:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.c238f853aca5

Editor?s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said that Russian hackers had penetrated the U.S. electric grid. Authorities say there is no indication of that so far. The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid.

and not Russian but Ukrainians - but who sees the difference? :1orglaugh

There's been no evidence presented, genius. Just 'cause Obama told his guys in the CIA to leak a rumor to the press does not mean there is actual evidence. What is actual evidence however, is the wikileaks Email ID that I posted earlier above the pic of Crockett sucking cock- Email ID 1223066 which shows that Obama spent $65,000 of taxpayer money on "hot dogs & pizza" flown in from Chicago. The email said: "I think Obama spent about $65,000 of the tax-payers money flying inpizza/dogs from Chicago for a private party at the White House not long ago, assume we are using the same channels?" “If we get the same “waitresses,” I’m all for it!!!” -- Yeah, seems legit..

READ --> Wikileaks: Obama Spends 65k of Taypayer Money on Hotdogs Flown in From Chicago

http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/...psxj48x6fv.jpg
:1orglaugh

Yes, that's exactly what we need to do. We need to have Trump, who has no political experience, have his brand new CIA director Mike Pompeo, who has never worked in the intelligence community... order a new report? It's like the blind leading the blind.

I did a search on wikileaks and the phrase "ignorant voters" shows up 1 time and that is sourced to a document from 1975.

I also did several other searches using the words and the date that is shown in the meme you posted and I couuld not find anything in wikileaks indicating that it was ever actually said.

So, could you please show me where that was actually stated that or wikileaks shows that it was stated.

https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=...levant#results

Thanks in advance

What's up Sarettah?? Big fan! Ok so the meme states that it was someone within the HRC campaign, in an email to someone in the DNC. It's been reworded, but Email ID 4788 shows: "She doesn't want the people knowing about her relationships on Wall Street. She wants to achieve consistency and the best way to do that is to keep the people ignorant"

--> https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4788

pointed that out in a previous post in this thread , but it did not fit the agenda ... Must be Russia , because Russia has been humiliating the USA quite a bit lately ( Red line, Syria chemical weapons, Snowden, Crimea , Syria regime backing, liberating Aleppo, doing a truce .... )

Software was an old version ( not 4.1.b ) of an Ukranian shell .....

You have literally zero room to talk about the US govt. You live in Russia which is a dictatorship just isn't a Assad or Saddam style dictatorship. You have a bit more freedom than Syrians or Iraqis had except you can't pick your leader anymore than they could.

As for our military.. We at least put troops on the ground to limit the all out killing as much as possible in a war situation. Russia just wants to kill everything on the ground from the air, rearguardless of who the targets might be. A guy kicking in a door doesn't mean every kid or person in that house will die. A bomb dropped on the house does.. Both are shit, but one way doesn't kill everything just because they are in the wrong place or part of the wrong religious sect..

The email you are referencing is between 2 members of the DNC and is a quick transcript of Ben Carson's comments on MSNBC on May 13, 2016 while talking to Chris Wallace.

Go to about 9:45 in this video and you can see/hear the comment you are attributing to a member of Hillary Clinton's campaign was actually a comment by Ben Carson.



Former Presidential Candidate Dr. Ben Carson on Uniting GOP Around Trump | MSNBC - YouTube

So that hardly backs up your meme.

.

Assad was elected by the people of Syria, genius. You're an idiot. Obama goes on TV talking about the "regime" in Syria and morons like you believe that ass clown.

Hey Crockett, Obama and Hillary wanted to get rid of Assad because Assad refused to let Hillary's campaign donors the Saudi government build a pipeline through Syria. Get some facts already.

Sarettah, yes I knew they were discussing Carson's comments. I intentionally didn't mention it to see if you would pick up on it. You clearly have critical thinking skills, unlike Crockett :1orglaugh

Fact is that email was not the only one. Here's one involving Podesta the molesta:

Wikileaks: Clinton Insiders Want ?An Unaware & Compliant Citizenry?
Wikileaks: Clinton Insiders Want "An Unaware & Compliant Citizenryâ?� - Your News Wire

But about Trump you talk - i am ferst time agree with you (not):1orglaugh:1orglaugh

yes i vote for Putin(like in US for trump) - it is named Democracy! And majority people do it like me too. Only you do not like democracy - and you want to dictate own will to all, but can only cry))

Good joke :1orglaugh

Yes and + Trump win. Russia did it too.(Hackers) :1orglaugh
PS: but soros pay pets newer stop lie

In this case, two wrongs did make a right. Unless you want your government to operate in total secrecy.

I will agree that the news that Clinton had willfully deleted emails she was told to present. Saying it was a mistake shows your naivety or worse. It was bigger news than all the crap they tried to sling at Trump.

Clinton is allowed to protect her privacy, just not what she does in her job.

Yes, we do have to live with what America does. When you are as insignificant as Czech, then we won't. My cousin is involved in the wars America starts and my brother is an American along with his family.

As for the content remark, show us your sites. Everyone knows what I did. so far you want to hide what you do.

Bush and Blair took us to war when all the evidence pointed to Iraq having no WMD. That's more than a simple mistake.

Both are big shits and bad for the US. But there's a bigger problem for World politics.

We're increasingly being ruled by an elite who don't care about the 90%, vaguely care about the top 9% and love the top 1%. Which is how it was back in the 19th Century. We no longer have Government for the people, by the people.

This is because the top 10% no longer need the rest to produce their wealth. So unless they fear the 90% voting them out of a job, the 90% will continue to slowly get poorer. Not the bottom 50% which is already happening, it will work its way up the ladder. Until it hits the 60%, 70% and continue.

The strength of the people was always based on the people's ability to produce goods and services everyone used and profited from. It's the basis of trickle down. Put Third Wolrd labour forces, Automation, Tax Havens and mass migration into that mix and we have very little power.

Trump has made people realise the power of their votes. If he doesn't do a good job, vote him out. Same goes for every elected official from local councilman to the President.

Hillary is part of the status quo that's dedicated to making us poorer. And if you don't believe that, look back to the 60s/70s and see where we are now. It's a slow but determined change but it will only get worse unless you vote for change.

Your problem is thinking it's about saving people from evil dictators and that winning a war makes everything great.

Why didn't the US react to save lives in Cambodia, a country is destabilised?

Why not intervene in Rwanda, Uganda, Chile, etc? Want a clue? It's black and oozes out of the ground.

Muslims don't want you interfering in their countries. So stop the fuck doing it.

What I want is to know that our elections are secure from hackers.

You have mistake. but i am fixed it:winkwink:

Geographically challenged crew. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Outdated software compromised a computer at a power authority. Albeit, not on the grid but...they actually hired an idiot who clicks phish bait. :upsidedow

But he didn't say he will take a look at it with his people. He didn't give them any credit whatsoever. Can't you not even admit that he acts incredibly odd towards Putin. He won't criticize the guy for anything. This also isn't just the CIA, this is multiple agencies.

The CIA and Obama didn't say anything because they were trying to allow the election to play out in a democratic fashion. So that the Trumpers would have to accept it. Something the other side had no interest in. They won doing it, fine. But it is quite Patriotic to question the Trump Putin connection and if you are completely unwilling to see something odd, you are much more of a Trump supporter than a supporter of America in my opinion.

If Trump investigates and provides some facts and reports then we have a conversation. Him avoiding looking is the issue.

Dude, WTF are you talking about? Multiple agencies? Allow the election to play out?
Wrong! The CIA and Obama were sure that Hillary's dumb ass would win. And when she tells you that 17 agencies determined there was Russin hacking- Wrong! That statement was based on THIS joint statement from DHS and the director of national intelligence. It specifically says this: "However, we are NOT now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government."

---> https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/...ector-national

If something goes wrong in the Trump government

It's Russia's fault, perfect.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Its funny Robbie, you straight up sat here and argued that there was 100% a stand down order from Hillary during the Benghazi attack.

It didn't matter what anyone said you knew better. When it became absolutely proven there was no stand down order and that the entire thing was a product of Fox News making shit up.. You still wouldn't say you were wrong.

Now here you are again, claiming the same kind of BS.. Robbie and Fox News always knows best everyone...


See this is why I no longer even try to debate you, and just troll the fuck out of you. You make shit up to fit your narrative then act like your shit doesn't stink.

I've watched you do it too many times to ever give you the benefit of doubt.

Saw a reply to my post then saw this and just lost interest. Yawn.

1. I never said I was "unwilling to see something odd".
I simply pointed out that Julian Assange himself has already stated that it wasn't the Russians who gave him the email dumps he put out that showed the HORRIBLE corruption of the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.

2. It's a good thing that I don't value your opinion of my thoughts on this subject.
I'm gonna stick with my own life experience and intelligence and not your biased analysis of what I think and feel. :)

Trump and his butt buddies seem very desperately to WANT to deny what all of the intelligence agencies are saying. Do they think this might look a little fishy to every one else with common sense. You know...people who understand that Russia does this sort of thing like an ape scratches his ass.

What is going on here that's making Republicans trust Russia/Putin more than the CIA?

At what point in time has Julian Assange become an acceptable source of information?

Julian Assange is a wanted man who has been hiding in an embassy for years now only because he wants to avoid "possible" charges for a crime he "may have" committed.

And exactly what corruption did they expose? That the DNC did their job and had one of the questions in advance? OMG lock them up! What else - that they liked pizza?

There was exactly what I thought would be in that email dump. Jack fucking squat. Just a bunch of in-fighting, but mostly "nothing to see here".

Trump, on the other hand had an entire shit-storm of scandal all out in the open, but FOX news says Hillary is evil and that makes it so for half the country. You have to hand it to FOX and the Republicans....they really performed their due diligence for the last few years, and while their constant smearing of Clinton may not have cost her the election it probably tipped the scales. I'm not denying she's very responsible for the loss as well, but the general public opinion of Hilary Clinton is that she's capable, but a criminal. A criminal? How? They made old people believe that Hilary Clinton was running around the Benghazi complex with an AK47, and that the Clinton Foundation (which has helped millions of people) is a front for a criminal empire. Then there's the pizzagate thing which is just beyond stupid, and I feel sorry for the idiots who believed that. Actually, I don't feel sorry for them...I hope they die soon because they're not smart enough to be walking among the rest of us.

I look around sometimes and wonder "who are the fucking idiots in my general vicinity who put that clown show in the White House?"

1. He is the guy who released the email dumps. He knows exactly where they came from.

2. WikiLeaks has dumped over 10 million documents over the years and has a PERFECT record of being 100% correct every time. Nothing that they have ever released has ever been shown to be false.

3. The DNC colluded with the Clinton Campaign to fuck Bernie Sanders out of the nomination. That the Clinton campaign paid people to start fights at Trump rallys. That John Podesta (Clinton Campaign Manager) colluded with reporters from CNN and had them over for private dinner partys as well as getting questions ahead of time AND telling CNN what questions to ask Trump to make Clinton look better.

So when the media was screaming that Trump's "rhetoric" was causing violence at his rallys...and then it turned out that the Clinton Campaign and the DNC were paying people to start those fights...that means nothing to you?

You don't see why that is so wrong and so fucked up for our election process?

Somebody could have gotten killed because of the shit that Clinton and the DNC did with that kind of thing.
Remember...the media was saying exactly that! "Somebody is going to get killed."

Of course they were blaming it all on Trump.
Once it came to light that it was Clinton's doing...they dropped that narrative immediately.

Again, this man is in hiding and refuses to come out and face potential charges for an unrelated crime. He is most obviously not an upstanding citizen that can be trusted.

Not to mention he hasn't told us who gave him the information or provided any proof.

No, they do not have a record of being 100% correct. In most cases, we cannot verify any of their information. I cannot verify any of it. Nor can you. We think it's legit, but we don't know. Even if it is legit, it's stolen. Crimes were committed in the act of getting that information.

So... Let me see if I understand this correctly.... The DNC intentionally picked Clinton over Sanders because they thought Clinton was the path to victory? Well, gee, oh my god, that is just horrible.

That's not a crime. That's not corruption. That's called common sense.

Corruption is when the President Of The United States is charging the Secret Service rent to provide him security.

It isn't...

Well, I was lookin' everywhere for them god-darned Reds
I got up in the mornin' 'n' looked under my bed
Looked in the sink, behind the door
Looked in the glove compartment of my car
Couldn't find 'em

I was lookin' high an' low for them Reds everywhere
I was lookin' in the sink an' underneath the chair
I looked way up my chimney hole
I even looked deep inside my toilet bowl
They got away

Well, I was sittin' home alone an' started to sweat
Figured they was in my T.V. set

Exposé: Wikileaks "October Surprise" Emails proven false


dailykos.com/story/2016/10/11/1581144/-Expos-Wikileaks-October-Surprise-Emails-proven-false