![]() |
Quote:
A story would come out about some evil shit Trump has done and it would be in the news cycle a day or two then right back to Clinton and the emails. Out of the whole year the only story that has legs was grab them by the pussy, that lasted a week, then right back to Clinton's emails, which weren't actually hers, it was Pedestos & the DNC. |
Quote:
I goggled it an cannot find any such statement. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Else they have been sleeping the last 25 years. Already in 1996 you had a virus that could control someone's pc. You just run an ip scanner and could see every computer infected. It isn't new what they are doing. Disconnect from internet is only remedy. There always will be people opening every email. |
Quote:
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_Dossier US intelligence ran & repeated this over and over : " according to british intelligence .... " .... Gave them deniability .... |
Quote:
Let me "educate" you real quick. Bill Clinton himself as President: "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. And then Bush used a CIA report to invade Iraq that was also DEAD WRONG. CNN.com - Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures - Jul 9, 2004 And here's Senator Hillary Clinton: "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 These were all CIA fuck-ups and false info. And of course in 2015 it was revealed that intelligence reports on the war with ISIS had been altered to make it look better than it is: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/23/wo...orts.html?_r=0 Weird how the CIA is one of the most ruthless and overtly political agency's in the Federal Govt. and how nobody can trust them...until NOW. Suddenly, the CIA director answering to his boss Pres. Obama alleges that Russia "meddled" with the election but won't show any proof. But everyone is accepting it as gospel. Just like everyone believed them and we went to war with Iraq. Trust me...if Obama uses the CIA to start a war with Russia, it won't be as easy as conquering Iraq. :( This is war-mongering at it's worst. :disgust |
Quote:
As for the information, I agree it should have been released, but two wrongs don't make a right. You can't steal someone's car then tell the police you stole it to keep them from driving drunk. |
Quote:
Why you people feed the need to lie about events will never cease to amaze me or maybe it will or already has. The truth is usually bad enough without enhancing it with lies. |
Quote:
The reason Bush was able to sell the war and get others on board is because he and his admin, cherry picked the fuck out of the intel reports to claim Saddam had WMD then used that to sell the war to congress and our allies. Tony Blair also did the same thing on his side of the pond.. The reason so many members of congress went along with the war and voted in favor is because they believed what Bush & co was telling them. This wasn't a case of failed intelligence starting a war. It was a case of an administration nit picking intelligence to push a war. Yes there was a war monger but it wasn't the CIA or Clinton.. However in Robbie's world it's always the liberal's fault.. Anyone but his team.. |
Quote:
Robbie blames BOTH Clinton's & the CIA for invading Iraq. PRICELESS! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Robbie didn't you follow what was happening at the time? Let me "educate" you real quick. Bush wanted to goto war with Iraq. Then 535 people in congress had to vote on his request. Notice from the chart I highlighted below, REPUBLICANS ( your party ) overwhelming put us in that fucked up war, where Democrats overwhelming voted AGAINST the war. http://i.imgur.com/i5nXTda.jpg Look at the right wing headline results for CIA & FBI: Trump smart to be skeptical of FBI, CIA — just look at their track record ... The alt-right is telling you guys you can't believe U.S. intelligence and to listen to Trump for the correct info. Do you realize what that means, the road you're being taken down? Trump told you the elections were rigged, you agreed, until he won, then changed his story saying the elections aren't rigged, and you agree. Trump said the Electoral College is not Democratic and should be abolished, until the Electoral College voted him president, then he said they're brilliant and a safeguard for Democracy. Don't you see a fundamental problem with taking one mans word as truth when the truth instantly changes to fit their narrative? Don't you see a red flag when you're told to trust the FBI by your party when it's convenient, and told not to trust them when info comes out that damages them? |
I didn't "blame" the Clinton's.
I pointed out that the CIA not only has a long history of nefarious activity...but also have been shown to "cook" intel to the President's beck and call. I 100% agree about Bush having them cook it up for him. As did Bill Clinton when he ordered missiles fired on Iraq. That's what the CIA does. If you guys are all pro-CIA...I don't know what to say about that. |
Goddammit Crockett and Bladewire!! You clowns are totally f*cking right for once! Yeah Bush & Cheney knew the intel on WMDs was bogus. Those peckerwoods just wanted to make them & their friends rich from war contracts! They are war criminals!! Here's Jesse Ventura's report on the matter. He should be POTUS!
|
america invade over lies? but who would post such a hurtful thing? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh its like saying the US army is a bunch of paid terrorists and thugs :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
|
Quote:
Compared to what was dragged up about Trump it was more important that you know what she does when she'sin office. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I'll add: They were joined by Democrats voting for it in the house and Senate that included John Kerry and Hillary Clinton. But yes...it was Bush who pushed it hard and...THEN used cooked up CIA intelligence to persuade all the Senators and Congressmen. That's my point on this whole issue. Suddenly our entire country had developed amnesia and "forgot" what the CIA did for Bush in the last administration. And now everybody wants to hold hands and believe a politicized "report" from the CIA that shows no proof at all so that Trump's presidency can be de-legitimized politically and the country can remain divided (the one thing that Pres. Obama has done flawlessly) "The White House fact sheet asserts, the report largely consists of tips to improve cyber security and prevent future attacks, it also appears to cite evidence Russian Intelligence Services (RIS) actively attempted to hack into U.S. systems, a campaign the government has named ?GRIZZLY STEPPE.? But as the media runs with the story and many outlets accept the 13-page report as fact, veterans of the intelligence community have pointed out flaws with the FBI-DHS analysis. According to Philip Giraldi, a former CIA agent, the report fails to prove Russia is behind the hack. In a recent Facebook post, he asserted that ?apart from assertions of Russian activity connected to an unnamed political party, [the report] provides absolutely no evidence that the alleged intrusions into the DNC servers were anything beyond normal intelligence agency probing for vulnerabilities.? 'In fact' he adds, 'it doesn?t even provide the evidence for that.' Further, he argues: 'There is no evidence of particular mal-intent that can be traced back to the Russian government, much less to Vladimir Putin. Nine of the thirteen pages of the report deal with advice on how to keep your system from being hacked.' |
By the way...the media's "knowledge" of all this that they keep reporting as gospel truth?
"a former senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the hack investigation told CNN." Russian hacking and the 2016 election, explained - CNNPolitics.com That's it. An unnamed "former law enforcement official" THAT is what CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, and newspapers that were blatantly anti-Trump are using along with President Obama and his administration just saying it to the press. Just exactly the same way that the President had all of those media outlets reporting that Benghazi was caused by a "youtube video" when it was already well known to he and Hillary that it was a terrorist attack. Yet, he still had his people go on all the news shows and repeat that for weeks...and he went on David Letterman's show himself and repeated that lie. And then...once the election was over and he had beaten Romney...THEN the truth was revealed. I'm just saying....fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Just think back to how deceptive our federal govt. has been under every President in your lifetime. This is how they operate. It's disgusting. |
>“GRIZZLY STEPPE.”
"drunk grizzly" - it is 100% russians and persinal putin. you can see all proof here: 1. vodka 2. bears Who if not are putin can have it all)) |
Quote:
You are what is fucking wrong with this country and your type is why education is now lacking. You are a product of the dumbed down ignorant population the GOP has been trying to create for years. Wake the fuck up use some common sense and "learn" critical thinking.. all of these areas you're severally lacking.. I can no longer be tolerant of you fools, you are a disease sucking the life out of my country with your ignorance. |
Quote:
And, as I said before, two wrongs don't make a right. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1q6ac0vm.jpg :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Tell me everything bad you remember being publicised about Trump and i'll compare with what I remember. People were reminded daily about a mistake Clinton made, whereas anything that came up about Trump was let go within one or two days, but for the pussy grabbing which lasted a week. You're brainwashed Paul. Clinton wanted to protect her privacy, Trump has an extensive documented legal history of fucking over the little guy at every turn, but you don't care, your not American and you don't have to live with it, you just sit back in judgement laughing and antagonizing people not believing that I make my living off my content, because you fail at doing it yourself. Every day I get new memberships & rebills but my reality doesn't fit yours so it must not be true :1orglaugh You've turned into this complete dick of the person you used to be. I think your accounts been hacked, either that or you're in the throws of a very deep negative depression. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...psllqeap54.jpg :thumbsup |
^^ Fake redhat nic trolling ^^
|
Quote:
How f*cking dumb are you clowns??? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
^^ fake nic meltdown ^^
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Newsflash.. I've always stated Hillary was shit. Trump is just bigger shit :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
She was the lesser of 2 evils, and the more experienced. Email server - mistake Benghazi - mistake Trump doesn't want you to trust U.S. intelligence and wants you to lick deep in Putins ass while Trump butt fucks you all holes feeding his 1% buddies what they can steal out of the treasury. |
Quote:
I'm only saying that not only is the CIA a very bad organization with a history of murder and overthrowing other govts., but they also do what the President tells them to do. And as history shows...Presidents have used them for anything they wanted. Even this time...notice that the CIA didn't say shit during the election because the President thought Hillary was going to win. Then once he DIRECTED them to say something...THEN it was the "Russians". Hell, it may very well be the Russians. It's nothing new for sure. We do it to every other country in the world, and they all do it to us. But what I am saying is: I personally do not trust the CIA. They lie as a profession. They are a freakin' spy agency. If you "trust" them...then so be it. I do not. And never will. History shows it. |
Quote:
http://data.whicdn.com/images/138167909/original.jpg |
Quote:
It's like fucking the whore who swears she's a virgin :1orglaugh |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc