GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   United States releases information about Russian hacking (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1236865)

Bladewire 01-01-2017 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21417787)
So the big hack was stuff the electorate had every right to know. No wonder some are pissed off.

Meanwhile, the media spent most of their time digging up every single derogatory story they could about Trump. And exaggerating them or creating a few.

You must have been napping this last election cycle. Every single day the media talked about Clinton's emails and the hacked emails of the DNC, every single day.

A story would come out about some evil shit Trump has done and it would be in the news cycle a day or two then right back to Clinton and the emails. Out of the whole year the only story that has legs was grab them by the pussy, that lasted a week, then right back to Clinton's emails, which weren't actually hers, it was Pedestos & the DNC.

Steve Rupe 01-01-2017 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21418177)
Kind of reminds me of when the US intelligence agencies assured us that Iraq had nukes

I do not recall the US intelligence making any such statement. Educate me and post any link that proves that statement.

I goggled it an cannot find any such statement.

Steve Rupe 01-01-2017 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21418177)
Kind of reminds me of when the US intelligence agencies assured us that Iraq had nukes

Double post. Not sure why.

Tasty1 01-01-2017 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21416404)
This is where the real problem is.... Russia is trying to hack EVERYTHING. Now they've discovered Russia is trying to hack a US power company..... You don't think they are trying to hack every power company in the US? If we go to war with Russia the first thing to go is our power grid....

Vermont Electricity Department Finds Malware Linked to Russian Hackers - NBC News

But nah... This isn't important for our government to be investigating. Let's investigate Clinton's emails again.

Didn't we know already the USA can do the same.
Else they have been sleeping the last 25 years.

Already in 1996 you had a virus that could control someone's pc.
You just run an ip scanner and could see every computer infected.
It isn't new what they are doing. Disconnect from internet is only remedy.
There always will be people opening every email.

directfiesta 01-01-2017 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21418246)
I do not recall the US intelligence making any such statement. Educate me and post any link that proves that statement.

I goggled it an cannot find any such statement.

Quote:

Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Assessment of the British Government, also known as the September Dossier, was a document published by the British government on 24 September 2002 on the same day of a recall of Parliament to discuss the contents of the document.[1]
The paper was part of an ongoing investigation by the government into weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, which ultimately led to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. It contained a number of allegations according to which Iraq also possessed WMD, including chemical weapons and biological weapons.
The dossier even alleged that Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear weapons programme. Without exception, all of the allegations included within the September Dossier have been since proven to be false, as shown by the Iraq Survey Group.
|If you are looking for a word to word quote, it does not exist , as all the sexying of the reasons to go to war were implications/deductions leading to other implications/deductions .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_Dossier

US intelligence ran & repeated this over and over : " according to british intelligence .... " .... Gave them deniability ....

Robbie 01-01-2017 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21418246)
I do not recall the US intelligence making any such statement. Educate me and post any link that proves that statement.

I goggled it an cannot find any such statement.

Didn't you follow what was happening at the time.

Let me "educate" you real quick.

Bill Clinton himself as President:
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.


And then Bush used a CIA report to invade Iraq that was also DEAD WRONG.
CNN.com - Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures - Jul 9, 2004

And here's Senator Hillary Clinton:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


These were all CIA fuck-ups and false info.

And of course in 2015 it was revealed that intelligence reports on the war with ISIS had been altered to make it look better than it is:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/23/wo...orts.html?_r=0

Weird how the CIA is one of the most ruthless and overtly political agency's in the Federal Govt. and how nobody can trust them...until NOW.

Suddenly, the CIA director answering to his boss Pres. Obama alleges that Russia "meddled" with the election but won't show any proof.

But everyone is accepting it as gospel.

Just like everyone believed them and we went to war with Iraq.

Trust me...if Obama uses the CIA to start a war with Russia, it won't be as easy as conquering Iraq. :(

This is war-mongering at it's worst. :disgust

kane 01-01-2017 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21418072)
Do you feel the same about America hacking other countries?

As for this one, again the information released should have been released.

If any country tries to influence or mess with the fair elections of another country that is wrong.

As for the information, I agree it should have been released, but two wrongs don't make a right. You can't steal someone's car then tell the police you stole it to keep them from driving drunk.

Steve Rupe 01-01-2017 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21418444)
Didn't you follow what was happening at the time.

Let me "educate" you real quick.

Bill Clinton himself as President:
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.


And then Bush used a CIA report to invade Iraq that was also DEAD WRONG.
CNN.com - Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures - Jul 9, 2004

And here's Senator Hillary Clinton:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


These were all CIA fuck-ups and false info.

And of course in 2015 it was revealed that intelligence reports on the war with ISIS had been altered to make it look better than it is:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/23/wo...orts.html?_r=0

Weird how the CIA is one of the most ruthless and overtly political agency's in the Federal Govt. and how nobody can trust them...until NOW.

Suddenly, the CIA director answering to his boss Pres. Obama alleges that Russia "meddled" with the election but won't show any proof.

But everyone is accepting it as gospel.

Just like everyone believed them and we went to war with Iraq.

Trust me...if Obama uses the CIA to start a war with Russia, it won't be as easy as conquering Iraq. :(

This is war-mongering at it's worst. :disgust

I followed events better than you it seems as no US intel agency ever made the statement you pulled from your ass. "Kind of reminds me of when the US intelligence agencies assured us that Iraq had nukes"

Why you people feed the need to lie about events will never cease to amaze me or maybe it will or already has. The truth is usually bad enough without enhancing it with lies.

crockett 01-01-2017 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21418444)
Didn't you follow what was happening at the time.

Let me "educate" you real quick.

Bill Clinton himself as President:
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.


And then Bush used a CIA report to invade Iraq that was also DEAD WRONG.
CNN.com - Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures - Jul 9, 2004

And here's Senator Hillary Clinton:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


These were all CIA fuck-ups and false info.

And of course in 2015 it was revealed that intelligence reports on the war with ISIS had been altered to make it look better than it is:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/23/wo...orts.html?_r=0

Weird how the CIA is one of the most ruthless and overtly political agency's in the Federal Govt. and how nobody can trust them...until NOW.

Suddenly, the CIA director answering to his boss Pres. Obama alleges that Russia "meddled" with the election but won't show any proof.

But everyone is accepting it as gospel.

Just like everyone believed them and we went to war with Iraq.

Trust me...if Obama uses the CIA to start a war with Russia, it won't be as easy as conquering Iraq. :(

This is war-mongering at it's worst. :disgust

Once again Robbie pulling info out of his ass, lying and making shit up to fit his narrative. The US intel agencies did not say that. That was a British report..

The reason Bush was able to sell the war and get others on board is because he and his admin, cherry picked the fuck out of the intel reports to claim Saddam had WMD then used that to sell the war to congress and our allies. Tony Blair also did the same thing on his side of the pond..

The reason so many members of congress went along with the war and voted in favor is because they believed what Bush & co was telling them. This wasn't a case of failed intelligence starting a war. It was a case of an administration nit picking intelligence to push a war.

Yes there was a war monger but it wasn't the CIA or Clinton.. However in Robbie's world it's always the liberal's fault.. Anyone but his team..

Bladewire 01-01-2017 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21418444)
Didn't you follow what was happening at the time.

Let me "educate" you real quick.

Bill Clinton himself as President:
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.


And then Bush used a CIA report to invade Iraq that was also DEAD WRONG.
CNN.com - Report slams CIA for Iraq intelligence failures - Jul 9, 2004

And here's Senator Hillary Clinton:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


These were all CIA fuck-ups and false info.

And of course in 2015 it was revealed that intelligence reports on the war with ISIS had been altered to make it look better than it is:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/23/wo...orts.html?_r=0

Weird how the CIA is one of the most ruthless and overtly political agency's in the Federal Govt. and how nobody can trust them...until NOW.

Suddenly, the CIA director answering to his boss Pres. Obama alleges that Russia "meddled" with the election but won't show any proof.

But everyone is accepting it as gospel.

Just like everyone believed them and we went to war with Iraq.

Trust me...if Obama uses the CIA to start a war with Russia, it won't be as easy as conquering Iraq. :(

This is war-mongering at it's worst. :disgust





Robbie blames BOTH Clinton's & the CIA for invading Iraq. PRICELESS! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Robbie didn't you follow what was happening at the time?

Let me "educate" you real quick.

Bush wanted to goto war with Iraq.

Then 535 people in congress had to vote on his request.

Notice from the chart I highlighted below, REPUBLICANS ( your party ) overwhelming put us in that fucked up war, where Democrats overwhelming voted AGAINST the war.

http://i.imgur.com/i5nXTda.jpg


Look at the right wing headline results for CIA & FBI:

Trump smart to be skeptical of FBI, CIA — just look at their track record ...

The alt-right is telling you guys you can't believe U.S. intelligence and to listen to Trump for the correct info. Do you realize what that means, the road you're being taken down?

Trump told you the elections were rigged, you agreed, until he won, then changed his story saying the elections aren't rigged, and you agree.

Trump said the Electoral College is not Democratic and should be abolished, until the Electoral College voted him president, then he said they're brilliant and a safeguard for Democracy.

Don't you see a fundamental problem with taking one mans word as truth when the truth instantly changes to fit their narrative?

Don't you see a red flag when you're told to trust the FBI by your party when it's convenient, and told not to trust them when info comes out that damages them?

Robbie 01-01-2017 03:38 PM

I didn't "blame" the Clinton's.

I pointed out that the CIA not only has a long history of nefarious activity...but also have been shown to "cook" intel to the President's beck and call.
I 100% agree about Bush having them cook it up for him. As did Bill Clinton when he ordered missiles fired on Iraq.
That's what the CIA does.

If you guys are all pro-CIA...I don't know what to say about that.

Acepimp 01-01-2017 08:55 PM

Goddammit Crockett and Bladewire!! You clowns are totally f*cking right for once! Yeah Bush & Cheney knew the intel on WMDs was bogus. Those peckerwoods just wanted to make them & their friends rich from war contracts! They are war criminals!! Here's Jesse Ventura's report on the matter. He should be POTUS!


pimpmaster9000 01-02-2017 03:03 AM

america invade over lies? but who would post such a hurtful thing? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh its like saying the US army is a bunch of paid terrorists and thugs :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Paul Markham 01-02-2017 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21418228)
You must have been napping this last election cycle. Every single day the media talked about Clinton's emails and the hacked emails of the DNC, every single day.

A story would come out about some evil shit Trump has done and it would be in the news cycle a day or two then right back to Clinton and the emails. Out of the whole year the only story that has legs was grab them by the pussy, that lasted a week, then right back to Clinton's emails, which weren't actually hers, it was Pedestos & the DNC.

What exactly were they saying about her emails? That she shouldn't have deleted after being told to present them, that they should never be on a private server, that she might have something to hide?

Compared to what was dragged up about Trump it was more important that you know what she does when she'sin office.

Paul Markham 01-02-2017 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21418594)
If any country tries to influence or mess with the fair elections of another country that is wrong.

As an American how can you say that and keep a straight face?

Quote:

As for the information, I agree it should have been released, but two wrongs don't make a right.
This wrong was informing the electorate of what Hillary was keen to hide.

Paul Markham 01-02-2017 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21418621)
I followed events better than you it seems as no US intel agency ever made the statement you pulled from your ass. "Kind of reminds me of when the US intelligence agencies assured us that Iraq had nukes"

Why you people feed the need to lie about events will never cease to amaze me or maybe it will or already has. The truth is usually bad enough without enhancing it with lies.

You're splitting hairs. Bush, Blair and cronies lied and lied again to us. To make money for the Arms Industry and a few others.

Paul Markham 01-02-2017 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21418930)
I didn't "blame" the Clinton's.

I pointed out that the CIA not only has a long history of nefarious activity...but also have been shown to "cook" intel to the President's beck and call.
I 100% agree about Bush having them cook it up for him. As did Bill Clinton when he ordered missiles fired on Iraq.
That's what the CIA does.

If you guys are all pro-CIA...I don't know what to say about that.

Then just come out and say the Republicans pushed the US into an unwinnable, illegal, pointless war that cost billions and lives to make Iraq a worse place than it was.

Robbie 01-02-2017 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21419602)
Then just come out and say the Republicans pushed the US into an unwinnable, illegal, pointless war that cost billions and lives to make Iraq a worse place than it was.

The Republicans pushed the US into an unwinnable, illegal, pointless war that cost billions and lives to make Iraq a worse place than it was.

And I'll add: They were joined by Democrats voting for it in the house and Senate that included John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.

But yes...it was Bush who pushed it hard and...THEN used cooked up CIA intelligence to persuade all the Senators and Congressmen.

That's my point on this whole issue.

Suddenly our entire country had developed amnesia and "forgot" what the CIA did for Bush in the last administration.

And now everybody wants to hold hands and believe a politicized "report" from the CIA that shows no proof at all so that Trump's presidency can be de-legitimized politically and the country can remain divided (the one thing that Pres. Obama has done flawlessly)

"The White House fact sheet asserts, the report largely consists of tips to improve cyber security and prevent future attacks, it also appears to cite evidence Russian Intelligence Services (RIS) actively attempted to hack into U.S. systems, a campaign the government has named ?GRIZZLY STEPPE.?

But as the media runs with the story and many outlets accept the 13-page report as fact, veterans of the intelligence community have pointed out flaws with the FBI-DHS analysis.
According to Philip Giraldi, a former CIA agent, the report fails to prove Russia is behind the hack. In a recent Facebook post, he asserted that ?apart from assertions of Russian activity connected to an unnamed political party, [the report] provides absolutely no evidence that the alleged intrusions into the DNC servers were anything beyond normal intelligence agency probing for vulnerabilities.?
'In fact' he adds, 'it doesn?t even provide the evidence for that.'
Further, he argues:
'There is no evidence of particular mal-intent that can be traced back to the Russian government, much less to Vladimir Putin. Nine of the thirteen pages of the report deal with advice on how to keep your system from being hacked.'

Robbie 01-02-2017 10:20 AM

By the way...the media's "knowledge" of all this that they keep reporting as gospel truth?

"a former senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the hack investigation told CNN."
Russian hacking and the 2016 election, explained - CNNPolitics.com

That's it.
An unnamed "former law enforcement official"

THAT is what CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, and newspapers that were blatantly anti-Trump are using along with President Obama and his administration just saying it to the press.

Just exactly the same way that the President had all of those media outlets reporting that Benghazi was caused by a "youtube video" when it was already well known to he and Hillary that it was a terrorist attack.
Yet, he still had his people go on all the news shows and repeat that for weeks...and he went on David Letterman's show himself and repeated that lie.

And then...once the election was over and he had beaten Romney...THEN the truth was revealed.

I'm just saying....fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Just think back to how deceptive our federal govt. has been under every President in your lifetime.
This is how they operate. It's disgusting.

Sarn 01-02-2017 10:57 AM

>“GRIZZLY STEPPE.”

"drunk grizzly" - it is 100% russians and persinal putin.
you can see all proof here:
1. vodka
2. bears
Who if not are putin can have it all))

crockett 01-02-2017 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21416623)
Crockett, you are WRONG. There was no hack if the RNC servers. The New York Times was lying. The big question is, will Crockett ever post real facts??

VIDEO ---> Spicer Says Russians Never Hacked The RNC, Reports Are False | The Daily Caller

Dude you are a fucking clown.. You will use some right wing political hack website as proof. Yet you will claim Members of Congress, the FBI & CIA are lying. You're typical dumbshit who will believe anything he reads on Facebook as long as it's what "you" want to hear or what your Trumpdaddy tells you to believe.

You are what is fucking wrong with this country and your type is why education is now lacking. You are a product of the dumbed down ignorant population the GOP has been trying to create for years. Wake the fuck up use some common sense and "learn" critical thinking.. all of these areas you're severally lacking..

I can no longer be tolerant of you fools, you are a disease sucking the life out of my country with your ignorance.

kane 01-02-2017 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21419596)
As an American how can you say that and keep a straight face?



This wrong was informing the electorate of what Hillary was keen to hide.

This just in....I don't run the US government. For that matter, I have no influence over the US government or its policies. I can and do disagree with some of the things our government does.

And, as I said before, two wrongs don't make a right.

2MuchMark 01-02-2017 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21420376)
Dude you are a fucking clown.. You will use some right wing political hack website as proof. Yet you will claim Members of Congress, the FBI & CIA are lying. You're typical dumbshit who will believe anything he reads on Facebook as long as it's what "you" want to hear or what your Trumpdaddy tells you to believe.

You are what is fucking wrong with this country and your type is why education is now lacking. You are a product of the dumbed down ignorant population the GOP has been trying to create for years. Wake the fuck up use some common sense and "learn" critical thinking.. all of these areas you're severally lacking..

I can no longer be tolerant of you fools, you are a disease sucking the life out of my country with your ignorance.

Now you see why I gave up.

Acepimp 01-02-2017 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21420376)
Dude you are a fucking clown.. You will use some right wing political hack website as proof. Yet you will claim Members of Congress, the FBI & CIA are lying. You're typical dumbshit who will believe anything he reads on Facebook as long as it's what "you" want to hear or what your Trumpdaddy tells you to believe.

You are what is fucking wrong with this country and your type is why education is now lacking. You are a product of the dumbed down ignorant population the GOP has been trying to create for years. Wake the fuck up use some common sense and "learn" critical thinking.. all of these areas you're severally lacking..

I can no longer be tolerant of you fools, you are a disease sucking the life out of my country with your ignorance.

It's official! Crockett is 99% clueless about what's actually going on! Hey Crockett, Donna Brazille was lying. She did help Hillary cheat, and Wilikeaks is not doctored by russians. What's your news source?? Npr? LOL :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1q6ac0vm.jpg

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 01-02-2017 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21419593)
What exactly were they saying about her emails? That she shouldn't have deleted after being told to present them, that they should never be on a private server, that she might have something to hide?

Compared to what was dragged up about Trump it was more important that you know what she does when she'sin office.

What was dragged up about Trump?

Tell me everything bad you remember being publicised about Trump and i'll compare with what I remember.

People were reminded daily about a mistake Clinton made, whereas anything that came up about Trump was let go within one or two days, but for the pussy grabbing which lasted a week. You're brainwashed Paul.

Clinton wanted to protect her privacy, Trump has an extensive documented legal history of fucking over the little guy at every turn, but you don't care, your not American and you don't have to live with it, you just sit back in judgement laughing and antagonizing people not believing that I make my living off my content, because you fail at doing it yourself. Every day I get new memberships & rebills but my reality doesn't fit yours so it must not be true :1orglaugh

You've turned into this complete dick of the person you used to be. I think your accounts been hacked, either that or you're in the throws of a very deep negative depression.

crockett 01-02-2017 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21420916)
It's official! Crockett is 99% clueless about what's actually going on! Hey Crockett, Donna Brazille was lying. She did help Hillary cheat, and Wilikeaks is not doctored by russians. What's your news source?? Npr? LOL :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1q6ac0vm.jpg

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You are fucking nuts, You can't debate with actual facts or reason so you resort with that. Perhaps if you spent as much time educating yourself as you do making fake troll accounts you might not be such a lost cause.

pimpmaster9000 01-02-2017 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21420916)
It's official! Crockett is 99% clueless about what's actually going on! Hey Crockett, Donna Brazille was lying. She did help Hillary cheat, and Wilikeaks is not doctored by russians. What's your news source?? Npr? LOL :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1q6ac0vm.jpg

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yanks_Todd 01-02-2017 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21418177)
Kind of reminds me of when the US intelligence agencies assured us that Iraq had nukes

So unless they have a perfect record they have no credibility?

Rochard 01-02-2017 03:24 PM

Let's do this.

http://memecrunch.com/meme/BL1F9/i-g...ussy/image.png

Bladewire 01-02-2017 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21421144)


Acepimp 01-02-2017 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21420970)
You are fucking nuts, You can't debate with actual facts or reason so you resort with that. Perhaps if you spent as much time educating yourself as you do making fake troll accounts you might not be such a lost cause.

Hey Crockett, ya might wanna read all the wikileaks, just sayin' Lol! :1orglaugh

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...psllqeap54.jpg
:thumbsup

Bladewire 01-02-2017 03:57 PM

^^ Fake redhat nic trolling ^^

Acepimp 01-02-2017 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21421204)
^^ Fake redhat nic trolling ^^

Yeah i'm fake trolling and wikileaks is doctored by Russians! :1orglaugh

How f*cking dumb are you clowns??? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 01-02-2017 04:26 PM

^^ fake nic meltdown ^^

crockett 01-02-2017 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd (Post 21421132)
So unless they have a perfect record they have no credibility?

Unless they are on Robbie's team, then they can have zero credibility and be A ok..

crockett 01-02-2017 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Facepimple (Post 21421189)
Hey Crockett, ya might wanna read all the wikileaks, just sayin' Lol! :1orglaugh

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...psllqeap54.jpg
:thumbsup

This is the problem with you little Trump cult members.. You think because I'm telling you "your guy" is full of shit that I automatically like Hillary. See this is another example of your type having no ability to think with logic or reason. If a person is not drinking your koolaid they are the enemy. You guys are just primed an waiting for a dictator.. You guys see everyone not on your team as the enemy. You are the reason guys like Erdogan and Duterte can turn once stable democratic countries into dictatorships. You are fucking nuts..

Newsflash.. I've always stated Hillary was shit. Trump is just bigger shit :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 01-02-2017 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21421297)
Newsflash.. I've always stated Hillary was shit. Trump is just bigger shit :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Exactly.

She was the lesser of 2 evils, and the more experienced.

Email server - mistake

Benghazi - mistake

Trump doesn't want you to trust U.S. intelligence and wants you to lick deep in Putins ass while Trump butt fucks you all holes feeding his 1% buddies what they can steal out of the treasury.

Robbie 01-02-2017 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd (Post 21421132)
So unless they have a perfect record they have no credibility?

Of course not. But Trump would be wise to get into office and THEN have HIS CIA director and HIS FBI director take a look at everything.

I'm only saying that not only is the CIA a very bad organization with a history of murder and overthrowing other govts., but they also do what the President tells them to do.

And as history shows...Presidents have used them for anything they wanted.

Even this time...notice that the CIA didn't say shit during the election because the President thought Hillary was going to win.
Then once he DIRECTED them to say something...THEN it was the "Russians".

Hell, it may very well be the Russians.
It's nothing new for sure. We do it to every other country in the world, and they all do it to us.

But what I am saying is: I personally do not trust the CIA.
They lie as a profession. They are a freakin' spy agency.

If you "trust" them...then so be it.
I do not. And never will.

History shows it.

Sarn 01-02-2017 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21421297)
guys like Erdogan and Duterte can turn once stable democratic countries into dictatorships. You are fucking nuts..

Newsflash.. I've always stated Hillary was shit. Trump is just bigger shit :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes, Trump is a big demon dictator. we will liberate you Crockett!:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
http://data.whicdn.com/images/138167909/original.jpg

Bladewire 01-02-2017 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21421483)
Of course not. But Trump would be wise to get into office and THEN have HIS CIA director and HIS FBI director take a look at everything.

I'm only saying that not only is the CIA a very bad organization with a history of murder and overthrowing other govts., but they also do what the President tells them to do.

And as history shows...Presidents have used them for anything they wanted.

Even this time...notice that the CIA didn't say shit during the election because the President thought Hillary was going to win.
Then once he DIRECTED them to say something...THEN it was the "Russians".

Hell, it may very well be the Russians.
It's nothing new for sure. We do it to every other country in the world, and they all do it to us.

But what I am saying is: I personally do not trust the CIA.
They lie as a profession. They are a freakin' spy agency.

If you "trust" them...then so be it.
I do not. And never will.

History shows it.

Robbie, you know it's Russia :1orglaugh

It's like fucking the whore who swears she's a virgin :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc