GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Proof Of Collusion (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1283146)

JFK 10-31-2017 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 22056012)
Did you see that pic they had of his smiling face on the news? That face says "I'm about to fucking sing to the feds".

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Busty2 10-31-2017 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 22056602)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

I would bet he has already sung

Rochard 10-31-2017 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thommy (Post 22056582)
what you asspimp do not understand is that if someone is anti-trump he is not automatically pro hillary.

I am not fond of Hillary. In fact, I can't stand her. However, she is at least qualified. At the same time I'm freaking tired of the relentless attacks against her.

I was a hardcore Republican until the impeachment of Bill Clinton. That was pure bullshit. During the White Water investigation they had the balls to the President of the United States if he got a blow job from an intern, while under oath and in front of his wife? Holy fucking shit. Once I saw that I became an independent who leans Democratic. I vote for who I feel is the right party, not who "my party" tells me to vote for.

The hatred by the Republican party against the Clinton family is brutal and uncalled for. She went through a dozens investigations during the Obama administration, all of which were pure bullshit. With the email scandal it was a common practice for other Secretaries of State AND in Congress, yet we had to have multiple investigations. With Benghazi we knew no crime had been committed by Hillary - this was a terrorist attack - yet again we had multiple investigations.

Yet again this morning the Chief of Staff suggested we should have a special prosecutor investigate the "Uranium" deal. Outfuckingstanding. Hillary Clinton did not make the decision on this deal, most likely didn't know about it, no uranium left the United States, and no money went into Hillary's pocket. But we should have an investigation.

The Republican party doesn't seem to understand this bullshit fires up their base but pisses everyone else off.

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22055922)
The big news today isn't Manafort - it's George Papadopoulos.

While George Papadopoulos was working for the Trump campaign he held multiple secret meetings with a Russian professor who had ties to the Russian government. George Papadopoulos "ought to use the professor's Russian connections to arrange a meeting between the campaign and Russian government officials". George Papadopoulos later met with this same "professor" and a "Russian woman".

LOL. It gets better. He tried to set up a secret meeting between Trump and the Russians.

"In April, the professor introduced Papadopoulos to a Russian national connected to the Russian ministry of foreign affairs, and they had conversations over Skype and email about setting up a meeting between Drumpf campaign and Russian government officials.

In late April, Papadopoulos learned about the "dirt" on Clinton, and the following day he emailed a senior campaign policy adviser: "Have some interesting messages coming in from Moscow about a trip when the time is right," according to the statement."

And then...

"In May, Papadopoulos sent an email to a "high ranking Campaign official" with subject line "Request from Russia to meet Mr. Trumpf." The email said Russia was eager to meet with the candidate and have been reaching out.
In a footnote, the statement notes that the email was forwarded between campaign officials and who wrote they should discuss: "We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal."

George Papadopoulos has already plead guilty and signed a deal. They have all of his emails and skype messages. I wonder where that will lead.

Drip. Drip. Drip.

Mueller, the FBI, and the CIA already know what happened. It's just slowly coming to light.

now I'm confused??? isn't this guy, George Papadopoulos the scary supper rich dem buying the elections?

directfiesta 10-31-2017 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22056730)
now I'm confused???

pretty obvious ... didn't need to say so ...

Bladewire 10-31-2017 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22056696)
I am not fond of Hillary. In fact, I can't stand her. However, she is at least qualified. At the same time I'm freaking tired of the relentless attacks against her.

I was a hardcore Republican until the impeachment of Bill Clinton. That was pure bullshit. During the White Water investigation they had the balls to the President of the United States if he got a blow job from an intern, while under oath and in front of his wife? Holy fucking shit. Once I saw that I became an independent who leans Democratic. I vote for who I feel is the right party, not who "my party" tells me to vote for.

The hatred by the Republican party against the Clinton family is brutal and uncalled for. She went through a dozens investigations during the Obama administration, all of which were pure bullshit. With the email scandal it was a common practice for other Secretaries of State AND in Congress, yet we had to have multiple investigations. With Benghazi we knew no crime had been committed by Hillary - this was a terrorist attack - yet again we had multiple investigations.

Yet again this morning the Chief of Staff suggested we should have a special prosecutor investigate the "Uranium" deal. Outfuckingstanding. Hillary Clinton did not make the decision on this deal, most likely didn't know about it, no uranium left the United States, and no money went into Hillary's pocket. But we should have an investigation.

The Republican party doesn't seem to understand this bullshit fires up their base but pisses everyone else off.

The problem with the Republicans and their fake investigations is that it doesn't matter how many if their base they alienate and turn independent or Democrat because their Presidential candidates can lose by millions & millions of vote and still be annointed POTUS. Soon we'll have presidential election stuff where the Republican candidate loses by 20 million votes and is still annointed POTUS by the Electoral College.

Rochard 10-31-2017 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22056730)
now I'm confused??? isn't this guy, George Papadopoulos the scary supper rich dem buying the elections?

I think you have him confused with someone else.

astronaut x 10-31-2017 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 22056046)
Brainless Thommy
Has no brain since it got washed away in the libtard brainwashing.

Look, more name-calling from someone who cries about name-calling.

Nice playground mentality :thumbsup

Rochard 10-31-2017 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22056744)
The problem with the Republicans and their fake investigations is that it doesn't matter how many if their base they alienate and turn independent or Democrat because their Presidential candidates can lose by millions & millions of vote and still be annointed POTUS. Soon we'll have presidential election stuff where the Republican candidate loses by 20 million votes and is still annointed POTUS by the Electoral College.

I want my government to do it's job. If an investigation is required, then investigate.

However, at this point, the Republican party is using investigations as a political weapon. They aren't interested in the truth, but instead only interested in making an opposing candidate look bad.

Now we have an investigation, the Republicans have zero interest in getting at the truth. The only time the Republicans show up to the Congressional investigations is when former Obama staff members are being interviewed. They want to use these investigations as a weapon. They seem to be focused (still) on the unmasking, which is a routine procedure - any time a US citizen gets caught up in an intelligence investigation they are in fact unmasked.

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22056242)
Canadians are unarmed North Americans with healthcare. Sadly, I am not one of them.

But I can understand the confusion because I'm so friendly.

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...0b&oe=5AADF619

that's funny as hell

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22057122)
I think you have him confused with someone else.

thanks, I don't follow the players

astronaut x 10-31-2017 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22056252)
You mean like Hillary's missing emails, that she illegally tried to delete after getting a congressional subpoena?

Trump has it all. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:pimp

And yet she is no trouble at all, after alllllllllll that investigating.

Hmmm.. makes you wonder eh?

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22056240)
You mean other than three Trump campaign members being charged, one pleading guilty, more secret emails, more secret meetings with Russians, this time in London?

where did trump get his campaign people Richard? guys already pulling strings and trump showed up or did trump bring in guys for the job that had been with him for years?

that is the real question to my mind... if the guys being charged are political hacks, that's means they were put on to him by the powers that be... or did trump show up with a gang of thugs?

do you know which?

crockett 10-31-2017 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 22056120)

FREE DT! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thommy (Post 22056582)
what you asspimp do not understand is that if someone is anti-trump he is not automatically pro hillary.

this goes both ways being anti Hillary is not pro trump

Quote:




this guy in the white house is the dumbest, most unreliable and most dangerous

this has happened many many times. we have survived

Quote:


chimpanzee of all chimpanzees you could vote there.
but this fact canīt be seen from another chimpanzee who is convinced that he would be normal to have fleas because ALL chimpanzees have fleas.

so go to get rid of your fleas - go to a doctor and ask him if he can help you to become human and than you might see the difference between a chimpanzee and a smart president.

strange analogy, does this have some personal significance for you?

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22056240)
You mean other than three Trump campaign members being charged, one pleading guilty, more secret emails, more secret meetings with Russians, this time in London?

Richard you have no idea about the 'pleading guilty' suppose the guy got busted fucking a kid and the 'just right people' set him up to rat trump out... he does a few years in a fed day camp, goes into witness protection after... as plausible as anything you have to say... we except the witness protection stuff. the guy really gets a knife in the kidney while in prison :2 cents:

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22056696)
I am not fond of Hillary. In fact, I can't stand her. However, she is at least qualified. At the same time I'm freaking tired of the relentless attacks against her.

that's fucking weird.. am I supposed to enjoy the relentless attacks against trump? fuck running the government lets all be fucking crybabies!

Quote:




The hatred by the Republican party against the Clinton family is brutal and uncalled for.


no one innocent Richard.

Quote:


Yet again this morning the Chief of Staff suggested we should have a special prosecutor investigate the "Uranium" deal. Outfuckingstanding. Hillary Clinton did not make the decision on this deal, most likely didn't know about it, no uranium left the United States, and no money went into Hillary's pocket. But we should have an investigation.

so your theory is the 'secretary of state' had no input or knowledge of the country 'secret uranium supply and resources? that's fucking great.

I would not want someone that fucking incompetent to be present for sure. and the REAL is issue is the pay off thorough the Canadian charity cleaning the Russian payment's.

that's what they are talking about. this has been documented by many sources.

Clinton Foundation Donations and Bill Clinton Speaking Fee
Clinton?s role in the Uranium One sale, and the link to the Clinton Foundation, first became an issue in 2015, when news organizations received advance copies of the book ?Clinton Cash:haThe Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,? by PeterhaSchweizer, a former fellow at a conservative think tank.

On April 23, 2015, thehaNew York Timeshawrotehaabout the uranium issue, saying the paperhahad ?built upon? Schweizer?shainformation.

ThehaTimeshadetailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.

The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren?t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after thehaTimeshastory, the foundation acknowledged that it ?made mistakes,? saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

ThehaTimeshaalso wrote that Bill Clinton spoke at a conference in Moscow on June 29, 2010 ? which was after the Rosatom-Uranium One merger was announced in June 2010, but before it was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States in October 2010. The Russian-based Renaissance Capital Group organized the conference and paid Clinton $500,000.

Renaissance Capital has ?ties to the Kremlin? and its analysts ?talked up Uranium One?s stock, assigning it a ?buy? rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was ?the best play? in the uranium markets,? the Times wrote.

But there is no evidence that the donations or the speaking fee had any influence on the approvals granted by the NRC or the Committee on Foreign Investments.

this should be on bullshit or not with penn and teller... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


Quote:

The Republican party doesn't seem to understand this bullshit fires up their base but pisses everyone else off.
unlike the democratic bullshit, thanks for the clarification. seriously dude... you gonna go with that? :2 cents:

Rochard 10-31-2017 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057170)
where did trump get his campaign people Richard? guys already pulling strings and trump showed up or did trump bring in guys for the job that had been with him for years?

that is the real question to my mind... if the guys being charged are political hacks, that's means they were put on to him by the powers that be... or did trump show up with a gang of thugs?

do you know which?

Amazing question.

Trump has two people on board with him - his friends and family who have no political experience what so ever, and then people with political experience who aren't trusted by Trump, and do not get along with his friends and family. These two groups do not get along well, and he tends to favor his friends and family. I'm sorry, but Jared Kushner has no business being in the White House.

In the case of Manafort, he had been friends with Trump a long time. Others, like Papadopoulos, were "hand me downs" - Papadopoulos came from the Ben Carson campaign (if I understand correctly).

Some of his choices are fucking bizarre. Betsy Devos has ZERO experience in education. She had never ONCE stepped foot into a public school her ENTIRE LIFE - She went to private school as a child, her children went to private school, and her entire family has made a fortune in private schools. Ben Carson for HUD? That's a cruel joke, right? Perfectly qualified to be Surgeon General, but HUD? The argument Trump gave was that Carson grew up in pubic housing so he was qualified, but by this measure that means you and I are qualified based on the fact that our parents owned houses. The only one that seems to be doing well and understands her job is Nikki Haley.

My favorite though is Rex Tillerson for Secretary Of State. Zero qualifications for one of the most important positions in the country. Then add in Kushner who will magically just solve all of the problems in the Middle East, and it's easy to understand why nothing has been accomplished in ten months and his approval rating continues to sink lower, being the least popular president EVER.

Rochard 10-31-2017 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057196)
that's fucking weird.. am I supposed to enjoy the relentless attacks against trump? fuck running the government lets all be fucking crybabies!

In short, yes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057196)
no one innocent Richard.

You mean after fourteen investigations and no charges, clearly Hillary must be guilty, right?

We should have another investigation to find out. You know what they say - Fifteenth time is a charm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057196)
so your theory is the 'secretary of state' had no input or knowledge of the country 'secret uranium supply and resources? that's fucking great.

That's exactly what I am saying. You do understand what the Secretary of State is, and what the Secretary of State does, right? The Secretary of State is concerned with the relations of other countries, not what happens within the US borders. This is much more an area that the Department Of Energy would be interested in, or the Secretary of Defense. Hillary Clinton wasn't briefed on this, didn't sit in on meetings about this; The Secretary of State doesn't weigh on regular operations of energy companies. Her department signed off on it; This is something that happens hundreds of times a year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057196)
The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren?t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after thehaTimeshastory, the foundation acknowledged that it ?made mistakes,? saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

This is completely false. The man who owned Uranium One and made the donations to Clinton sold his interests in Uranium One before Clinton was Secretary of State.

RedFred 10-31-2017 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057182)
Richard you have no idea about the 'pleading guilty' suppose the guy got busted fucking a kid and the 'just right people' set him up to rat trump out... he does a few years in a fed day camp, goes into witness protection after... as plausible as anything you have to say... we except the witness protection stuff. the guy really gets a knife in the kidney while in prison :2 cents:

Fucking a kid would get charged at the state level. :2 cents:

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22057326)
Amazing question.

Trump has two people on board with him - his friends and family who have no political experience what so ever, and then people with political experience who aren't trusted by Trump, and do not get along with his friends and family. These two groups do not get along well, and he tends to favor his friends and family. I'm sorry, but Jared Kushner has no business being in the White House.

think of it like asking you about the dodgers... okay? I do not follow baseball however I am aware of baseball and some of the issues, fair enough? this is about as much info as I have about politics, yet you guys just refuse to believe it.

Quote:


In the case of Manafort, he had been friends with Trump a long time. Others, like Papadopoulos, were "hand me downs" - Papadopoulos came from the Ben Carson campaign (if I understand correctly).

Some of his choices are fucking bizarre. Betsy Devos has ZERO experience in education. She had never ONCE stepped foot into a public school her ENTIRE LIFE - She went to private school as a child, her children went to private school, and her entire family has made a fortune in private schools. Ben Carson for HUD? That's a cruel joke, right? Perfectly qualified to be Surgeon General, but HUD? The argument Trump gave was that Carson grew up in pubic housing so he was qualified, but by this measure that means you and I are qualified based on the fact that our parents owned houses. The only one that seems to be doing well and understands her job is Nikki Haley.

My favorite though is Rex Tillerson for Secretary Of State. Zero qualifications for one of the most important positions in the country. Then add in Kushner who will magically just solve all of the problems in the Middle East, and it's easy to understand why nothing has been accomplished in ten months and his approval rating continues to sink lower, being the least popular president EVER.
Rex Tillerson is my favorite as well. one hell of a man and a patriot. and the motherfucker knows some Russians.

I'm not sure why I even need to mention this, it seems so obvious.. we NEED relations with Russia. and China. you do realize that correct? pretty sure cnn and the times ect have kept this away from your eyes.

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/c...week-jury-duty

this is the type of man we need in government

Grapesoda 10-31-2017 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22057350)
In short, yes.



You mean after fourteen investigations and no charges, clearly Hillary must be guilty, right?

We should have another investigation to find out. You know what they say - Fifteenth time is a charm.



That's exactly what I am saying. You do understand what the Secretary of State is, and what the Secretary of State does, right? The Secretary of State is concerned with the relations of other countries, not what happens within the US borders. This is much more an area that the Department Of Energy would be interested in, or the Secretary of Defense. Hillary Clinton wasn't briefed on this, didn't sit in on meetings about this; The Secretary of State doesn't weigh on regular operations of energy companies. Her department signed off on it; This is something that happens hundreds of times a year.



This is completely false. The man who owned Uranium One and made the donations to Clinton sold his interests in Uranium One before Clinton was Secretary of State.

okay... I'm not going to research this because it really doesn't matter to me.. if you don't mind. IMO there has been way to much dirty water around the Clintons and Obama to just pretend everything is okay. some of the dirty water is very obvious.

and all the sexual claims against Bill Clinton... https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...nt-fine-229460... lol!!

if you think your team of liars is telling truth and the other team of liars is lying... you can have that can of worms in your head by yourself.. not for me. :2 cents:

Rochard 10-31-2017 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057484)
Rex Tillerson is my favorite as well. one hell of a man and a patriot.

Other than being a boy scout when he was a child, what makes him a patriot?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057484)
I'm not sure why I even need to mention this, it seems so obvious.. we NEED relations with Russia. and China. you do realize that correct? pretty sure cnn and the times ect have kept this away from your eyes.

Well, yes, we need relations with Russia. But we know someone who knows how to handle international relations. Of all countries, not just Russia. Tillerson is a businessman. He knows oil. He has zero experience with international relations.

Rochard 10-31-2017 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22057488)
okay... I'm not going to research this because it really doesn't matter to me.. if you don't mind. IMO there has been way to much dirty water around the Clintons and Obama to just pretend everything is okay. some of the dirty water is very obvious.

and all the sexual claims against Bill Clinton... https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...nt-fine-229460... lol!!

if you think your team of liars is telling truth and the other team of liars is lying... you can have that can of worms in your head by yourself.. not for me. :2 cents:

What does Bill Clinton have to do with ANY of this?

This is hilarious. You keep acting like they won. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton are done, over with; Hillary is on a book tour. She'll spend the rest of her life giving speeches, maybe do some consulting; She'll never have to worry about money. But for some reason the Republican party keeps going after her. Because, you know, after fourteen investigations she must be guilty of something, RIGHT? You keep trying.

Hillary Clinton is the most vetted politician in American history.

But while you bring up sexual claims.... Let's grab this by the pussy! You want to bring up sexual claims from a President who hasn't been in office for nearly twenty years while Trump is in office? You cannot remotely be serious. That's a joke, right?

charlie g 10-31-2017 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 22055936)
https://www.justice.gov/file/1007271/download

Somebody is in BIGLY trouble. Shameful!!!

Tweet that Orange Baboon!

I just read this and nowhere in this is trump. I know it's a long read, but this is not about trump...it's about manafort laundering money. your conjecture is wild and not correct. the next target will be podesta, which is why he stepped down....swamp draining? check

clinton should be really nervous now that this is on money laundering, if podesta rolls over the clintons are SUNK. it's glorius

charlie g 10-31-2017 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astronaut x (Post 22057164)
And yet she is no trouble at all, after alllllllllll that investigating.

Hmmm.. makes you wonder eh?

Oh my god... you people are either blind or just plain stupid. The clintons have skirted the law for 30 years. It has happened so much that it's turned you guys into dindunuffins. The emails and the private server we know she lied to congress about that. The emails are vital to her potential money laundering case, which is why she deleted them and destroyed any evidence she thought relevant. Even this is obstruction of justice that would put you or I in jail if it were us. Do you really think the comey investigation was thorough and fair? Allow a potential witness to act as counsel during an interview is never ever ever done, but was allowed for clinton. The investigations against clinton have been dog and pony shows, and if mueller does his job the democrats(and republicans) will start to shit their pants. Because folks, this is the first step to draining the swamp. And guess what, Trump will come out the winner just like everytime someone fucks with him.

Rochard 10-31-2017 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 22057648)
I just read this and nowhere in this is trump. I know it's a long read, but this is not about trump...it's about manafort laundering money. your conjecture is wild and not correct. the next target will be podesta, which is why he stepped down....swamp draining? check

clinton should be really nervous now that this is on money laundering, if podesta rolls over the clintons are SUNK. it's glorius

The last time a campaign chairman was indicted AND charged was during Watergate. None of the charges mention Trump because they are not against Trump; they are against Manafort and Gates. These are money laundering charges, and very VERY easy to prove in court. Manafort and Gates will be facing serious jail time, and these might result in them going to prison for the rest of their lives. The intention it to put pressure on them to flip on Trump. If they don't flip, or if there was no collusion, they go to prison for the crimes they committed. Best case for Manafort and Gates is for them to tell all they know and make a deal.

We already know there was collusion. A member of Trump's Foreign Policy Committee "magically" met a Russian agent while on vacation in Italy, came back and told the Trump campaign he had met someone who had "dirt" on Clinton, and someone at the Trump Campaign signed off on him and "another person" going to a foreign country to meet this person.

As for the Podesta Group, there seems to be no indication of any wrong doing. They were mention in the indictment only because they did some work for the same group Manafort worked for. Working for this group isn't what Manafort is in trouble for, nor is there any wrong doing involved in working for them. There was a dozen other companies mentioned in the indictment, and oddly enough the only ones the Republicans have latched onto is the Podesta Group.

At this point the Podesta Group does not seem to be under investigation, nor are any of the other companies under investigation. In the event they decide to investigate them, and they discover the Podesta Brothers were making money in Ukraine and then holding it in a bank in Cypress that Russians use to launder money.... Well then, they will be charged and they can go to prison. With the Podesta Brothers there is no "deal" to be made.

Again, I find it amusing that out of the dozen companies mentioned only one is being singled out, and Republicans are acting like they are under investigation. Take a look at the Podesta Brothers and compare them to Manafort. The Podesta Brothers are life long politicians - Do you really think they were laundering money through banks in Cypress?

Of course you had to mention Clinton, because she has zero involvement in any of this. But we should investigate her again just to be sure.

Rochard 10-31-2017 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 22057670)
Oh my god... you people are either blind or just plain stupid. The clintons have skirted the law for 30 years. It has happened so much that it's turned you guys into dindunuffins. The emails and the private server we know she lied to congress about that. The emails are vital to her potential money laundering case, which is why she deleted them and destroyed any evidence she thought relevant. Even this is obstruction of justice that would put you or I in jail if it were us. Do you really think the comey investigation was thorough and fair? Allow a potential witness to act as counsel during an interview is never ever ever done, but was allowed for clinton. The investigations against clinton have been dog and pony shows, and if mueller does his job the democrats(and republicans) will start to shit their pants. Because folks, this is the first step to draining the swamp. And guess what, Drumpf will come out the winner just like everytime someone fucks with him.

If they have been "dirty" for the past thirty years... Why hasn't it come up in any of the dozen or investigations we've had in the past four years?

If you are so concerned about "missing emails", shouldn't you be up in arms about the million plus emails missing under President Bush?

onwebcam 10-31-2017 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22057752)
If they have been "dirty" for the past thirty years... Why hasn't it come up in any of the dozen or investigations we've had in the past four years?

If you are so concerned about "missing emails", shouldn't you be up in arms about the million plus emails missing under President Bush?

CIA's been cleaning up after them for years that's why. Obama was a spook as well. That's why his past is so sketchy, full of holes, multiple SS#s and all.. Bush Jr was via Bush Sr. Considering he and Osama Bin Laden were childhood friends Jr was most likely his handler.. The US has been run by CIA since at least Bush Sr. Likely since Kennedy. MSM is FULL of CIA. That's why they all work in unison.. That's why all of them are pissed their election fix didn't work..

Mueller's indictments weren't a warning to Trump. It was a warning to these people. Podesta, Hillary and others. If you don't stop trying to take out a democratically elected President, I'm taking you out. If these people keep pushing, Trump has no choice. All dirty secrets will be revealed. Trump allowing the Kennedy file release was a message. The Newsweek Uranium One article was a message. He's making it very clear. Fuck with me, Ill fuck you 10 times over. Quite sure he has a plan in place to expose everyone if anything happens to him. He's not stupid.

Once again, Trump met with Mueller the day before he was appointed. If you think he didn't know Mueller would be the appointment you're a complete fucking moron. Pretty much retard status. Trump interviewed Mueller for FBI director - CNNPolitics

ilnjscb 11-01-2017 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22056242)
Canadians are unarmed North Americans with healthcare. Sadly, I am not one of them.

But I can understand the confusion because I'm so friendly.

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...0b&oe=5AADF619

Then I hope you'll take it upon yourself to vote and maybe do some campaign volunteering, etc, and not just post all day.

lock 11-01-2017 01:04 AM

The bigger the problem the more support they will have.

Rochard 11-01-2017 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22057800)
Then I hope you'll take it upon yourself to vote and maybe do some campaign volunteering, etc, and not just post all day.

I am already involved in a number of local charities.

I also believe local politics is much more important - What happens in Washington has little impact on the local population. Taxes go up, taxes go down, healthcare costs will always go up.

What's important to me is my house not flooding. My city government was blasted for working on flood control during the recession when our local government was going broke. The city government told us it wasn't a matter of if we would have to deal with flooding, but when, and sure enough when the rains finally came last winter we were ready and everything worked as they hoped.

I am very well known here locally. I run the local Facebook groups for the city. Everyone is telling me I need to run for city council. I am sure I will in the future.

Barry-xlovecam 11-01-2017 08:23 AM

Quote:

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III?s court filing tells a sordid tale of influence-peddling on behalf of Yanukovych, Vladihamir Putin?s man in Kiev. But while Monday?s revelations were in no way an indictment of Trump-Russia collusion, they were a searing indictment of Trump?s judgment in bringing Manafort into his campaign in the first place.
Lack of better judgment is not an impeachable offense.

The new rich is orange moron :2 cents:
Trump is obnoxiously nouveau riche in behavior -- gold toilets and such. '0' class. Talks to the knuckle draggers like he has an 8th grade education ...

He was a curiosity when he was a private enterprise.
As a leader of a nation -- Trump is a disgrace apart from his feigned incompetence.

At least Richard Nixon was competent in the workings of government -- dosen't get much worse. Even conservative Republican party regulars are distancing themselves. Remember, the Republican leadership forced Nixon to resign.

ilnjscb 11-05-2017 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22058086)
I am already involved in a number of local charities.

I also believe local politics is much more important - What happens in Washington has little impact on the local population. Taxes go up, taxes go down, healthcare costs will always go up.

What's important to me is my house not flooding. My city government was blasted for working on flood control during the recession when our local government was going broke. The city government told us it wasn't a matter of if we would have to deal with flooding, but when, and sure enough when the rains finally came last winter we were ready and everything worked as they hoped.

I am very well known here locally. I run the local Facebook groups for the city. Everyone is telling me I need to run for city council. I am sure I will in the future.

If you honestly believe you can be associated with the adult industry and run a city council campaign successfully, and any polling says you have a chance, I promise here and now to donate the full amount allowed by law to your campaign.

Rochard 11-06-2017 07:55 AM

More proof of collusion this morning.... Just fucking wow.

I thought this meeting was a "nothing burger"....

A Russian lawyer who met with President Donald Drumpf?s oldest son last year says he indicated that a law targeting Russia could be re-examined if his father won the election and asked her for written evidence that illegal proceeds went to Hillary Clinton?s campaign.

And then....

Veselnitskaya said she went to the New York meeting to show Drumpf campaign officials that major Democratic donors had evaded U.S. taxes and to lobby against the so-called Magnitsky law that punishes Russian officials for the murder of a Russian tax accountant who accused the Kremlin of corruption.

Veselnitskaya also said Drumpf Jr. requested financial documents showing that money that allegedly evaded U.S. taxes had gone to Clinton?s campaign.

So now we have Donald Trump Jr directly asking the Russians for dirt on Hillary Clinton. Most likely he lied about this under oath too.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ow-lawyer-says

TheRock55 11-09-2017 03:05 PM

If these "russians" that Donald Trump JR met with were so bad and evil...then how the hell did they get to enter the country?

Rochard 11-09-2017 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRock55 (Post 22068620)
If these "russians" that Donald Drumpf JR met with were so bad and evil...then how the hell did they get to enter the country?

No legal grounds to stop them?

TheRock55 11-09-2017 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22068666)
No legal grounds to stop them?

So they're not russian "agents"....

Bladewire 11-10-2017 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22064228)
More proof of collusion this morning.... Just fucking wow.

I thought this meeting was a "nothing burger"....

A Russian lawyer who met with President Donald Drumpf?s oldest son last year says he indicated that a law targeting Russia could be re-examined if his father won the election and asked her for written evidence that illegal proceeds went to Hillary Clinton?s campaign.

And then....

Veselnitskaya said she went to the New York meeting to show Drumpf campaign officials that major Democratic donors had evaded U.S. taxes and to lobby against the so-called Magnitsky law that punishes Russian officials for the murder of a Russian tax accountant who accused the Kremlin of corruption.

Veselnitskaya also said Drumpf Jr. requested financial documents showing that money that allegedly evaded U.S. taxes had gone to Clinton?s campaign.

So now we have Donald Trump Jr directly asking the Russians for dirt on Hillary Clinton. Most likely he lied about this under oath too.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ow-lawyer-says

Yeah they all lie about speaking with Russians about stolen emails then when caught say it was nothing or "oh we met but can't remember the conversation" scumbags :disgust

TheRock55 11-10-2017 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22069818)
Yeah they all lie about speaking with Russians about stolen emails then when caught say it was nothing or "oh we met but can't remember the conversation" scumbags :disgust

Define "russians"...is it anyone who is part russian, russian or kremlin?

They haven't lied about anything. Meeting with people is not illegal. Clinton met with Russians. How is meeting with someone bad and illegal?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc