200 fake news story believers

He's a huge waste of time, there's no evolution with this nick it's just hardcore alt-right cut paste talking points for months now. No industry talk, just a political troll.

Anyone calling American FBI CIA liars & fake news don't deserve the time of day :2 cents:

NBC: Intel chiefs did not brief Trump on supposed compromising material, saw it as “disinformation”

NBC: Intel chiefs did not brief Trump on supposed compromising material, saw it as ?disinformation? « Hot Air

lol
 

LOL funny...

And here it is on the actual NBC News site.

Wow...and CNN is STILL trying to say that they reported "truthfully". They are beyond being a fucking joke.

Donald Trump Wasn'''t Told About Unverified Russia Memo, Official Says - NBC News

Scandals are what drive presidency

Reporting about the existence of an opposition research document, and it's contents, is legit CNN, NBC news.

Reporting opposition research, out of context, as actual news, is what Breitbart, Fox, alt-right, etc do.

And here is an article saying Trump was briefed, and intelligence officials are defending the reasons why they briefed him.

According the article "Trump was told about the information during a meeting with top intelligence officials last Friday.".

Intel officials defend briefing Trump on unverified allegations

Did you even read that article?

Your article says the direct opposite - that Trump was briefed:

Multiple officials say that the summary was included in the material prepared for the briefers, but the senior official told NBC News that the briefing was oral and no actual documents were handed to the Trump team.

Nope it was included in the briefs as an example of disinformation.

"According to the official, the two-page summary about the unsubstantiated material made available to the briefers was to provide context, should they need it, to draw the distinction for Trump between analyzed intelligence and unvetted “disinformation.”

That fake non industry nick is a waste of your time he references fake news sites as a rebutle source to actual facts :2 cents:

You are so dense sometimes.

They said that they told him about it AFTER the briefing. And then ONLY as an example of FALSE intel.

Read CLOSER:
"A summary of the unverified reports was prepared as background material for the briefing, but not discussed during the meeting, the official said. During Trump's press conference Wednesday morning, the president-elect said he was made aware of the information "outside that meeting."

"According to the senior official, the two-page summary about the unsubstantiated material made available to the briefers was to provide context, should they need it, to draw the distinction for Trump between analyzed intelligence and unvetted "disinformation."

That must be the parts you deliberately didn't read. :disgust

And that USA Today (the GREATEST newspaper in the world :1orglaugh ) article was put out earlier in the day.

The NBC News story came out at 11 p.m. and made CNN & USA Today's b.s. stories look foolish.

and the winner is....
4chan

I know that the time on the article says 10:58 pm but it actually came out much earlier. The hotair one references the NBC article and it came out at 11:20 am.

.

so it turns out crockett posted fake news. big shock.

nice job, dipstick.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

turns out, your the one following fake news, moron.

hilary is up by 11! :1orglaugh

Funny, after all the fake news from the right was outed during the election, now everything you don't like is fake news.

Typical russian putinbot.

Robbie acting the fool once again. In typical Robbie fashion he takes one little bit of information to claim everything else is fake.

In this case, the orginal story claimed Trump was briefed on these papers. This is what officials orginaly stated.

Robbie's entire basis of denial is that a head official later came back and said Trump wasn't briefed on the full files but only a oral briefing of a 2 page summary of the details.

This is all it takes in Robbie's world to claim he's right. Such grand delusion. Sad.

Btw no where in Robbie's link does it say any of the articles or news was fake. As every article has said since the beginning, the full document has not been fully vetted or verified. This was known since day one.

No major network has ever claimed it was. Also every major news organizations has also stated exactly where the document came from. No one has tried to hide that.

This is typical right wing brainwashing at play. Just say something over and over then it becomes fact in their minds. This is why they like Trump because when he lies to them, he always says it 3 times....

In this case they claim fake news over and over until they convenience themselves, because that's what their big daddy Trump tells them to think.

Sad.

But it is fake news. Why can't you just admit that? You got trolled

JoushaMo's internet must of been shut off the last few days. He's now going mental trying to make up for his lost time here on gfy crying his days away for missing out on major Trump drama..

No its not, it's exactly what it's been said to be. No where but in your fanasty world is it not a real document.

You little nut jobs are all the same. Denial, denial, denial..

The only people who were trolled was your parents at your high school graduation, because they thought you were given an education..

It isn't a real intelligence document. MSM played fast and loose with their ethics and got trolled. Are you seriously implying that what is written in that document might actually be factual? Because if you go back to the beginning of this thread you were on the wagon believing that they were serious accusations. Now you want to pivot and act like the news was that he was told about some bullshit? You bought the troll and look like a fool. At least be a man and admit you were wrong.

you posted fake news, & thought it was real. dumbass.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Go away simpleton, I have no time for your ignorance.. I will now treat you like your Führer treats you because you are too dumb to have a conversation with.

Dude.. It was said from the beginning that it came from a former MI5 guy, that now does private contracting. Literally every major news source said this and was very open about it. No one tried to hide that, so why are you trying to make it out like it's some new thing?

The only people getting trolled is your dumb ass for not paying attention and now thinking you've suddenly found a smoking gun. This is why you Trumplets are so easily taken advantage of, because you never pay attention to the details, just the big flashy titles.

Oh and BTW your Trump daddy now admits Russia did the hacking.. FUCKING AMAZING RIGHT???!!!! So now how do you feel for being lied to and taken advantage of?

Why did DT deny Russia's involvement for so long then? Didn't he even ask Russia to hack Clinton at his last press conference?

So 6 months ago press conference Trump asks Russia to hack Clinton, then constantly denies knowing if Russia actually hacked her for 6 months, while complimenting Russia at every turn, then yesterday, 6 months later, admits Russia hacked Clinton.

Turns out the guy that wrote this is actually an extremely respected former intelligence officer and his associates are all saying that if he wrote it - it was well vetted in advance. This was evidently contracted to be done by one of Trumps earlier Republican opponents to find dirt on Trump:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...dossier-author

So it evidently is not fake news at all

i predicted trumps win, & posted my map, that came within 7 points of the truth. im a fucking ace.

you on the other hand...still shilling the usual delusional bullshit. quack away dumb liberal drone. obama & CNN have you singing their song.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes this was known since it was released. The info of him being respected and a reliable informant was said in the 1st article about these papers.

Only the Trumplets seem to ignore this info because it doesn't fit the "fake news" narrative their Führer tells them to believe. Meanwhile Trumplets here on GFY with no proof tried to call him a Russian spy because he is saying things they don't like.. Meanwhile they cry about fake news, which is code word for anything bad about the Führer..

Opposition research dossiers are done on every candidate by their opponents.

The dossiers are made for private consumption by the campaig and are composed of factual dirt actually dug up in the candidate, as well as possible lines of attacks, based on lies, that would be effective based on public perception.

If that's an actuall opposition research dossier it will have fact and fiction.

The ironic thing, is Trump used "paid" investigators in the whole Obama birth certificate witch hunt and they had no issues at all with that.. So sad how their little brains work.. Really truly, sad.

your dumber than a retard in the lunch room that sees bread & butter on the ground, picks it up, & eats it.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Um.... Allow me to highlight that for you.

Not to mention he is a birther.

While I disagree with Robbie on a lot of things, at least he can debate and there is no question that he is smart.

It seems it was the Republican party who originally hired this man to do the research...

Pretty sure his reputation is no longer respected considering his "intelligence" includes a story made up from Home Alone 2 by a 4chan troll. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Rochard, we can't "disagree" on facts. Something either happened or it didn't.

The Intelligence people had a 2 page document. They never showed it to Trump. They didn't even TALK about it in the briefing.
AFTER the briefing was over and they had all left the room together...they are walking and talking and one of them told Trump about the rumor in that document.

And he told Trump that the rumor was an example of false intel as opposed to what they were presenting him with in the actual intelligence briefing which was vetted and analyzed intel.

That's what I've been trying to say in every post I made.

Trump is right. CNN is full of shit. And if you had watched them on CNN when they cut in to interrupt the Senate confirmation hearings for the "Breaking News" you would know that.
It was Jake Tapper, Carl Bernstein, and about a half-dozen others sitting on stools with HUGE smiles on their faces.

And they proceeded to take full credit for "breaking" the story on national television and bragged about how hard they had worked over several weeks to confirm the story.

Then the next day after Trump destroyed them in the press conference AND the Intel chiefs said the story was false...THEN they tried to say that their reporting was STILL correct because they were just saying that Trump had been given a 35 page dossier in his Intel briefing.

That too turned out to be FALSE.

I'm not arguing whether Trump is "good" or "bad".
I think he's gonna be great and the economy is gonna roar. You think he's insane and sucks and it's gonna be really bad.

We aren't changing each other's minds. The truth will be revealed over the next few years as the economy either takes off...or goes tits up. :)

I'm just discussing the same thing I've been babbling about for the last 2 years....the media is so in the tank for the Democrat Party that it's lost any sense of journalistic integrity.

They are like Agent Fox Moulder on "The X Files"...they WANT to believe.
And what they want to believe is anything and everything that might hurt Trump.

That's just bad journalism.
It's no wonder the public doesn't trust them.

You are mistaken.. Robbie doesn't actually debate about facts or to find the truth. Robbie has always tried to nit pick very specific things apart to claim he wins and that he was always right.. (Remember Robbie claiming there was a stand down order in Benghazi.. we argued about that for weeks and even after it was proven false he still argued it was true, never accepting he was wrong)

Honestly, Robbie is worse than the other lemon heads, because he knows what he's doing and he doesn't care if he's pushing a false narrative, only that he can say he's right about some little detail.

The funny thing is he's still wrong about his little tiny detail in this topic.. Honestly I realize he can string two words together , which is more than the other GFY conserabros can do, but it's really no reason to give respect to someone who continues to argue half truths even when called out on it. He's knows he's lying to you which makes him worse than the other idiots who actually believe their nonsense.

Robbie is one of the worst guys here for bullshitting.

Look exactly at what he's doing here.. His entire issue to claim it's "ALL" BS is that he claims they didn't "show" Trump the 2 page document. That's his entire argument and his logic to claim all this is made up, simply because 1 official said they briefed Trump and a 2nd said they didn't. (the actual "real" difference was 1 official claimed they briefed him "with" the documents, the other claimed it was oral.. (Ie Trump was briefed either way, but just wasn't clear on how)

Robbie doesn't care about the actual facts, but rather he can say he's right therefore everything else is wrong. The funny part is he's still wrong..

Does that seem like a reasonable argument to determine if a document is fake or not?