Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21881941)

Another fake nick. You signed up in 2003, have less than 1k posts, and I've never heard of you?

Fake.

Originally Posted by CoolMikey (Post 21881956)

What's with you all and "fake nick"? One's argument/opinion doesn't become any less valid just because you don't know the identity of the person posting it. :2 cents:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 21882067)

unprecedented idiocy levels on this board these days. BaldBastard is not a 'fake nick', and nor is the criteria for a nick being 'fake' whether any 1 single person has heard of them or done business with them before, unless that 1 single person is under the deluded impression they know EVERY person in the biz.

I swear the mental illness on this board is catching... I expect it from the resident nutcases, but Rochard, really? Not sure if you are being serious or not tbh mate.

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21882241)

FAKKKKKE

BTW anyone want to buy fakeporn.com ? send me an offer over 2k in value.

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 21882067)

I swear the mental illness on this board is catching... I expect it from the resident nutcases, but Rochard, really? Not sure if you are being serious or not tbh mate.

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 21882256)

Yeah. Months ago we spotted crockett using same phrases like mental specimen (hating foreigners, inventing shit etc). Then weeks ago I spotted Rochard doing the same with fake nicks etc.
Amazing to watch how somebody would overtake specimen's ridiculous mental way of thinking.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21882247)

Thanks for the idea! I just registered fakepron.com and stuffed it with redirect ads :thumbsup

Originally Posted by CoolMikey (Post 21881956)

What's with you all and "fake nick"? One's argument/opinion doesn't become any less valid just because you don't know the identity of the person posting it. :2 cents:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 21882067)

unprecedented idiocy levels on this board these days. BaldBastard is not a 'fake nick', and nor is the criteria for a nick being 'fake' whether any 1 single person has heard of them or done business with them before, unless that 1 single person is under the deluded impression they know EVERY person in the biz.

I swear the mental illness on this board is catching... I expect it from the resident nutcases, but Rochard, really? Not sure if you are being serious or not tbh mate.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21882310)

No, I'm done with this. I'm done debating with people I do not know.

We seem to have a lot of people on this board who want to argue and debate things and want to play games and they all have he same things in common
- no sig
- low post count
- no contact info
- no way to figure out who they are

I don't come here to debate with people I don't know. I come here to talk to people in the industry. Seems to me like most people don't even work in the industry - if in fact they are real.

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21882358)

I've had two court cases where what I typed on this board was quoted... So rants it shall be :) Depends on how you use it, for me its the morning tea room. Have a break, have a read and a rant and go back to work.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21882364)

What are the two case numbers where your posts on GFY were quoted?

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21882412)

What you want me to leave a cookie trail for Miss westie vagina? so her pursuits are only a google a away? I got stung for 1.6 mill

so let me think about that
.. no

btw.. fakenic.com

sorry had to :P

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21881101)

And that's exactly what they're going to do to free themselves of China's stranglehold on their economy :thumbsup.

NK must be stopped.

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21881737)

You never were in on the know as you were just a Marine Corp Grunt many, many years ago. You are not aware of our current capabilities, and clearly are not aware of current military policy

Even what is ancient history in the era of current technology the military intel was 100% aware that Iraq was preparing to invade Kuwiat. You keep talking about the U.S. being a target of NK and it really is not nor in all likely hood will it ever be. It is our allies, South Korea, and possibly Japan that would be the priority targets for South Korea. South Korea would be the first and foremost target for NK. We are obligated to defend both and we will carry out our obligation.

In addition, no missile would be halfway here before we know that we are a target. We know within a matter of seconds what the general target of a missile is. We have capabilities that some of our enemies may know about but the public will not know about until maybe 20 years from now or longer. What the WH says or our intel agencies say, or what the media says that those agencies say, has little if anything to do with actuality. Maybe 20 years out the public may or may not know the actual truth of what is being said or even done at this moment in time.

I have been in the intel field so I know more than you or anyone else that has not been in the intel field but even I am not up to date and I never will really be up to date ever again. I still have friends that are up to date but they are pretty closed mouth as their job requires them to be and even when they speak to me, I cannot ever be certain of what they are saying, as it is the job of intel to, among other things, to be deceitful.

The bottom line is when something negative about our intel, our military, or weapons systems are made public it probably is not true, and vice versa, if something positive is made public about these same subjects, it too may not be true.

Nothing is as it seems.

I spoke a little to quickly about missiles. It is conceivable that a submarine lunched missiles, in some instances could be on the target before it was established what the target in fact would be.

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21881821)

Please do as you are just an ex Jar Head grunt that really does not have knowledge about our Intel, military policies, capabilities or weapons systems so there is not anything that I have to debate with you. Every thing you think you know about these subjects is what has been released to the public. I know what I know because it was my field of expertise for a number of years.

Just to inform you, unlike you I do not have a nick. It is my name.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21882298)

Exactly.

We all work in the same industry. If you are posting on this board and do not have contact information... Then you are a fake nick.