GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Fake moon landing .. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1239820)

Pete 01-17-2017 04:07 AM

Aliens don't allow humans on the moon. Everyone knows that

XXXtrailers 01-17-2017 04:08 AM

In Moon Landing We Trust!

Paul Markham 01-17-2017 04:09 AM

Whether Man did land on the Moon or not. It was a waste of time.

Robots are the future, the cost of sending people into space, keeping them alive and bringing them back is ridiculous. Even the space station.

Pete 01-17-2017 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21458044)
Whether Man did land on the Moon or not. It was a waste of time.

Robots are the future, the cost of sending people into space, keeping them alive and bringing them back is ridiculous. Even the space station.

I always wondered why they didn't build a space station on the moon in some kind of bunker rather than in space.

wehateporn 01-17-2017 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21458023)
And the Russians never disputed that the moon landing were genuine ?

Funny that.

So the various space walks and crafts launched by the Russians, was that all faked by them ?

Or is that piece of the Space race genuine ?

What about the various dogs, monkeys, mice and bullfrogs that have apparently been in orbit ?

All bullshit ???

Or is that true ?

It's relatively simple to get into orbit, but it's not simple to send people on a 500,000 mile trip through space, land half way and then get back again. If they could do that in the 60's then in 2017 there would be day-trips available for tourists

NewNick 01-17-2017 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21458056)
It's relatively simple to get into orbit, but it's not simple to send people on a 500,000 mile trip through space,

Relatively simple to get into orbit ? Fucking nonsense.

Getting in and out of the Earths atmosphere and gravitational pull is the difficult bit.

Take off and re entry is what takes the real engineering and technological difficulty.

Sailing across the empty bit in between is the easy bit.

Idiot.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

wehateporn 01-17-2017 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 21458077)
Relatively simple to get into orbit ? Fucking nonsense.

Getting in and out of the Earths atmosphere and gravitational pull is the difficult bit.

Take off and re entry is what takes the real engineering and technological difficulty.

Sailing across the empty bit in between is the easy bit.

Idiot.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Relatively simple compared to sending a man to the moon and bringing them back alive, yes, that's why the Russians put a man in space in 1961, yet even with exponential technology improvements, over 50 years later no one has been able to send a man to the moon :2 cents:

just a punk 01-17-2017 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21456718)
Do you have any links to proof the moon landing was real, or is there no proof ( i.e. lunar rocks, lunar soil, our equipment on the moon, our foot tracks on the moon )?

It was German Moon program, not yours. Everything was done by Nazi genius Wernher Von Braun and his team. The US astronauts were used just like...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...cropped%29.jpg

Plus your money of course. Wernher Von Braun has died and the Moon program has died too. Now the States can't send even a banana into the outer space.

Bladewire 01-17-2017 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21458056)
It's relatively simple to get into orbit, but it's not simple to send people on a 500,000 mile trip through space, land half way and then get back again. If they could do that in the 60's then in 2017 there would be day-trips available for tourists

Day trips? It takes 3 days to get to the moon! Leaving and re-entering the atmosphere is not easy, and it's taxing on hardware.

The moons days last 13 days and temperatures reach 123C the nights are -153C. No water source. The list goes on.

Its not like a day trip to the desert. It's like 3 days of risking your life to reach the desert and 3 days risking your life to get back to earth.

You have a limited pool of space tourist wanting to visit the atmosphere let alone risk there life to visit a cold hot dusty rock by leaving & re-entering the atmosphere.

CaptainHowdy 01-17-2017 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 21458035)
Aliens don't allow humans on the moon. Everyone knows that

https://gfy.com/image.php?u=4726&dateline=1484652441

DownThePoole 01-17-2017 08:09 AM

There were so many people involved in this operation, it's not possible that all of them were involved in such a lie and never came out with the truth.

2MuchMark 01-17-2017 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21458044)
Whether Man did land on the Moon or not. It was a waste of time.

Top Ten Scientific Discoveries Made During Apollo Exploration of the Moon

https://airandspace.si.edu/explore-a...pollo-results/

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21458044)
Robots are the future, the cost of sending people into space, keeping them alive and bringing them back is ridiculous. Even the space station.

"To boldly go where no man has gone before" doesn't tug your heartstrings I guess...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 21458050)
I always wondered why they didn't build a space station on the moon in some kind of bunker rather than in space.

There are many reasons. The technology didn't exist (and still doesn't). But even if you could, you need energy, food, water and other resources to keep people alive. It is too expensive to bring food and water to the moon so food would have to be grown there, and water would have to be found there (which they recently did). Besides keeping everyone alive, the low gravity would cause bones and muscle mass to turn to mush. Then there's problems due to radiation, living in a closed environment and other things that need to be addressed.

I'm all for a Moonbase Alpha type place, but it's a really big deal...



Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21458086)
Relatively simple compared to sending a man to the moon and bringing them back alive, yes, that's why the Russians put a man in space in 1961, yet even with exponential technology improvements, over 50 years later no one has been able to send a man to the moon :2 cents:

No, NewNick is right. The hardest part is leaving the earth, and returning. Leaving the earth requires a shit-ton of energy and fuel. Once in orbit, a few seconds of energy is only needed to push the capsule out of orbit and towards the moon. The ship uses almost no fuel during the trip, and the stresses on the ship are much less. Of course there are all kinds of other things to worry about during the trip, but I think its less than escape and re entry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 21457165)
Having worked at Launch Complex 39 at KSC for more than a few years I ...

No. fucking. way. Did you really??!? really really? Wow!


Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21457333)
Even Kubrick left messages that he filmed it



(For those who don't know, this is a documentary called "Room 237" about "The Shining" movie).

When I first heard about this movie I really wanted to see it. If you like the movie The Shining, its great. It contains all kinds of interesting ideas about the movie, its references, filming techniques, etc.

But the guy who made this movie is also a quack. He thinks continuity errors are on screen on purposes, and, he thinks the movie contains a hidden message claiming the landings were fake. It is so beyond stupid, and it is such a stretch that I dismissed most of the rest of the movie. Too bad.

Pete 01-17-2017 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 21458344)

LMFAO!!:1orglaugh

DBS.US 01-17-2017 09:38 AM

If you know your U.S. history and know why we would fake it, you know if we did.

Bladewire 01-17-2017 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US (Post 21458701)
If you know your U.S. history and know why we would fake it, you know if we did.

We didn't fake it. We went to the moon, and back :thumbsup

john1975 01-17-2017 10:14 AM

overwhelming evidence we've never made it to the moon, and anybody trying to convince us otherwise is probably Gov. / NASA themselves...

The technology available in the 60's would of made it impossible. If it was so easy, why hasn't any country (including our own) been back since? The moon is the most interesting near-earth object...yet we completely ignore it like it's not even there. Lets instead spend $billions$ more trying to get to Mars...where we've only had a 50% success rate so far. (or less)

Pete 01-17-2017 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john1975 (Post 21458767)
overwhelming evidence we've never made it to the moon, and anybody trying to convince us otherwise is probably Gov. / NASA themselves...

The technology available in the 60's would of made it impossible. If it was so easy, why hasn't any country (including our own) been back since? The moon is the most interesting near-earth object...yet we completely ignore it like it's not even there. Lets instead spend $billions$ more trying to get to Mars...where we've only had a 50% success rate so far. (or less)

because there are aliens on the far side of the moon.

john1975 01-17-2017 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete (Post 21458848)
because there are aliens on the far side of the moon.

0:20 seconds into clip

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvoJHjbiXr0

rogueteens 01-17-2017 11:38 AM

The US sent men to the moon, its a fact for the simple reason that the one country that could have blown their "faked" story stayed silent even though they could have numerous reasons to blow a lie apart - the old USSR

Bladewire 01-17-2017 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john1975 (Post 21458767)
overwhelming evidence we've never made it to the moon, and anybody trying to convince us otherwise is probably Gov. / NASA themselves...

The technology available in the 60's would of made it impossible. If it was so easy, why hasn't any country (including our own) been back since? The moon is the most interesting near-earth object...yet we completely ignore it like it's not even there. Lets instead spend $billions$ more trying to get to Mars...where we've only had a 50% success rate so far. (or less)

If we never went to the moon, how have we been using the retroflectors we put on there? Are you saying Russia verifying their existence means Russia is lying too? The territories were put there during the Apollo mission in '69, you know, USA Americans on the moon :thumbsup

"The first successful tests were carried out in 1962 when a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology succeeded in observing laser pulses reflected from moon's surface using a laser with a millisecond pulse length. Similar measurements were obtained later the same year by a Soviet team at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory using a Q-switched ruby laser.

Greater accuracy was achieved following the installation of a retroreflector array on July 21, 1969, by the crew of "Apollo 11", and two more retroreflector arrays left by the "Apollo 14" and "Apollo 15" missions have also contributed to the experiment.

Successful lunar laser range measurements to the retroreflectors were first reported by the 3.1 m telescope at Lick Observatory, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Lunar Ranging Observatory in Arizona, the Pic du Midi Observatory in France, the Tokyo Astronomical Observatory, and McDonald Observatory in Texas.







PR_Glen 01-17-2017 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 21457165)
Having worked at Launch Complex 39 at KSC for more than a few years I can tell you there was nothing fake about the lunar landings.

If you look at the site referenced most of the arguments that it was faked stem from the lack of knowledge of basic physics,,,,its well know the flag was a foil like substance made to look like it was blowing in the wind, which there is none...no stars...really are you that dumb? stars are magnified by the earths atmosphere plus the light gathering ability of cameras in the 60s wasnt exactly sensitive enough to capture the very dim light from stars..one light source huh apparently this moron doesnt know that from the lunar surface the earth is very large and it reflects light from the sun...theres 2 HUGE light sources...Imprints...hello gravity or lack thereof.

Everytime I read some moron who uses these args it makes me wonder what they actually did learn in science class this is all very basic very simple stuff....

SMFH

come on, you are really going to come back at us with basic physics? that hasn't been taught to people at capacity for decades now. clearly it isn't important! If it were we may even believe the facts of the matter or even understand why they are facts at all! Not to mention the logic involved ie if it was something we couldn't do wouldn't it make more sense not to push their luck by faking it fucking 5 more times?? not to mention the numerous fly by's we did first!

next you are going to tell me that nasa released over 1400 images taken from the moon itself!

Bladewire 01-17-2017 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 21459001)
come on, you are really going to come back at us with basic physics? that hasn't been taught to people at capacity for decades now. clearly it isn't important! If it were we may even believe the facts of the matter or even understand why they are facts at all! Not to mention the logic involved ie if it was something we couldn't do wouldn't it make more sense not to push their luck by faking it fucking 5 more times?? not to mention the numerous fly by's we did first!

next you are going to tell me that nasa released over 1400 images taken from the moon itself!

What are you trying to say?

john1975 01-17-2017 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens (Post 21458950)
The US sent men to the moon, its a fact for the simple reason that the one country that could have blown their "faked" story stayed silent even though they could have numerous reasons to blow a lie apart - the old USSR

werd..

you can gather a lot more information by staying quiet, when your gut instinct tells you the opposite.

why do u think the CIA lies so much..? It's all to keep relations happy, and business profitable.

Pete 01-17-2017 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john1975 (Post 21458935)

That's proof right there

Bladewire 01-17-2017 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 21457369)
America sucks tho...

Only if you're in a U.S. Government building with Crucifissio :winkwink:

http://i.imgur.com/44l9Zyh.gif




romeo22 01-17-2017 01:13 PM

yes the best real movie


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc