Sessions is spoiled goods -- NEXT!

Trump has not been convicted of any 'crime.' Being really fat and ugly is not a crime. Distorting the truth is not a crime either -- we don't have the jail space :laughing-

Contempt of Court and Perjury are crimes however ...

you guys are getting desperate :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Now we find out that someone from the Senate Committee on Armed Services met with the Russian government TWICE and failed to notify the State Department about it? LOL.

This is fucking hysterical.

or you to attack trumpy :)

One goal is to get Trump under oath and that will take time, likely years, as it President Clinton, unless another big undeniable scandal pops up.

About what? Trump didn't do anything but win a fucking election :1orglaugh

Senator Special ... Link, what party?

NEWS FLASH!!!


Donald Trump Jr. likely paid at least $50,000 for event held by hosts linked to Russia - MarketWatch

Looks like the ACLU is getting in on the fun...

https://www.aclu.org/news/aclu-calls...rjury-sessions

“Jeff Sessions took an oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and it is now clear that he broke that oath in his confirmation hearing. If senators of both parties allow an attorney general nominee to plainly lie under oath with no repercussions, they will render our government’s cabinet confirmation process no more than kabuki theater. This matter must not and cannot be seen as a partisan issue, as it goes to the heart of the credibility of our democracy. The American people deserve a full investigation into whether Sessions perjured himself and if he is indeed fit to serve as our nation’s highest law enforcement official. No one is above the law — certainly not those sworn to uphold it.”

Republicans are just digging their own grave trying to ignore this shit by playing party politics.

Nice!

Cue the multiple pro Putin fake nics to troll

ACLU will now be liberal bias fake news!

The ACLU IS fake liberal news

Actually, THAT would probably be Trump, and by bar, you probably mean mini bar...

http://blondethumb.com/wp-content/up...-978497700.jpg

Although Trump told us there was no communication between his campaign the Russian government.... We have Flynn, Sessions, and now two others..... How much further does this go?

Exclusive: Two other Trump advisers also spoke with Russian envoy during GOP convention

OMG OMG the russians!!! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

And now we find out that Trump's son in law took meetings with the Russian government at Trump Tower? LOL.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/u...ssia.html?_r=0

Redhats here are mostly foreigners, and love Russia because Trump loves Russia, they will see no problem with colluding with Russia, Russian espionage etc.

As he should have. And as Flynn should have.
As ALL incoming transition teams do. Even the NY Times (which has openly stated that they are anti-Trump and have no journalistic credibility with their bias) says in the link you provided:
"It is common and not improper for transition officials to meet with foreign officials."

Of course it is. Obama did it. Bush did it and all the way back to when Adams followed Washington as our second President.

Everyone at that level is smart enough to start getting their ducks in a row.

The truly unprecedented political move was Pres. Obama putting sanctions on Russia during his final days as President.
A politically clever way to lay landmines for Trump's first month in office.

He started a major confrontation with the 2nd most powerful country on Earth and gave all the Democrat politicians a beautiful way to delay and hurt Trump's administration.

Clever and smart politically by Pres. Obama. TERRIBLE for the country.

I know that every anti-Trump person is just loving this. That's cool.

But when you really think about it...you know very well that Pres. Obama did it intentionally and knew how it would play out.
He would NEVER have put sanctions on Russia in the final days of his lame duck period if Hillary had won the election.

Instead he would have worked closely with her and her team to make sure that the U.S. relationship with Russia was as good as he could get it.

But I suppose that everyone who hates Trump with blind passion finds this to be at least one thing that can make them smile.

As we saw at the speech in front of Congress...the Democrat politicians sat on their hands and did NOT applaud when Trump said he wanted to work together to help American families get better jobs and rise up.

Put them in a horrible light. Who the hell DOESN'T want that? And yet...they did not applaud and instead made grimacing faces. Nancy Pelosi just looked bad doing that.

But at least President Obama gave them this parting gift.
So instead of working with Trump on the important issues that were promised to the American people: jobs, trade, immigration, security....the Democrats can keep everything in chaos over John Podesta's emails that revealed the truth about Hillary Clinton.

And his email password was "password". lol
Great security there!

Dude you live in a fairy land. Flynn and Sessions both were talking to Russians BEFORE Trump won. You are trying to rewrite history to make your excuses.

If Obama had done this you would have raged until you busted a blood vessel. What they did is illegal.

It wasn't about the blowjob, it was lying about the blowjob.

Just as a reminder....

Much, Much worse than lying about making deals with Russians..

We have a winner for dumbest lib-tard comment of the day!

:1orglaugh

Prosecutor: appointed by AG or Congress (republican)

Sticking With Trump, Republicans Resist Call for Broader Russian Inquiry

Bingo. And that's the reason Trump fired Flynn. For lying to Pence.

As for Sessions...He was asked specifically if anyone in the Trump campaign had met with any Russian officials.
He said that he had no knowledge of any of that happening.

Sessions was a U.S. Senator. Not a member of the staff of the Trump campaign.
He was just a Senator who endorsed Trump.

So if Hillary had won...would we have investigated Elizabeth Warren for anyone she talked to? Or Chuck Schumer? Or any other govt. official based on which candidate they endorsed?

Meanwhile truly important things are being slowed down as the Trump administration has to deal with political b.s.

And if you hate Trump and want him to fail that is a good thing. Stop him from doing things you disagree with.

If you're like me, and want to see new trade deals, tax reform, and new job growth...then it's a bad thing that's going on.

Hillary lost. John Podesta's emails that were put out by Wiki Leaks 8 MONTHS before the election didn't cause that.
She was a terrible candidate put forward by a political party that is on life support this year.

Hopefully, the Democrat Party will stop shooting themselves in the foot...perform an "autopsy" that identifies the REAL reasons that they have lost all power in the local, state, and Federal govt.'s
But the longer they act like spoiled brats and make themselves look like sore losers...the longer it will be before they are able to get new blood into their party and push forward a more "working man's" agenda.

I was hoping that they would do that immediately after the election. But..it looks to me like this could lead to them losing even more ground in the 2018 elections. :(

well - Sessions said that "he has been called a surrogate" during the Trump campaign - which kind of makes him part of the campaign, no?


but I completely agree about the Democratic party - besides Bernie.

but otherwise i do read a lot of butthurt and no real solutions from them

Calling someone a "surrogate" doesn't make them a member of the Trump Campaign staff.
Especially a high-powered U.S. Senator who was sitting on the Armed Services Committee in the Senate.

I could call you a "surrogate" for the Democrat Party of the U.S. because you are always taking that side in debate.
But it doesn't mean that you are a part of the Democrat Party.

Here is the actual question from Sen. Al Franken and the answer from Sessions:

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.

SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."

Now you can take that as Sessions "lying" or you can take it as Sessions telling Franken that he was not a part of the Trump campaign and did not have meetings with Russian officials during the campaign and on behalf of the campaign.

According to The Washington Post Sessions spoke with the Ambassador from Russia in July and Sept. of 2016.

The Wiki Leaks dump happened in March of 2106

And when Sessions spoke to the ambassador...every media outlet in the U.S. was saying that every poll showed Trump LOSING in a landslide (remember those fake polls and fake news?)

Was Sessions really meeting with the Ambassador to talk about how to "meddle" in the election when the email dump had already happened months before?
Or was he meeting to discuss the sanctions...that had not even been talked about by Obama yet because he thought Hillary was going to win? (the sanctions happened in Obama's final days of Jan. 2017 as a "fuck you" to Trump)

Or was Sessions just doing his job as a senior high-ranking member of the Senate?

If you hate Trump...then you believe that Sessions was definitely working as a Russian spy.
If you like Trump, then the whole thing is just stupid.

Obviously I voted for Trump. I want to see his economic agenda realized. This shit is slowing it down.
Democrats are against him 100%, even if the things he wants are good...they will still be against it because if they can make him fail they will regain power.

Same stupid shit the Republicans did to Pres. Obama.

The Establishment in Washington D.C. does NOT want Trump to succeed. They want him to fail spectacularly so that no other non-politician will ever dare to run for President again.

Robbie pretends to ignore me because he can't man up when I call him out for his bullshit. Meanwhile he's always posting in my topics meaning he reads everything I type.. :error

Anyway, what Robbie is trying to bullshit everyone about is he's claiming this is a "Trump/Sessions" thing as in He didn't lie to Trump.. The thing Robbie keeps ignoring and triers to bullshit threw is that Sessions "lied" under oath to Congress. Session committed perjury.

He committed so much fucking perjury that when you search the definition of perjury, it's all about Sessions.. :1orglaugh

https://www.google.com/search?q=purg...tf-8#q=perjury

Robbie the Republican apologist will never stop trying to bullshit people...Why do you guys keep responding to him like he's not another dumbass JoushaMo..

Holeeee sheeeit your head is so far down in that Trump sand. How much Russia smoke do you need to have an idea that maybe the TRump campaign and Russia were/are cozy in a way that is very shady at the very least? Every other day we're hearing about "this person and that person" close to Trump were meeting with Russians while they were hacking our election. You have political blinders on, but I'm just calling a spade a spade.

Fuck you. :)

No...fuck you. You're so full of shit. Full of it up to your "neutral" eyeballs.

Guess it's time to send you on your way. You have met all the criteria for blocking someone.
1. You are useless to the industry. You can't make me one thin dime
2. You are a disrespectful keyboard warrior.

Good luck to you in whatever it is you do for a living. Have a nice life. Goodbye to you. :)

Have fun being wrong all the time.

Dont worry he will still post in all your topics while claiming to ignore you.

Cry me a river -- Fuck Sessions
He's just another Alberto Gonzales

https://s14.postimg.org/iw6s9foc1/DOJ_monkey.png

Sessions: "I was involved in the (Trump) campaign."

This guy must be a really dumb lawyer...he just keeps on talking and thus digs the hole deeper on himself.

Skip to the 6:00 minute mark:

Wait, I thought Sessions "wasn't part of the Trump campaign"? Then how was he still able to access a Trump campaign spending account to travel to the GOP convention??

From the Wall Street Journal:
"Jeff Sessions Used Political Funds for Republican Convention Expenses

Records show attorney general used campaign account for travel expenses to Cleveland, where he met Russian envoy"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/jeff-se...ses-1488509301

I disagree. Did the Russians go to the Democratic convention and have secret meetings with Clinton?

Why is it that there are twenty-seven members of the Armed Forces Committee, yet only one of them meet with the Russian government, behind closed doors, and why wasn't the State Department involved?

If there is nothing wrong with the Trump campaign meeting with Russian agents, why did Flynn resign? Why did Sessions lie about it under oath? Why are they hiding all of this?

If this is perfectly normal, why didn't the Trump administration come out and say "Well of course we met with the Russians. Every campaign does".