![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was a hardcore Republican until the impeachment of Bill Clinton. That was pure bullshit. During the White Water investigation they had the balls to the President of the United States if he got a blow job from an intern, while under oath and in front of his wife? Holy fucking shit. Once I saw that I became an independent who leans Democratic. I vote for who I feel is the right party, not who "my party" tells me to vote for. The hatred by the Republican party against the Clinton family is brutal and uncalled for. She went through a dozens investigations during the Obama administration, all of which were pure bullshit. With the email scandal it was a common practice for other Secretaries of State AND in Congress, yet we had to have multiple investigations. With Benghazi we knew no crime had been committed by Hillary - this was a terrorist attack - yet again we had multiple investigations. Yet again this morning the Chief of Staff suggested we should have a special prosecutor investigate the "Uranium" deal. Outfuckingstanding. Hillary Clinton did not make the decision on this deal, most likely didn't know about it, no uranium left the United States, and no money went into Hillary's pocket. But we should have an investigation. The Republican party doesn't seem to understand this bullshit fires up their base but pisses everyone else off. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nice playground mentality :thumbsup |
Quote:
However, at this point, the Republican party is using investigations as a political weapon. They aren't interested in the truth, but instead only interested in making an opposing candidate look bad. Now we have an investigation, the Republicans have zero interest in getting at the truth. The only time the Republicans show up to the Congressional investigations is when former Obama staff members are being interviewed. They want to use these investigations as a weapon. They seem to be focused (still) on the unmasking, which is a routine procedure - any time a US citizen gets caught up in an intelligence investigation they are in fact unmasked. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hmmm.. makes you wonder eh? |
Quote:
that is the real question to my mind... if the guys being charged are political hacks, that's means they were put on to him by the powers that be... or did trump show up with a gang of thugs? do you know which? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
strange analogy, does this have some personal significance for you? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
no one innocent Richard. Quote:
I would not want someone that fucking incompetent to be present for sure. and the REAL is issue is the pay off thorough the Canadian charity cleaning the Russian payment's. that's what they are talking about. this has been documented by many sources. Clinton Foundation Donations and Bill Clinton Speaking Fee Clinton?s role in the Uranium One sale, and the link to the Clinton Foundation, first became an issue in 2015, when news organizations received advance copies of the book ?Clinton Cash:haThe Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,? by PeterhaSchweizer, a former fellow at a conservative think tank. On April 23, 2015, thehaNew York Timeshawrotehaabout the uranium issue, saying the paperhahad ?built upon? Schweizer?shainformation. ThehaTimeshadetailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One. The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren?t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after thehaTimeshastory, the foundation acknowledged that it ?made mistakes,? saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company. ThehaTimeshaalso wrote that Bill Clinton spoke at a conference in Moscow on June 29, 2010 ? which was after the Rosatom-Uranium One merger was announced in June 2010, but before it was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States in October 2010. The Russian-based Renaissance Capital Group organized the conference and paid Clinton $500,000. Renaissance Capital has ?ties to the Kremlin? and its analysts ?talked up Uranium One?s stock, assigning it a ?buy? rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was ?the best play? in the uranium markets,? the Times wrote. But there is no evidence that the donations or the speaking fee had any influence on the approvals granted by the NRC or the Committee on Foreign Investments. this should be on bullshit or not with penn and teller... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh Quote:
|
Quote:
Trump has two people on board with him - his friends and family who have no political experience what so ever, and then people with political experience who aren't trusted by Trump, and do not get along with his friends and family. These two groups do not get along well, and he tends to favor his friends and family. I'm sorry, but Jared Kushner has no business being in the White House. In the case of Manafort, he had been friends with Trump a long time. Others, like Papadopoulos, were "hand me downs" - Papadopoulos came from the Ben Carson campaign (if I understand correctly). Some of his choices are fucking bizarre. Betsy Devos has ZERO experience in education. She had never ONCE stepped foot into a public school her ENTIRE LIFE - She went to private school as a child, her children went to private school, and her entire family has made a fortune in private schools. Ben Carson for HUD? That's a cruel joke, right? Perfectly qualified to be Surgeon General, but HUD? The argument Trump gave was that Carson grew up in pubic housing so he was qualified, but by this measure that means you and I are qualified based on the fact that our parents owned houses. The only one that seems to be doing well and understands her job is Nikki Haley. My favorite though is Rex Tillerson for Secretary Of State. Zero qualifications for one of the most important positions in the country. Then add in Kushner who will magically just solve all of the problems in the Middle East, and it's easy to understand why nothing has been accomplished in ten months and his approval rating continues to sink lower, being the least popular president EVER. |
Quote:
Quote:
We should have another investigation to find out. You know what they say - Fifteenth time is a charm. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not sure why I even need to mention this, it seems so obvious.. we NEED relations with Russia. and China. you do realize that correct? pretty sure cnn and the times ect have kept this away from your eyes. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/c...week-jury-duty this is the type of man we need in government |
Quote:
and all the sexual claims against Bill Clinton... https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...nt-fine-229460... lol!! if you think your team of liars is telling truth and the other team of liars is lying... you can have that can of worms in your head by yourself.. not for me. :2 cents: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is hilarious. You keep acting like they won. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton are done, over with; Hillary is on a book tour. She'll spend the rest of her life giving speeches, maybe do some consulting; She'll never have to worry about money. But for some reason the Republican party keeps going after her. Because, you know, after fourteen investigations she must be guilty of something, RIGHT? You keep trying. Hillary Clinton is the most vetted politician in American history. But while you bring up sexual claims.... Let's grab this by the pussy! You want to bring up sexual claims from a President who hasn't been in office for nearly twenty years while Trump is in office? You cannot remotely be serious. That's a joke, right? |
Quote:
clinton should be really nervous now that this is on money laundering, if podesta rolls over the clintons are SUNK. it's glorius |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We already know there was collusion. A member of Trump's Foreign Policy Committee "magically" met a Russian agent while on vacation in Italy, came back and told the Trump campaign he had met someone who had "dirt" on Clinton, and someone at the Trump Campaign signed off on him and "another person" going to a foreign country to meet this person. As for the Podesta Group, there seems to be no indication of any wrong doing. They were mention in the indictment only because they did some work for the same group Manafort worked for. Working for this group isn't what Manafort is in trouble for, nor is there any wrong doing involved in working for them. There was a dozen other companies mentioned in the indictment, and oddly enough the only ones the Republicans have latched onto is the Podesta Group. At this point the Podesta Group does not seem to be under investigation, nor are any of the other companies under investigation. In the event they decide to investigate them, and they discover the Podesta Brothers were making money in Ukraine and then holding it in a bank in Cypress that Russians use to launder money.... Well then, they will be charged and they can go to prison. With the Podesta Brothers there is no "deal" to be made. Again, I find it amusing that out of the dozen companies mentioned only one is being singled out, and Republicans are acting like they are under investigation. Take a look at the Podesta Brothers and compare them to Manafort. The Podesta Brothers are life long politicians - Do you really think they were laundering money through banks in Cypress? Of course you had to mention Clinton, because she has zero involvement in any of this. But we should investigate her again just to be sure. |
Quote:
If you are so concerned about "missing emails", shouldn't you be up in arms about the million plus emails missing under President Bush? |
Quote:
Mueller's indictments weren't a warning to Trump. It was a warning to these people. Podesta, Hillary and others. If you don't stop trying to take out a democratically elected President, I'm taking you out. If these people keep pushing, Trump has no choice. All dirty secrets will be revealed. Trump allowing the Kennedy file release was a message. The Newsweek Uranium One article was a message. He's making it very clear. Fuck with me, Ill fuck you 10 times over. Quite sure he has a plan in place to expose everyone if anything happens to him. He's not stupid. Once again, Trump met with Mueller the day before he was appointed. If you think he didn't know Mueller would be the appointment you're a complete fucking moron. Pretty much retard status. Trump interviewed Mueller for FBI director - CNNPolitics |
Quote:
|
The bigger the problem the more support they will have.
|
Quote:
I also believe local politics is much more important - What happens in Washington has little impact on the local population. Taxes go up, taxes go down, healthcare costs will always go up. What's important to me is my house not flooding. My city government was blasted for working on flood control during the recession when our local government was going broke. The city government told us it wasn't a matter of if we would have to deal with flooding, but when, and sure enough when the rains finally came last winter we were ready and everything worked as they hoped. I am very well known here locally. I run the local Facebook groups for the city. Everyone is telling me I need to run for city council. I am sure I will in the future. |
Quote:
The new rich is orange moron :2 cents: Trump is obnoxiously nouveau riche in behavior -- gold toilets and such. '0' class. Talks to the knuckle draggers like he has an 8th grade education ... He was a curiosity when he was a private enterprise. As a leader of a nation -- Trump is a disgrace apart from his feigned incompetence. At least Richard Nixon was competent in the workings of government -- dosen't get much worse. Even conservative Republican party regulars are distancing themselves. Remember, the Republican leadership forced Nixon to resign. |
Quote:
|
More proof of collusion this morning.... Just fucking wow.
I thought this meeting was a "nothing burger".... A Russian lawyer who met with President Donald Drumpf?s oldest son last year says he indicated that a law targeting Russia could be re-examined if his father won the election and asked her for written evidence that illegal proceeds went to Hillary Clinton?s campaign. And then.... Veselnitskaya said she went to the New York meeting to show Drumpf campaign officials that major Democratic donors had evaded U.S. taxes and to lobby against the so-called Magnitsky law that punishes Russian officials for the murder of a Russian tax accountant who accused the Kremlin of corruption. Veselnitskaya also said Drumpf Jr. requested financial documents showing that money that allegedly evaded U.S. taxes had gone to Clinton?s campaign. So now we have Donald Trump Jr directly asking the Russians for dirt on Hillary Clinton. Most likely he lied about this under oath too. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ow-lawyer-says |
If these "russians" that Donald Trump JR met with were so bad and evil...then how the hell did they get to enter the country?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They haven't lied about anything. Meeting with people is not illegal. Clinton met with Russians. How is meeting with someone bad and illegal? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc