![]() |
Quote:
If you oppose Trump by posting, you are making no difference other than demonstrating the need for enhanced spell checking. If you actually care what happens, then call a few friends in swing states and convince them to vote next time. |
Quote:
"Staging a no-fly zone requires either the assent of regional allies ... or an expensive, open-ended and risky deployment of aircraft carrier groups to the eastern Mediterranean." Considering the GOP would probably still have won a ton of seats even if Clinton took the big prize, getting this kind of thing approved could take a very long time and a lot of effort. It seems like a rash plan, but she had to say something strong on the ISIS front to counter Trump's "number one tricky" plan of "getting rid of ISIS in 30 days." She was waging a war of sound bites by October, as we all know, and losing badly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The real issue is 77,000 votes in three states. Call your friends. Don't judge, listen. Urge them to vote. Drive them if needed. That will actually make a difference. |
Quote:
https://www.google.com/maps/@31.891534,11.1095509,3.08z Take a look at how close Europe is to the hornet's nest...and how far away we are in geographical terms. That counts for a whole lot as it pertains to radical Islam problems. |
Quote:
It sounds like you've been through a lot of political shakeup in your lifetime. That's good experience to advise people who are looking at the possibility of the same in the States. Do you honestly believe that the Muslims being allowed into the States as the very slow trickle of highly vetted refugees were going to be a problem down the road? Would money not be better spent making sure that American mosques don't have any radical leaders in them, and making sure the children are being sent to mainstream schools instead of traditional Muslim schools? Surely there must be a better way than an all-out ban? |
weak parasites who live off the state, who all got a participation ribbons cannot deal with reality
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Economist (slightly left leaning) Al Jazeera English The Washington Post (used to be right leaning?) The Guardian The CBC (very left leaning) PBS News Hour (fairly balanced from what I have seen so far) NHK World BBC World and I keep an eye on RT America for shits n giggles. I tried reading Breitbart, but their "articles" were all opinion pieces with no actual sources and their titles are just obnoxious clickbait. I wouldn't consider them a news source at all. I haven't read the Drudge Report in years. Huffington Post is like "AOL News:lite". It's just as click-baity as Breitbart. 77k votes are the real issue? I disagree. I think the real issue at hand is Trump driving the bus off a cliff to prove that he is in control of the steering wheel. 77k votes are a project for a few years from now. |
Quote:
We'll then we'll agree to disagree. I think the Sturm und Drang is pointless, and we need to focus on 18 and 20 with real preparation and action. If you believe there is another way, then best of luck. |
Quote:
I think "sturm und drang" might be a misnomer, as that seems to be what Trump's approach was to the election and the response is quite logical and reasoned as a pushback against his alternative-fact appeal to emotions above all else. |
a) did you try to leave your mass media bubble for a while ? as long as there will be loonies and bad guys, there will be always a terror...it is not something to get rid off by 100 %... how many people are dying in car accidents per year in France and how many in terrorists attacks (that are not car "accidents" lol) ? if you are sheep to be ruled by fear, well then you are sheep. Not saying that letting in milions of people without any checks on them was a wise thing to do though
b) too bad that you are hero Trump was saying completely different thing back then when the war in Iraq just started. You are putting so much faith in this guy that is rather funny and amusing, he is your ideal cure for all your bitterness, maybe you will get wiser after few years and see that this change wasnt actually for better but for worse. but it will be too late prolly for that, like it is always is for short sighted people. Quote:
|
and yeah, this thread wouldn't be complete without femdomdestiny's input of course :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:winkwink::winkwink::winkwink:
|
Elli,
The Economist - Rothschild i.e. Western propaganda Al Jazeera - Western propaganda for the Arab world (a small bit of truth thrown in too now and again) The Washington Post - Fake News The Guardian - Well written and sourced, but also filled with propaganda (global warming, vaccines, EU etc) The CBC - Fake News PBS News Hour - Fake News NHK World - I've never tried it, will check it out BBC World - BBC is official Western propaganda RT America - Very good choice, they will tell you things that your own media won't. Of course they have their own propaganda about their own country, but they are in a position to tell you the truth about US/Europe. If you want to find out some stories which the mainstream media are trying to avoid, you will often find it posted here https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Honestly reminds me of my friend's divorce where every single thing the other person does is seen from the most damning perspective, and they are treated as the basest demon wearing flesh. We'll have to agree to disagree again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
More FAKE NEWS
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Coolest conspiracy theory on GFY for long time.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But hey, thanks for the compliment. :banana:banana |
Quote:
And that is a dangerous combination in our industry. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc