you've failed the debate if you seem to think that a webster definition applies to gfy.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

you've certainly never been in an actual academic debate, that's beyond clear. let alone won one.

Riiiight.. I love how you go on about how you are different right as you lump every one into the "liberal lynch mod".. sure thing conservabro!

you liberal lynch mobsters love to look a gifthorse in the mouth.

i'm the gfyer that told you how to defeat Trump- focus on the lawsuits.

and i am different from your liberal lynch mob, that's why i'm not in your club.

crockie, i predicted Trump was out of the race way back a ~year ago.


https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...ighlight=trump

I have no problems with many right leaning people in real life. It's just they aren't the foaming at the mouth blame all the world's ills on liberals.

The fact is there hasn't been a liberal movement in this country since the hippies in the 60s. Meanwhile anyone who isn't off the deep end conservative is labeled a liberal to guys like you.

In fact when ever I see someone complaining about liberals, I already know it's impossible to have real dialog with them because they don't seem to understand reality that this country has been leaning right since the 60s.

You guys would call Reagan a liberal if he ran for president today with the same positions he had then.

Yes I know, you are just like Robbie..in denial.

speaking of denial, and the topic,

it's OK with the liberal lynch mob that BO spends his time arguing with the media over what name to call the enemy that is attacking US on US soil, it's also Ok for Senator Elizabeth Warren to unleash a name calling attack on Trump at the very same time.



that lack of sense is part of the liberal lynch mob lunacy.

oh noes, we can't call violent terrorists that attack and murder US citizens "muslim extremists" but hey, it's A-OK to call Trump a racist, sexist bully.

No, the truly sad part, is the Right has made "that" a issue. This is why the right is in the position it's in with a nut like Trump as their nominee, because they make mountains out of mole hills and spend all their time bickering about issues that mean nothing.

Hey let's whine about Transgender people in bathrooms. Let's hate the gays, let's ban muslims.. let's call everyone we hate liberals and blame Obama the Kenyan!

Let's deny evolution and claim global warming is a hoax because of al Gore.. The list can go on and on..

Tje right does everything possible to ignore real issues to instead cater to their base of dumb rednecks and relgious nuts.

After the Civil Right Act of 1964 the schism began.
I was 9 years old I watched it develop.

It and Medicare were the only things LBJ got right. If it were not for his administration's Vietnam policy decisions he would have been a great American President IMHO. But he fucked up bad with Vietnam in a typical way that failed in the cold war over and over again. Had LBJ walked away; 1 million lives would not have been lost on all sides and the outcome might have been the same in the long run anyway.

Had Goldwater in 1964 been elected we might still be at war with the Soviets in some long term struggle, IDK, hard to say.
Had George Wallace been elected there might be total apartheid in the USA.

If, If, If Donald Trump is elected AMERICA WILL BE GREAT :upsidedow We will "run out of bricks for walls". Hillary is a lukewarm progressive don't expect any dramatic change in US policy from Mrs. Clinton. That is why the Anybody But Trump Republicans may end up supporting her -- if that is 5% of the electorate in November -- Hello President Clinton II.

The Adams and Roosevelt Dynasties we successful -- the Bush Dynasty was a miserable failure. The outcome of a Clinton Dynasty is questionable.

well she can back up what she's saying so..

so BO is a puppet to the right? right. BO chooses his battles, get real. he chose to make the name calling an issue instead of making, you know, actually doing something about the enemy, the issue.

Don't take the clown show so seriously Mo ... and Crockett
They are acting like fucking clowns -- what does the tell you?
That they are fucking clowns :upsidedow
Trump and Warren. Warren lost any respect I had for her. I already knew Trump was a POS

But..but there is a war on Christmas and it's all the liberals fault!

Yes,yes yes.. it's always the other guys fault. Obama choose to call them Terrorist and the right got all but hurt he won't call them "Islamic terrorists"..

Whaaa whaa whaaaa.. Meanwhile if he called the Co Shooter a "Christian terrorist" the right would of gone fucking ape shit...and that's exactly why he doesn't call them islamic terrorist because if it's not ok to use it for one group it's not ok to use for the other.

Obama is being neutral by not blaming the religion for a small percentage of its followers actions.

Exactly what a president is supposed to do.. yet Republicans whine because they want to isolate and hate specific groups...

Who'd you learn your lack of debate skills from, Horatio Caine?


You just blamed the Republicans for BO arguing semantics about name calling.

I'm with you.

I think there should be a difference between a reactionary and a Republican. There are none these days and that is a big part of the problem.

Nelson Rockefeller was the last leader of the Liberal Wing of the Republican party in the 1960s -- Amazing- huh a Liberal Republican -- there was long ago. Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican -- the founding father of the GOP is rolling over in his grave looking at what the GOP has become. The Democrats has a Southern Conservative Racist and State's Rights crowd up to Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy.

The Politics of Polarization in America started after Ronald Reagan -- not that it was Reagan's fault -- the man was not a racist. Something, deep in the US American beliefs snapped and came out -- a new meanness and the hatred thought buried came to the surface -- and here we are today. It was always here ... always throughout history too. People like to hate -- it makes them feel they are superior even better if 'god' is on their side. :2 cents:

I have many, many, many issues with Warren, but her swinging in the mud, trading barbs with Trump, doesn't bother me at all.

Meh, You know I have those brassmonkeys. Refusing to vote for pathological liar and egomaniac doesn't make liberal. :2 cents:

This is Warren auditioning for the VP role. Traditionally the VP candidate on the ticket is the one that attacks the other presidential candidate while the presidential candidate "stays above the fray." Warren is showing that she is willing to stand toe to toe or tweet to tweet as it may be with Trump. She is also a darling of the left can could help bring Bernie's supporters into Hillary's camp.

I think many Sanders supporters will look at her as a back stabber at this point. Warren could of helped the Sanders campaign a lot..

Instead she positioned herself in a "safe spot" and now is going to work for someone who is the exact opposite of her previous stance .

Warren is anti big bank while Hillary is pro big bank.. That doesn't jive well, means warren is laying with the beast in exchange for position.

She's right to do it. How much time does trump spend trying to undermine and diminish her? trump is afraid of her, they way he is afraid of all smart women. I hope she makes him shit his pants.

Exactly.

Signed,

Dyna mo Sanders supporter.

Let me remind you which one of us graduated with 3.8 GPA from college and went to top prep school with best debate team in the state. Thaaaaats right, that would be me :1orglaugh As matter of fact its a mandatory freshman course now that I think of it. My daughter had to take it last year. Also had a A. Dynasty, you know..
Your definition of debate is googling up an article and barely digesting one paragraph... :1orglaugh
Or the ultimate jewel "Clinton will drop out before POTUS run... POTUS run just started"... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
No matter which defenition of "debate" we look up it won't describe anything of what you are doing. :1orglaugh

It's wrong when Trump does it but right when Warren does it because Trump does it isn't how a professional handles the sitch. she had appeared srespectable enough to not stoop to name calling.

Hey congrats on your accomplishments. Although whatever for-profit university you attended apparently didn't teach you that plentyof people, like myself, graduated from a top 10 accredited university with gpa much better than that.

DeVry has never cracked top 6000 list. So please lets not talk about top 10. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh While back you said you failed your debate class and had to settle for GED.
Not to be rude but were you raised by a single parent and lacked a lot of attention? I notice how you like to complement yourself in just about any post. Even when you argue that 2+2 is 6.

Making up facts rochard style is no way to win an argument. It's weird someone who claims to be educated not only can't see that, but has to make shit up that I never stated to try and win while trying to insult my family.

I won't stoop to your level and slur your daughter, I don't need to.

She need not bother. No one destroys Trump better than Trump.

That's how the system works. Trump never chooses his battles well. Which is why he loses so often.

You must have forgotten Martin Luther King.

And everything before him.

Edited to make it right.

Didn't meat to touch a nerve, cap. Just asked a question... There really wasn't any argument. Once again, you have weird understanding of debate/argument.

Where am I??

You didn't touch a nerve. I'm just pointing out that your debate skills are shit taught at Trump university, your alma mater. Because heads up: Attacking someone's family isn't a legitimate debate tactic taught at an accredited university.