GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   US airforce is a joke. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1233898)

pimpmaster9000 12-12-2016 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21374020)
From 1959-1973 there was a loss of close to sixty thousand lives with the NVA/Viet Cong losing in the millions of lives. The military never lost a tactical battle during 14 years of engagement. So yes they fought very well.

20 years against tiny penis farmers :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh did you then proceed to invade a girl scout camp somewhere else like in nepal? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh how many years did that last?

AMDWarrior 12-12-2016 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21373267)
You can call it as you want, but it's a true. In contrast to Vietnam, the Soviet mission in Afghanistan has never been a full-scale war for Russia. We had no mobilization here like you have in the States (surprised?) Only a so-called limited contingent of Russian army was involved. Technically it was just a military counter-terror operation just like the anti-radical Islamic one we have on North Caucasus today. The USSR has controlled about 99% of Afghanistan in 1989 when Gorbachev decided to left Germany (Eastern Berlin) and Afghanistan alone to show the West that has has got no knife behind his back.

Your propaganda may shit into your head as much as it wants, but there is a documentary video posted above. That was a march of winners. They have accomplished the mission in 1979. After that the Soviet army has simple secured the country to keep Najibullah in power. We have lost about 15,000 during 10 years there. The Mujahideens have lost 670 thousands to two millions, according to wikipedia - 130 times more than Russia a dirty guerilla war!

Do you think that's not a good result? Just for a comparison, the United States have lost 58 thousands killed and 303 thousands wounded in Vietnam. You have officially lost that war to tiny Asians. There was not march of honor for you. That was just a cowardly escape.


No wonder your programs,suck ass.. you're a total fucking moron..

AMDWarrior 12-12-2016 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 21374269)
20 years against tiny penis farmers :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh did you then proceed to invade a girl scout camp somewhere else like in nepal? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh how many years did that last?



And then we have this big ole pussy...lol

pimpmaster9000 12-12-2016 05:52 PM

oh it was SO important that these guys have democracy LOL definitely worth the millions dead etc...

https://anotefromabroad.files.wordpr...pg?w=600&h=415

the US army aint no joke...its black humor :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Rochard 12-12-2016 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21373744)
Sure thing, over 50,000 US soldiers have been killed and 300,000 were invalided. And that's a "limited scale war"?

My father died in Vietnam when I was nine months old, so I am well aware of the deaths involved.

The United States never really lost a battle in Vietnam. However, there was very little public support for the war with the American public. The politicians didn't allow the military to do what it needed to do. At a certain point we had a choice between going all out or walking away, and the politicians decided it was time to get out.

Barry-xlovecam 12-12-2016 07:24 PM

@rochard;

I'm sorry your dad died along with some of my friends, my friends brothers and my teacher's son in the war.

I am sorry they died fighting a fight that was not really theirs to fight.

That was so long ago but it still saddens me.

Bladewire 12-12-2016 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21375016)
My father died in Vietnam when I was nine months old, so I am well aware of the deaths involved.

Hey when I make jokes about our losses in Vietnam being nothing because we breed quickly in America I dont mean to minimize your loss. I'm sorry the war robbed you of your Dad he was a great hero to sacrifice for us all. Much respect 💓

just a punk 12-13-2016 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21375016)
My father died in Vietnam when I was nine months old, so I am well aware of the deaths involved.

Sad to hear that, but have you asked yourself a question: what for your father has died?

just a punk 12-13-2016 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AMDWarrior (Post 21374611)
No wonder your programs,suck ass.. you're a total fucking moron..

Sure. That's why the free version has almost 50 thousand downloads at wordpress.org and why almost everybody here uses the commercial one. Must be because I'm such a moron in history and in programming too :error

I really can't understand how you guys can be so brainwashed. How you heard something about Internet? Maybe somebody told you that any kind of information is freely available there, or pornhub is the only site you are familiar with? This is Vietnam:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...d_children.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...rningHouse.jpg

I won't post more images here, because they are really TERRIBLE. Is this something you have to be proud for your army? Burning kids with napalm? Oh these brave soldiers were such heroes.

This is the invasion into Russian Crimea (yes that's brutal and merciless invasion you are so worried about):







These are not staged Hollywood movies. This is a documentary. Feel the difference?

pimpmaster9000 12-13-2016 02:51 AM

good jokes:

"america is the leader of the free world" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

"thank you for your service!" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

"protecting america" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

"stolenvalor.com" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


always amusing to see USIS supporters say stuff :thumbsup

just a punk 12-13-2016 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21373294)

And nobody has died, because our catapulting systems have always been top-notch :thumbsup

This is what happened during the failure of the space rocket engine. Watch it at 2:50 (that's an unique documentary footage):



The cosmonauts were ejected in the capsule and have survived.

As you may know, Russia did most of space launches in the human history (two times more than the USA) and lost only 4 cosmonauts in two accidents. In both cases the people have died during the landing: determination of the capsule and a failure of parachute system. No single cosmonaut has died during the rocket launch so far.

In contrast to Russia, the United States have no technologies to equip their rockets with life saving systems. Thus in case of failure the astronauts are doomed and they have no single hope to be saved...



Don't think that I'm trying to make fun of this tragedy or so. No way! I'm just showing you that the real US technologies and not the same as the ones shown in your countless movies. They are too overpriced far not the best ones in the world like Hollywood tries to show it... You were the 2nd in the space and only because Nazi genius like Von Braun have done all the job for you. Today Von Braun is dead and the Russian rocket technologies is the only way to send your astronauts to the outer space.

Barry-xlovecam 12-13-2016 07:27 AM

USSR red army tanks graveyard, east of Kabul, Afghanistan

USSR red army tanks graveyard, east of Kabul, Afghanistan
| .Afghanistan, Tank, Vehicle Graveyard

USSR red army tanks graveyard? few km east of Kabul, Afghanistan
When Russia left Afghanistan after the war, a lot of their equipment was left behind.


Left in a hurry --did you?

https://s23.postimg.org/ccfqy4wqj/ra_01.jpg

https://s30.postimg.org/497zbk9f5/22...0b256c1d_o.jpg

https://s30.postimg.org/y2ezk5y29/yu...y_north_of.jpg

https://s30.postimg.org/3m92m1cj5/40164356_chopper.jpg

Forgot your fallen?

https://s30.postimg.org/okf8k4cdt/61...30b83b13f7.jpg

Bladewire 12-13-2016 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21375916)

Don't think that I'm trying to make fun of this tragedy or so. No way! I'm just showing you that the real US technologies and not the same as the ones shown in your countless movies.


just a punk 12-13-2016 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21376000)

I didn't get that. What did you try to say? That's a graveyard of used vehicles. Haven't you heard about similar graveyards in former ex-Soviet republics?

This is Russia and Ukraine for example:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ul_pxPxMQTE/maxresdefault.jpg

http://relaxic.net/wp-content/upload...metery_013.jpg

http://cdn.fishki.net/upload/post/20...d3ff641d85.jpg

http://velokrat.com/wp-content/uploa.../P51704791.jpg

So what? Maybe Taliban will find a cheaper way to utilize those rusty old tanks, because nobody here wants to spend a ruble to recycle that junk. At least now it's a problem of the new Afghan government - not ours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21376015)

Forget it. This super-duper technology will make America great again:

https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress...206182643.jpeg

:thumbsup

Steve Rupe 12-13-2016 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21375367)
Sad to hear that, but have you asked yourself a question: what for your father has died?

Of course he knows why his father died just as I do.

"I, (state name of enlistee), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

pimpmaster9000 12-13-2016 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21376339)
Of course he knows why his father died just as I do.

"I, (state name of enlistee), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

oh that explains it :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

you are the intellectual equivalent of an ISIS fighter citing the kuran :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

the "so help me god" at the end always makes me laugh...god would approve the USA dropping more bombs than ww2 on tiny penis asian farmers...gods work = confirmed :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

just a punk 12-13-2016 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21376339)
Of course he knows why his father died just as I do.

"I, (state name of enlistee), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

So the US Constitution has sent him to that war? The Constitution told the US army to burn Vietnamese kids with napalm? I have already posted this link above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_Massacre

Who did that to the kids? Who has raped and killed them? Some mad animals or the brave US soldiers? What for???

Bladewire 12-13-2016 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376024)
Forget it. This super-duper technology will make America great again



Steve Rupe 12-13-2016 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376399)
So the US Constitution has sent him to that war? The Constitution told the US army to burn Vietnamese kids with napalm? I have already posted this link above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_Massacre

Who did that to the kids? Who has raped and killed them? Some mad animals or the brave US soldiers? What for???

You either are apparently ignorant about the US Constitution and the US political system or are just a troll. I suspect that you are alittle of both. Being that the US is a Republic, the US Constution provides for the election of people to represent them in governance of the country, which includes the President of the country. It was the elected representatives of the people that made the decision to engage our military, specifically upon the orders of the President of the US who is the ultimate Commander in Chief of US military forces.

Civilians micro manage the US military, which said management includes when to engage , where to engage and how long to engage our military forces. It also includes target selection, rules of engagement, and the goals of the engagement, the type of weapons that may be used during the engagement etc. etc. etc.

just a punk 12-13-2016 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21376411)


When I was a kid, I had a schoolmate who has made a laser. It was in 80's of the past century. I mean he made it from the scratch - no Chinese light pointers or DVD burner components. He as made it of polystyrol. That toy was able to easily blow up the balloons. I bet it was about 100 million times chepar than the one on video :)

BTW, a friend of my son has made a handheld rail-gun like in Quake. Course it was unable to sink a battle cruiser, but I believe it was able to easily put down a quadrocopter drone and it was enough to deserve a prize on physics in the school ;) Maybe he should send it to the US Army :)

As we say here, everything new is a well forgotten old one:



Go Google for 1К17 :winkwink:

Bladewire 12-13-2016 10:37 AM


just a punk 12-13-2016 10:53 AM


Rochard 12-13-2016 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21375367)
Sad to hear that, but have you asked yourself a question: what for your father has died?

My father died because he believed in a higher cause, and supported our government. At the time, our government believed it was in our best interests to prevent Vietnam from becoming Communist. You can argue this was a valid goal, although you would have to take a long look at the history of Vietnam to have a proper discussion.

What happened with Vietnam had a massive effect on our society here in the United States. Our military and the support for our military was at it's lowest point ever both from a moral standpoint as well as fighting ability. The general population hated the government, the politicians, and the military. The military itself had crumbled; Officers had no control over the men in their unit and were afraid to enter the barracks. There is a great book about this called the Long Gray Line - It details the Army West Point Class of 1966, their training, Vietnam, and the aftermath and how it effected their lives.

Our military has changed a lot since then. Take a good look at what happened in Iraq - twice. To put it in perspective, The Iraq - Iran war lasted eight years, hundreds of thousands died, and it ended in a stalemate. The United States went in and destroyed the Iranian military and their government in weeks.

Something very similar happened with the Soviet Union with Afghanistan. (I don't know much about it but I just ordered a book off of Amazon.)

It's difficult to compare the Russian military to the American military. Russia doesn't even have a blue water navy. It's only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, isn't nuclear powered, and recently sailed around Europe to the Mediterranean which was, well, comical. The only aircraft carrier is in such poor shape it had to be freaking towed to Syria.


http://image.tsn.ua/media/images4/60...56d29395da6817

Bladewire 12-13-2016 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376585)
.

The latest in Russian robotics technology!



Meanwhile in the USA 3 years ago...




Steve Rupe 12-13-2016 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21376612)
My father died because he believed in a higher cause, and supported our government. At the time, our government believed it was in our best interests to prevent Vietnam from becoming Communist. You can argue this was a valid goal, although you would have to take a long look at the history of Vietnam to have a proper discussion.

What happened with Vietnam had a massive effect on our society here in the United States. Our military and the support for our military was at it's lowest point ever both from a moral standpoint as well as fighting ability. The general population hated the government, the politicians, and the military. The military itself had crumbled; Officers had no control over the men in their unit and were afraid to enter the barracks. There is a great book about this called the Long Gray Line - It details the Army West Point Class of 1966, their training, Vietnam, and the aftermath and how it effected their lives.

Our military has changed a lot since then. Take a good look at what happened in Iraq - twice. To put it in perspective, The Iraq - Iran war lasted eight years, hundreds of thousands died, and it ended in a stalemate. The United States went in and destroyed the Iranian military and their government in weeks.

Something very similar happened with the Soviet Union with Afghanistan. (I don't know much about it but I just ordered a book off of Amazon.)

It's difficult to compare the Russian military to the American military. Russia doesn't even have a blue water navy. It's only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, isn't nuclear powered, and recently sailed around Europe to the Mediterranean which was, well, comical. The only aircraft carrier is in such poor shape it had to be freaking towed to Syria.


http://image.tsn.ua/media/images4/60...56d29395da6817

I read that book years ago and it is well written and informative in multiple ways. I can't recall the name of the Cadet but he was the most gung ho of all of the Cadet's in the class and when he was in Vietnam he became so disillusioned with the war and the way it was being fought, he was Court Martialed, if my memory serves me well, for disobeying orders given to him by a Major who was in a chopper above him. He did not want to see anymore of his men get wasted so he refused to reengage them in a battle as he was ordered to do. If I recall correctly his men and he had been engaged for several days, were suffering with lack of sleep, very low on ammo, water, food etc. Had already lost alot of men, were heading for an extraction point, when this Major ordered them to turn back and engage a unit that was following them. He refused this order.

just a punk 12-13-2016 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21376612)
It's difficult to compare the Russian military to the American military. Russia doesn't even have a blue water navy. It's only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, isn't nuclear powered, and recently sailed around Europe to the Mediterranean which was, well, comical. The only aircraft carrier is in such poor shape it had to be freaking towed to Syria.

What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other? Why not swordsmen and archers then? Just imagine the US dragoons vs Russian musketeers on horses. What a battle could it be, ah?! :1orglaugh

Man, the anti-ship missiles were invented a long time ago. Surprised? One cruise missile is 1000000's times cheaper than an aircraft carrier, but it's much more effective. There will be no Kamikazes or anything like that. It will be as simple, as cheap and as effective as this:



I have no idea why Putin has decided to take the rusty and half-dead Admiral Kuznetsov to Syria. I think the old man has a senility. The aircraft carriers are dinosaurs nowadays - they are just a joke. Nobody will use them in a real war, because they will be sunk in the first minutes of any military conflict.

In fact it will be a bit worse, because according to the Russian military doctrine, the tactical nuke warheads will be used against the enemy aircraft carriers. One small tactical nuke of 500 kilotons exploded about 100-200 meters above the entire battle group will do the trick. E.g. SS-N-19 "Shipwreck" or SS-N-27 "Sizzler". They are cheap, fast and have about 2000-2500 tactical range (can be launched from planes, ships and submarines).

Bladewire 12-13-2016 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376705)
What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other?

I have no idea why Putin has decided to take the rusty and half-dead Admiral Kuznetsov to Syria.


Steve Rupe 12-13-2016 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376705)
What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other? Why not swordsmen and archers then? Just imagine the US dragoons vs Russian musketeers on horses. What a battle could it be, ah?! :1orglaugh

Man, the anti-ship missiles were invented a long time ago. Surprised? One cruise missile is 1000000's times cheaper than an aircraft carrier, but it's much more effective. There will be no Kamikazes or anything like that. It will be as simple, as cheap and as effective as this:



I have no idea why Putin has decided to take the rusty and half-dead Admiral Kuznetsov to Syria. I think the old man has a senility. The aircraft carriers are dinosaurs nowadays - they are just a joke. Nobody will use them in a real war, because they will be sunk in the first minutes of any military conflict.

In fact it will be a bit worse, because according to the Russian military doctrine, the tactical nuke warheads will be used against the enemy aircraft carriers. One small tactical nuke of 50 kilotons exploded about 100-200 meters above the entire battle group will do the trick.

Quite a display of ignorance on your part. You are not a tactition if you cannot see the need for aircraft carriers and seem to be ignorant of strategic consequences of using nukes in any scenario.

just a punk 12-13-2016 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21376717)

Can it survive after a 500 kiloton tactical blast which is equal to about 30 Hiroshimas?

I have a doubt, comrade...

Steve Rupe 12-13-2016 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376705)
What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other? Why not swordsmen and archers then? Just imagine the US dragoons vs Russian musketeers on horses. What a battle could it be, ah?! :1orglaugh

Man, the anti-ship missiles were invented a long time ago. Surprised? One cruise missile is 1000000's times cheaper than an aircraft carrier, but it's much more effective. There will be no Kamikazes or anything like that. It will be as simple, as cheap and as effective as this:



I have no idea why Putin has decided to take the rusty and half-dead Admiral Kuznetsov to Syria. I think the old man has a senility. The aircraft carriers are dinosaurs nowadays - they are just a joke. Nobody will use them in a real war, because they will be sunk in the first minutes of any military conflict.

In fact it will be a bit worse, because according to the Russian military doctrine, the tactical nuke warheads will be used against the enemy aircraft carriers. One small tactical nuke of 50 kilotons exploded about 100-200 meters above the entire battle group will do the trick.

Quite a display of ignorance on your part. You are not a tactition if you cannot see the need for aircraft carriers and seem to be ignorant of strategic consequences of using nukes in any scenario.

Bladewire 12-13-2016 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376735)
Can it survive after a 500 kiloton tactical blast which is equal to about 30 Hiroshimas?

I have a doubt, comrade...

It converts to a submarine :1orglaugh

just a punk 12-13-2016 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21376753)
It converts to a submarine :1orglaugh

:)

Which country it could be used against? Somalia? Sorry but I don't think that the US taxpayers will be happy to know that it absolutely useless against other armies because they have the modern anti-ship cruise missiles and tactical nukes. China, India, Iran and even Pakistan can sink it in minutes. What is the reason to spend such a big money to it?

Bladewire 12-13-2016 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376759)
:)

Which country it could be used against? Somalia? Sorry but I don't think that the US taxpayers will be happy to know that it absolutely useless against other armies because they have the modern anti-ship cruise missiles and tactical nukes. China, India, Iran and even Pakistan can sink it in minutes. What is the reason to spend such a big money to it?

Your missiles fail like your aircraft carriers


just a punk 12-13-2016 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21376774)
Your missiles fail like your aircraft carriers


Looks like fun :1orglaugh

How many US astronauts were not delivered to the outer space by Russian rockets? What's about the Curiosity rover? ;) Do you really think they won't be able to deliver a nuke when needed? ;)

The mobile ICBM nuke launcher sends a commercial satellite to the orbit:



Note the time it needs to prepare for the launch and to send a spaceship to the outer space. Enjoy :winkwink:

pimpmaster9000 12-13-2016 12:34 PM

reality:

serbs shoot down US stealh fighter with old russian missle from the 60's

we gave away all the downed tech to russians and chineese :thumbsup no worries :thumbsup

http://www.ausairpower.net/USAF/F-11...ia-1999-1S.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeoMKq5W4AAD7n1.jpg

just a punk 12-13-2016 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 21376822)
reality:

serbs shoot down US stealh fighter with old russian missle from the 60's

Actually that's not so simple. The Soviet S-125 "Neva" missile was made in 1961, so it just didn't know the super-duper US stealth plane was invisible.

Don't worry. It was punished, ashamed and told to never take down F-117A in future. No kitty! A bad kitty!

https://images-mm.s3.amazonaws.com/S..._Shirt_POP.jpg

Bladewire 12-13-2016 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376843)
Actually that's not so simple. The Soviet S-125 "Neva" missile was made in 1961, so it just didn't know the super-duper US stealth plane was invisible.

Don't worry. It was punished, ashamed and told to never take down F-117A in future. No kitty! A bad kitty!

https://images-mm.s3.amazonaws.com/S..._Shirt_POP.jpg

So you honestly think Russia will win the war against The United States of America?

(again, I love Russian people this is not about them)

ZiggiZiggiCrew 12-13-2016 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21376411)


Good weapon for sunny day:thumbsup but not work in rain or smoke:(

ZiggiZiggiCrew 12-13-2016 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376504)



No any chance for Russian agressor:thumbsup
http://liveukraine.su/uploads/images...rev_b9b5dd.jpg

just a punk 12-13-2016 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21376891)
So you honestly think Russia will win the war against The United States of America?

No one will. The USA have no single chance to survive just like Russia, Australian or Colombia. The whole planet will be destroyed, and for a few thousand years even a grass won't grow here.

Sarn 12-13-2016 02:51 PM

>Something very similar happened with the Soviet Union with Afghanistan. (I don't know much about it but I just ordered a book off of Amazon.)

Pakistan imported weapons and partisan. And during 10 years = 10 000 dies


Rochard 12-13-2016 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376705)
What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other?

No. But only because no one else has aircraft carriers.

Well, Russia has one. But isn't nuclear powered, and couldn't even make it around Europe to the Mediterranean without refueling and without breaking down. China also has an aircraft carrier, which they bought from Russia, but that is not even functioning.

Bladewire 12-13-2016 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 21376951)
No one will. The USA have no single chance to survive just like Russia, Australian or Colombia. The whole planet will be destroyed, and for a few thousand years even a grass won't grow here.

So you think Putin would start a nuclear war because he lost a battle or two? I don't think so.

pimpmaster9000 12-13-2016 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21377404)
So you think Putin would start a nuclear war because he lost a battle or two? I don't think so.

US army: bla bla bla bla!
Pooty: fuck off or I launch!
US army: sir yes sir so sorry sir we are fucking off right away!
Pooty: and suck dicks while you are running away!
US army: gargle gargle gargle!

its amusing that americans think they can take on russia with a few ships tho :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 12-13-2016 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 21377428)
US army: bla bla bla bla!
Pooty: fuck off or I launch!
US army: sir yes sir so sorry sir we are fucking off right away!
Pooty: and suck dicks while you are running away!
US army: gargle gargle gargle!

its amusing that americans think they can take on russia with a few ships tho :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Trump is more maniacal and egocentric than Putin, he'll push harder than any president so far because Putin will inevitably lie to him and fuck him over, like Putin does all agreements, this is why he has so many problems around the world.

pimpmaster9000 12-13-2016 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21377434)
Trump is more maniacal and egocentric than Putin, he'll push harder than any president so far because Putin will inevitably lie to him and fuck him over, like Putin does all agreements, this is why he has so many problems around the world.

pooty does not have problems, problems have pooty...trump fears the pooty its the one smart thing he is doing from the start...respect the pooty...befriend the pooty...trump will avoid the #1 man on the planet...

Sarn 12-13-2016 05:00 PM

Russia make robot for space traveling(around moon) :1orglaugh
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Czj1aJJWgAAsBzo.jpg
https://cdn3.tass.ru/width/744_b12f2...12/4399750.jpg
???? ????????: ??????? ????????: "?????" ?????????? ? ????? ????

Bladewire 12-13-2016 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 21377470)
pooty does not have problems, problems have pooty...trump fears the pooty its the one smart thing he is doing from the start...respect the pooty...befriend the pooty...trump will avoid the #1 man on the planet...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh You could be right we'll see :thumbsup

Sarn 12-13-2016 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21377308)
No. But only because no one else has aircraft carriers.

Well, Russia has one. But isn't nuclear powered, and couldn't even make it around Europe to the Mediterranean without refueling and without breaking down. China also has an aircraft carrier, which they bought from Russia, but that is not even functioning.

:1orglaugh
http://img.ifcdn.com/images/70adc787...d8dab571_1.jpg

Horatio Caine 12-13-2016 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 21371854)
Your military is a joke, America is in no danger whatsoever, it is clear even to your own army that they stand for nothing and protect nobody...you topple governments, invade, bomb, terrorise and generally retard humanity by making it arm the fuck up so you guys can feel "safe"...your army is a joke and always will be...biggest roleplay troop on the planet LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_..._in_Yugoslavia

On 6 April 1941 the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was invaded ..

The invasion lasted little more than ten days, ending with the unconditional surrender of the Royal Yugoslav Army on 17 April. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Here is a list of wars won by Serbs

http://previews.123rf.com/images/bia...tock-Photo.jpg


Serbian War History Book as taught in school..

http://www.tank.ee/wp-content/upload...392271765.jpeg

Sponsored by ...

http://dovetail.org.au/media/35724/aihw.jpg


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123