GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Trump Jr. releases Emails, told a "Russian Government Attorney" highly sensitive data (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1271053)

RedFred 07-12-2017 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21886759)
I simply state FACTS- No evidence of a crime. Talking to a Russian lawyer is not a crime.

Hey Braindead Fred- How am I a "Nazi sympathizer" because i post facts?

You're deranged by media hysteria. It's rather entertaining to watch.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:pimp

:1orglaugh

What's entertaining to watch is you Trump supporters losing your fucking minds at whats going on.

:1orglaugh

baddog 07-12-2017 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 21886762)
Another Trumper that has a reading/comprehension issue.

"I?m not prepared to say that there?s proof you could take to a jury" is not saying there is no proof.

I'm starting to wonder how some of you got past the 3rd grade.

If you would not take it to a jury you only have hunches.

The Porn Nerd 07-12-2017 05:16 PM

None of this matters. If Trump were ever to take the stand, for any reason whatsoever, he would just do the Ronald Reagan "I do not recall" dance.

These people are Masters at getting what they want and escaping any real penalties. LOL

Robbie 07-12-2017 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 21886798)
None of this matters. If Trump were ever to take the stand, for any reason whatsoever, he would just do the Ronald Reagan "I do not recall" dance.

These people are Masters at getting what they want and escaping any real penalties. LOL

You can't "escape" a "penalty" if there is NO crime committed and no penalty involved to begin with.

Just because CNN, The NY Times, Washington Post, and the rest of the establishment so desperately WANTS there to be some kind of "wrongdoing"...doesn't make it a fact.

Bottom line: The Clinton Campaign OPENLY "colluded" with Ukraine. They held the meetings at the Ukraine Embassy.
This was all known by the FBI, Congress...and the fake news media.

The Trump campaign OPENLY "colluded" with Russian people connected to Putin. They held this particular meeting in Trump Tower.
It was well known by the FBI, Congress, and the fake news media...and even REPORTED by Jared Kushner back in April as part of his vetting for his White House position.

So what is the difference?
The difference is you hear NOTHING about the Clinton campaign's meetings with foreign govt.'s
And there is 24 hour wall-to-wall coverage of Trump Jr. on CNN right now.

No other news. NOTHING is happening in the entire world on CNN except Trump Jr. and "Russia".

You can tune in to Fox News or even MSNBC and they have actual news shows that do the news of the day. And yes, that includes the Trump Jr. story.

But CNN? There is NO other news.
No Syria. No North Korea. No bombing at the Air Force recruitment center. No Ukraine vs. Russia. Nothing...ONLY Trump Jr.
It's the only news.
And it's been "Breaking News" now for the last 24 straight hours.

And it's all "panels' of "experts" calling for impeachment and babbling about "treason" , etc.

Dude...if that isn't a double standard and total hypocrisy...then I don't know what is.

Bladewire 07-12-2017 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21886876)
You can't "escape" a "penalty" if there is NO crime committed and no penalty involved to begin with.

Just because CNN, The NY Times, Washington Post, and the rest of the establishment so desperately WANTS there to be some kind of "wrongdoing"...doesn't make it a fact.

Bottom line: The Clinton Campaign OPENLY "colluded" with Ukraine. They held the meetings at the Ukraine Embassy.
This was all known by the FBI, Congress...and the fake news media.

The Trump campaign OPENLY "colluded" with Russian people connected to Putin. They held this particular meeting in Trump Tower.
It was well known by the FBI, Congress, and the fake news media...and even REPORTED by Jared Kushner back in April as part of his vetting for his White House position.

So what is the difference?
The difference is you hear NOTHING about the Clinton campaign's meetings with foreign govt.'s
And there is 24 hour wall-to-wall coverage of Trump Jr. on CNN right now.

No other news. NOTHING is happening in the entire world on CNN except Trump Jr. and "Russia".

You can tune in to Fox News or even MSNBC and they have actual news shows that do the news of the day. And yes, that includes the Trump Jr. story.

But CNN? There is NO other news.
No Syria. No North Korea. No bombing at the Air Force recruitment center. No Ukraine vs. Russia. Nothing...ONLY Trump Jr.
It's the only news.
And it's been "Breaking News" now for the last 24 straight hours.

And it's all "panels' of "experts" calling for impeachment and babbling about "treason" , etc.

Dude...if that isn't a double standard and total hypocrisy...then I don't know what is.

Put down the crackpipe Robbie

Trump Jr. Released the info

After lying 3 times

And

After everyone else in the room lying about the meeting ever taking okace.

Yes they all 3 "forgot" it ever happened, until the NY Times article came out.

Wacko wingnut

Steve Rupe 07-12-2017 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21886102)
Keep in mind that all the intelligence agency's say there is no evidence, Chuck Schumer says there is no evidence, Adam Schiff says no evidence...
Kind of destroys your comment.

This is definitely a witch hunt. And the goal now is to try and get people under oath and catch them perjuring themselves.
Same tactic the Republicans used on Pres. Bill Clinton

And as I said before...the DNC and the Clinton campaign OPENLY colluded with Ukraine and Mexico...God knows how many we don't know about.

The Clinton campaign was the dirtiest, most corrupt campaign of modern history.
After all...that's what was actually revealed in the hacked emails. But everyone seems to have conveniently "forgotten" about that.

Of course what she did or didn't do during her campaign is really immaterial, is it not. She is not the President the Donald is. It is important what he did and what he is currently doing not her. She is history and will not leave a legacy like Presidents do.

The Porn Nerd 07-12-2017 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21886876)
You can't "escape" a "penalty" if there is NO crime committed and no penalty involved to begin with.

Just because CNN, The NY Times, Washington Post, and the rest of the establishment so desperately WANTS there to be some kind of "wrongdoing"...doesn't make it a fact.

Bottom line: The Clinton Campaign OPENLY "colluded" with Ukraine. They held the meetings at the Ukraine Embassy.
This was all known by the FBI, Congress...and the fake news media.

The Trump campaign OPENLY "colluded" with Russian people connected to Putin. They held this particular meeting in Trump Tower.
It was well known by the FBI, Congress, and the fake news media...and even REPORTED by Jared Kushner back in April as part of his vetting for his White House position.

So what is the difference?
The difference is you hear NOTHING about the Clinton campaign's meetings with foreign govt.'s
And there is 24 hour wall-to-wall coverage of Trump Jr. on CNN right now.

No other news. NOTHING is happening in the entire world on CNN except Trump Jr. and "Russia".

You can tune in to Fox News or even MSNBC and they have actual news shows that do the news of the day. And yes, that includes the Trump Jr. story.

But CNN? There is NO other news.
No Syria. No North Korea. No bombing at the Air Force recruitment center. No Ukraine vs. Russia. Nothing...ONLY Trump Jr.
It's the only news.
And it's been "Breaking News" now for the last 24 straight hours.

And it's all "panels' of "experts" calling for impeachment and babbling about "treason" , etc.

Dude...if that isn't a double standard and total hypocrisy...then I don't know what is.

I don't think it's a double standard. If Hillary were President now the 24 news media ("fake" or not) would be hounding her. Just as they did to Obama, Bush Jr. and Bill Clinton. It's their JOB to hype everything! They have 24 hours of programming to fill and they are desperate for viewership. And no one gives better copy (or tweets) then Donald Trump. He must be a comedian's wet dream!

So they hyper focus on whoever brings them the most eyes (and dollars). Trump does that and is a Master at manipulating the media right back. They're perfect for each other!

Don't go getting upset and losing your erections - which are MUCH more important - by noticing the hypocrisy. Trust me, you will live a longer and happier life by ignoring the duplicity all around you. :)

Robbie 07-12-2017 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 21886909)
Don't go getting upset and losing your erections - which are MUCH more important - by noticing the hypocrisy. Trust me, you will live a longer and happier life by ignoring the duplicity all around you. :)

Oh yeah? Well I got news for you. I lost my erections long before the hypocrisy and...er, uh...
nevermind...

crockett 07-12-2017 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21886888)
Of course what she did or didn't do during her campaign is really immaterial, is it not. She is not the President the Donald is. It is important what he did and what he is currently doing not her. She is history and will not leave a legacy like Presidents do.

Robbie and the other crazies have been blaming Obama and Hillary for so long they don't know how to stop, not to mention look objectively at anything.. Just Today Trump tries to bring up more lies about Hillary because he KNOWS people like Robbie will fall for it every fucking time...

The Porn Nerd 07-12-2017 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21886939)
Oh yeah? Well I got news for you. I lost my erections long before the hypocrisy and...er, uh...
nevermind...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

CM can help with that. :thumbsup

Paul Markham 07-12-2017 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21886006)
Clearly Robbie and Paul are among the more informed members of the GFY community.

It's been 8 months of Russia hysteria. No evidence. CNN employees exposed by Project Veritas saying it's all bullshit. To get ratings. It was the Russians! But the DNC refused to let the FBI look at their "hacked" server. So no evidence of a Russia hack, no evidence of Trump collusion with Russia. And the delusioanl leftists still believe the lies. The definition of insanity.
:2 cents:

:pimp

If there was evidence that Trump has done something wrong, I would be the first to denounce him. He is wrong on issues like Global Warming, Healthcare, etc. He's 100% right on building a wall, bringing jobs back to the US, stopping jobs flowing out of the US.

The problem with the libtards is they refuse to see the times he's right.

Paul Markham 07-12-2017 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21883975)
If you read the emails Trump Jr. states that the info will be great for "later in the summer" the emails were dropped week by week, later in the summer. Weaponized data released at specific intervals at Trump Jr.s direction.

Where is the damning evidence on Clinton that he was supposed to learn?

Paul Markham 07-12-2017 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21884701)

I will defend Bladewire on this. There is nothing to see here but a manufactured story. Like the GIF he posted the whole thing is fake.

Paul Markham 07-12-2017 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21885433)
Umm Paul keep up and actually read, the only "nothing burger" was they got no dirt on Hillary...lol

So what's the problem?

Paul Markham 07-12-2017 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21885442)
Paul perhaps you should look up "intent".. It doesn't matter that the cop you picked up didn't give you a bj, it matters you tried to pay her for one...

Try explaining to the cops that the purse you stole had no money so you can't be guilty..

They are caught conspiring to commit a crime. It doesn't matter that they didn't get the info. It matters they were willing to conspire with a Russian agent to get it and then laid out how they would use it in the campaign.

This very much is a crime.. It's just halarious that literally fake Hillary info is what takes them down..

It's the best payback she could have ever asked for..

Is the son of a Presidential candidate breaking the law by talking to a foreigner?

Paul Markham 07-12-2017 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 21885493)
Dude, wake up. The Trump team was asked many times if they met with Russians. They lied many times when they said No.

How can you be fucked in the ass so hard by such giant dicks, and not feel it?

Does that cover all Russians?

Paul Markham 07-12-2017 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 21885529)
No one ever said they were smart..

They managed to beat Clinton.

thommy 07-13-2017 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21887275)
Is the son of a Presidential candidate breaking the law by talking to a foreigner?

paul donīt be childish.

is the mafia boss who send a murder to someone NOT GUILTY ???

and are you REALLY THAT brainwashed that you believe that trump did not know about all that?

if THAT would be the case it is a reason more to get rid of him when he gives the power to other people and donīt know what they do.

if something like that happens in a company the manager gets fired because he does not know what is going on - and he gets paid for KNOWING IT !

BaldBastard 07-13-2017 12:37 AM

If Putin was involved, his gripe is with America, as a country.

And his ultimate achievement would be to kill your democracy and turn you against one another. If your saying he influenced Trump getting in then you better realise he probably did exactly the same to Obama, more than likely actually.. Just this time around they had better tools.

Let me take you back in time
Kremlin Cheers Obama's Re-Election - ABC News

Your being played against one another, Trump is just another spoke in the wheel.

OY 07-13-2017 04:31 AM

Tick, tock, tick, tock.....

Sarn 07-13-2017 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21886747)
...
"Subject: Russia - Clinton - private and confidential"

Shady as fuck

Nothingburger my ass. Fucking shady ass lying bitches.

100% Truth! Impeach !! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
"Subject: From Russia - Compromat on Clinton - For Trump comrade! private and confidential 100%l Visa/Mastercard accepted"
:1orglaugh

BaldBastard 07-13-2017 05:11 AM

The Ivanka story will be a lot more damaging:

Ivanka Trump vacationing with Putin’s rumored girlfriend | TheHill

Wendi Deng dating Putty I doubt, doing some dirty work for Rupert.. totally

https://patribotics.blog/2017/06/17/...ell-companies/

Ivanka Trump, the Russia scandal and her billionaire's network

Ivanka is more tied to Russia than any of them, how the fuck she got WhiteHouse clearance is a concern

Busty2 07-13-2017 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21884770)

3. I like turtles.

We have a winner :thumbsup:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Rochard 07-13-2017 11:34 AM

Here is my take on this.....

1) The Russian attorney clearly has deep roots to Moscow. A quick look at who she's worked for says it all. She is not in the United States advocating for changing laws about adapting Russian children or getting Russians off the boycott list because it's a fun hobby.

2) Trump Jr. took the meeting with obvious intentions to violate the law. No matter how you spin it, Trump Jr. WANTED to meet with a foreign national to discuss election information.

3) Somewhere along the line Trump Jr, Jared, and or Manafort should have thought "This is a bad, bad idea" and should have called the FBI.

4) It's impossible they didn't tell Trump about this meeting before and after. There is no way the three top people in the Trump campaign all agreed to take a meeting without telling Trump about it, both before and after. Even if nothing happened, they would have discussed it with Trump.

5) This now opens up Trump Jr to investigation, as well as his emails. I wonder if there was any follow up via email.

6) Jared violated the law when he failed to disclose this meeting for his security clearance.

7) They are trying to play this off like nothing happened in this meeting, yet shortly after the meeting Trump was on Twitter discussing Hillary's emails hacked by the Russians, and hinting there was something bigger.

8) It's pretty clear that information was passed in both directions. The Russians targeted specific areas in their meddling; Clearly voting data was passed to them. At the same time, the Trump campaign seemed to know before Wikileaks was going to release damaging information.

This is great. Now it opens up Trump Jr to the investigation. They get to read all of his emails too. Can't wait to see what they find.

Robbie 07-13-2017 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21888460)
Here is my take on this.....

1) The Russian attorney clearly has deep roots to Moscow. A quick look at who she's worked for says it all. She is not in the United States advocating for changing laws about adapting Russian children or getting Russians off the boycott list because it's a fun hobby.

2) Trump Jr. took the meeting with obvious intentions to violate the law. No matter how you spin it, Trump Jr. WANTED to meet with a foreign national to discuss election information.

3) Somewhere along the line Trump Jr, Jared, and or Manafort should have thought "This is a bad, bad idea" and should have called the FBI.

4) It's impossible they didn't tell Trump about this meeting before and after. There is no way the three top people in the Trump campaign all agreed to take a meeting without telling Trump about it, both before and after. Even if nothing happened, they would have discussed it with Trump.

5) This now opens up Trump Jr to investigation, as well as his emails. I wonder if there was any follow up via email.

6) Jared violated the law when he failed to disclose this meeting for his security clearance.

7) They are trying to play this off like nothing happened in this meeting, yet shortly after the meeting Trump was on Twitter discussing Hillary's emails hacked by the Russians, and hinting there was something bigger.

8) It's pretty clear that information was passed in both directions. The Russians targeted specific areas in their meddling; Clearly voting data was passed to them. At the same time, the Trump campaign seemed to know before Wikileaks was going to release damaging information.

This is great. Now it opens up Trump Jr to the investigation. They get to read all of his emails too. Can't wait to see what they find.

1. She is in the United States because the Obama Administration gave her that clearance.

2. There is NO LAW that Trump Jr. violated...much less "intended" to.

3. Trump Jr. was told in the email that this lawyer supposedly had info on CLINTON colluding with the Russians. The FBI has no business involved with a campaign decision. Just ask the DNC who told the FBI to fuck off when they requested the DNC server to try to find out who hacked it...the FBI to this very day has NEVER been given that server to inspect. All the "Russia did it" stuff is based on assumptions by intelligence officials based on their experience.

4. Really? And you know this how? More of your bias based on hatred with no real knowledge backing you up.

5. What "investigation"? And into what exactly? Trump Jr. has said he would testify in front of Congress. But the REALITY that you don't know about because CNN hasn't told you...is that Jared Kushner reported this entire meeting in detail back in April as part of his security clearance vetting. The FBI has already "investigated" this.

6. See the above statement...Jared reported this in April for his vetting.

7. Yeah, so?

8. Again, a statement by YOU based on what you THINK (which you have been wrong 100% of the time on all of your Trump pronouncements).

Sure is easy to take your arguments apart. :)

baddog 07-13-2017 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21888772)
1. She is in the United States because the Obama Administration gave her that clearance.

2. There is NO LAW that Trump Jr. violated...much less "intended" to.

3. Trump Jr. was told in the email that this lawyer supposedly had info on CLINTON colluding with the Russians. The FBI has no business involved with a campaign decision. Just ask the DNC who told the FBI to fuck off when they requested the DNC server to try to find out who hacked it...the FBI to this very day has NEVER been given that server to inspect. All the "Russia did it" stuff is based on assumptions by intelligence officials based on their experience.

4. Really? And you know this how? More of your bias based on hatred with no real knowledge backing you up.

5. What "investigation"? And into what exactly? Trump Jr. has said he would testify in front of Congress. But the REALITY that you don't know about because CNN hasn't told you...is that Jared Kushner reported this entire meeting in detail back in April as part of his security clearance vetting. The FBI has already "investigated" this.

6. See the above statement...Jared reported this in April for his vetting.

7. Yeah, so?

8. Again, a statement by YOU based on what you THINK (which you have been wrong 100% of the time on all of your Trump pronouncements).

Sure is easy to take your arguments apart. :)

On item one, she had lots more reason to discuss adoption.

Educate yourself: http://www.businessinsider.com/magnitsky-act-russian-adoptions-donald-trump-jr-meeting-2017-7

Robbie 07-13-2017 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 21888832)
On item one, she had lots more reason to discuss adoption.

Educate yourself: Magnitsky Act: Why Russian adoptions discussed at Donald Trump Jr. meeting - Business Insider

I had seen the reports on that. And yeah...as the family lawyer for one of the people impacted by that law, I'd say she was definitely looking for relief for her client.

BUT...at that point and time, Trump hadn't even become the official Republican nominee. And according to all the fake news polls he would end up losing to Hillary in a landslide anyway.

So my guess (and unlike Rochard, I acknowledge that it's just a guess with nothing to back it up in anyway) would be that her client was trying to cover all of his bases and looking for any possibility of help for his particular situation. So she pulled a "bait and switch" to get a meeting with Trump Jr.

But forget all of that...let's go with Rochard and CNN: This was a lawyer with "ties" to Putin and President Trump is obviously a Russian spy. :1orglaugh

Bladewire 07-13-2017 09:27 PM


President Donald Trump’s attorneys knew of Don Jr.’s sketchy email chain weeks ago: report

On Wednesday Trump told Reuters that he just learned of the email exchange ?a couple of days ago.? Thus, Trump either lied to the reporters or his attorneys have kept him out of the loop.

Trump repeated the same claim while talking with reporters aboard Air Force One Wednesday while en route to Paris.

?I only heard about it two or three days ago,? Trump said according to a White House transcript.

However, sources told Yahoo that Trump?s foul-mouth attorney Marc Kasowitz and legal officer for the Trump Organization Alan Garten both knew of the emails by the third week of June, after Kushner?s attorneys discovered them.

Paul Markham 07-14-2017 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thommy (Post 21887296)
paul donīt be childish.

is the mafia boss who send a murder to someone NOT GUILTY ???

and are you REALLY THAT brainwashed that you believe that trump did not know about all that?

if THAT would be the case it is a reason more to get rid of him when he gives the power to other people and donīt know what they do.

if something like that happens in a company the manager gets fired because he does not know what is going on - and he gets paid for KNOWING IT !

Is the son of a Presidential candidate breaking the law by talking to a foreigner?

You didn't answer the question. You gave a stupid answer.

Paul Markham 07-14-2017 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21888460)
Here is my take on this.....

1) The Russian attorney clearly has deep roots to Moscow. A quick look at who she's worked for says it all. She is not in the United States advocating for changing laws about adapting Russian children or getting Russians off the boycott list because it's a fun hobby.

2) Trump Jr. took the meeting with obvious intentions to violate the law. No matter how you spin it, Trump Jr. WANTED to meet with a foreign national to discuss election information.

3) Somewhere along the line Trump Jr, Jared, and or Manafort should have thought "This is a bad, bad idea" and should have called the FBI.

4) It's impossible they didn't tell Trump about this meeting before and after. There is no way the three top people in the Trump campaign all agreed to take a meeting without telling Trump about it, both before and after. Even if nothing happened, they would have discussed it with Trump.

5) This now opens up Trump Jr to investigation, as well as his emails. I wonder if there was any follow up via email.

6) Jared violated the law when he failed to disclose this meeting for his security clearance.

7) They are trying to play this off like nothing happened in this meeting, yet shortly after the meeting Trump was on Twitter discussing Hillary's emails hacked by the Russians, and hinting there was something bigger.

8) It's pretty clear that information was passed in both directions. The Russians targeted specific areas in their meddling; Clearly voting data was passed to them. At the same time, the Trump campaign seemed to know before Wikileaks was going to release damaging information.

This is great. Now it opens up Trump Jr to the investigation. They get to read all of his emails too. Can't wait to see what they find.

So it is illegal for a member of the election team to visit foreign officials. Does that cover all foreign officials?

Sarn 07-14-2017 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21889330)
So it is illegal for a member of the election team to visit foreign officials. Does that cover all foreign officials?

She was not from officials. Private attorney.
And of course, our officials had connected with two sides in USA election, it is the question of safety, but it was not she. We must know who will control nuke button.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21888460)
Here is my take on this.....
1) The Russian attorney clearly has deep roots to Moscow. A quick look at who she's worked for says it all. She is not in the United States advocating for changing laws about adapting Russian children or getting Russians off the boycott list because it's a fun hobby.
...

I don't think such attorney has interest about children, here she is lies. As I think she tried to remove the few people from boycott list in the USA. This list under secret for make easily corrupt scheme deleting people from there

CarlosTheGaucho 07-14-2017 04:12 AM

So a foreign national attorney who should not have been awarded Visa in the first place sends an email bait for a hatchet job on HRC to Donald Jr.

Who's stupid enough to fall for it and even publicise details about that non- meeting (that resulted in just about exactly nothing) in the media.

And this is the biggest trending topic now? Am I missing something?

Barry-xlovecam 07-14-2017 05:02 AM

Former Soviet Counter Intelligence Officer at Meeting With Donald Trump Jr. and Russian Lawyer - NBC News

Sounds like they are closing in for the kill ...

Quote:

[Attorney] [V]eselnitskaya acknowledged to NBC News that she was accompanied by at least one other man, though she declined to identify him.

The presence at the meeting of a Russian-American with suspected intelligence ties is likely to be of interest to special counsel Robert Mueller and the House and Senate panels investigating the Russian election interference campaign. ...
She knows Mueller will be deposing her under oath (CYA)?

Sarn 07-14-2017 05:30 AM

She makes a good promotion for own lawyer agency. Nothing more over there will not be found.

Paul Markham 07-14-2017 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 21889543)
She was not from officials. Private attorney.
And of course, our officials had connected with two sides in USA election, it is the question of safety, but it was not she. We must know who will control nuke button.

Of course, election officials can meet with foreigners. You missed the sarcasm in my post. It would be illogical to suppose anything else. Trump is being held to an impossible standard here.

Paul Markham 07-14-2017 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosTheGaucho (Post 21889618)
So a foreign national attorney who should not have been awarded Visa in the first place sends an email bait for a hatchet job on HRC to Donald Jr.

Who's stupid enough to fall for it and even publicise details about that non- meeting (that resulted in just about exactly nothing) in the media.

And this is the biggest trending topic now? Am I missing something?

No, you're not. Just pointless Trump bashing. They can't find anything of substance, so go after nothing.

crockett 07-14-2017 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 21888772)
1. She is in the United States because the Obama Administration gave her that clearance.

2. There is NO LAW that Trump Jr. violated...much less "intended" to.

3. Trump Jr. was told in the email that this lawyer supposedly had info on CLINTON colluding with the Russians. The FBI has no business involved with a campaign decision. Just ask the DNC who told the FBI to fuck off when they requested the DNC server to try to find out who hacked it...the FBI to this very day has NEVER been given that server to inspect. All the "Russia did it" stuff is based on assumptions by intelligence officials based on their experience.

4. Really? And you know this how? More of your bias based on hatred with no real knowledge backing you up.

5. What "investigation"? And into what exactly? Trump Jr. has said he would testify in front of Congress. But the REALITY that you don't know about because CNN hasn't told you...is that Jared Kushner reported this entire meeting in detail back in April as part of his security clearance vetting. The FBI has already "investigated" this.

6. See the above statement...Jared reported this in April for his vetting.

7. Yeah, so?

8. Again, a statement by YOU based on what you THINK (which you have been wrong 100% of the time on all of your Trump pronouncements).

Sure is easy to take your arguments apart. :)


Look everyone it's all Obama's fault, no one ever does anything wrong except OBAMA, OBAMA, Obama and Hillary.. Nothing to see here folks Obama and Hillary was not at the meeting therefore nothing could have possible been done wrong..

Jeez you guys are sooo biased.. Why is it me the only true independent on GFY that always has to point this out!!

Also there is totally no investigations guys it's all perfectly normal stuff.. It's a big nothing burger.. Just watch Alex Jones and Joe Rogan they will tell you the truth!

crockett 07-14-2017 06:06 AM

Anyway back to "REALITY"... it gets worse for little Don, Trump & Kushner but of course we know Manafort is in the clear because he's the one talking..

It's seems the Russian lawyer had a friend with her at the meeting.. He is a ex Soviet counter intelligence officer who now has duel citizenship and works in the US as a lobbyist..

Literally every body does this people, it's all totally legit normal politics! Obama did it at least 65 times..

crockett 07-14-2017 06:08 AM

I found a picture of Baddog, Robbie & Paul together..

https://sahajtimepass.files.wordpres...-3_monkeys.jpg

Sarn 07-14-2017 06:25 AM

Paranoia is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of delusion and irrationality. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself (e.g. "Everyone is out to get me"). Paranoia is distinct from phobias, which also involve irrational fear, but usually no blame. Making false accusations and the general distrust of others also frequently accompany paranoia. For example, an incident most people would view as an accident or coincidence, a paranoid person might believe was intentional.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123