>Where was the German police that time ?

good post. and this shows how retarded are bilions of people that follow ALL religions like sheep and all these rules. YEAH, BILLIONS. hard to imagine, right ?

Albania - 12 % of Muslims pro Sharia, Kosovo - 20 %, Azerbejdzan - 8 % ???:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Thanks to the communists for the atheism:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

comrade, but is it possible for BLACK people to behave like that in RUSland ?
or they will be beaten like in Imperalist America ?:winkwink::winkwink::winkwink:

in Russia can be possible all :1orglaugh

COSMOS :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

thommy: islamic terror attacks across Europe started when the migrant crisis started. Do you think there is a connection? Yes or no answer will do.

nope - there have been terror attacks long before - but your conclusion is wrong because you are talking about europe and do not see the whole world.

let´s say it like this: 30 years ago there have not been that much broken mobile phones in europe as now - and i am pretty sure that since the netherlands lost the final in 2010 against spain in the football WC there are even more broken mobile phones.

so following your logic the netherlands are responsable for broken mobile phones.

the number of terror attacks WORLDWIDE is dramatically increasing since bush went into iraq. that means even when there are still not more attacks than 0,1 % are happening in europe that there are automatically more attacks there.

and YES the refugee crisis brought also a number of people what should not be here but this is a circumstance what should not blame the majority of the refugees who are NOT terrorists. this is also caused by the NUMBER of people and not on the percentage of terrorists inside this group.

you know HOW many deadly problems we have on this planet when we exclude terror?
let´s talk about drugs, let´s talk about AIDS let´s talk about other imported crimes what are killing THOUSANDS of people every fucking day in europe.
if you do not want that you have to make a wall around your country - stop all flights, cars and ships in and out and stop to negotiate with other countries and you will be fine.
welcome to stone age !

you guys have the talent not to see the whole thing. you have the idea that one group of people is responsable for all and everything and you forget that we indeed have MUCH bigger problems we are used to live with already.
you also forget that the problem you want to resolve is getting bigger if you cut them off and don´t even try to change something. you mismatch cause and effect in all and everything no matter if it is regards to economy or humanity.
farseeing is not your talent but this is what we need in this case.
and this is why we do NOT NEED silly ideas from people who think that their own misfortune is made by others as themselves.

not to mention biggest disease of all: religion.
since christianity becomes legal in europe it brings mass murderings, genocides, crusades, wars and many more.
i did my reading and i can support my opinion with historical facts if someone wanna argue.
religion is worse shit ever.

to burn heretic!))

My solution keeps them out of the West. So who care if they continue to massacre millions of Muslims?

Reducing illegal migration reduces unemployment among the native population. Wages rise, taxes rise, people on welfare come off welfare.

You're in favour of housemaids earning $600 a month. You lost your argument there.

Think before you type something that dumb.

Add the UK and probably all Western countries.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ity-sharia-law

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/73...-UK-Islam-poll

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7...muslims-survey

Read it and see the truth about how they think.

Idiots like Thommy want to allow more in to "educate" them out of Islam. :1orglaugh

Are you referring to the number of terrorist attacks in the West or those in the ME?

The ME ones have been going on for a lot longer. Remember Israel had to put up a wall, that works fine, to reduce the problem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...rorist_attacks

At least check Google to see if your logic isn't bullshit.

true !
and not only foreign religions also our own is still used for some ugly things.

says WHO ???

A Look at the Israeli West Bank Barrier Wall

i think YOU should do that because than you would see that the number of terror attacks WORLDWIDE increased a lot.

worldwide means: in every country and that includes europe and NO WALL will stop that - it will make the hate bigger AND WITH THE HATE THE PROBLEM !

where do you think the MOST europeans and US citizens where killed - NO it is NOT in THEIR countries !!!

have you seen an ISIS beheading video what was made in Germany or in the US or any other part of the western world ???

they have been even killed in turkey because terrorists hate turks. WHAT A FUCK shall turkey do??? a muslim ban for a muslim country ????

you are SOOO FUCKING FAR from any reality and your logic seems to be on holidays.

if you want to hide yourself in your bedroom than do it. but it is not a solution for people who want a free world with free travel and free people.
bring all europeans all americans and all westerns OUT from all this countries and you will see how fast the worlds economy breaks in pieces.

you can not even think from 11.59 am to noon - so stop to try think and finding solutions - you are incapable for this task.

It would be incorrect to claim that Islamic terrorist attacks started with the migration crisis. In fact, in the light of history, the Islamic motivated violence (violent Jihad) never stopped since the inception of Islam in 622 AD (the year of hijra - migration to Medina as described above).

First of all, it's very important to use the correct terminology - this is not an "act of terror" in the western sense of the word. It's not a certain group wanting something in exchange for holding hostages or for threatening with more terror. This is an act of violent Jihad, entirely in line with the doctrine of Islam. The same doctrine based on which the early Caliphs attacked, conquered and subjugated their neighboring lands, spreading the Caliphate and establishing the rule of Islam.

Why the distinction - "violent" Jihad? Because not all forms of Jihad are violent.

The doctrine of Jihad ("struggle" or "struggle in the way of allah") has been sold to Westerners as a "misunderstood " concept. And it is quite true, but not in the way you may think.

A regular westerner will envision a Jihadist as somebody like the Charlie Hebdo or Bataclan assassins, as a Mujahedeen that blows himself up in a rival mosque, or as the Islamic state Jihadis conquering new territory in their Toyotas.

But this is just one part of jihad - called in the Islamic doctrine "Jihad by the sword".

There are several forms of Jihad described in the doctrine of Islam, including:

- Jihad of the heart (Jihad bis nafs)
- Jihad by the sword (Jihad bis Saif))
- Jihad by pen (Jihad bil qalam)
- Jihad by the word (Jihad bil lisan)
- Jihad by money

While the first one is rather spiritual and indeed does not extend to the Kuffir (non-Muslims) the primary goal of the other forms of Jihad is to struggle against non-muslims and to spread Islam.

Btw. if a follower of Islam claims that the "spiritual Jihad" is the only meaning of Jihad - he is purposefully silent about the rest of the doctrine - it is a form of deception.

The doctrine of Islam commands "every sane male that reaches puberty" to engage in Jihad, however Jihad is "no more obligatory as long as enough followers engage in it".

It also rewards "those that arm Jihadis the same as the Jihadis themselves". So if you want to get the highest reward of Heaven, you can either become a Jihadi yourself, or you can support one materially. This was proven to be a very smart and effective rule in order to spread Islam throughout the history.

Let's try to put together a couple of examples for better illustration:

Jihad of the heart (Jihad bis nafs)

- an example may be a follower of Islam working on his faith (for example hajj - the pilgrimage to Mecca, one of the pillars of Islam, could be considered to fall into this category), this is not much prevalent throughout the doctrine (estimated cca 2 pct. of all the verses in the doctrine related to Jihad)

Jihad by the sword (Jihad bil Saif)

This has been historically practiced either as an offensive jihad under Caliphs (first, second wave of Jihad + the conquests of the Ottoman empire) conquering territory and spreading Islam by force. Or as a defensive Jihad in case that anybody attacks Dar al Islam (the land ruled by Islam).

Ever since the last caliphate was officially terminated in 1924, there has been not so much in the way of "official" offensive Jihad, it is perpetrated mostly by various non governmental Jihadi groups.

Anyway a several examples of recent large scale application of Jihad that can be considered are for example:

- the bloody partition of India and Pakistan
- civil wars in Lebanon, Algeria, most of the Africa with Islamic presence
- the war between Iraq and Iran (Sunni vs. Shia - the Islamic republic of Iran called for defensive Jihad)
- trans national Islamic groups such as Al Qaeda, Al Shabab, Boko Haram, Taliban
- a post WW II Rohingya effort to establish an Islamic enclave inside Burma (Western Myanmar)
- Hamas and Fatah in PA - Jihad against the state of Israel
- the on going wave of Jihad coming from the Islamic communities in Europe and US

etc. etc.

Jihadi groups are present in pretty much every Islamic community around the world. Btw. I believe the recent truck using Jihadi from NYC was named Saifulo - this is a direct reference to the word Saif ("sword").

Anyway, the violent Jihad itself is not as dangerous at this point of time as the non-violent forms of Jihad. The Jihadis are, at this point of time, not likely to be strong enough to conquer the Western lands by the sword or by terror alone, therefore the relative danger is limited. One thing they already succeeded at though is to spread fear - just how many magazines re-printed the Mohammad cartoons? Zero?

They also successfully manage to bleed the Western governmental budgets on surveillance and law enforcement (unless your priority is to tackle online "hate speech" as in Sadiq Khan's London).

Anyway, if Islam would plan to take over the West in a way of migration and growing demographic share (as it is officially planned by the Muslim Brotherhood for example). And such as it is also entirely in line with the doctrine - "migration in the way of Allah", it is certainly not very smart if the Islamic communities in the West engage in violent Jihad.

But let's examine the non - violent forms of Jihad:

- Jihad by pen (Jihad bil qalam)

Various Islamic organizations work tirelessly in order to forbid and criminalize any criticism of Islam.

When was the last time you saw an open criticism of Islam in mainstream media?

Did you know that FBI, in September 2011, succumbed to the pressure from various Islamic organizations and terminated any anti-terror training materials and courses that would include the word "Islam" in it?

Who revived the "hate speech laws" to protect "religions" in UN in 1999? Well it was OIC ("the organization of Islamic cooperation")

Do you know that, for example the top Google search results for terms such as "Islam" or "Jihad" were suddenly modified in the summer last year, based on the initiative from the Texas Imam Omar Sulleyman?

And most of all - the invention of the, completely made up, and absurd term "Islamophobia" that is used to instantly shut down any criticism of Islam whatsoever (see Canadian motion 103 for a recent application).

This is btw. entirely in line with Sha'ria principle "no criticism of Islam is allowed".

Instead a positive image of Islam is spread - example - most of the recent students at the politically correct schools will definitely know about the so called Islamic "Golden age". But they may have a hard time to answer properly how did Islam spread throughout the history.

- Jihad by the word (Jihad bil lisan)

An example are these frequent "interfaith" gatherings. A Bishop, Rabbi and an Imam sit down and of course you only hear the early, Meccan verses in the Qu'ran, that we are all brothers in the Abrahamic faith, that there's no compulsion in religion, and no part of the latter, Medinan doctrine targeted against non-Muslims (that abrogates the earlier verses) is ever mentioned.

The Bishop and Rabbi don't challenge that since they are either afraid to, or more likely, they themselves know very little about the doctrine of Islam. It feels nice, yet it is again a form of deception.

- Jihad by money

Did you know that, approximately 70 pct. of the Mosques in US are supposed to be financed from Saudi Arabia?

Did you know that pretty much all the Islamic literature and services in the US and western prisons (very fertile ground for new converts) is also often donated by Saudi Arabia or Qatar?

These are just marginal examples, but anytime there's another, megalomaniac, Islamic center opened in the city near you, keep in mind that it has, according to the doctrine of Islam, also its distinct political purpose.

Are they? well then they should be arrested. Nobody is sticking up for criminals here.

http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploa...hase-gif-4.gif

http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploa...hase-gif-4.gif

http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploa...hase-gif-4.gif

http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploa...hase-gif-4.gif

http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploa...hase-gif-4.gif

http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploa...hase-gif-4.gif

it impossible to stop terrorism with criticism

Go research the question yourself and see what you come up with. Use current information for the last 10 years and not refer back to older info to make it look right.

No economic migrants congregate in Germany by walking through safe countries because Germany gives them more. They do not register in the first safe country because that would stop them getting to the most benefits. Therefore economic migrants.

Germans killed by fireworks.

Germans killed by the terrorist.

http://www.datagraver.com/thumbs/130...l-20170523.png

Czech killed by terrorists.

For someone who claims to be intelligent, you're a dope.

Numbers and concentration. You will have problems as the Muslim community grows.


Islamic terrorist attacks in USA.

don´t you understand that the whole world will have problems with that?

why do you want to outsource this problem and wait?
because than you hope that you will not see it anymore ????

what do you think will happen in 10 or 20 years after THEY ALL KNOW that we hate them and don´t even let them in our countries or help the ones who need help?

are you REALLY that dumb that you are unable to count 1+1 together?

WHAT do you want to do against people who are moving to islam in czech and get radicalized there?

WHAT do you want to do against the HUNDRED THOUSAND of AMERICAN BORN PRISONERS who join the radicalized islam in us jails?

source

you do not have answers !!!!
you do not have solutions!!!!
you do not even have a brain!!!

Islam teaches followers to kill or subjugate non-believers. It also teaches followers to stay separate from other religions, which has now been changed to destroy other forms of Islam. Mohammed killed fellow Arabs for not being Muslims from the beginning of his campaign to subjugate Mecca. All this is worshipped in Islam and written in the Quran.

The actual number of Muslims killing other Muslims in countries where they are a dominant proportion of the population should tell any logical thinker that Islam has a problem. It's not a few hundred, it's millions of Muslims who believe in violence as a tool to spread their ideology. The problem in the West is they are now teaching it to their children.

You are stupid and fell for that one.

We gave up spreading religion by force centuries ago. Islam commands that they spread Islam by force.

Jesus taught the parable of the good Samaritan. Islam teaches a different way.

And your solution to educate them away from Islam, will work?

https://www.google.cz/search?dcr=0&e...igious+schools

The evidence says NO!

Who is going to radicalise Czech people to become Muslims, if there are none in Czech? Once again you display your lack of logical thought.

I do quick searches on Google and come up with the facts I find. You talk from the heart. Which is biased.

THIS is exactly how your knowledge looks like.
sometimes you do not even look at the sources where you get the shit from.

you try to find the sources what proves YOUR idea.

there are billions of people out there MUCH MORE intelligent as you are I am.
do you think none of them ever have thought about such ideas?

the world is too complicated for you paul. you should stop to think about things that you will never understand in a trillion years.

if you do not recognize the connections in the world history and do not see that hate and lock out NEVER was a solution then try it again in the next life to understand. because in this you will not get it anymore

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnmI9eFzO9A&t=28s

BBC Panorama report.

So much for educating them.





https://barenakedislam.files.wordpre.../2011/09/b.png

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...94_634x536.jpg

http://www.poverty.org.uk/06/bh.png

http://www.poverty.org.uk/47/ah.png

Proof that immigration should be very strictly controlled. So the country accepting them only takes the best and those that are needed. The EU says no to that idea and the uk makes very scant claims to control it. The first rule should be 5 years working before a penny is given in benefits.

Thommay where do you think Germany will be in 250 years from now? If you look at many islamic countries today, some were taken over by force quickly, but many were taken over slowly. With time, they slowly become the majority and force everyone (kill or convert) that isn't a muslims out. How do you think they get these islamic countries with NINITY-NINE-FUCKING-PERCENT-MUSLIM??

Do you think that German society becoming more islamic would be better or worse? I think we have enough data based on the 1400 year history of islam to know that what's going to happen to your country eventually once you've let enough in.

in 250 years from now there won't be anymore this stupidity called religion (any).

Show us your dick with "GFY" written on it and your middle finger out "OneHungLow"

And I know of 1000s of Muslims living in the West who have carried out suicide bombings, raping children, denouncing the Western way, kill their children for leaving Islam, refusing to marry someone their parents picked, etc.

But you think your beer drinking pork eating typify most Muslims. :upsidedow

Once again you prove yourself to be a fool.

LOL I know of 100.000-s of americans who drop bombs, gay rape, invade :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Smart kebab will educate children faster than idiot Tommy :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Rox2j5JpH3...0/54630445.jpg