| CarlosTheGaucho |
10-23-2016 12:38 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie g
(Post 21237598)
She did not answer those questions because he kept talking instead of insisting she answer. As I said before, he does not know when to keep quiet and let her try to answer indefensible questions.
A great question would have been- did you delete those emails and smash the phones because you did not want people to see your incompetence regarding your job as SoS and letting 4 US citizens get killed in Benghazi? Or maybe you did not want people to see you exchanging influence for money from foreign governments? Or maybe you did not people to see you organizing violence at my rallies? Could it be you did not want women's rights groups to see you taking money from places with no women's rights like Saudi or Qatar? Or was it some other crime you wanted to conceal? Then let her squirm for answers.
|
Very true, in fact, pretty much everything she claimed in the debate could have been completely torn apart had he been at least slightly more coherent in his points and reasoning.
Those fake personal stories, women's rights, champion of the middle class fighting against big business, 17 government agencies accusing Russia etc. etc. all complete and utter travesty.
Whoever wants to read actual Clinton campaign / current administration documents, there's a unique opportunity:
https://twitter.com/wikileaks
She actually indirectly confirmed the authenticity of these documents by her wild claims that they were stolen by Russia. Suit yourself. |
