![]() |
Quote:
i think NRA stands for assault weapons due to the slippery slope. next up for ban is handguns if liberals get the ARs... :2 cents: |
Quote:
you may want to get updated on the fact the left, up to and including BO, hasn't done jack shit about the gun problems. |
Quote:
I agree with you. And so long as the Arms Industry pays for politicians on both sides nothing will get done. This is the freedom Woj talks about, they have bought your freedom to buy guns you don't need to make them richer and like Woj don't care if they're used to kill kids. He uses stupid analogies like cars. What's the most people one man has killed with a car? Or GS. So after a person has committed a crime, police can react. Prevention is not an issue. There's one thing that's guaranteed to come from the Right. Dipshit logic. |
Quote:
|
does anyone really want to ban guns in general? I mean I'm sure there are some
seriously though there is no need for a civilian to have an assault rifle...yes people will still be shot but guns but it will be harder to carry out mass attacks. To say "it won't stop gun violence" is ignorant. that is like saying get rid of seat belts because people still die in car crashes so it doesn't help |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is a political problem, all it needs is a countrywide referendum. More limits on the power of weapons the general public can own, or leave it. The arms one can bear is already limited, so can be done. |
Quote:
It's simple logic. 1 bullet can only kill 1 person, or 2 if it goes through. A semi-automatic and loads of bullets can kill 50 or more. If it's illegal top own a fully automatic machine gun that can spit out 100s a minute. Why not assault weapons and large magazines? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123