Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21927721)

Tries to further qualify his bullshit from his shit-brain with a link to INFOWARS. Wow, this is just comedy gold. Are you sure you want to keep walking into these?

It's like when one of you illiterate assholes calls someone a moron, but can't even write it in basic English...or just punctuates every dumb, untrue statement with laugh emojis.

There's not too many things on the planet dumber than a Donald Trump defender. It scares me that you walk among the non-mongoloids and will breed.

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21927787)

I could care less about who they misquoted. A misquote doesn't make a story false.

Seth Rich really was murdered and his murder really is unsolved.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21928630)

The ENTIRE story was fake.

The President of the United States approved planting a fake news story to hide the fact that the Russians hacked the DNC.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21928630)

The ENTIRE story was fake.

Seth Rich was murdered, most likely in a robbery attempt. This much is true. But then they tried to connect his work to Wikileaks and tried to make it look like he was the one who leaked the documents to Wikileaks - of which there is ZERO evidence. There is NO EVIDENCE of this at all. Yet somehow a major news outlet is running this as if it was fact.

The President of the United States approved planting a fake news story to hide the fact that the Russians hacked the DNC.

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21928648)

^^ That's FAKE NEWS, buddy. You claim it's a fact, but there's ZERO EVIDENCE that Russia hacked the DNC servers, stole data, and fed the data to Wikileaks. Simply no evidence. DO you not find it strange that the DNC refused to turn over their server to the FBI for forensic examination? It's fact. So how are you so sure it was "the Russians?"

Forensics prove your theory to be incorrect:


BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locally—Not Hacked

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21928648)

^^ That's FAKE NEWS, buddy. You claim it's a fact, but there's ZERO EVIDENCE that Russia hacked the DNC servers, stole data, and fed the data to Wikileaks. Simply no evidence. DO you not find it strange that the DNC refused to turn over their server to the FBI for forensic examination? It's fact. So how are you so sure it was "the Russians?"

Forensics prove your theory to be incorrect:


BOMBSHELL: New Report Shows Guccifer 2.0-DNC Files Were Copied Locally?Not Hacked

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21928834)

Every one of our Intelligence agencies tell me the Russians hacked the DNC. They told us exactly who did it.

Here you go: DNC hack: how Crowdstrike found proof Russia hacked DNC | WIRED UK

This not even remotely open to discussion.

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21928903)

So the DNC called in a 3rd party rather than allow law enforcement to look? OK It's settled.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21928912)

That lie was debunked months ago. You need to update you propoganda portfolio. On second thought don't. Stay outdated :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21928834)

Every one of our Intelligence agencies tell me the Russians hacked the DNC. They told us exactly who did it.

Here you go: DNC hack: how Crowdstrike found proof Russia hacked DNC | WIRED UK

This not even remotely open to discussion.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21928912)

That lie was debunked months ago. You need to update you propoganda portfolio. On second thought don't. Stay outdated :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21928927)

What lie? Law enforcement has never been given access to the servers. Rochards proof is 3rd party brought in by DNC. And that proof is only IP which any idiot knows can be spoofed. Do you really think the person who actually did this would leave such an easy trail back to them? Or more likely they left a trail to throw off the scent? That's even if the trail is real considering the source.

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 21929233)

A 5 month old article from Wired magazine.. It's settled, everyone! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

About those intelligence agencies who "determined" Russian hacking: Fake News. The New York Times had to retract that. It was just a "committee" of Obama fan-boys in 3 agencies with fake opinions. ZERO agencies determined anything concrete.

EVEN NEW YORK TIMES CORRECTION IS INCORRECT

No evidence of Drumpf "collusion," no evidence of Russia hacking DNC, CNN & WaPo are disgraced as fake news... WIkileaks offers reward for info on Seth Rich.. but that was random.... Man you guys are easily duped :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh





^^ Facts mean nothing to the liberal lunatics

:pimp