![]() |
Ein Hundert! :321GFY
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
:glugglug |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nobody is all evil just as nobody is all good. |
If evil is relative, then it boils down to this: Saying something is evil is disagreeing with the justifiability of doing it. It is irrational and inconsistent to advocate evil.
|
Quote:
Hitler was driven by his beliefs, just like the muslim terrorist is driven to flight a fucking airplane into a building. Evil? What is the definition of evil? Someone enlighten me. Evil is relative. Evil is what humans define it to be. There is always two sides to each coin, some think it was the right thing to do, other don't. Hitler was emotional and determined. And he managed to motivate millions of others to follow his plan. What I do not understand is how he could get his followers to believe that Jews were scum that deserved to be thrown in a ghetto, later gasses and burned to ashes. Mind blowing and shocking. |
Quote:
Your pilot light is out, fool. Keep on reaching!!!!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Saddam's birthday bash kicks off in a week or so. I bet that's one hell of a party.
|
Quote:
rock on...danzig |
Rednecks don't have girlfriends that look like Caroline.
|
Quote:
just another Evil German. except I know for a FACT he prefers Black and Asian girls. ;) |
Quote:
So are you not accusing me of what your life revolves around? That being glorifying an aspect of evil you find appealing? Which would be glorifying evil. |
Quote:
good band...for a german:Graucho |
Quote:
;) |
Quote:
Even those who wish to glorify what other people call "evil" do not, themselves, advocate that which they feel is evil. "Evil", if it is relative, means "the stuff I think people shouldn't do". It just doesn't make sense to say "I should do what I shouldn't do." Of course, if Evil isn't relative like that, then it is absolute. In that case, we each have our own opinion but only some of us are right. In that case, when we say evil, we mean "the thing I am guessing is actually absolutely evil". |
danzig - mother :thumbsup
|
Quote:
The idea that a single individual could be responsible for all of it is hero worship. Edison had over 1,000 patents; his muckers had none- until they left him. Not smarter than any of them. He was just a fuckin' name. *Many* scientific geniuses of fair conscience and free spirit fled Hitler and the Reich. Individuals can deviate. Nazis can't; they ape and follow orders; they implement a program; they minimize invention, that organic peculiarity. As we move from the industrial / machine age into the information age, great advances are born of individuals, or teams that could not function efficiently within nationalism. The genius of hitler is an outgrowth of a particular age of technology. |
Quote:
That is true. That's why W. von Braun and his crew willingly left post-war Germany to continue their great doings for the opposition. Fucking sellouts. |
the most simple definition of evil is:
'Characterized by anger.' anger keeps me focused. |
I don't really give a fuck about what people do to one another as long as it doesn't affect me, but this is evil. :(
|
<a href=http://www.dowhatthouwilt.com>'Do what Thou wilt, shall be the Whole of The Law.'</a>
|
Quote:
think about the number of chemicals in that computer you post from and what it toook to get there before you make such comments. where will you 'throw it away.?' 'throw away society,' early chapter in FUTURE SHOCK ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bush/Republicans was/is definitely proof that this works. cept its flags instead of swastikas. |
Quote:
99% of artificial products can be tested straight on humans given enough knowledge of organic and biological chemistry, with little or no harm to the test subjects. We also have the ability to manufacture the same products with little or no waste and damage to the environment. The proof - clandestine chemists push the boundaries of drug production with deadly chemicals every day, and skilled ones can create brand new legal analogues whilst protecting their subjects and creating minimal waste and damage to the biomass. Testing on helpless animals and environmental damage from industry are totally unnecessary and the fuck it up for everyone, and are just a function of the evil of corporate greed. But that's getting a bit off topic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
;) |
Quote:
|
think about it when you toss your garbage out hippie.
http://www.svtc.org/hightech_prod/desktop.htm you post messages from a machine that goes against your argument. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
At least I don't live in a country which produces thousands of tons of nuclear waste every day. Once again, though, that wasn't my point, my focus was on the morality of torturing animals for human gain. That to me is an almost universal example of evil. |
|
Quote:
You were talking about Hitler and such, not animals. You alone were the person who changed the topic to animals and scientific experiments. your focus was off topic, dont try to side step now. you brought it up, i was simply posting the ignorance behind your thoughts. and i wont point it out again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You were the one who posted the statistics that backed up my assertions, you were the one who brought out the peta hippie stuff... not me. Ignorance? Maybe you should stick to the design and leave the science to those of us who have a little practical experience. Bye. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
yet again you prove your ignorance. Quote:
hahaha |
I also think that hitler was a "genius".. but let me make myself clear, he was mad, just like any mad scientist.
the skill this man had to speak in public, to convince, to lift the spirits of the depressed. for 1 man to take a shattered country and, with it, take over most of Europe... I am sorry, but if you dont call that pure "genius", then I dont know what is genius for you :winkwink: nonetheless, he was mad. there is NO excuse for the holocaust. We cannot call it conquest, that is for sure... he used in one of the speeches : "who remembers the armenians anyways?" (referring to the armenian genocide in 1915), this guy totally thought that what he was doing was right... enough about hitler, time to watch some porn :thumbsup |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Honestly I don't see why you've got such a bee up your ass about this. I guess the reason that you have to introduce all the bullshit and make stuff up is because you realise that you can't back your statements up and you don't want to backpeddle. |
Quote:
look, he's doing it again! hahaha Quote:
Its funny to watch the un-educated challenge a team that specifies knowledge in this area. http://www.svtc.org/hightech_prod/desktop.htm Call em and tell them they are wrong you desktop chemical expert, youre a joke. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition 760 N. First Street San Jose, CA 95112 Phone: +1 408-287-6707 what a joke. keep reaching boy. Quote:
Quote:
you back it up by this so called education you dont have. you challenge things you have no facts to back up. you are the one with nothing to back up and keep back peddling. |
i thought you were leaving?
cant stop thinking about me? hahaha |
Quote:
|
:321GFY Hitler and anyone that thinks he was good for any fucking thing. Some of you will look back when you get older and think (if you have anything left to think with by then) and say god but wasn't I a fucked up mess when I was young.
:321GFY Hilter :321GFY and his kind |
For some reason, this thread comes to mind when reading this post. In that thread, everyone was so quick to mention that he was being praised for his skills as a director, and the fact that he was a child rapist in no way should take away from that.
When you mention Hitler, the first thing that pops into everyone's head is the final solution. The fact is, Hitler led a very interesting life, and there is much more to him than merely the final solution. What he did to Germany in a matter of years was simply incredible. So i ask this; why is it okay to praise a child rapist as a brilliant director, but not to praise a genocidal mass murderer as a brilliant politician? |
Quote:
Do you fuck Goats? I'm Serious do you? |
You are linking to statistics that you clearly can't read to prove a point that doesn't even relate to my initial argument. Somehow you've managed to go off on a tangent and leave the original point far in the distance, and you just keep pointing to your little table of data which is irrelevant without a context in which to analyze it.
A high post count and abuse are a poor substitute for logical debate, and it seems pointless tying to argue with someone who focuses on the former. Why even bother? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
einhundert und fuenfzig !
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc