Fiddy western world invasion and final conquering proponents.

Nothing buy facts here. Something libtards cannot deny. :thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

why not get your facts straight first?

neither your numbers nor the turn of events is remotely true

i'm always up for a reasonable debate - but without name calling and staying true to what really happened.

none of that applies to your post - so i rather do something else than waste my time here

your usual drivel. you take an event WITH NO FACTS. NO CONTEXT WHATSOEVER... and respond with a baseless emotional reaction, compare current US policy to McCarthyism or worse (as if you even know what McCarthyism was without looking it up) and suggest we'll all look back and be ashamed - and then want to adopt the position that you don't understand how others might find that insulting or offensive.

first of all, its none of your fucking business WHO gets admitted to another country. you don't even live on this side of the globe. seems to me, Germany has more than its share of issues to deal with the 1,000,000 refugee disaster... and also, while we're here,... thanks for sending the 9/11 terrorists our way.

you continually take drive-by shots at others, insulting people and their views and beliefs in your posts and then when challenged, adopt a holier than thou attitude, declare yourself above it all and walk away.

you're an intellectual midget, pussy and coward.

you don't want "reasonable debate" or discussion. saying "we'll all look back and be ashamed" (particularly in the context of your non-stop far left posts), along with your sprinkling of other shots at another nation and its people when politics is discussed, is hardly the starting point for "reasonable debate". you don't want a solution, you want to point fingers. you don't have answers. you have criticisms. you don't want to debate, you want to say "you're wrong about everything" and then run and hide.

like ********** and others on your far side of the political spectrum (though ignorant of this, you think you're just "right"), that is never your intent. you simply get emotional about an issue and post emotionally charged rants to vent like a hysterical woman and take subtle shots here and there at others. even worse, you won't even begin to consider the view points of others yet insist you're always up for "reasonable debate" as a parting shot which is pure bullshit and not true at all. thats why i think you're a fucking twat.

and by the way... thats what? the 1000th time you've finished with "i've got better than things to do than...blah blah blah post here"?.... yet here you are posting here every day. clearly you don't have better things to do.

http://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/f...nal% 20v2.pdf

So, Trumpspeek wants you to believe that we should create a bad public relations display over a small group of Afghan girls that want travel visas to enter a robotics contest in the US. The Afghans thank you for your insincerity. This is how we MAGA and win the hearts and minds of the world. Rubbish!

And i just realized another thing, Stefan.. Afghanistan isn't even on the list of nations for the TEMPORARY travel ban, you fucking retard.... and after a cursory review of the facts (something you have no interest in) - competitors from Iran and Sudan (which are on the list) WERE granted visas.... a fact which of course didn't make a catchy headline for an agenda and click bait driven media.


but again, you guys don't need facts to drive your agenda, you just need emotion... and thats enough.

did not read^^ don't care

LOL

obviously you do care if is important enough to you to respond.

No it's not. He promised to ban some Muslim Countries, he carried out that ban. Much to the dislike of the libtards.

Needs to be repeated.

All very good, but these people are Brown. So it all changes.

Okay then let's have a reasonable debate. Where does it say someone has a right to visit another country?

Until I see the average Muslim denouncing terrorism, ISIS, et al my feeling is simple: keep ALL Muslims out of America. They (the Muslims) are not interested in integrating or assimilating ANYWHERE and view their presence as a sort of subtle warfare.

Again, let me see/hear average everyday Muslims - good, hard-working average people who just want a better life and to take care of their family - let me see/hear THEM denounce terrorism and open the mosques and denounce Sharia law. THEN they can come live amongst us. Not until then, sorry.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

US foreign policy and US allies in the middle east created/funded/armed alqaeda and ISIS...muslims all over the world already speak against US foreign policy, I do not understand what more you can ask for?

as for shariah law, you do not understand what it is like most people here...googling some shit and copy pasting "western journalism" about what shariah "really is", does not mean you know anything...if you did know what it really was you would not mention it at all...but you did and this proves your ignorance on the subject....

the middle east has been at war since the dawn of civilization itself. islam has been at war with itself for 14 centuries.

the USA did not cause either.

just as the USA is not causing CONSTANT muslim on muslim terrorism, murder and violence in the middle east today.

nice try.

Not only that, but it was a TEMPORARY travel ban of only 90 days to simply buy time to put processes and procedures in place to deal with travel requests from those countries who lack any real controls on their end.

Only Two Afghan girls refused visas to the United States for a robot-building competition.:2 cents:

so has christianity...murdering each other for the last 14 centuries...much more so than any other part of the world...

your government and foreign policy is the cancer of the world...your country is addicted to war and war inc. is too big to fail...you may proceed to pretend like this is not so, it is very amusing...

you're right. Islam is quite the success story.

You're not in your homeland because you have a failed government, and you point at America as the source of the worlds problems, not sadam, Assad, Kim Jong Un, China, etc. Everything's America's fault with you :1orglaugh

or... from his very own homeland....

QFT:

But I will add that I do not believe in a single "bad guy" or Boogieman (and I do not mean Barry White, I believe in him). That's a convenience for the dull-minded. It's easier to point one finger at something and claim "That's the problem!" when, in fact, it's often a combination of many, many factors. IS there a "military industrial complex"? Of course - President Eisenhower (a Republican, for those who care) warned us about it when he left Office in 1960. If it was a concern fifty+ years ago imagine how massive it must be now.

So it's basically a pox on everyone's house as far as I'm concerned. Every country and faction has its' part to play. Me? I'm a pacifist. Make love, not war, etc etc etc.

Dude you have a dedicated invasion force that is the biggest employer on planet earth and you have invaded more countries than the Roman empire and dropped more bombs than WW 1&2 combined and 2 nukes and half your spending is on more war...

You are literally cancer LOL

No, that cannot be true !!!!!

Pretty much because spastically no one is a terrorist. It is a super small subset of humanity.

I feel the same way actually. There are no innocent parties. There are no single causes.

At least, these people will understand that they have to stop violence in name of religion.

Why just America?

He ignores all but US violence as if it doesn't happen. He doesn't even acknowledge violence his fellow countrymen did when murdering 100,000s of Muslims.

what other violence was there where the USA was not involved? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

https://williamblum.org/images/uploa...ntions_map.png

Does anyone know if they have found the missing team from Burundi yet?

Why is the travel ban a sad day for America?

The travel ban, in my opinion, doesn't go nearly far enough. He should ban all migration except for a few who can pass a rigorous test. The top criteria would be, do you adhere to a religion, creed, sect or group that doesn't respect the values of the country you're entering.

Billionaires aren't interested in fair. Or even the damage they cause, they're only interested in their profits.

This is one way they save the costs of teaching Americans to do the jobs. The EU is in favour of this system.

What does the OP want? A policy on migration like the EUs, where anyone can get into a boat and enter the EU. Or a policy like Australias where only people who will benefit Australia is allowed in?

He needs to come clean because all the terrorist recent atacks are attributed to migration, along with homelessness, poverty, low wages, unemployment, etc. The UK would be far better off if it had stricter migration policies.

http://www.poverty.org.uk/47/dh.png

http://www.poverty.org.uk/06/a.png

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...men-unemployed

It's not just the First generation we need to be concerned about. It's the second, third and fourth generations.

The OP carries the guilt of Hitler, be careful you don't repeat that guilt. Hitler was aided in his rise to power by Europe's hatred of the Jews. A sect that had not integrated into European society enough to be accepted after living there for 1,000 years. Does he expect the current crop of migrants to integrate into the West quicker than that?

Religion is meant to keep a group apart from its neighbours. Be they Mormon's, Catholic, Jews, Muslims, etc. It's only recently with the rise of agnostics and atheist that we look past a man's creed or colour and start thinking what does he bring to the table. And sadly most migrants don't bring anything.

Yeah! The USA does not want any more people in its stolen land! They used the resources of their former countries to cleanse the injuns and then commited treason and now they legit 101%...patriots and shit LOLly...

So when are you white traitors leaving?

nigga please.

Chances of them coming up with something unique or worthwhile are next to none. You really think anyone can compete with the Silicon Valley or Japanese companies?

They just wanted to get into the country and stay under some bullshit pretense.

Here's a Russian military "robot" (tin piece of shit mounted on a remote controlled cart). Putin just hangs his head in shame.

USA and Japan got nothing..

Award for Courageous Achievement Awarded to teams that exhibit a “can-do” attitude throughout the Challenge, even under difficult circumstances, or when things do not go as planned.

Gold: South Sudan
Silver: Afghanistan

---------------

Afghan team among medal winners at global robotics event - ABC News


FIRST Global Challenge Award:
Awarded to teams that earn the most match points
Gold: Finland
Silver: Singapore
Bronze: India

FIRST Global Grand Challenge Award
Awarded to teams that accrue the most cumulative points over the course of the competition.

Gold: Team Europe
Silver: Poland
Bronze: Armenia