yes to me too, pbbc is officially relocating to natalie k's vagina.

Yes ended 4 days ago. I'm sure it takes a day or so to tabulate.. What so funny? Don't know what month you're in? Or did you think I meant it to be a post debate? No, I pointed out Reagan and Carter being way behind in the polls. Regan is actually the best example considering he was an actor and not a politician. Goes to show how the polls have been manipulated for a long time.

Faltering Nolts,

Trump Nailed it!
People are Wise to Her Jig ...He Let Her Talk Herself Right out of the Job

.

It means approximately 50% of those were polled BEFORE 9 women came out and said they were assaulted by Trump. Also, 538 gives Surveymonkey a C- rating. But hey, if taking one outdated poll from an unreliable pollster and hanging onto it like its gospel makes you feel better so be it.

I thought he came off as personable, knowledgeable, straight shooting. She came off as... eh... a lying bitch.

Let's not forget that the first time ever trump put those rally sabotage videos into the spotlight and guess what... mainstream news still is not covering it. Headlines are... donald trump will rip America apart by the pussy if he loses...

Sad day for mankind.

... oh, anyone notice hillary didn't address bills rapes and accusations and her cover up even though it was directly asked of her?

Unreliable pollster? And you quote 538? lmao.. Sorry but your women vote isn't going to turnout. They hate Hillary too. They will stay home. Besides the claims are unsubstantiated. At least one can't even prove she ever met Trump. Another had an obvious resentment for him blowing off her invite just months ago. She didn't seem to have a problem with him before...

You don't understand, it's not black & white like that. Let me explain:

The media I mean are the ones with big corporations behind them who support Clinton, Like CNN, MSNBC, even shows like the Daily Show, which has such an obvious agenda, packaged as 'comedy'.

Here's an example: I, as an outsider, wanted to check if there was any big news in the world a few weeks ago. I thought, let's check CNN.com... The front page was literally 90% Trump topics, and they ALL head a negative headline.
1 topic about Clinton... and that one had a neutral headline.

Let me explain how propaganda works, in this case about Trump:
Yes, lots of times they pick things he did say.
Because propaganda isn't spouting blatant lies about someone, that's of course very inefficient. If a channel was purely making 100% up, nobody would watch it.

The way propaganda works is simply blowing up anything stupid, dirty or negative about Trump (how irrelevant or small it is doesn't matter) and repeat it constantly. Keep Reminding people 24/7 about it (indoctrination). And in many cases it's getting spun completely out of context as well, like the preposterous claim that Trump is racist, because he said something about ILLEGALS, NOT Mexicans in general. The 'machine' latches on to this, spins it, and breeds a fabricated idea with a juicy 'racist' triggerword loosely based on something that wasn't racist at all.

Now look at Clinton. Her sins are much, much bigger than Trump on the scope of human rights, wars, and having a government job but cashing in and doing things big corps pay her to do. Trump said 'grab em by the pussy'. Clinton orchestrated wars to replace dictators who didn't wanna work for the US anymore, so they get replaced by a US puppet. Death, destruction, refugees. Clinton Cash. Benghazi. Emails. Wikeleaks reveal how she hates 'everyday people' etc.

These extreme things, 100 times worse than anything Trump has done, gets mentioned 1 time with a neutral headline. Nothing more.

That's the difference, and that's how propaganda works.

I think it should be pointed out that Hillary made herself look like a monster to a huge portion of Americans when she jumped to the defense of late-term abortions.

I'm kind of relieved to read a response from this side that isn't just pure lunacy, thank you for that. I think most of us here would welcome a candidate that challenged the old garb that keeps getting elected from both sides and pushed around and manipulated by their corporate backers. This would have been the perfect time to take them down, as hillary, essentially, is a weak candidate overall. But the failures to produce a republican candidate lies with the fault of the party more than just trump here. Trump played the hand he was dealt perfectly to get the nomination, but if they put up some REAL candidates in the first place he wouldn't have had a chance and the republicans would walk away with this election. So now, win or lose, someone is going to get elected that is not what the american people want or need and they will be elected by 'team sport' loving fanatics instead of people who want legitimate changes moving forward.

Also, it didn't help that trump has lunatics championing his name so loudly the way they do--it's kind of political suicide. If anything, he should have had his people quiet them down, distance himself from them and just push specific IMPORTANT issues instead. A perfect example is this board. The local insane asylum opened up wide here, so guys like you get over shadowed by people talking about election rigging, conspiracy nonsense and racial rants instead of actual issues.

Honestly, I'm going to agree that he did not handle every opportunity with perfection. I'm also going to point out that every single debate I've seen him in, I would not say he won by knock out blows and talking points. Here's the thing though...

It's what made him the republican nominee. It's what is going to make him potus. All he has to do now is his rallies and buy commercial slots which include, and not limited to

Open borders statement
Video footage of dnc trump violence
Her screaming in benghazi hearing
Her screaming about 50 points ahead.
Each video follow with past trump statements that just make fucking sense to most people

That is enough.

Actually the MAJORITY of the population is pro-choice

Trump knows he is gonna lose, that is why he doesn't campaign anymore he just makes excuses for losing. If you think that debate shifted the electoral vote you are in for a rude awakening.

This isn't even remotely true. There is a very sharp divide currently on the pro-life/pro-choice argument.

http://i.imgur.com/Px7izAm.png

Abortion | Gallup Historical Trends

Factor in that if you describe the procedures that are done to actually perform a late-term abortion you will be pretty hard pressed to find people that would support the practice.

https://lozierinstitute.org/the-real...on-procedures/

Hillary looked like shit in the debate and was in tinfoil hat mode spouting about Russia, completely ignoring her own actions. She never answered for taking money from countries like Saudia Arabia and Qatar when she pretends to be a supporter of women and gays and she never answered for her campaign being caught inciting violence at Trump rallies.


Nice concern trolling.

Are you trying to say you are not pro choice as well? It is ONLY the extreme religious faction behind this, and nobody here is going to believe you are that in any form. I would hope politics can't corrupt THAT far..

Disgusting establishment puppet.

Must be funny explaining to the puppets how exactly are they being manipulated :)

I wonder if they will go after Hillary for stating the response time of our nuclear capabilities. I know that this information has been out there, but it was speculation, coming from a ex secretary of state is different!

I'm not what some would describe as "pro-life" and I don't believe that to be entirely true. Pretty much everyone I personally know and have met are either pro-life or take issue with it. I don't hang out with bible-thumping religious extremists. Most of these people haven't stepped foot in a church in years.

The whole argument about "majority of america" being pro-choice is a fantasy. What is true is that either people want it outright banned or used only in limited circumstances. (rape, incest, protect life of mother for example) This is what available evidence shows.

http://i.imgur.com/cb0DzP7.png

Abortion | Gallup Historical Trends

Did you ever stop and think that she is acting fake, that this is not the real Hillary?

All you see is controlled, polished, what she wanted you to see.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvN3g8EXEAEaRIj.jpg

I seem to have PBBC inside my panties...


& I like it :winkwink:

She did not answer those questions because he kept talking instead of insisting she answer. As I said before, he does not know when to keep quiet and let her try to answer indefensible questions.

A great question would have been- did you delete those emails and smash the phones because you did not want people to see your incompetence regarding your job as SoS and letting 4 US citizens get killed in Benghazi? Or maybe you did not want people to see you exchanging influence for money from foreign governments? Or maybe you did not people to see you organizing violence at my rallies? Could it be you did not want women's rights groups to see you taking money from places with no women's rights like Saudi or Qatar? Or was it some other crime you wanted to conceal? Then let her squirm for answers.

DIS IS ME IRL

Very true, in fact, pretty much everything she claimed in the debate could have been completely torn apart had he been at least slightly more coherent in his points and reasoning.

Those fake personal stories, women's rights, champion of the middle class fighting against big business, 17 government agencies accusing Russia etc. etc. all complete and utter travesty.

Whoever wants to read actual Clinton campaign / current administration documents, there's a unique opportunity:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks

She actually indirectly confirmed the authenticity of these documents by her wild claims that they were stolen by Russia. Suit yourself.