GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Business Subpoena request. Need help! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1277165)

GAMEFINEST 08-25-2017 12:52 PM

Disregard hoes acquire currency

Konda 08-25-2017 10:51 PM

Most likely some ex girlfriend that complained her video is on your site and now they want you to handover the IP address of whoever uploaded it or provided it to you.

You are not in the US so just ignore it. If it was something more serious or if they were after you personally they would have contacted your domain registrar and/or host, not you. So I wouldn't worry.

brassmonkey 08-26-2017 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 21970095)
:1orglaugh :thumbsup ...

you long piece of shit!

BaldBastard 08-26-2017 03:24 AM

You shouldn't of replied.

Now that you have, just comply with what they want.

If you have had a DMCA to remove files fully understand the DMCA means fuck all except "please remove this file", its what they do next that can bite you on the ass.

It doesn't matter what country you are in, a court case will eat away at your brain, its not something I would wish upon anyone. In the USA they can follow a case thru all the way without you having to be there at all. Once the charge is processed in the USA then they have to bring that to your country, where you might have a chance of fighting it again.

That was the situation in my case anyway.

Subpoenas can be issued via email, this very board, and the bad advise on it got that passed in to law!!

j3rkules 08-26-2017 03:31 AM

An e-mail subpoena is not a valid form of service of process. Just delete it.

Barry-xlovecam 08-26-2017 03:47 AM

https://www.enom.com/terms/subpoena_criminal.asp
You can play internet games all day ...

BaldBastard 08-26-2017 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j3rkules (Post 21971265)
An e-mail subpoena is not a valid form of service of process. Just delete it.

It certainly fucking can be..

WILLIAMS v. ADVERTISING SEX LLC

http://blog.internetcases.com/2005/1...nts-by-e-mail/


https://www.serve-now.com/resources/e-service-cases

Barry-xlovecam 08-26-2017 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21971281)

That ruling is not in a criminal law case. (either link)
The police (at least in the USA) do not, and will not, investigate *free standing* civil matters.

Cloudflare will roll over too ;)
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/1...eal_customers/
Cloudflare ordered by judge to help unmask two website owners

At very least a US Court can act in rem to seize your US registered domain and any servers you have on US soil -- lawyer up or move to the dark web and start living under a rock. It might be nothing too or just information you would gladly furnish to make this just go away.

SpicyM 08-26-2017 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21971281)
It certainly fucking can be..


No it can't.

They couldn't prove you received or read that. Contrary to that, when you receive an official letter, you need to sign a delivery receipt at the post office.

BaldBastard 08-26-2017 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpicyM (Post 21971353)
No it can't.

They couldn't prove you received or read that. Contrary to that, when you receive an official letter, you need to sign a delivery receipt at the post office.

Ok I didn't receive one and I didn't get slammed with 1.6 million in fines from it, and you know better.

thanks.

The problem is we always presume its a jilted lover or whatever, where as in my case it turned out to be a pissed off lawyer with way to much time on their hands, just on 1/4 tonne paperwork sits in my storage.

pornlaw 08-26-2017 05:31 AM

Dont get panicked. This is very routine. I deal with dozens of criminal subpoenas each month for my clients.

US law enforcement has to follow MLAT procedures when issuing a subpoena for business records in a criminal matter. Its unlikely that the local detective from LBPD will be bothered.

National law enforcement in the US usually knows the rules and can follow the treaty guidelines.

A local attorney in Long Beach NY will be of little help. You need to hire someone that understands MLAT and can explain it to the detective.

Let me know if I can assist.

SpicyM 08-26-2017 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21971359)
Ok I didn't receive one and I didn't get slammed with 1.6 million in fines from it, and you know better,

thanks.

Who did you receive it from?

If you confirmed you had received it , then it can be a different situation of course.

E-mail doesn't prove anything. Even ip address doesn't. That sir was confirmed to me by a lawyer.

BaldBastard 08-26-2017 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpicyM (Post 21971371)
Who did you receive it from?

If you confirmed you had received it , then it can be a different situation of course.

E-mail doesn't prove anything. Even ip address doesn't. That sir was confirmed to me by a lawyer.


WILLIAMS v. ADVERTISING SEX LLC

Barry-xlovecam 08-26-2017 06:06 AM

Like I said Mike: get a lawyer LOL

SpicyM 08-26-2017 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21971375)
WILLIAMS v. ADVERTISING SEX LLC


"She petitioned the court to allow her to obtain service by alternate means, including e-mail"

..which means it is not usual procedure and that court had to approve it. Also, this is a criminal case, he was contacted by police.

Did you reply to that or acknowledge anyone you knew of the email or that you received it?

I don't say they can't use it. I just say it can't be proven you received it. Even delivery notification doesn't ensure the email was delivered. It can still end up in a spam folder, or you simply don't use the email address anymore, or the email address is shared etc.

Where I live this would not work. It must be proven that YOU received the delivery, by signing the paper, the delivery confirmation. And the official letter must be mailed to your actual physical address where you reside or stay.

brassmonkey 08-26-2017 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j3rkules (Post 21971265)
An e-mail subpoena is not a valid form of service of process. Just delete it.

correct! what about the phone call??

brassmonkey 08-26-2017 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by j3rkules (Post 21971265)
An e-mail subpoena is not a valid form of service of process. Just delete it.

maybe the address on whois is wrong and the email is correct

loveparade 08-26-2017 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21971261)
You shouldn't of replied.

Now that you have, just comply with what they want.

If you have had a DMCA to remove files fully understand the DMCA means fuck all except "please remove this file", its what they do next that can bite you on the ass.

It doesn't matter what country you are in, a court case will eat away at your brain, its not something I would wish upon anyone. In the USA they can follow a case thru all the way without you having to be there at all. Once the charge is processed in the USA then they have to bring that to your country, where you might have a chance of fighting it again.

That was the situation in my case anyway.

Subpoenas can be issued via email, this very board, and the bad advise on it got that passed in to law!!

Did you have trial because of DMCA? Could you tell more about how it was and how it ended?
I don't know the reason of that email, was it DMCA or something else. 4 days and there aren't any answer from them. In any case I would be grateful for any information. Thanks!

loveparade 08-26-2017 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw (Post 21971363)
Dont get panicked. This is very routine. I deal with dozens of criminal subpoenas each month for my clients.

US law enforcement has to follow MLAT procedures when issuing a subpoena for business records in a criminal matter. Its unlikely that the local detective from LBPD will be bothered.

National law enforcement in the US usually knows the rules and can follow the treaty guidelines.

A local attorney in Long Beach NY will be of little help. You need to hire someone that understands MLAT and can explain it to the detective.

Let me know if I can assist.

Of course I would be grateful for help. I have not recivied any subpoena. I got just some email a week ago and it's all, they asked me to give them my address. I wanted someone at least to find out what happend, maybe call to that detective. There was his telephone number and his name in the email. I don't want to post it here.

How to contact you? I don't see private messages here, probably I do not have enough messages here and I can't send them.

Nitzer Ebb 08-26-2017 12:02 PM

The detective will ask you to pay your "penalty" in itunes cards. Delete email and stop worrying.

pornlaw 08-26-2017 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loveparade (Post 21971849)
Of course I would be grateful for help. I have not recivied any subpoena. I got just some email a week ago and it's all, they asked me to give them my address. I wanted someone at least to find out what happend, maybe call to that detective. There was his telephone number and his name in the email. I don't want to post it here.

How to contact you? I don't see private messages here, probably I do not have enough messages here and I can't send them.

michael(at)fattlegal.com

They want your address so they can send you a subpoena.

I get paid for legal work though...

If you are looking for free help - you need to see my earlier post. You should spend some of your time researching MLAT.

Bladewire 08-26-2017 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw (Post 21971935)
michael(at)fattlegal.com

They want your address so they can send you a subpoena.

I get paid for legal work though...

If you are looking for free help - you need to see my earlier post. You should spend some of your time researching MLAT.

That's rediculous!

OP if you need legal advice I'm a certified nonattorney feel free to hit me up for free nonlegal advice :thumbsup

BaldBastard 08-26-2017 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loveparade (Post 21971839)
Did you have trial because of DMCA? Could you tell more about how it was and how it ended?
I don't know the reason of that email, was it DMCA or something else. 4 days and there aren't any answer from them. In any case I would be grateful for any information. Thanks!

I had an email come in one night saying I had used someone?s name on my website demanding that I removed it.

While the email was open, I ftped into my site and deleted the page, was one of millions, automated seo spam, early 2000's.

There was no content, just a text link to sponsor, that text link was actually broken, was not carrying thru my affiliate code.

Ie: text link, with no way for me to make money from it. The pages I had not written, were done by some seo spam company I used to generate them.

I have no idea who made them, was an ICQ contact, didn?t even pay we just split the traffic.

Because I had deleted the page in question immediately and there was no content, I basically forgot about it.

Couple of weeks later the paperwork starts arriving.

So I went to my Lawyer, who had a look at what i had received and they come back and said.. we cant comment as its American law not Australian.. That will be $3500 thank you.

So I went FUCCCCCK.

Then I contacted an USA Lawyer, in CA, and they looked at it and went.. we can?t comment this is in WA, you need someone in West Virgina

The problem there was the person doing the suing was a lawyer in WA, I looked up the town where the case was being heard in court and there only seemed to be two lawyer firms in town and the chick suing me had worked at both. She also served as an intern to the Judge overseeing the case.

Worst of all not only was she suing me, but also my company so I got stung twice.

I had no way of defending myself, the case went thru the court system and the judge basically threw it out due to lack of jurisdiction

Williams appealed that and took it to the appeals court and because no one was defending it.. they gave her everything she asked for.

850k for me and 850k for company, for a text link

So never presume these things are from anyone but a jilted Lawyer with too much time on their hands, and don't presume if you ignore it... it will all go away.

I suggest you take up PornLaws offer

Barry-xlovecam 08-26-2017 09:15 PM

And I doubt you ever paid the judgment if you had no assets in the court's jurisdiction. Did they try for a civil contempt on a failure to appear for a debtor's examination? Probably not.

Once again I say: The police only are involved in crime investigations. Crimes can equal jail time. Lawyer up.

BaldBastard 08-26-2017 10:59 PM

No I didn't pay a cent, because she has to bring that judgement to me here in Aus, which she can, but all of a sudden we are on a level playing field costs wise. No doing her own work here, she will be paying someone else.

Reality is though she got me for a lot more than the court ever ordered, its the mental drain, the slandering of my and company name in public, to the point I couldn't trade any more and all the other shit that plays on your brain, that is the real unmeasured cost. Business wise it took me 8 years to recover from.

Just commenting, because yes a Subponena can be issued via email in the USA, and yes you can be charged in multiple courts, without ever of doing a thing... NO proof required!

And lawyering up in your own country or even in the USA means shit, except more cost for you. You need a lawyer in the jurisdiction you are being charged in.

Give them your details, let them contact you, act when you have the subpoena, at least then you know what its for and can take any action you or your lawyer deem necessary. Trying to make that process more difficult, just adds to your issues.

Paul Markham 08-26-2017 11:17 PM

It's a scam, ignore it.

The Porn Nerd 08-26-2017 11:28 PM

First, they did not say you were the target of the criminal investigation did they?

Email? Aside from this thread what "proof" is there you even got it and it didn't go to spam? What's the penalty of ignoring it?

You don't live in the US and this is a US issue? If it were serious they would have your address.

I guess they can't arrest you if they don't have your address, right? LOL

:banana

Barry-xlovecam 08-27-2017 12:16 AM

To all the GFY IDIOTS: The police do not get involved in civil matters. Third, and last time, I am going to say this.

If I say the sky is blue some of you assholes will argue it is pink.

If they (the police or a civil claimant) really knows your domain name -- they can get your address from the registrar VERY easily. If you registered your domain with a false address your domain is forfeit to the registry.

So, 90% of this is just GFY mental masturbation. I don't give a fuck -- this is not my problem.

Klen 08-27-2017 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21972435)
I had an email come in one night saying I had used someone?s name on my website demanding that I removed it.

While the email was open, I ftped into my site and deleted the page, was one of millions, automated seo spam, early 2000's.

There was no content, just a text link to sponsor, that text link was actually broken, was not carrying thru my affiliate code.

Ie: text link, with no way for me to make money from it. The pages I had not written, were done by some seo spam company I used to generate them.

I have no idea who made them, was an ICQ contact, didn?t even pay we just split the traffic.

Because I had deleted the page in question immediately and there was no content, I basically forgot about it.

Couple of weeks later the paperwork starts arriving.

So I went to my Lawyer, who had a look at what i had received and they come back and said.. we cant comment as its American law not Australian.. That will be $3500 thank you.

So I went FUCCCCCK.

Then I contacted an USA Lawyer, in CA, and they looked at it and went.. we can?t comment this is in WA, you need someone in West Virgina

The problem there was the person doing the suing was a lawyer in WA, I looked up the town where the case was being heard in court and there only seemed to be two lawyer firms in town and the chick suing me had worked at both. She also served as an intern to the Judge overseeing the case.

Worst of all not only was she suing me, but also my company so I got stung twice.

I had no way of defending myself, the case went thru the court system and the judge basically threw it out due to lack of jurisdiction

Williams appealed that and took it to the appeals court and because no one was defending it.. they gave her everything she asked for.

850k for me and 850k for company, for a text link

So never presume these things are from anyone but a jilted Lawyer with too much time on their hands, and don't presume if you ignore it... it will all go away.

I suggest you take up PornLaws offer

Hmm, i got also once request to remove name, but after i removed it there was no further action. But charging 3500$ just for saying how they are not eligible for it it's crazy, if not valid. I mean, that would be like bringing a car to mechanic and they say you how they dont fix you brand but still charge you.

k0nr4d 08-27-2017 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21972435)
I had an email come in one night saying I had used someone?s name on my website demanding that I removed it.

While the email was open, I ftped into my site and deleted the page, was one of millions, automated seo spam, early 2000's.

There was no content, just a text link to sponsor, that text link was actually broken, was not carrying thru my affiliate code.

Ie: text link, with no way for me to make money from it. The pages I had not written, were done by some seo spam company I used to generate them.

I have no idea who made them, was an ICQ contact, didn?t even pay we just split the traffic.

Because I had deleted the page in question immediately and there was no content, I basically forgot about it.

Couple of weeks later the paperwork starts arriving.

So I went to my Lawyer, who had a look at what i had received and they come back and said.. we cant comment as its American law not Australian.. That will be $3500 thank you.

So I went FUCCCCCK.

Then I contacted an USA Lawyer, in CA, and they looked at it and went.. we can?t comment this is in WA, you need someone in West Virgina

The problem there was the person doing the suing was a lawyer in WA, I looked up the town where the case was being heard in court and there only seemed to be two lawyer firms in town and the chick suing me had worked at both. She also served as an intern to the Judge overseeing the case.

Worst of all not only was she suing me, but also my company so I got stung twice.

I had no way of defending myself, the case went thru the court system and the judge basically threw it out due to lack of jurisdiction

Williams appealed that and took it to the appeals court and because no one was defending it.. they gave her everything she asked for.

850k for me and 850k for company, for a text link

So never presume these things are from anyone but a jilted Lawyer with too much time on their hands, and don't presume if you ignore it... it will all go away.

I suggest you take up PornLaws offer

Right, and to collect on it they'd have to sue you in Australia because a USA judgement doesn't mean anything in AU. They won, but really if you aren't planning on having any assets in the US it doesn't matter much.

My advice to OP is to ignore everything they send you. If you confirmed receipt of it or not, It's not a certified letter and you don't really know who is emailing you or why. It might be someone phishing for your data to do some identify theft or do use this data after to do bank account changes on affiliate programs you work with. You have many, many reasons to believe that it could be a scam.

The police doesn't work like that. If they needed to contact you, they would subpoena your domain registrar or host for your information and send you a letter.

k0nr4d 08-27-2017 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21972725)
To all the GFY IDIOTS: The police do not get involved in civil matters. Third, and last time, I am going to say this.

Not entirely true, in some countries they do. For instance, my friend had to give a statement to police in germany because he was a witness in a civil suit against a company that went or was going bankrupt.

BaldBastard 08-27-2017 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0nr4d (Post 21972775)
Right, and to collect on it they'd have to sue you in Australia because a USA judgement doesn't mean anything in AU. They won, but really if you aren't planning on having any assets in the US it doesn't matter much.

My advice to OP is to ignore everything they send you. If you confirmed receipt of it or not, It's not a certified letter and you don't really know who is emailing you or why. It might be someone phishing for your data to do some identify theft or do use this data after to do bank account changes on affiliate programs you work with. You have many, many reasons to believe that it could be a scam.

The police doesn't work like that. If they needed to contact you, they would subpoena your domain registrar or host for your information and send you a letter.

Incorrect: American judgement stands in Australia and is collectable.

I would have to counter sue, especially since I can prove the judgement was based on untested statements and basically lies.

I have no idea if the OP is in that position or not.

Certainly any "Ignore It" advise is wrong.

loveparade 08-27-2017 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21972435)
I have no idea who made them, was an ICQ contact,

I have more than 100'000 comments on the site, most of them something like "hey, send me nudes here " and telephone number or email. From time to time I get requests to delete some comment. I remove it. But how can I know, either a comment is someone joke or not? How to protect myself? Just remove all comments that contain any personal information? By the way anyone can leave a comment with his name and number and then sue me and ask 850k.

k0nr4d 08-27-2017 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21972781)
Incorrect: American judgement stands in Australia and is collectable.

I would have to counter sue, especially since I can prove the judgement was based on untested statements and basically lies.

I have no idea if the OP is in that position or not.

Certainly any "Ignore It" advise is wrong.

So what did you do then? Obviously not pay it out - so ergo it seems to not be collectable that easily, otherwise anyone can sue you for anything in the US, win by default because you wont defend yourself and ruin you financially in your own country. I know at least here a judgement in the US is not collectable and I would have to be sued locally.

loveparade 08-27-2017 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21972633)
No I didn't pay a cent

Have you been in US after this incident?

BaldBastard 08-27-2017 04:08 AM

loveparade

Actually its irrelevant if you remove the posts, in my case I removed them within seconds of being notified.. way it was read to the judge was, links were removed "some time after" that could of been days, weeks or months.

The issue in the eyes of the law is they were there to start with.. not how fast or if you removed.

Have I been back to the USA? no,. I don't need a holiday being ruined at border control ;) Not saying that would happen, just not willing to carry the risk.

k0nr4d
"So what did you do then? Obviously not pay it out - so ergo it seems to not be collectable that easily, otherwise anyone can sue you for anything in the US, win by default because you wont defend yourself and ruin you financially in your own country. I know at least here a judgement in the US is not collectable and I would have to be sued locally. "

I'd be asking a lawyer that question regarding what's collectible or not. If your country is a party to the Hague Convention.. they can.

And yeah in the USA they can sue you just like that and flow it right thru the court system, your presence is not required.

Read up on the case: WILLIAMS v. ADVERTISING SEX LLC

Basically a celeb sponsor said they had a sex tape, affiliates went out and promoted that.
The person the sponsor said it was, was not the person in the Video.

She went to google and pulled up the first two pages of links, and sued everyone, "54 affiliates" from all around the world.

One USA webmaster fort it in court, and got let off for lack of jurisdiction.

But she continued the case against 52 others.. out of the USA

No one went to court, just her and the judge

Finally it was throw out of court "lack of jurisdiction"

So she took it to 4th circuit appeals court... and won.

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions...d/091412.U.pdf

And thast how they can fuck you over in the USA if you ignore it..

k0nr4d 08-27-2017 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21972841)
loveparade

Actually its irrelevant if you remove the posts, in my case I removed them within seconds of being notified.. way it was read to the judge was, links were removed "some time after" that could of been days, weeks or months.

The issue in the eyes of the law is they were there to start with.. not how fast or if you removed.

Have I been back to the USA? no,. I don't need a holiday being ruined at border control ;) Not saying that would happen, just not willing to carry the risk.

k0nr4d
"So what did you do then? Obviously not pay it out - so ergo it seems to not be collectable that easily, otherwise anyone can sue you for anything in the US, win by default because you wont defend yourself and ruin you financially in your own country. I know at least here a judgement in the US is not collectable and I would have to be sued locally. "

I'd be asking a lawyer that question regarding what's collectible or not. If your country is a party to the Hague Convention.. they can.

And yeah in the USA they can sue you just like that and flow it right thru the court system, your presence is not required.

Read up on the case: WILLIAMS v. ADVERTISING SEX LLC

Basically a celeb sponsor said they had a sex tape, affiliates went out and promoted that.
The person the sponsor said it was, was not the person in the Video.

She went to google and pulled up the first two pages of links, and sued everyone, "54 affiliates" from all around the world.

One USA webmaster fort it in court, and got let off for lack of jurisdiction.

But she continued the case against 52 others.. out of the USA

No one went to court, just her and the judge

Finally it was throw out of court "lack of jurisdiction"

So she took it to 4th circuit appeals court... and won.

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions...d/091412.U.pdf

And thast how they can fuck you over in the USA if you ignore it..

Yes, I'm not saying you can't be sued in the US. I'm saying to actually collect any judgement is much, much more difficult and requires a local court to do it (in which case you could then defend yourself)

BaldBastard 08-27-2017 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0nr4d (Post 21972853)
Yes, I'm not saying you can't be sued in the US. I'm saying to actually collect any judgement is much, much more difficult and requires a local court to do it (in which case you could then defend yourself)

Well that's an in theory thing, reality is all they have to do is take the Judgement to the local court and if due process has been done, the court MUST inforce that judgement.

In my case I can show multiple instances where due process was not done, American court was lied too and I had VERY good reasons to believe that I would not get a fair trial... Person suing me was a fucking intern to the Judge just being one...

OP might not have that and could be guilty as charged, just in my case.. I wasn't and what's more, I can easily prove that. Just be fucked if I was going to try in a red neck court in Charlottesville VA

pornlaw 08-27-2017 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0nr4d (Post 21972775)
Right, and to collect on it they'd have to sue you in Australia because a USA judgement doesn't mean anything in AU. They won, but really if you aren't planning on having any assets in the US it doesn't matter much.

Not this pertains to the OP's original question but I need to correct this...

If you have domain names that are .com, .net, .org or any of the other US based domains then you do have assets in the US that can be taken. Its called an In Rem action.

Once there is a judgement, a smart creditor can ask the courts to seize the domains and place them into an auction to satisfy the judgement. You can lose the domains of your most important sites.

Second, if you have billing (or an affiliate site) through a US based billing company, then your money flows through a US bank and can be attached and taken before they are deposited in your bank.

If you have a trademark or copyrights in the US, those are also tangible property that can be seized and sold to satisfy the judgement.

To believe you can sit back and do nothing because the Plaintiff will have to come to my country is just incorrect.

Granted the value of those assets may not be enough to satisfy the judgement but losing all of your domains, especially the domain of your most profitable site might be enough to force you to deal with the judgement before your entire business is decimated and you have to begin all over with new domains.

pornlaw 08-27-2017 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 21972841)
loveparade

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions...d/091412.U.pdf

And thast how they can fuck you over in the USA if you ignore it..

You arent getting fucked. You didnt show up and defend yourself. When you dont bother to defend a lawsuit in the US, the plaintiff usually wins everything they are asking for.

Read this part of the decision...

Quote:

We note that the Default Defendants are commercial
enterprises and persons involved in the distribution of adult
Internet content. These relatively sophisticated litigants
pursued a litigation strategy that carried the real possibility
of having a default judgment entered against them. Nonetheless,
the Default Defendants failed to enter an appearance before the
district court or this court at their own peril.

You could have defended the case and it is very likely she would not have won nearly everything she had asked for - or you might have prevailed.

Now she has a default judgement and if she finds a smart attorney she can attach whatever assets you have in the US - see my above post.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123