GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Trump Bans All Transgenders From the U.S. Military (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1272979)

Google Expert 07-27-2017 02:07 AM

Liv Schrieber and son:

http://i.imgur.com/OynACI5.jpg

http://c2n.me/3MsVCdH.jpg

It's time to end this degeneracy.

Paul Markham 07-27-2017 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyA (Post 21915136)
If Paul markham thinks there is a difference between fighting next to a gay or straight man it's because Paul would be preoccupied thinking about sucking the guys dick

If you are against gays and trams in the military it's cause your a closeted gay
Fact

Paul I know about 100 gay men that would beat the piss out of you in about 2 seconds so there is no difference

It means your a bigot and a closet gay

No, it's not. My feelings are about what serving soldiers on the front line want. Once they say it's OK. Then fine.

Paul Markham 07-27-2017 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 21915193)
Gay men have HIV at a rate that is astounding compared to straight men.

A group of soldiers gets severely injured and blood is flying everywhere. One has HIV. Now they all do.

Maybe he has. But the point you make is he didn't know about it.


Quote:

But having been in the Army and trained with men, can women do the job that is required? I certainly think so. Don?t get me wrong; I completely understand why men have always been put on the frontline. Biologically, something happens to men, call it testosterone or whatever, when they are put under threat. Within seconds a powerful burst of aggression kicks in and they become a pack of wolves.

I experienced this during training. I also realised that whilst women can get to this level of aggression, it doesn't come as quickly or as naturally as it does with men. And of course, seconds and minutes lost in the field can be life or death. Any delay is simply a risk you can?t take.

The last thing our nation needs right now is women coming home in body bags.

Rochard 07-27-2017 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21915133)
My reply was about Blacks in the Army. Not social change.

Blacks in the army were part of social change. As was women in the army.

Rochard 07-27-2017 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21915130)
Women are not as physical as men.

There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

pimpmaster9000 07-27-2017 07:33 AM

it is not safe for men with tits to be in the army because US foreign policy is already insulting enough and now if the invaders are men with tits this will piss off everybody being invaded even more...it is hugely disrespectful...

it is not PC for them to be in the army either...human beings deserve a dignified death and it is not politically correct towards normal men who are heterosexual to be attacked and killed by guys with tits invader mercenaries...it is simply not right...

Google Expert 07-27-2017 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21915853)
There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

that seal is a MAN

he has a DICK

Helix 07-27-2017 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21915853)
There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

He transitioned after he retired from the military.

Paul Markham 07-27-2017 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21915838)
Blacks in the army were part of social change. As was women in the army.

My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

Paul Markham 07-27-2017 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21915853)
There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

So he was in the Army, changed to a woman while in the Army and everything was fine!!!!

Oh no, he changed after he left the army.

This guy makes my point and Trump's for us. Kristin Beck on Trump transgender ban in military: 'Let's meet face to face' - Business Insider

EddyTheDog 07-27-2017 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21915988)
My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

Then it's about education? - Blacks on the front-line where frowned upon - It happened anyway and now it's normal - In fact it's encouraged...

Social change will happen - It's happened all your LONG life:winkwink: - Get used to it Paul.....

Rochard 07-27-2017 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21915988)
My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

No, as a matter of fact I do not see the difference. A woman can pull a trigger just as easily as a man can on the battlefield.

I have lots of friends in the US military, and a lot of them are women. One of them was a medic, and she spent a lot of her time in combat in Afghanistan. She did her job and came back alive. She saved lives. You can't tell me she is not as qualified to serve as I am.

Bladewire 07-27-2017 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 21915988)
My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

You don't feel safe with a Gay man, even if he's white?

That's your own emotional problem Paul and has nothing to do with reality.

TheSquealer 07-27-2017 09:30 AM

Haha.. Trump is so good at pushing buttons, he has Liberals furiously defending the military and joining up to fight.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 07-27-2017 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert (Post 21915373)
Liv Schrieber and son:

http://i.imgur.com/OynACI5.jpg

http://c2n.me/3MsVCdH.jpg

It's time to end this degeneracy.

How many kids do you have? Please tell me you haven't reproduced. I see you're pushing the anti Hollywood agenda and the anti Gay / transgender agenda. The only degeneracy are idiots like you trying to impose your uneducated bigoted beliefs on other people. If assholes like you can raise your kids with hate & judgement others can raise their girls that feel like boys, as boys & vice versa.

EddyTheDog 07-27-2017 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21916180)
Haha.. Trump is so good at pushing buttons, he has Liberals furiously defending the military and joining up to fight.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

LOL - It's funny because it's true - I bet thousands of transsexuals have invaded the sign up booths today - Imagine the looks on their faces when they see a battalion of transsexuals heading towards them...

http://2static4.fjcdn.com/comments/S...1527261cc0.jpg

Bladewire 07-27-2017 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21916180)
Haha.. Trump is so good at pushing buttons, he has Liberals furiously defending the military and joining up to fight.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I went to join the army when I was 18 and started the paperwork with the recruiter, then I was denied. I was really pissed but it was their rules. I didn't have a diploma and they said I had to graduate high school first. At that point I was already out of school for a year supporting myself. Never went back to reapply, never got my diploma. None of it had to do with me being Gay.

The armed forces is a patriot thing, not a liberal vs conservative thing. Thats a fucked up stereotype you've concocted there :2 cents:

Steve Rupe 07-27-2017 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21916162)
No, as a matter of fact I do not see the difference. A woman can pull a trigger just as easily as a man can on the battlefield.

I have lots of friends in the US military, and a lot of them are women. One of them was a medic, and she spent a lot of her time in combat in Afghanistan. She did her job and came back alive. She saved lives. You can't tell me she is not as qualified to serve as I am.

She may be as qualified to serve as you are but I doubt that you are qualified to serve. Unless she is a bull dyke and is full of testosterone she is not 100% capable of performing her role in the MOS as a medic. She is not capable of carrying or dragging a 200 lb man out of harms way in order to treat him.

The military allows women to serve in many MOS's that they are not 100% qualified to serve in. I have many friends that have served and are still serving and all have testified to this fact. Just as another example; women are allowed the MOS for driving a truck but they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS, the average woman driver cannot change a tire on a duece and a half, she cannot lift five gallon Jerry cans of gas to put gas into the truck, she cannot load or off load much of what is carried on the truck.

A woman is allowed the MOS of being a Micro Wave Systems Operator and they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS. They cannot lift the 5 gallon Jerry cans of gas to fill the Generators. The majority of them cannot use the heavy sledge hammers to pound the long heavy iron stakes in for the guide wires on the Micro Dishes.

Men in these MOS's have to be able to perform all of these feats in order to obtain the MOS. They brass turn their heads when it comes to women being able to meet the requirements of the MOS. There really are very few MOS's in the military that women can perform 100% of the requirements.

Men have to go out of their way to assist women in performing the duties required of the MOS that PC allows them to serve in. Men cannot act like men or talk like men when women are serving in MOS's that they are not actually qualified to server in.

One of my friends, an NCO, was an instructor for summer drills for West Point Cadets. Women are now allowed to serve at the Point. My friend was on the firing range as an instructor when the cadets were firing .50 Cal's MG's. A female cadet could not clear her MG when it jammed. She asked my friend to clear it for her. He told her no that he would not that she had been trained on that procedure and to clear it herself. He then went on to say something along the lines of, if you can't don't worry about it, you won't ever be required to use one in combat anyhow.

She reported him and he was reprimanded not for not helping her but for "Sexual Harassment" and this went into his jacket. In addition he was removed from being an instructor for the Cadets. He did not mind that so much but a permanent black mark on his record for "Sexual Harassment" pissed him off and when his enlistment was up after 12 years in the service he did not reenlist.

The powers that be should never have done away with the WAC's and over women's branches. The WAC's could all perform their MOS's 100%.

Steve Rupe 07-27-2017 11:05 AM

It now turns out that the Joint Chiefs as well as the head of the Joint Chiefs new nothing about the Donald's imposing a ban on Transgenders which means the Donald lied yet again when he tweeted that he had consulted with his Generals.

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:09 AM

https://scontent.fbna1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...d4&oe=59FDFB91

seXXXhub 07-27-2017 11:10 AM

i couldnt agree more with Trump

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21916249)
She may be as qualified to serve as you are but I doubt that you are qualified to serve. Unless she is a bull dyke and is full of testosterone she is not 100% capable of performing her role in the MOS as a medic. She is not capable of carrying or dragging a 200 lb man out of harms way in order to treat him.

The military allows women to serve in many MOS's that they are not 100% qualified to serve in. I have many friends that have served and are still serving and all have testified to this fact. Just as another example; women are allowed the MOS for driving a truck but they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS, the average woman driver cannot change a tire on a duece and a half, she cannot lift five gallon Jerry cans of gas to put gas into the truck, she cannot load or off load much of what is carried on the truck.

A woman is allowed the MOS of being a Micro Wave Systems Operator and they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS. They cannot lift the 5 gallon Jerry cans of gas to fill the Generators. The majority of them cannot use the heavy sledge hammers to pound the long heavy iron stakes in for the guide wires on the Micro Dishes.

Men in these MOS's have to be able to perform all of these feats in order to obtain the MOS. They brass turn their heads when it comes to women being able to meet the requirements of the MOS. There really are very few MOS's in the military that women can perform 100% of the requirements.

Men have to go out of their way to assist women in performing the duties required of the MOS that PC allows them to serve in. Men cannot act like men or talk like men when women are serving in MOS's that they are not actually qualified to server in.

One of my friends, an NCO, was an instructor for summer drills for West Point Cadets. Women are now allowed to serve at the Point. My friend was on the firing range as an instructor when the cadets were firing .50 Cal's MG's. A female cadet could not clear her MG when it jammed. She asked my friend to clear it for her. He told her no that he would not that she had been trained on that procedure and to clear it herself. He then went on to say something along the lines of, if you can't don't worry about it, you won't ever be required to use one in combat anyhow.

She reported him and he was reprimanded not for not helping her but for "Sexual Harassment" and this went into his jacket. In addition he was removed from being an instructor for the Cadets. He did not mind that so much but a permanent black mark on his record for "Sexual Harassment" pissed him off and when his enlistment was up after 12 years in the service he did not reenlist.

The powers that be should never have done away with the WAC's and over women's branches. The WAC's could all perform their MOS's 100%.







it's a conspiracy










EddyTheDog 07-27-2017 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21916420)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh...

EddyTheDog 07-27-2017 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21916402)
It now turns out that the Joint Chiefs as well as the head of the Joint Chiefs new nothing about the Donald's imposing a ban on Transgenders which means the Donald lied yet again when he tweeted that he had consulted with his Generals.

There is some massive backtracking going on - He got an idea in whats left of his brain and just said it - I do the same thing - Fortunately I'm not POTUS...

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe (Post 21916402)
It now turns out that the Joint Chiefs as well as the head of the Joint Chiefs new nothing about the Donald's imposing a ban on Transgenders which means the Donald lied yet again when he tweeted that he had consulted with his Generals.

Lied or played fools? People actually think Trump himself is tweeting? Or that a tweet is an order?

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21913282)
He sure loves pissing in snowflakes cereal. :1orglaugh

I know it's a day late and a dollar short but would like to apologize for my comment before anyone gets offended. Some people may like piss in the cereal.

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21916453)
Lied or played fools? People actually think Trump himself is tweeting? Or that a tweet is an order?

I guess you didn't get the memmo that Trump's tweets are official white house statements and as such will be archive in the library of Congress.

Consider Trump's tweets to be 'official statements,' says Spicer - ABC News

Statements of Administration Policy |
Whitehouse

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916471)
I guess you didn't get the memmo that Trump's tweets are official white house statements and as such will be archive in the library of Congress.

Consider Trump's tweets to be 'official statements,' says Spicer - ABC News

Spicer? You mean the guy who was crying behind a bush/fired/leaker said that? No shit?

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21916486)
Spicer? You mean the guy who was crying behind a bush/fired/leaker said that? No shit?

Well I tried to educate you :1orglaugh

You can lead a horse to water but can't make it drink :2 cents:

Statements of Administration Policy |
Whitehouse

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916492)
Well I tried to educate you :1orglaugh

You can lead a horse to water but can't make it drink :2 cents:

Statements of Administration Policy |
Whitehouse

Oh please do, educate me on some twitter law. :1orglaugh

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21916504)
Oh please do, educate me on some twitter law. :1orglaugh

It's not about me it's about official communications from the Whitehouse, and the law, and how the Whitehouse itself defines the tweets. What's wrong with you?

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916510)
What's wrong with you?

Not as easily offended or gullible as you?

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21916519)
Not as easily offended or gullible as you?

Feel free to goto the whitehouse.gov link and educate yourself.

GAMEFINEST 07-27-2017 11:41 AM

I still get the purpose of this at all..

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916525)
Feel free to goto the whitehouse.gov link and educate yourself.

I did. Sorry I'm not digging through 3 pages of policy postings to find this mystery "twitter is law/order"
Feel free to educate me when you find it/can back up your claim besides something Spicer said.

Bladewire 07-27-2017 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21916540)
I did. Sorry I'm not digging through 3 pages of policy postings to find this mystery "twitter is law/order"

You can go here too Donald Trump's tweets are now presidential records

onwebcam 07-27-2017 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916543)

Presidential record is recording and preserving.

Try again.

TheSquealer 07-27-2017 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916204)

The armed forces is a patriot thing, not a liberal vs conservative thing. Thats a fucked up stereotype you've concocted there :2 cents:

Uhm... no,its not. It's a "build the most effective fighting force possible" thing. Thats why people are not allowed to join the armed forces for a large variety of reasons.... regardless of whether or not they call themselves "patriot" or no.

Bladewire 07-27-2017 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 21916657)
Uhm... no,its not. It's a "build the most effective fighting force possible" thing. Thats why people are not allowed to join the armed forces for a large variety of reasons.... regardless of whether or not they call themselves "patriot" or no.

The armed forces is not a liberal vs conservative thing. Fact

If you think non patriots put their lives on the line in the armed forces then you don't respect America or those who serve.

Trying to selectively choose who YOU feel is a patriot in the military is a complete bitch move.

TheSquealer 07-27-2017 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21916666)
The armed forces is not a liberal vs conservative thing. Fact

If you think non patriots put their lives on the line in the armed forces then you don't respect America or those who serve.

Trying to selectively choose who YOU feel is a patriot in the military is a complete bitch move.

I'm saying that "patriotic" is irrelevant to what goes into developing an effective fighting force. i'm sure lots of midgets are fiercely patriotic.

As i said, the military discriminates as it is for this very reason.

Furthermore, "patriotic" absolutely is a conservative vs liberal thing. Conservatives are far more sensitive to group loyalty and associated symbolism (tribe, community, city, state, country etc) as well as threats to the group and security than Liberals who have a very dim sensitivity or none at all to these issues (see Jonathan Haidt and "moral matrices").

Granted there is a scale like everything but it's not EVER conservatives burning flags, aiding and comforting and defending the enemy or calling soldiers baby killers.... FACT.

Suicide rates alone on Trannies is troubling... but of course, in everyone's quest for a flawed perception of justice, no one actually cares about deaths that are happening right now to that very group.


U.S. Transgender Survey: Largest Study of Its Kind Comes Out | Time.com

... "National Center for Transgender Equality survey

The U.S. Transgender Survey found that a whopping 40 percent of trans people have attempted suicide, compared to just 4.6 percent of the general population. That is, a trans person is more than eight times more likely to try to kill themselves than a non-trans person. "


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123