GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Trump is the laziest President ever (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1289409)

Acepimp 12-30-2017 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22141128)

Trump ran for president to become richer.

Trump did not run for president to serve the American people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22141161)
^^ There sure are lots of uninformed people on this board. (All you Hillbots)

Very sad.

:pimp

Rochard 12-30-2017 11:36 PM
Five days ago tRUMP tweeted "back to work". He's played golf every day for the past five days since then.

RedFred 12-31-2017 09:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22141212)
Five days ago tRUMP tweeted "back to work". He's played golf every day for the past five days since then.


https://scontent.fapa1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...33&oe=5AF98E8C

seeandsee 12-31-2017 09:51 AM
trump really hurt american people? :D

directfiesta 01-01-2018 09:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22141161)
sure ... great backup link /// :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Quote:
Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina says that “so little” of the charitable donations to the Clinton Foundation “actually go to charitable works” — a figure CARLY for America later put at about 6 percent of its annual revenues — but Fiorina is simply wrong.

Fiorina and others are referring only to the amount donated by the Clinton Foundation to outside charities, ignoring the fact that most of the Clinton Foundation’s charitable work is performed in-house. One independent philanthropy watchdog did an analysis of Clinton Foundation funding and concluded that about 89 percent of its funding went to charity.

Simply put, despite its name, the Clinton Foundation is not a private foundation — which typically acts as a pass-through for private donations to other charitable organizations. Rather, it is a public charity. It conducts most of its charitable activities directly.

Asked for backup, the CARLY for America super PAC noted that the Clinton Foundation’s latest IRS Form 990 shows total revenue of nearly $149 million in 2013, and total charitable grant disbursements of nearly $9 million (see page 10). That comes to roughly 6 percent of the budget going to grants. And besides those grants, the super PAC said, “there really isn’t anything that can be categorized as charitable.”

That just isn’t so. The Clinton Foundation does most of its charitable work itself.

Katherina Rosqueta, the founding executive director of the Center for High Impact Philanthropy at the University of Pennsylvania, described the Clinton Foundation as an “operating foundation.”
https://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/wh...tion-money-go/

I don't like Clinton at all ( would not have voted for her ) , but at least stick with facts...

Mainly AssChimp, as FACTS are so important to him .... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Busty2 01-01-2018 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22141575)
Quoted for truth

Acepimp 01-01-2018 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22142502)
sure ... great backup link /// :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh



https://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/wh...tion-money-go/

I don't like Clinton at all ( would not have voted for her ) , but at least stick with facts...

Mainly AssChimp, as FACTS are so important to him .... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Well since you called me out, allow me destroy this dumbassery with the TRUTH:

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants

Charity watchdog: Clinton Foundation a ?slush fund?

If they're so giving, where is the $12 BILLION in Haiti relief money? Since Haiti is still in ruins 8 years after the earthquake, it's clear the money was stolen.

:2 cents:

muthisdev 01-02-2018 05:26 AM
I hate Occupy Democrats.
If you're going to be liberal, fine. If you're going to be conservative, fine.
But don't use places that regularly get details wrong as part of your evidence.

You're supposed to be better than that. Facts are supposed to matter.
And if you're linking there, you're either lazy, or showing that facts don't matter to you. Only sides.

SuckOnThis 01-02-2018 06:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by muthisdev (Post 22143645)
I hate Occupy Democrats.
If you're going to be liberal, fine. If you're going to be conservative, fine.
But don't use places that regularly get details wrong as part of your evidence.

You're supposed to be better than that. Facts are supposed to matter.
And if you're linking there, you're either lazy, or showing that facts don't matter to you. Only sides.

Occupy democrats didnt make Trump the fattest and laziest ever.

What facts do you dispute?

muthisdev 01-04-2018 02:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 22143768)
Occupy democrats didnt make Trump the fattest and laziest ever.

What facts do you dispute?
I am not disputing the article. Or that Trump is fat. Or lazy.
What I dispute here is using a place that has a terrible record for misinformation.

Occupy Democrats's file | PolitiFact
https://www.snopes.com/tag/occupy-democrats/

Don't link to places that play fast and loose with facts.

I don't link to InfoWars, even if there's an article on there that happens to be true. Why? Because there's other stuff there that talks about chemtrails and chemicals that make frogs gay.

RedFred 01-04-2018 08:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by muthisdev (Post 22146957)
I am not disputing the article. Or that Trump is fat. Or lazy.
What I dispute here is using a place that has a terrible record for misinformation.

Occupy Democrats's file | PolitiFact
https://www.snopes.com/tag/occupy-democrats/

Don't link to places that play fast and loose with facts.

I don't link to InfoWars, even if there's an article on there that happens to be true. Why? Because there's other stuff there that talks about chemtrails and chemicals that make frogs gay.
Article? What article? I didn't link to any article.

CaptainHowdy 01-04-2018 08:07 AM
What is the problem with lazyness??

RedFred 01-04-2018 08:45 AM
https://cdn1.thr.com/sites/default/f...01/unnamed.jpg

JustinWWW 01-04-2018 10:54 AM
I want to see his golf skills:)

Acepimp 01-04-2018 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by muthisdev (Post 22146957)
I don't link to InfoWars, even if there's an article on there that happens to be true. Why? Because there's other stuff there that talks about chemtrails and chemicals that make frogs gay.
Uh, you can watch Congress discussing chemtrails. It's real

Why the "Chemtrail Conspiracy" Is Real

Uh, the studies about Atrazine proved the "gay frogs"

Pesticide atrazine can turn male frogs into females

You should probably read more Infowars :1orglaugh

:pimp


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 PM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123