![]() |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
please tell the author that the recipients of the perceived slur HAVE A CHOICE TO DECIDE HOW TO REACT. the assumption that black people have a right to be hostile in the face of a word is a profoundly fake idea. black people can, & should, choose to ignore it. But the civil rights industry constantly reminds the community of the past & to shackle them permanently into the liberal plantation. This is the keystone to keep black people democrats: fear & ignorance, of a word that should have no power anymore, but the civil rights industry keeps it alive, for power/money/grants from rich libs. the important thing to understand that it is NURTURE, not NATURE, that makes a community mad at a word. todays black people are not slaves, can vote, can educate themselves via the web now. no excuses to be mad at the word now... except making blacks hate the word is a jobs program for the social justice movement. get a clue mark. :1orglaugh |
dont libs find it odd...
that the ethnic slurs so liberally traded in the 70s...spick, spook, chink, guke, slopes, wop, guinea, honkey...are totally out of the vocabulary now. but the big bad N word persists, since its the only word with an entire social justice cause that profits from teaching black children to hate it when white people use it. but its OK to use it when rapping. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
so liberals. how do your fellow voters in the rust belt think of you dumb libs...when your so vocal about protecting the right to burn old glory...but ban Ben shapiro from giving a conservative speech at a college. Ban milo for insulting the token black ghostbuster on twitter.
interesting free speech interpretation by libs...free speech only when libs agree with it...like burning the US flag is OK, N word, no... :1orglaugh |
^^^ Classic meltdown. Reminds me of someone named Dyna Mo.
|
Go into the Trump Terminal and push the green button.
|
Quote:
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, ensuring that there is no prohibition on the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
He sucks at hiding his multiple personality disorder, especially when he bumps his own threads with those fake nics. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Donald Trump Names Steven Mnuchin New Treasury Secretary" He names a former Golden Sachs/Soros banker, you know, part of establishment big banks he rallied against There are a few threads of Trump supporters bashing Soros, yet have no problem with Trump hiring a former employee of his |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seriously it's plainly obvious that you're a really nice guy. BUT you're in the smut game so the only politics you honestly should be concerned about are increasing your collection of DEAD PRESIDENTS and ROYALTY PRINTED ON MONEY. Personally I don't give a shit if a giant meteor slams into the United States and wipes it off the face of the earth as long as I have a chance to transfer my holdings into another nation. http://img1.imagilive.com/1116/t3_5fpt32.jpg |
Quote:
Here, I'll help you get started: Five things you need to know about Steve Mnuchin - BBC News For all the bitching and moaning that people made about Clinton being in the pocket of big banks, here's Donald Trump, who sits on a fucking toilet made of gold, hiring a Goldman Sacks exec as treasury secretary. Just insane. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc