GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   This is what Republicans will do for you.. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1236184)

crockett 12-26-2016 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imabro (Post 21406729)
Not really sure how you can work in adult as long as you say you have but think he is a fake nick.

I have my doubts you are in the industry.

I've never said I'm still in this industry. I stopped porn websites back in 2011 or 12 or somewhere around there but it's not like their forum is really "industry" anymore anyway.

I do ebay/amazon now. What I do for money, doesn't change the fact what I said it 100% accurate. You can try to distract and deny, but you only fool yourself.

Bladewire 12-26-2016 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imabro (Post 21406744)
You didn't think I was fake when you were sucking me off in Tempe.

Finally you say something that gives me warm fuzzies :thumbsup

crockett 12-26-2016 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imabro (Post 21406729)
Not really sure how you can work in adult as long as you say you have but think he is a fake nick.

I have my doubts you are in the industry.

btw, anyone who still works in this industry and supports Trump or Republicans in general is a fucking idiot. A short sighted one at that.

Acepimp 12-26-2016 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21404677)
Republicans are not fiscally responsible. They haven't been at the very least since Regan. I'm all for fiscally responsible but it's not what the Republican party is about.

Republicans spend more than Democrats, it's an actual fact the budgets show this, but instead of covering it with taxes they borrow more from the credit card.. There is a Reason when Clinton was in office we were on track to pay off the national debt then Bush came in and completely erased that..

Yes Crockett, and that reason's name is Newt Gingrich. What's the debt at right now? If you believe Bill Clinton was in any way responsible, sorry but you're mistaken. Bill sure likes to try to take the credit for that. Get real dude. It's hilarious that you believe that you are 100% right, and that Paul Markham doesn't understand what's going on.

I'm curious Crockett, what are your sources of news? The ClintonNewsNetwork? Or maybe MSNBC which is owned by Comcast, a major donor to the Clintons? Do you even read wikileaks? Or is that just fake Russian propaganda? I'll say this as nicely as I can: Crockett, you are 90% clueless about world politics.

crockett 12-26-2016 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21407554)
Yes Crockett, and that reason's name is Newt Gingrich. What's the debt at right now? If you believe Bill Clinton was in any way responsible, sorry but you're mistaken. Bill sure likes to try to take the credit for that. Get real dude. It's hilarious that you believe that you are 100% right, and that Paul Markham doesn't understand what's going on.

I'm curious Crockett, what are your sources of news? The ClintonNewsNetwork? Or maybe MSNBC which is owned by Comcast, a major donor to the Clintons? Do you even read wikileaks? Or is that just fake Russian propaganda? I'll say this as nicely as I can: Crockett, you are 90% clueless about world politics.

You mean the nut job Neut Gingrich whom thinks congress should change ethics laws for Trump because he can't follow them?

It's quite fucking ironic that you Right wingers claim it was Congress and Not Bill Clinton when the debt was reduced. Meanwhile when it was increased under Obama you blame Obama.

Simply amazing how Republicans are always the ones doing everything, yet Congress can't seem to do shit the entire 8 years Obama has been president. :error

You dingbats live in a fucking funny little world. BTW I notice yet another hard core fake nobody nick comes out of the wood work knowing all and happens to be a foaming at the mouth republican. BTW perhaps you should check out that hosting in your sig, it seems to have gone down since the last time you logged into this fake troll account.. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 12-26-2016 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21407557)

You dingbats live in a fucking funny little world. BTW I notice yet another hard core fake nobody nick comes out of the wood work knowing all and happens to be a foaming at the mouth republican. BTW perhaps you should check out that hosting in your sig, it seems to have gone down since the last time you logged into this fake troll account.. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh one GOP troll so desperate to be relevant he posts under multiple fake nics to give the impression of a massive GFY GOP following :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Acepimp 12-26-2016 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21407557)

You dingbats live in a fucking funny little world. BTW I notice yet another hard core fake nobody nick comes out of the wood work knowing all and happens to be a foaming at the mouth republican.

LOL Crockett, I'm registered independent, because both parties have been infiltrated by greedy ass clowns, just like Paul Markham was trying to help you understand. And yeah I don't log in to GFY and post on here daily like you, since I'm actually working on my websites and other projects.

So, what are your sources of news? And do you believe wikileaks is fake propaganda doctored by Russians?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Acepimp 12-26-2016 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21407560)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh one GOP troll so desperate to be relevant he posts under multiple fake nics to give the impression of a massive GFY GOP following :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Do you believe that I have more than one account here? If so, you're even more delusional than Crockett. :2 cents: :1orglaugh :321GFY

Bladewire 12-26-2016 10:12 PM

^^ redhat fake nic meltdown ^^

Acepimp 12-26-2016 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21407581)
^^ redhat fake nic meltdown ^^

LOL! Reading comprehension is not your strong point. Meltdown LOL!! OK, genius: what are my other screen names? And please tell us your investigative techniques that led you to discover my nefarious dealings on... GoFuckYourself! :1orglaugh

Speigelau 12-26-2016 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21407593)
LOL! Reading comprehension is not your strong point. Meltdown LOL!! OK, genius: what are my other screen names? And please tell us your investigative techniques that led you to discover my nefarious dealings on... GoFuckYourself! :1orglaugh

Pay no attention to bladewire, he thinks anyone who doesn't agree with him and crockett must be a fake nick. He's just upset cause George Michael died today, bladewire lost his anal virginity while listening to Wham.

Acepimp 12-26-2016 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Speigelau (Post 21407608)
Pay no attention to bladewire, he thinks anyone who doesn't agree with him and crockett must be a fake nick. He's just upset cause George Michael died today, bladewire lost his anal virginity while listening to Wham.

:thumbsup Was wondering why he's such an ass clown :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 12-27-2016 12:04 AM

^^ redhat fake nics talking to themselves ^^

Truly pathetic "human being" :1orglaugh

kane 12-27-2016 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21407554)
Yes Crockett, and that reason's name is Newt Gingrich. What's the debt at right now? If you believe Bill Clinton was in any way responsible, sorry but you're mistaken. Bill sure likes to try to take the credit for that. Get real dude. It's hilarious that you believe that you are 100% right, and that Paul Markham doesn't understand what's going on.

I'm curious Crockett, what are your sources of news? The ClintonNewsNetwork? Or maybe MSNBC which is owned by Comcast, a major donor to the Clintons? Do you even read wikileaks? Or is that just fake Russian propaganda? I'll say this as nicely as I can: Crockett, you are 90% clueless about world politics.

I think one thing that is pretty clear, at least to me, is that during Clinton's time in office the economy did very well because a little thing called The Internet suddenly appeared and created many jobs out of nowhere and it gave many others ways to make extra money in their spare time.

Bill, Newt, fucking Bilbo Baggins, it didn't really matter who was in charge so long as they sat by and let we nerds do our thing.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21404761)
You don't seem to understand how politics work in the US Paul. You keep saying vote for only 2 parties. Money is the issue in American politics Paul. We have other parties but if they were in power, they would do the exact same things the current ones do.

Money buys politicians. It doesn't matter what team they play for. Money is what causes things to happen at both state and federal level. It wasn't always so bad at the state level, but it is now..

Right and wrong. You only have two parties because Americans only vote for two parties. Allowing big money to buy 1 out of 2 politicians in every seat. Because no one has the balls to not vote for those who aren't backed. Then when they don't do as told to by the voters, they drop them out of power.

Money only buys politicians it can only buy stupid voters. Vote Green, Socialists, communist and send a message to the billionaires that the USA isn't for sale.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21405055)
So..... uhmm... for what has been spent on heathcare to set up Obama Care, you could have had $3,000,000.00 USD in a personal bank account along with every single other US Citizen, but your Dear Leader chose to waste it all instead on a multi-billion dollar fiasco called Obama Care that is failing miserably. But yeah "you have no money for healthcare"... you just need government to step in an "fix it" again for you with a few billion more dollars! Not to put $3,000,000.00 more dollars into a personal account for you and every citizen... but to give it to insiders who get no bid contracts if you're friends with Michelle Obama and charge tax payers 100X the going rates for programming and development since it's just tax payer money anyway.

The greatest liberal lie of all with respect to healthcare is that insurance companies are the problem. The most heavily regulated industry in this nation... is the problem. Now there democrats have created a market where they can't even compete in and remain profitable and were forced to withdraw their participation... Ugh. Simpletons.

The problem with US Healthcare is. It's in the hands of shareholders.

The rest of the Modern World provides better healthcare for far far less. The problem Obama had was getting Healthcare into the 21st Century. We've had 100% Free at the Point of use State Owned Healthcare in Europe since the mid-1900s.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21405211)
You keep repeating the same mantra. Two parties this, two parties that as if you are revealing something that Americans do not know. We American's know this so enough already.

Am I wrong?

It's not just America, it's Europe as well. In Europe, we are seeing the rise of the Nationalists political parties. When will America see that?

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21405217)
he may have meant that Obama administration increased national debt by close to 10 TRILLLION, which comes out to about 100k per household... (a bit less than he stated, but the point remains them same)

do you feel that that money was spent wisely? that you got more than $100k benefit out of it? or if given the choice, would you rather take a $100k check to spend as you wish, or would you spend it same way that Obama administration did?

Imagine the jobless total without that extra borrowing.

If the money is spent in the US, it provides jobs, taxes and more jobs and taxes. Of course, you could always pay enough taxes to cover the costs to run a modern country. Let's face it you're willing to buy cheap Thrid World goods, constant migration from Third World Countries, that put Americans out of work. So why not pay the lower costs of Unemployment Benefits.

Again the real problem. Blinkered short sighted view of the political system. I'm sure Trump got a lot of votes by promising to cut taxes.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAJ (Post 21406426)
The bottom line is... many of his working class supporters lives are going to get worse.

It's now hitting the lower middle classes. It has to be hitting many here as the main source of income from online porn is The West.

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21407485)
I've never said I'm still in this industry. I stopped porn websites back in 2011 or 12 or somewhere around there but it's not like their forum is really "industry" anymore anyway.

I do ebay/amazon now. What I do for money, doesn't change the fact what I said it 100% accurate. You can try to distract and deny, but you only fool yourself.

There's one for a start. Now promoting cheap stuff on non-porn sites.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21407554)
Yes Crockett, and that reason's name is Newt Gingrich. What's the debt at right now? If you believe Bill Clinton was in any way responsible, sorry but you're mistaken. Bill sure likes to try to take the credit for that. Get real dude. It's hilarious that you believe that you are 100% right, and that Paul Markham doesn't understand what's going on.

I'm curious Crockett, what are your sources of news? The ClintonNewsNetwork? Or maybe MSNBC which is owned by Comcast, a major donor to the Clintons? Do you even read wikileaks? Or is that just fake Russian propaganda? I'll say this as nicely as I can: Crockett, you are 90% clueless about world politics.

Bill is guilty of creating a scheme where people who couldn't afford a mortgage got one. Those mortgages were then changing hands on the Markets for more than their face value.

He's also guilty of signing a trade deal that fucked America.

Bush is guilty of two unwinnable wars and allowing the markets to sell debt at more than the debt.

Obama is guilty of allowing the shareholders to keep over charging for healthcare. Guilty of going to more unwinnable wars. How much of those decisions rested on the two houses?

crockett 12-27-2016 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21407578)
Do you believe that I have more than one account here? If so, you're even more delusional than Crockett. :2 cents: :1orglaugh :321GFY

You fit the profile.. but maybe the hive mind thing is true. You conservatives all spew the exact same retarded shit from your right wing teleprompter, maybe it's just all of you are too dumb to think for yourself or maybe you are all fake nicks.. It's pretty much the same thing in mental capacity either way. :1orglaugh

crockett 12-27-2016 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21408025)
Bill is guilty of creating a scheme where people who couldn't afford a mortgage got one. Those mortgages were then changing hands on the Markets for more than their face value.

He's also guilty of signing a trade deal that fucked America.

Bush is guilty of two unwinnable wars and allowing the markets to sell debt at more than the debt.

Obama is guilty of allowing the shareholders to keep over charging for healthcare. Guilty of going to more unwinnable wars. How much of those decisions rested on the two houses?

According to 9.999 out of 10 GFY Republicans, anything Bill Clinton did except for Monica was the Republican Congresses doing. You do know who wrote that law you are taking about right? It has the two Republican's in Congress's name on it..

Acepimp 12-27-2016 06:41 AM

Crockett, you are 99% clueless about everything. Keep getting your information from Rachel Maddow instead of wikileaks so we can have further entertainment. :1orglaugh

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 06:50 AM

The present World Trade/Migration/PoliticalModel is unsustainable.
 
The present World Trade/Migration/PoliticalModel is unsustainable.

In 20-30 years the jobs that are left in the First World will either be done by machines, low skilled/paid workers or a few high skilled/high paid workers. The taxes raised from wages will shrink to a level that'as unable to pay the costs of running a country. Especially one with very high unemployment.

Encouraging businesses to be in the First World will be pointless unless those companies are prepared to pay very high levels of taxes. They will be constantly minimising the workforce.

50% of the Wests population are of working age. Forget about whether they are in or out of work. They have to provide the tax revenues to pay for all the things we take for granted and 100,000s of jobs.

The big problem is can we afford to pay for all these people?

http://www.immigrationeis.org/sites/..._scenarios.gif

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images...t2010-2030.gif

There will be one class that will be far better off, that's the one's who buy our politicians.

Until we stop voting for people who will fuck us over. They will continue to fuck us over.

People who think that whoever gets into office will fuck us are cowards. We can vote them out every election unless they work for us.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21408040)
According to 9.999 out of 10 GFY Republicans, anything Bill Clinton did except for Monica was the Republican Congresses doing. You do know who wrote that law you are taking about right? It has the two Republican's in Congress's name on it..

Are you still too slow to get it?

What makes you think a Democrat controlled congress would have gone against Bill or that two Republican's in Congress wouldn't have written it?

Get your head out of your ass and stop thinking Democrats are the solution. They along with the Republicans are the problem. They're both owned by the same people.

In Europe, we're owned by bureaucrats similar problem.

crockett 12-27-2016 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21407674)
I think one thing that is pretty clear, at least to me, is that during Clinton's time in office the economy did very well because a little thing called The Internet suddenly appeared and created many jobs out of nowhere and it gave many others ways to make extra money in their spare time.

Bill, Newt, fucking Bilbo Baggins, it didn't really matter who was in charge so long as they sat by and let we nerds do our thing.

Yes it fucking matters.. what happened as soon as Bush came into office. He took what was going to be used to finish balancing the national debt and handed out $500 checks then started two wars (1 was 100% avoidable) and bankrupted the economy. Then borrowed massive amounts of money for bail outs half of which he pushed into Obama's First year Budget.

crockett 12-27-2016 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21408049)
Crockett, you are 99% clueless about everything. Keep getting your information from Rachel Maddow instead of wikileaks so we can have further entertainment. :1orglaugh

Ahh look a brand new conservabro 1 topic in, shit posting like he's been here forever. Fake nick much or is it just the hive mind mentally ?

crockett 12-27-2016 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21408064)
Are you still too slow to get it?

What makes you think a Democrat controlled congress would have gone against Bill or that two Republican's in Congress wouldn't have written it?

Get your head out of your ass and stop thinking Democrats are the solution. They along with the Republicans are the problem. They're both owned by the same people.

In Europe, we're owned by bureaucrats similar problem.

You mean like how Republican controlled Congress with Trump whom are about to spend this country into a black hole because we it seems we need "more" nukes.

Yep that's the important thing is having more nukes and building walls. Not supporting workers right or getting people healthcare.

crockett 12-27-2016 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21408064)
Are you still too slow to get it?

What makes you think a Democrat controlled congress would have gone against Bill or that two Republican's in Congress wouldn't have written it?

Get your head out of your ass and stop thinking Democrats are the solution. They along with the Republicans are the problem. They're both owned by the same people.

In Europe, we're owned by bureaucrats similar problem.

Yes but in the US, the difference between out 2 parties is 1 party is full on war mongering God chanting lunatics. The other is not..

You will sit here rambling on how much Trump will save the US then soon as he start a fucking war, you will be bitching and crying about US war mongers.. You sit here trying to lecture us about us not having health care.. WHY the FUCK do you think we don't? It sure isn't Democrats whom have blocked it for 20+ years. Yet the next breath you whine about liberals telling us Republicans know what they're doing.. You have zero clue about US politics you just think you do..

Barry-xlovecam 12-27-2016 08:09 AM

Many people don't have jobs, or good jobs, because they are not worth employing. Sad but true ...

Let's mothball all the street cleaning machines and give the unemployed a broom and a job like North Korea does:2 cents:

onwebcam 12-27-2016 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21408025)
Bill is guilty of creating a scheme where people who couldn't afford a mortgage got one. Those mortgages were then changing hands on the Markets for more than their face value.

He's also guilty of signing a trade deal that fucked America.

Bush is guilty of two unwinnable wars and allowing the markets to sell debt at more than the debt.

Obama is guilty of allowing the shareholders to keep over charging for healthcare. Guilty of going to more unwinnable wars. How much of those decisions rested on the two houses?

The mortgage "scheme" wasn't really a thing. It was just an excuse. Most people forget that what happened first is George Soros pulled his entire portfolio out of the money markets which is what triggered runs on the banks and that is what started the collapse. He did this to propel Obama into office. And then banker bets (cdo's) are what really finished the market off.

Bladewire 12-27-2016 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21408235)
The mortgage "scheme" wasn't really a thing. It was just an excuse. Most people forget that what happened first is George Soros pulled his entire portfolio out of the money markets which is what triggered runs on the banks and that is what started the collapse. He did this to propel Obama into office. And then banker bets (cdo's) are what really finished the market off.

Your red hat is too tight.

You go from blaming Clinton for end times to George Soros for the housing collapse caused by Bush. You're really on point with your alt-white talking points.

Yes we know, all the damage done by Donald will be the fault of Obama & Clinton.

onwebcam 12-27-2016 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21408118)
Yes but in the US, the difference between out 2 parties is 1 party is full on war mongering God chanting lunatics. The other is not..

You will sit here rambling on how much Trump will save the US then soon as he start a fucking war, you will be bitching and crying about US war mongers.. You sit here trying to lecture us about us not having health care.. WHY the FUCK do you think we don't? It sure isn't Democrats whom have blocked it for 20+ years. Yet the next breath you whine about liberals telling us Republicans know what they're doing.. You have zero clue about US politics you just think you do..

You say that as if Obama hasn't started 2 wars while in office.

onwebcam 12-27-2016 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21408271)
Your red hat is too tight.

You go from blaming Clinton for end times to George Soros for the housing collapse caused by Bush. You're really on point with your alt-white talking points.

Yes we know, all the damage done by Donald will be the fault of Obama & Clinton.

Money Market Mayhem: The Reserve Fund Meltdown | Investopedia

FACT George Soros controlled the World's largest money market fund up until that point. The day of the money market crash "someone" removed hundreds of billions from the market.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21408118)
Yes but in the US, the difference between out 2 parties is 1 party is full on war mongering God chanting lunatics. The other is not..

You will sit here rambling on how much Trump will save the US then soon as he start a fucking war, you will be bitching and crying about US war mongers.. You sit here trying to lecture us about us not having health care.. WHY the FUCK do you think we don't? It sure isn't Democrats whom have blocked it for 20+ years. Yet the next breath you whine about liberals telling us Republicans know what they're doing.. You have zero clue about US politics you just think you do..

Still doesn't get it.

Democrats can't get elected because Americans are unwilling to pay what it costs to run their own country and ensure the economic future of America.

Trump has shown you what you can do by voting out both parties. He promised to cut migration and bring jobs back.

Look at Barry's comment to show you the problem. Will he pay a lot more taxes to improve education, pay benefits and employ all those street cleaners?

No, he won't even buy a phone made in the US by an American because it costs too much.

If we want politicians to do what's best for us. They have to fear us. And guns won't do that. Votes will. Hillary has no fear of us what so ever.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21408106)
You mean like how Republican controlled Congress with Trump whom are about to spend this country into a black hole because we it seems we need "more" nukes.

Yep that's the important thing is having more nukes and building walls. Not supporting workers right or getting people healthcare.

If Trump had stood up and said the new Military budget will cost each of you $xzy. He would have lost. Instead he came up with a fanciful scheme where it costs nothing and he can cut taxes.

In Europe that would have made him a laughing stock.

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21408181)
Many people don't have jobs, or good jobs, because they are not worth employing. Sad but true ...

Let's mothball all the street cleaning machines and give the unemployed a broom and a job like North Korea does:2 cents:

The companies moving to the Third World are employing Third World managers. Who then build their own companies. Soon your Western Market will be so reduced, you will need a broom.

How many sales do you get from the Third World?

Paul Markham 12-27-2016 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21408235)
The mortgage "scheme" wasn't really a thing. It was just an excuse. Most people forget that what happened first is George Soros pulled his entire portfolio out of the money markets which is what triggered runs on the banks and that is what started the collapse. He did this to propel Obama into office. And then banker bets (cdo's) are what really finished the market off.

George Soros pulled his money because he's bright enough to realise that buying/selling $100,000 debt bonds that would never be paid. Wasn't worth touching.

Or do you believe if he had kept his money in, nothing would have gone wrong?

Bladewire 12-27-2016 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21408289)
Money Market Mayhem: The Reserve Fund Meltdown | Investopedia

FACT George Soro's controlled the World's largest money market fund up until that point. The day of the money market crash "someone" removed hundreds of billions from the market.

Investopedia

Investopedia is your source of FACT?

Investopedia?

onwebcam 12-27-2016 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21408319)
George Soros pulled his money because he's bright enough to realise that buying/selling $100,000 debt bonds that would never be paid. Wasn't worth touching.

Or do you believe if he had kept his money in, nothing would have gone wrong?

George Soros has made his living terrorizing the system. He is in fact the cause of it. He removed his fund from the market, caused the collapse and created a run on the banks which put the banks at risk. Since he caused the problem he obviously knew where to profit Soros among firms that made money in 2008, 2009 - MarketWatch


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc