blonde girl was fucked up, just like what happened to those on the other side at Trump rallies. Strange, now that others are hitting back Trump supporters are acting like victims, strange.

I understand! Nevertheless, I got the informational packet in the mail, that is the liberal agenda.

This is the problem with extremists, they drive people away & they'll support anyone who is their nominee.

i will wait for you to name 1 democrat rally that was attacked & shut down by trump supporters. no trump supporters are attacking anyone except protesters looking for trouble at his rallies.

wait, your the guy comparing trump to hitler yes? :1orglaugh

so Trump is responsible for the liberals abandoning the high road?

:2 cents::2 cents:

bladewire is just another liberal. says he's not. he's either lying or ignorant. just like PC libs, he blame-shifts. violent democrats are never responsible for their behavior. its society, systemic racism, CEOs, trump. never themselves. they are the good side, the ones burning american flags, blocking highways, egging women.

:mad:

Well you just lost your own argument. If protesters are just looking for trouble and deserve to be physically assaulted at Trump rallies, then that goes both ways.

Trump is a Hitler hack, yes.

https://averyteoda.files.wordpress.c...t-to-laugh.gif

That's not true. I speak for myself, and again, I'm not a liberal. I'm not voting for Trump.

Notice I haven't labeled you anything in any of my posts, you wonder why that is?

again, like a liberal, you deflected.

name 1 time a trump supporter is EVEN AT A DEMOCRAT RALLY AT ALL, nevermind shouting down the rallies like liberal groups have.

come on, name 1.

& no, trump has no final solution to the mexican problem. FYI. dont talk to me about labeling when your comparing trump to hitler then declaring yourself somehow independent, and/or enlightened. dyna mo, for example, supports bernie, but defends trump. Wheres your balance mr independent? all i read so far is blame shifting & deflecting, tactics of losing debates.

:upsidedow

Trump instigates violence like Hitler.

Trump is an isolationist like Hitler.

Trump blames A specific group of immigrants for all our problems, and promises to eliminate them from our society, like Hitler did.

Trump sells anger & hate as hope for the poorest citizens like Hitler did.

The list goes on but most importantly, they didn't take Hitler seriously in the beginning.

dude, you are wayyy off the ranch of reality. how do i retort a fairy tale? if you are right, then trump has violent supporters who go to opposition rallies & tear them down. so i ask you, for the third time now, name 1 time trump, or trump supporters, have gone to the opposition rally & fomented hatred/violence. you dont, cause you cant. cause your wrong, flat out.

basically your taking a position that a victim is to blame for his aggressors actions. Women who are raped face the same kind of distortions, when people point out the short dress caused the rape. in this regard, you say trump is causing the violence against himself.

your in OZ, bro. cant continue this dialogue. i wanna deal with the real world. thanks.

:)

It is completely unfair to compare Trump to Hitler.


Hitler never conned old and poor people out of their life savings before coming into power.

:1orglaugh

so lets look into this...is anyone who wants to not be interventionalist is hitler? is this is serious comparison?

obama is isolationist...is he hitler too? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

see how your logic is as solid as a puddle?

interesting...i believe its the huffpost that put trump in the entertainment section, yes? & apparently the dems in general are not serious about winning, because the establishment is backing a candidate under investigation by the FBI. is that serious?

or do you too not care that obamas FBI is investigating clinton for mishandling state secrets, obstruction of justice, violating the freedom of information act, among other charges we dont even know yet coming from the clinton foundation. 30,000 missing emails, no big deal.

im sorry but you cant be serious. will you blame the dems when hitler-trump wins? or will you attack the voters as racist nit wits?

:1orglaugh

This is true! :1orglaugh

I really liked Trump in the beginning and was totally going to vote for him. I liked his style too, the way he engaged people, etc. but then things slowly weren't adding up. When he would imply things, then deny implying them, is when things really switched for me.

for me, regardless of the fallacy of the logic behind the hitler comparo, reducto ad hitlero or wtf the latin is, it's over the top hyperbole that not only does not bolster the argument against Trump, it hinders it.

Colin Powell saved no emails during his tenure as SOT during the Iraq war, he used his AOL email address for all work, exclusively. No investigation, no charges. No records of his emails saved. Not 1 email. No investigation, no charges.

The director of the FBI is a Republican & has drawn out the investigation. Leaks about the investigation would come out right before super Tuesday and other election dates. This is why I believe its another partisan investigation, like Bengahzi. I think politically motivated investigations are wrong, no matter who is behind them.

Investigations mean nothing, only the end result.

colin Powell was most certainly investigated for this and found guilty of violating State dept rules and regs, just like Hillary.

What was his penalty? Who was the FBI investigator? I can't find this anywhere.

HIs employer, the State department, investigated his improprieties along with Hillary's. what was Hillary's penalty?

well then you will be happy to know loretta lynch will make the decisions on whether to convene a grand jury to assess charges.

but in truth, what your saying is that all judicial figures are partisan, & de facto their findings are illegitimate when they investigate the other party. i think trump is getting attacked for the same line of logic with respect the judge on his case, right? so then you agree with trump on his mexican judge yes? it might be hypocritical to say trump is wrong, but so is james comey.

:)

the director of the FBI was appointed by Obama, but i'm glad i now know that the FBI is swayed by the republican party, dems hold no sway at FBI. FBI is fucking democrats at the behest of the republican party in a nefarious plot to keep hillary from becoming POTUS because the FBI very much is political. you know, because Comey is such a party gunslinger.

plot uncovered.

so that's 2 plots right bw? the trump destroys his 50 years of branding plot to get hillary elected and the fbi plot against hillary? or are there more plots?

oh, and the big reveal is that the State dept is in on the plot too, they're the ones that asked the FBI to get involved.

busted!
high 5!

Can we agree that the Bengahzi "investigaton" is partisan? Leading Republicans have stated this publicly.

I gave you valid reasons why the FBI investigation is partisan.

What Clinton did having a private email server was stupid, but I'm not seeing any proof yet that she did it maliciously.

Trump has done many fucked up things for malicious reasons and found guilty many times, by many judges and or paid out and settled to avoid a guilty judgement.

yes, let's hand wave off hillary's transgressions, because she's stupid and that's not really a valid reason to take her transgressions and improprities serious.

if you WANT to see the proof, its in a book called clinton cash. the FBI is looking into the things the book says, a whole separate investigation, independent of the email investigation. but you have to WANT to see the proof. oh wait, the writer must be partisan. nevermind.

:)

you'd think with all these complicated plots involving the state dept being in cahoots with the fbi while a billionaire volunteers to destroy his business and personal credibility that hillary would be doing better.

serbi, help US understand ourselves.

This thread is so gay. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

hey bronco. trump is getting sworn into the white house today. it looks like your the dumb dumb here.

:1orglaugh