GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Starting a new business successfully. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1215214)

Paul Markham 11-14-2016 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ketheriel (Post 21299146)
Mate, I don't have a straight answer. It says I'm a webmaster in my info, but I'm not, I'm a Systems Administrator / Platform Architect. I have a degree in Marketing Management, so I know a few things, though I don't earn a living from it.

This is what I have to tell you:

Before the industrial revolution there was more demand than offer; After the industrial revolution there's the opposite, there's more offer than demand.

So, you need to understand why people spend their money on other products/services and not yours... Why do they pick others? Why are others asses and boobs on display are better than yours?

Is it because they serve videos with more quality? Their site is more flow? No chunking?


For a trade to happen, both sides need to recognize value on the trade. You customer must see value on what you are offering him so that he pays you.

I dont know, but porn seems like impulse purchasing, this means, people either buy it when they check it out, because if they wait 3 or 4 days to take the decision, they might not get back to subscribe.

You should have analytics to answer your questions otherwise, there's nothing than hypothesis.


But like I said, I dont run porn of my own. I have mounting infra-structure/cloud for a friend who showed me this forum, and I'm looked at a few days of stats... but from what I see, porn sells itself ;)

Before I turned to porn I was a professional Salesman and Sales Manager and trained in the real world about Marketing.

Marketing, as you know, is about emphasising the benefits of a product and getting the product seen. Often by emphasising those benefits. Marketing can't sell the product if the product is crap. Salesmanship can't sell shit twice. This is why some sites have 100,000s of members or retained visitors and some 10s.

What far too many rely on is getting traffic. And they fail. Even in selling porn. Because porn itself no longer guarantees a sale. It has to be bloody great porn today.

You want analytics?

https://www.similarweb.com/website/p...teendreams.com

One in surfers view is great, the other not so.

Back in the day, when people were amazed, there was porn online. Sales relied on just getting traffic, now people have become far more discerning.

Google Expert 11-14-2016 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21299386)
Top worry should be to engage with the people who visit a site. If getting the traffic was the first priority. This game would be like it was back in the day. Now the consumer is educated and spoilt for choice. Which is why the bounce stats on Pornhub are so low.

If you're good at getting people to your site and they see the same old stuff they've seen before. They move on. Wasted exercise.

I make 40k profit revenue per month on an adult subscription-type website that i started couple years ago.

What do you make besides recycling your posts on a daily basis?

Do you have anything to show that would back your rants up?

Paul Markham 11-14-2016 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21299257)
I take issue with that statement and I'll tell you why.
  1. Uber
  2. PayPal
  3. Twitter
  4. Tesla -- Solar City
  5. Amazon
  6. Netflix

These are some examples of 21st Century (contemporary) marketing successes. They all involve a past-time business segment (transportation, retailing, finance,entertainment) where a neglected market segment was secured from the incumbent who had neglected this under served consumer segment. These usurpers captured their neglected market segment initially -- then have scaled out that segment.

In a short sentence: Disruptive Marketing.

The old rules seem to no longer apply.

Read The Intention Economy by David "Doc" Searls (Harvard Business Review Press 2012) and read it with contrarian eyes also -- very enlightening ;0)

I don't like 'mee too' or 'mee better' as it tends to only commoditize a market.

Agree.

Using this argument and applying it to porn, is wrong. since when were porn consumers neglected?

The question was.

So, you need to understand why people spend their money on other products/services and not yours... Why do they pick others? Why are others asses and boobs on display are better than yours?

Is it because they serve videos with more quality? Their site is more flow? No chunking?


Why do you choose to post here, buy the car you bought, buy Prime Beef instead of offcuts?

People buy because they're lied to or want/need what they buy.

As for more quality. A webcam site is a level playing field, the consumer picks the best quality girl for his needs, or moves to another site. Image quality and flow are problems that should always be fixed.

There's another way of marketing girls to consumers before they arrive a site. That's making a marketing video of her. Howard Stern would be a good place to start getting inspiration from. Saying it can't be done isn't an option.

Paul Markham 11-14-2016 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21299464)
I make 40k profit revenue per month on an adult subscription-type website that i started couple years ago.

What do you make besides recycling your posts on a daily basis?

Do you have anything to show that would back your rants up?

I have a lot to show for it. Enough money to retire on with no money owed, no debt and enough pensions to tide me over till I die.

Obviously, you have no clue who I am. I was in porn before a lot of you were born and retired because at 58 my wife and business partner had a disastrous accident 6 months later and she was back walking. I discovered I had cancer. Two years late I had beat it and for 30 months neither of us worked. We lived off the money we have.

Google my name + porn.

Can I google you or will you show us you site making $480,000 per year.

Google Expert 11-14-2016 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21299515)
bla bla bla...

I don't care what you say, ask anyone on this board - you come off like a really miserable fuck.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21299515)
Can I google you or will you show us you site making $480,000 per year.

No, you can't google me for obvious reasons, but here you go, this is 2016 so far. Would you like NATS guys to verify it for you?

http://i.imgur.com/SwXPTHH.png

MaDalton 11-14-2016 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21299407)
No argument. I bow to your superior knowledge. Are you working on the checkout or stacking shelves? :1orglaugh

actually my specialty is handling returnable bottles :thumbsup

Roald 11-14-2016 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21299689)
I don't care what you say, ask anyone on this board - you come off like a really miserable fuck.



No, you can't google me for obvious reasons, but here you go, this is 2016 so far. Would you like NATS guys to verify it for you?

http://i.imgur.com/SwXPTHH.png

http://www.greatshirts.nl/files/1183...47-650x650.jpg

The Porn Nerd 11-14-2016 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 21299749)
actually my specialty is handling returnable bottles :thumbsup

Why would you return bottles for a nickel each when homeless people can get them for free? :pimp

MaDalton 11-14-2016 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 21299797)
Why would you return bottles for a nickel each when homeless people can get them for free? :pimp

i paid out the deposit to anyone who returned them - including homeless people :winkwink:

fuzebox 11-14-2016 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 21299854)
i paid out the deposit to anyone who returned them - including homeless people :winkwink:

I always knew you were a stand up guy!

Sid70 11-14-2016 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21299689)

No, you can't google me for obvious reasons, but here you go, this is 2016 so far. Would you like NATS guys to verify it for you?

http://i.imgur.com/SwXPTHH.png

You're the real money artist. Where did you get the initial 500k+ to make a mill and have 500k+ for yourself?

Google Expert 11-14-2016 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sid70 (Post 21300457)
You're the real money artist. Where did you get the initial 500k+ to make a mill and have 500k+ for yourself?

I started out with probably no more than $5k

That's the magic of the internet. Instant access to a market of billions of people is where it's at. You can become a millionaire starting out with a couple hundred bucks.

Paul Markham 11-15-2016 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21299689)
I don't care what you say, ask anyone on this board - you come off like a really miserable fuck.

Only when talking to dickheads.



Quote:

No, you can't google me for obvious reasons, but here you go, this is 2016 so far. Would you like NATS guys to verify it for you?

http://i.imgur.com/SwXPTHH.png
Who should I as at Nats. I would be furious if they gave out my earnings.

Do you get all that traffic from Google, is that bought traffic or SEO?

Paul Markham 11-15-2016 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21300910)
I started out with probably no more than $5k

That's the magic of the internet. Instant access to a market of billions of people is where it's at. You can become a millionaire starting out with a couple hundred bucks.

Agree. We doubled then tripled our income by just putting content, we had already shot, online and reselling it.

That was back in 2000. Today the market is changing for most. For most Tubes sucked the life out of porn. Cams don't make the money they used to before and Dating is going to the big boys. Even Apps like Tinder are killing sales for sites like Match.com

With 159,000 raw uniques a day, you're either the God of SEO or buying traffic.

I see you have affiliates in there as a cost. So why not a link to this site?

thabootypro 11-15-2016 01:39 AM

Interesting

Sid70 11-15-2016 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21300910)
I started out with probably no more than $5k

That's the magic of the internet. Instant access to a market of billions of people is where it's at. You can become a millionaire starting out with a couple hundred bucks.

The trick is most people suck at that. And your making it up with the only $5k starting capital only proves you're rather exception not a rule. The scaling, rinse and repeat, automation things are hard to maintain :)


Be my mentor, show me how to grow my $5k up to 100k in a year. Please.

redwhiteandblue 11-15-2016 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21301393)
Who should I as at Nats. I would be furious if they gave out my earnings.

Do you get all that traffic from Google, is that bought traffic or SEO?

Uhhh...yeah, Google. That's why he paid out $383,000 to affiliates.

http://studionorth.co.uk/wp-content/...fused.com_.jpg

cocksucker mcgee 11-15-2016 09:04 AM

This is a funny thread.

fuzebox 11-15-2016 09:45 AM

Classic GFY. Someone shares numbers, are accused of lying. They share a screenshot, and now everyone wants to pick apart the business model as to discredit them.

Stop trying to find reasons why other people "got lucky" and get to work for fucks sake.

MaDalton 11-15-2016 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 21302443)
Classic GFY. Someone shares numbers, are accused of lying. They share a screenshot, and now everyone wants to pick apart the business model as to discredit them.

Stop trying to find reasons why other people "got lucky" and get to work for fucks sake.

https://static2.fjcdn.com/thumbnails...b722a8d63f.png

Paul Markham 11-15-2016 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue (Post 21302209)
Uhhh...yeah, Google. That's why he paid out $383,000 to affiliates.

http://studionorth.co.uk/wp-content/...fused.com_.jpg

Yes a lot of his traffic come from affiliates. I'm not disputing that.

How does the rest come, SEO or Bought?

What are the costs of his site, what is he selling?

My point is a site has to make traffic stay and buy and on 1-1,000 his ratios are good. Maybe he has a site that makes surfers stay and buy.

He's disputing what I say and in fact, maybe he should be backing me up as he has a good site.

The traffic numbers are too high to come exclusively from his SEO work. Unless he runs a brand name site. Think about what you see.

Paul Markham 11-15-2016 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cocksucker mcgee (Post 21302320)
This is a funny thread.

I know everyone reads stuff and swallows without thinking.

Paul Markham 11-15-2016 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 21302443)
Classic GFY. Someone shares numbers, are accused of lying. They share a screenshot, and now everyone wants to pick apart the business model as to discredit them.

Stop trying to find reasons why other people "got lucky" and get to work for fucks sake.

Not true. No one has said he's lying. In fact, a lot just believe anything they see, at face value.

GE started by saying concentrating on getting traffic to the site is more important than the site. 1-1,000 stats $383,000 to affiliates shows to me he's got a site that's pretty good. Would he get, convert that traffic and keep affiliates with a crappy site? In 2016!!!!!!!

The days of selling average porn at 1-1,000 are long gone. There's no "got lucky" in that. I suspect he's really a supporter of what I said and already has a good site.

redwhiteandblue 11-15-2016 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21302599)
Yes a lot of his traffic come from affiliates. I'm not disputing that.

How does the rest come, SEO or Bought?

Well, without knowing what sort of site it is, let's assume he's doing 50% revshare, and that in common with a lot of NATS based sponsors he splits processing fees with affiliates. If you work the numbers out it means his affiliates brought in somewhere around $890,000 out of the $1,125,000 total, that's 79%. Assuming all his traffic converts uniformly, then 79% of his traffic comes from affiliates. It's quite possibly higher than that but these are a lot of assumptions.

Oh and 1:1000 is good but not exceptional. I'm doing 1:600 so far this year.

Roald 11-15-2016 11:19 AM

we are registered in our own system as affiliate as well and we are our biggest affiliate. food for thought!!!

redwhiteandblue 11-15-2016 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 21302749)
we are registered in our own system as affiliate as well and we are our biggest affiliate. food for thought!!!

There is that.

What's the purpose of doing that just out of interest?

Roald 11-15-2016 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue (Post 21302770)
There is that.

What's the purpose of doing that just out of interest?

We do it for tracking purposes and just mark it as in-house accounts. Not sure how NATS handles that though.

Tasty1 11-15-2016 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21144154)

For a business/site to succeed it has to bring something new and better to the table. Or just shave off a micro-layer from all the others doing the same. Because there are others who have been around for years, successful and have all the elements needed to keep going.

The first thing to succeed is stop thinking negative. There simple sites that make very good money with a simple wordpress theme. You start, learn, involve, make something new, adjust, be creative and make more money. And the Nats stats look great.

Jel 11-15-2016 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21301420)
With 159,000 raw uniques a day, you're either the God of SEO or buying traffic.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh



:1orglaugh




















:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

















































































































:1orglaugh

Google Expert 11-15-2016 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue (Post 21302209)
Uhhh...yeah, Google. That's why he paid out $383,000 to affiliates.

Actually, we don't have affiliates. This is an in-house account used to track different traffic sources. I do have a partner though, who i split profit with.

Affiliates used to be a good thing in the past, when they actually had traffic, but nowadays affiliates don't matter much since very few have their own traffic sources.

P.S.
My initial argument to Paul Markham stands: it doesn't matter that you sell what is already available on 100 other sites. What matters is that your site gets shown to surfers first, so out of 100 similar sites they buy yours because they see it first. Traffic is king, always has been.

Google Expert 11-15-2016 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 21302749)
we are registered in our own system as affiliate as well and we are our biggest affiliate. food for thought!!!

This.

:thumbsup

Paul Markham 11-16-2016 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue (Post 21302737)
Well, without knowing what sort of site it is, let's assume he's doing 50% revshare, and that in common with a lot of NATS based sponsors he splits processing fees with affiliates. If you work the numbers out it means his affiliates brought in somewhere around $890,000 out of the $1,125,000 total, that's 79%. Assuming all his traffic converts uniformly, then 79% of his traffic comes from affiliates. It's quite possibly higher than that but these are a lot of assumptions.

Oh and 1:1000 is good but not exceptional. I'm doing 1:600 so far this year.

Exactly. Without more info we can only assume. Then it comes down to personal levels of acceptance. I*n business I've been taught the hard way to not accept anything at face value.

1-1,000 is good on that traffic volume. If he's doing it all himself he's a genius, if he's buying traffic which would explain the volume, it's good.

Still maintain that the site has to be good.

Paul Markham 11-16-2016 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bjorn_Tasty1 (Post 21302812)
The first thing to succeed is stop thinking negative. There simple sites that make very good money with a simple wordpress theme. You start, learn, involve, make something new, adjust, be creative and make more money. And the Nats stats look great.

A simple site can still be good to surfers.

Paul Markham 11-16-2016 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21304165)
Actually, we don't have affiliates. This is an in-house account used to track different traffic sources. I do have a partner though, who i split profit with.

Affiliates used to be a good thing in the past, when they actually had traffic, but nowadays affiliates don't matter much since very few have their own traffic sources.

P.S.
My initial argument to Paul Markham stands: it doesn't matter that you sell what is already available on 100 other sites. What matters is that your site gets shown to surfers first, so out of 100 similar sites they buy yours because they see it first. Traffic is king, always has been.

Of course showing it matters. showing surfers something they want to buy is more important. Your stats prove that.

Traffic has to be second to Content these days. Because sending 58 million (158,000 a day) people to a site that offers nothing 100s of others offer. Doesn't convert at 1-1,000.

Getting that much traffic in a year is also an indication you buy traffic. Which makes it even better stats.

Of course simple to just show the site. I'm sure many here know it if it's so great.

Of course, if I'm wrong and you get that traffic any other way. You are indeed a god among men. Not sure everyone here will agree that affiliates don't have traffic. I tend to agree with you that most are a waste of space.

Paul Markham 11-16-2016 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 21302749)
we are registered in our own system as affiliate as well and we are our biggest affiliate. food for thought!!!

So you do have other affiliates.

Paul Markham 11-16-2016 01:35 AM

No matter how much traffic a site can get. People are no longer buying mediocre because they landed on your site.

If they were, we would all be a lot richer.

Experienced people know that while getting traffic is important the difference in ratios between what can be achieved with Content like my crap and Met-Art level are poles apart. The hard part is affording to buy or being able to create what the top tier of professional producers ask for.

This is the same in all fields and not exclusive to porn. Prime Aberdeen Angus Burgers vs Macdonalds, Rolls Royce vs Ford, etc.

No one sends traffic to a site that doesn't convert. Redwhiteandblue gets 1-600, that's good. Never assume everyone can get 1-600 on any old site with any old site. Affiliates need to feed in more than 600 to their sites or promo content to send 600 people. And there's the clue Content is King.

How does an affiliate attract a surfer to click on a link? With average promo or the best, he can manage?

How does he keep surfers attention? With average promo or the best, he can manage?

How does he convert surfers? With average or the best, he can manage?

All through the process surfers are free to leave, you're not herding sheep, you're herding cats and the best way to herd cats, is offer them a juicy fish they want. Then they will go where you want them to go.

And never ever underestimate the power of satisfied return customers. They're gold.

Google Expert 11-16-2016 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21304675)
Traffic has to be second to Content these days. Because sending 58 million (158,000 a day) people to a site that offers nothing 100s of others offer. Doesn't convert at 1-1,000.

If you want to keep arguing just so that you can feel better about yourself and feel right - go ahead.

But i don't lie when i say that i sell below average content that can be found on the net for free.
Traffic and marketing is king.

Paul Markham 11-16-2016 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21304870)
If you want to keep arguing just so that you can feel better about yourself and feel right - go ahead.

But i don't lie when i say that i sell below average content that can be found on the net for free.
Traffic and marketing is king.

Then you are a god amongst men and no one should try to copy you. My comments are for us mere mortals.

Oh holy one, please show us your below average content ads, landing pages and sites so we can come and worship at your feet. You have no fear of us mere mortals competing with such a god.

Roald 11-16-2016 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21304678)
So you do have other affiliates.

of course.

Paul Markham 11-16-2016 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 21304921)
of course.

My comment was more aimed towards our new god. He does all this with only his partner. Do gods need partners?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc