GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The memo has been released (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1293527)

BaldBastard 02-04-2018 09:30 AM

Interesting....Gowdy is the only Republican on the House committee investigating Russian meddling to actually see the entire FISA application, and his conclusions are dramatically different than Nunes.

Also, it was widely reported today (except on Fox) that the FISA application did acknowledge the Steele dossier was paid for by a "political entity". Not to mention that the memo shoots its own "poison tree" theory in the foot by acknowledging it was Papodopolous who triggered the start of the investigation much earlier by bragging the Russians had compromising emails on Clinton and would be releasing them to help Trump - just weeks before hacked DNC emails were leaked by Wikileaks. Oh and the small side note that several other Governments intelligence agencies were warning the USA to look into Russian interference.

At this stage anyone who's seen the original warrant and spoken is not concerned, yet those who have not seen it are up in arms over it.

onwebcam 02-04-2018 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRPdommy (Post 22192685)
Ok... what does that change ?

It changed your argument.. :1orglaugh

Rochard 02-04-2018 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22192453)
Is it a crime to get information from a foreign government on an opponent? What info and was it true? How many have been convicted in a court of law?

There is a huge difference between opposition research and a foreign government hacking the opposition political party and giving you information.

GPS Fusion is an american research company. There is nothing wrong or illegal about hiring it.

However, conspiring with a foreign power to have their intelligence agencies illegally hack your opponent, give you the information, and then post this information online is completely illegal.

As for the missing emails, Hillary Clinton did not order delete the emails herself nor did she order the emails to be deleted. If she did, it would be a crime. This is not the first time this has happened; Under the Bush administration millions of emails got deleted.

Rochard 02-04-2018 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22192607)
Since you are so keen on what Gowdy says, here is a bit more of his interview that you willfully ignored.. He says the memo has zero chance of killing the investigation...


Pressing the point, CBS News White House and senior foreign affairs correspondent Margaret Brennan asked: "The memo has no impact on the Russia probe?"

"Not to me, it doesn't ? and I was pretty integrally involved in the drafting of it," Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, said. "There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower. The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopoulos' meeting in Great Britain. It also doesn't have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there's going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier."


He stright up says even if the dossier didn't exist, they would still be investigating Trump..

So sad you choose to inform yourself with only half the story.. But then again you are a Putinbot...


Suddenly 50 thousand Putinbots screamed out and were silenced...

The memo doesn't change or alter the investigation at all. That was never the intent of the memo. The memo was written and released only to change the way Americans view the investigation, to imply this was a political witch hunt.

Carter Page was under investigation long before Trump announced he was running for President. Even without the dossier there still would have been an investigation. If it wasn't due to Carter Page, it would have been because of George Papadopoulos and his actions in London.

There is still so much more we don't know. Why was Flynn having conversations with the Russian government, and what did they discuss? Sessions too. Sessions claims he met with the Russian government as part of his work on the Committee on Armed Services, yet NO ONE else from this committee ever met with anyone from the Russian government.

There is so much we do not know. There are other people - so called "coffee boys" like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos that we never heard of - that are a part of this that flip.

Rochard 02-04-2018 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRPdommy (Post 22192657)
The most interesting event in a timeline of events of this whole story that I was not aware of previously was this...

Dec. 26: Oleg Erovinkin, a former KGB official who was suspected assisting a former British spy in compiling a dossier alleging Trump ties to Russia, is found dead in the back seat of his car in Moscow.

Kinda makes the dossier have unverifiable elements at this point... but not 'fake'.

read the whole timeline...

https://www.politico.com/trump-russi...line-of-events

1st
We might assume a couple of things.
The current RNC charge is to 'free' Manafort and Papadopoulos.
They are the chief witnesses against Trump.
You must get evidence obtained against them thrown out.

2nd
If/when Mueller concludes, he is not likely to do more than drop all the intelligence on congress's lap. So it really is a matter of timing. Does it happen while it is controlled by the GOP or possibly when it is controlled by the DNC. So there is a sense of urgency by trump and RNC to make this go away very soon.
Or we are going to have a real fight trying to charge a sitting president. Much of that depends on the charges and if it affects the duty of the working president. most of which will likely be decided by the Supreme Court.

So it is more likely going to take public pressure to really get to the bottom of this.
That is if there is any backbone to know if and to what extent any foreign powers has influenced top officials of our government.

The dossier has lots of verifiable facts. Just because one source died doesn't mean they cannot verify what he said.

onwebcam 02-04-2018 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192697)
There is a huge difference between opposition research and a foreign government hacking the opposition political party and giving you information.

GPS Fusion is an american research company. There is nothing wrong or illegal about hiring it.

However, conspiring with a foreign power to have their intelligence agencies illegally hack your opponent, give you the information, and then post this information online is completely illegal.

As for the missing emails, Hillary Clinton did not order delete the emails herself nor did she order the emails to be deleted. If she did, it would be a crime. This is not the first time this has happened; Under the Bush administration millions of emails got deleted.


lol Fusion GPS's entire business is based on "character assassination" NOT "opposition research"


Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192707)
The dossier has lots of verifiable facts. Just because one source died doesn't mean they cannot verify what he said.

lol... Do tell.. Show me this list of "verifiable facts"

Acepimp 02-04-2018 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192697)
There is a huge difference between opposition research and a foreign government hacking the opposition political party and giving you information.

GPS Fusion is an american research company. There is nothing wrong or illegal about hiring it.

However, conspiring with a foreign power to have their intelligence agencies illegally hack your opponent, give you the information, and then post this information online is completely illegal.

As for the missing emails, Hillary Clinton did not order delete the emails herself nor did she order the emails to be deleted. If she did, it would be a crime. This is not the first time this has happened; Under the Bush administration millions of emails got deleted.

WHAT??? ENTIRELY FALSE, ROCHARD. no one conspired with foreign intelligence to hack the goddamm DNC. It was a leak by Seth Rich, not a hack. The data was transferred at speeds much faster than the Internet could provide- it was a flash drive at the server, not a hack over the internet. This is indisputable.

And it IS illegal to have your wife at Fusion gps (Nellie Orr) feed bogus intel to the husband in the FBI in order to fraudulently obtain warrants by lying to the Fisa judge (who was appointed by obama.) This is a massive scandal, yet Rochard claims it's perfectly legal.

Rochard, you are a hopeless Obama fan boy Hillbot. It's both stunning and sad.

:rasta

Robbie 02-04-2018 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRPdommy (Post 22192685)
Ok... what does that change ?

You said that Republicans funded "THE DOCUMENT".

No, they never did. They hired Fusion GPS during the primary to come up with opposition research. Trump won the primary.

THEN the Clinton campaign using DNC money hired Fusion GPS and paid out MILLIONS of dollars to hire Steele and create the "Document" (the dossier).

Trying to say that "Republicans originally did it" is just ignorant.

And it doesn't change the fact that a Democrat President and the DNC used the FBI and DOJ to spy on the opposition candidate in a Presidential election by paying RUSSIANS for fake info.

Watch what happens next. CNN isn't telling you this, and neither are MSNBC. But the FBI, DOJ and members of the Obama administration are all about to have an investigation done on them.

This is a case of trying to fix an election (just like they did the Democrat nomination by fucking over Sanders) and then trying to overthrow the duly elected President of The United States.

My belief is that "yes"...people are going to jail. Just not the ones that CNN and MSNBC and The Washington Post are trying to make you think are going to jail.

Acepimp 02-04-2018 10:00 AM

https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...8b&oe=5B1B5649

beerptrol 02-04-2018 10:16 AM

lol. Keep pushing your bullshit. The only ones who believe you are fellow chumpanzees and Russian trolls.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22192719)


tfto 02-04-2018 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22192335)
The collusion delusion is a hoax, buddy. And I live about 4 hrs from NYC. Let's get drinks :thumbsup

:rasta

Dude, in which direction?. Up 95 or down 95?

Rochard 02-04-2018 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22192715)
You said that Republicans funded "THE DOCUMENT".

No, they never did. They hired Fusion GPS during the primary to come up with opposition research.

So when you say "They (the Republicans) hired Fusion GPS" it means... They didn't partially fund this opposition research?

You seem to think this is two different things when it's not. The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative political website (most likely funded by Rubio), originally hired Fusion GPS to do opposition research on Trump. When Trump won the primary the DNC started to pick up the tab. The information Fusion GPS collected when it was being funded by The Washington Free Beacon wasn't thrown out, but instead was used in the Steele Dossier. The Washington Free Beacon in fact partially funded the Steele Dossier.

All of this is a smoke screen. It doesn't matter who funded it. It doesn't matter if it is politically biased. It's opposition research. Both sides does it. It's not illegal. It's standard in all Presidential elections. The Republican Party (and Fox News) is trying poke holes in who funded this, and frankly it's completely irrelevant. The investigation started three years before Trump announced he was running for office. The investigation had nothing to do with Trump - the investigation had to do with a US citizen working as a spy for Moscow. The investigation started to look at Trump because members of his campaign - namely Flynn and Sessions - talking to the Russian government. Again, nothing to do with Trump. Flynn and Sessions weren't targeted, but instead got picked up in the intelligence community routinely monitoring Russian agents on US soil. The investigation continued when a foreign government told the United States government an American citizen in London was bragging about how the Russians have dirt on Hillary, and how Russia was helping the Trump campaign.

This is nothing more than obstruction of justice by the Republican party.

Acepimp 02-04-2018 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22192723)
lol. Keep pushing your bullshit. The only ones who believe you are fellow chumpanzees and Russian trolls.

What Bullshit? And what Russian trolls? You're having trouble discerning facts from fake news.

There is no trump Russia collusion. Turn off the fake news & wake the fuck up.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cNCVdKiHFJ...een-fooled.jpg

:rasta

Acepimp 02-04-2018 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22192727)
Dude, in which direction?. Up 95 or down 95?

Down, not far from Philly / DC / B'more. I follow politics because it's local to me :thumbsup

onwebcam 02-04-2018 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192763)
So when you say "They (the Republicans) hired Fusion GPS" it means... They didn't partially fund this opposition research?

You seem to think this is two different things when it's not. The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative political website (most likely funded by Rubio), originally hired Fusion GPS to do opposition research on Trump. When Trump won the primary the DNC started to pick up the tab. The information Fusion GPS collected when it was being funded by The Washington Free Beacon wasn't thrown out, but instead was used in the Steele Dossier. The Washington Free Beacon in fact partially funded the Steele Dossier.

All of this is a smoke screen. It doesn't matter who funded it. It doesn't matter if it is politically biased. It's opposition research. Both sides does it. It's not illegal. It's standard in all Presidential elections. The Republican Party (and Fox News) is trying poke holes in who funded this, and frankly it's completely irrelevant. The investigation started three years before Trump announced he was running for office. The investigation had nothing to do with Trump - the investigation had to do with a US citizen working as a spy for Moscow. The investigation started to look at Trump because members of his campaign - namely Flynn and Sessions - talking to the Russian government. Again, nothing to do with Trump. Flynn and Sessions weren't targeted, but instead got picked up in the intelligence community routinely monitoring Russian agents on US soil. The investigation continued when a foreign government told the United States government an American citizen in London was bragging about how the Russians have dirt on Hillary, and how Russia was helping the Trump campaign.

This is nothing more than obstruction of justice by the Republican party.

Oh look, here we go again..............



"WASHINGTON (AP) ? In a story Feb. 2 about a Republican memo on the Russia investigation, The Associated Press erroneously reported that a former British spy?s work on an opposition research project was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it.

A corrected version of the story is below:"

https://apnews.com/63c883156e314b68b86209d3b63890f5

Rochard 02-04-2018 12:17 PM

This message is hidden because Acepimp is on your ignore list.
This message is hidden because onwebcam is on your ignore list.

Nope.

onwebcam 02-04-2018 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192831)
This message is hidden because Acepimp is on your ignore list.
This message is hidden because onwebcam is on your ignore list.

Nope.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh No wonder this idiot keeps repeating shit that is already discussed. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Sarn 02-04-2018 12:24 PM

:pimp

Acepimp 02-04-2018 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192831)
This message is hidden because Acepimp is on your ignore list.
This message is hidden because onwebcam is on your ignore list.

Nope.

Ignoring facts does not make them untrue.

These Hillbots are SO desperate to believe Putin hacked the election and Trump will be removed.

Trump Derangement Syndrome induced by lying MSM. Sad.

:rasta

RedFred 02-04-2018 12:31 PM

This message is hidden because Acepimp is on your ignore list because he lies so fucking much.

crockett 02-04-2018 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192703)
The memo doesn't change or alter the investigation at all. That was never the intent of the memo. The memo was written and released only to change the way Americans view the investigation, to imply this was a political witch hunt.

Carter Page was under investigation long before Trump announced he was running for President. Even without the dossier there still would have been an investigation. If it wasn't due to Carter Page, it would have been because of George Papadopoulos and his actions in London.

There is still so much more we don't know. Why was Flynn having conversations with the Russian government, and what did they discuss? Sessions too. Sessions claims he met with the Russian government as part of his work on the Committee on Armed Services, yet NO ONE else from this committee ever met with anyone from the Russian government.

There is so much we do not know. There are other people - so called "coffee boys" like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos that we never heard of - that are a part of this that flip.

No, Trump wanted to use the memo as a excuse to fire Rosinstine so he could plant someone to fire Muller. The problem with that is the Senate will not confirm anyone who will fire Muller..

Trump is still fucked. He broke the kaw, he knows it, he knows he's fucked but he's trying everything possible to unfuck himself but he's in political quicksand at this point. All his squirming just makes him sink deeper..

The only pepole who still believe Trump at this point are the nutters like onewebcam, AssPimple and the hate democrats not matter what's like Robbie and Vendillza..

Normal people, the people who actually matter know he's guilty as sin..

Sarn 02-04-2018 12:47 PM

Great jobs numbers and finally, after many years, rising wages- and nobody even talks about them. Only Russia, Russia, Russia, despite the fact that, after a year of looking, there is No Collusion!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...46200488271872

Rasmussen just announced that my approval rating jumped to 49%, a far better number than I had in winning the Election, and higher than certain “sacred cows.” Other Trump polls are way up also. So why does the media refuse to write this? Oh well, someday!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...98726381457409

Sarn 02-04-2018 12:51 PM

Russia to rising wages in USA :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Rochard 02-04-2018 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22192867)
No, Trump wanted to use the memo as a excuse to fire Rosinstine so he could plant someone to fire Muller. The problem with that is the Senate will not confirm anyone who will fire Muller..

Trump is still fucked. He broke the kaw, he knows it, he knows he's fucked but he's trying everything possible to unfuck himself but he's in political quicksand at this point. All his squirming just makes him sink deeper..

The only pepole who still believe Trump at this point are the nutters like onewebcam, AssPimple and the hate democrats not matter what's like Robbie and Vendillza..

Normal people, the people who actually matter know he's guilty as sin..

But the memo hasn't changed anything. It surely hasn't helped Trump. If anything it's done the direct opposite. Trump's base is going to continue to believe what it believes - let them fap fap fap to Fox News.

Trump cannot, under any circumstances, fire Robert Mueller. In the event he does, there will be a move to impeach him, and then demands for a new special prosecutor.

This is not going away.

This is why I walked away from the Republican party. We had a dozen investigations into Hillary Clinton, and frankly she handled them all. We have on investigation into Trump and now the entire Justice Department is biased?

Rochard 02-04-2018 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 22192873)
Rasmussen just announced that my approval rating jumped to 49%, a far better number than I had in winning the Election, and higher than certain ?sacred cows.? Other Trump polls are way up also. So why does the media refuse to write this? Oh well, someday!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...98726381457409

A sitting President is being accused of colluding with a foreign government to rig a US election and this will most likely end in impeachment. But let's talk about his ratings.

crockett 02-04-2018 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22192841)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh No wonder this idiot keeps repeating shit that is already discussed. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You claiming everything you don't want to hear is fake, doesn't equal discussed. You just repeat outright lies and proclaim you win..

You say ridiculous shit like the dossier was proven to be fraudulent which is a lie. Many things in that dossier have been proven to be accurate and have been verified by other sources.

Nothing, nothing at all has been proven to be fake, just somethings like the hooker stories can't be verified..

You are basically the 3 dumb monkeys wrapped up in one.. You lie, you don't listen and you won't open your eyes..

crockett 02-04-2018 01:16 PM

Btw, when this is all said and done, we will see Nunes go down for abuse of power.

Sarn 02-04-2018 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192879)
A sitting President is being accused of colluding with a foreign government to rig a US election and this will most likely end in impeachment. But let's talk about his ratings.

I am not are believe in the colluding, I think it is speculation by the media. Trump win because peoples support him. I bet on it involved the USA secret services, CIA FBI & DIA(Michael Flynn). All they have assets in foreign countries for use, that's why we not will know the truth, I think the investigation will end with nothing. Trump just show for secret services - that POTUS is the boss and they work for him, and politics, not their business, that's why he "attacks" them.

RedFred 02-04-2018 01:39 PM

https://scontent.fapa1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...fc&oe=5B1EFBE8

The Porn Nerd 02-04-2018 01:49 PM

The Russian news going "He's ours again" (meaning Trump) does not look good tho. All Americans should recognize that Russia is NOT our friend. EVERY American should be united on this point but no, some prefer to point fingers internally at each other.

This is, of course, exactly what Russia wants. Therefore I will continue to plead for unity and common ground. If Trump is convicted, or Democrats go to jail, NONE of it is good for America and, in the end, Russia wins. Let's prevent that ok?

Cue The Beatles 'Come Together'....right now. LOL

Acepimp 02-04-2018 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22192867)
No, Trump wanted to use the memo as a excuse to fire Rosinstine so he could plant someone to fire Muller. The problem with that is the Senate will not confirm anyone who will fire Muller..

Trump is still fucked. He broke the kaw, he knows it, he knows he's fucked

Normal people, the people who actually matter know he's guilty as sin..

LoLoL!!!!


The conspiracy nuts keep saying Trump wants to fire Mueller. Has he said that? No, and there's no evidence after more than a year, except on the democrats.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22192877)
But the memo hasn't changed anything. It surely hasn't helped Trump. If anything it's done the direct opposite.

Trump cannot, under any circumstances, fire Robert Mueller. In the event he does, there will be a move to impeach him

This is why I walked away from the Republican party. We had a dozen investigations into Hillary Clinton, and frankly she handled them all. We have on investigation into Trump and now the entire Justice Department is biased?

NOT ACCURATE- There is no investigation into Trump. HE is NOT under investigation. Man, it's like talking to 5 year olds lol. The investigation is into alleged Russian interference in the election. Trump is in no way in danger of impeachment. Fact.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVKV7XDV4AA1VgU.jpg

So you see Rochard, the Mueller probe is based on fake intelligence that Hillary paid $12 million for. Of course Trump CAN fire Mueller if he wanted to. There's no need, since the probe has exposed Russia collusion with the Steele dossier, as well as the corrupt FBI "secret society" that was abusing power to help Hillary influence the election. Make sense?

:rasta

Sarn 02-04-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 22192907)
The Russian news going "He's ours again" (meaning Trump) does not look good tho...

It was good trolling for haters :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The Porn Nerd 02-04-2018 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn (Post 22192913)
It was good trolling for haters :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

How typically Russian. LOL
Bring back the Nude Mews.
At least I got to see Muscovite titties. :thumbsup

crockett 02-04-2018 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22192903)

LOL fucking inbred nazis.. :1orglaugh

Busty2 02-04-2018 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22192909)
The conspiracy nuts keep saying Trump wants to fire Mueller. Has he said that? No, and there's no evidence after more than a year, except on the democrats.

WRONG

read this

New York Times

WASHINGTON ? President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.

The West Wing confrontation marks the first time Mr. Trump is known to have tried to fire the special counsel. Mr. Mueller learned about the episode in recent months as his investigators interviewed current and former senior White House officials in his inquiry into whether the president obstructed justice.

Amid the first wave of news media reports that Mr. Mueller was examining a possible obstruction case, the president began to argue that Mr. Mueller had three conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation, two of the people said.

First, he claimed that a dispute years ago over fees at Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Va., had prompted Mr. Mueller, the F.B.I. director at the time, to resign his membership. The president also said Mr. Mueller could not be impartial because he had most recently worked for the law firm that previously represented the president?s son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Finally, the president said, Mr. Mueller had been interviewed to return as the F.B.I. director the day before he was appointed special counsel in May.

After receiving the president?s order to fire Mr. Mueller, the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, refused to ask the Justice Department to dismiss the special counsel, saying he would quit instead, the people said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to be identified discussing a continuing investigation.

Mr. McGahn disagreed with the president?s case and told senior White House officials that firing Mr. Mueller would have a catastrophic effect on Mr. Trump?s presidency. Mr. McGahn also told White House officials that Mr. Trump would not follow through on the dismissal on his own. The president then backed off
(because he's a fucking coward hiding behind others)

Bladewire 02-04-2018 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22192455)
If you believe Trump is the only liar in congress, you are more stupid than I thought.

It's nice that you admit your man Trump is a fucking liar. Looks like reality is starting to sink in for you :thumbsup

Bladewire 02-04-2018 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22192903)


Sarn 02-04-2018 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 22192929)
...
Bring back the Nude Mews.
At least I got to see Muscovite titties. :thumbsup

They do not take beauty girls for news, for wifes not jealous of their husbands.))
Husband watching TV - Coub - GIFs with sound

VRPdommy 02-04-2018 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22192867)
No, Trump wanted to use the memo as a excuse to fire Rosinstine so he could plant someone to fire Muller. The problem with that is the Senate will not confirm anyone who will fire Muller..

Trump is still fucked. He broke the kaw, he knows it, he knows he's fucked but he's trying everything possible to unfuck himself but he's in political quicksand at this point. All his squirming just makes him sink deeper..

The only pepole who still believe Trump at this point are the nutters like onewebcam, AssPimple and the hate democrats not matter what's like Robbie and Vendillza..

Normal people, the people who actually matter know he's guilty as sin..

I might want to correct your thinking on this.
The key here is to break the chain of evidence and witnesses.
So while Papadopoulos and Manafort are still waiting on proper court, pleading not guilty, on the hopes trump can stop this.
If the Republicans could get the surveillance in question discredited, the evidence against them goes out the window. And perhaps ties to Trump. Even if Trump has no culpability in any of the Russia stuff, it looks as if he is culpable for Obstruction.

But Flynn was under investigation of the NSA and Page and others under investigation with the FBI years before Trump ran for POTUS. The campaign actually tied them up together in a neat little bow. Adding more credence to the investigation.

As long as nobody is only convicted in the court of public opinion, I'm happy to hear those that would want to throw it all out on a few misleading and/or incorrect facts.
It's just not going to change much.
Eventually, the real case will be presented with real evidence and not hearsay.


Wishful thinking... It is more a play to have public support for doing things that they should not be attempting in the near term. The Republicans, lead only by some, want to create enough disbelief to make it through the next election should Mueller investigation run that long. We have been told he is not the kinda guy that would want to end this at election time so it is either in the next 3-6 months or after the mid-term election.

Many republicans are to be dammed either way. If they talk anything against trump, they 'may' face a backlash from voters in their districts. So you can see the most vocal are those that had heavy support for trump last election.

But what worries me is these boneheads are likely to inspire riots soon enough even if that is not their intent.
You know much of this looking very familiar with a era we call McCarthyism.


Acepimp 02-04-2018 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Busty2 (Post 22192953)
WRONG

read this

New York Times

WASHINGTON — President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.

The West Wing confrontation marks the first time Mr. Trump is known to have tried to fire the special counsel. Mr. Mueller learned about the episode in recent months as his investigators interviewed current and former senior White House officials in his inquiry into whether the president obstructed justice.

Amid the first wave of news media reports that Mr. Mueller was examining a possible obstruction case, the president began to argue that Mr. Mueller had three conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation, two of the people said.

First, he claimed that a dispute years ago over fees at Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Va., had prompted Mr. Mueller, the F.B.I. director at the time, to resign his membership. The president also said Mr. Mueller could not be impartial because he had most recently worked for the law firm that previously represented the president’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Finally, the president said, Mr. Mueller had been interviewed to return as the F.B.I. director the day before he was appointed special counsel in May.

After receiving the president’s order to fire Mr. Mueller, the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, refused to ask the Justice Department to dismiss the special counsel, saying he would quit instead, the people said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to be identified discussing a continuing investigation.

Mr. McGahn disagreed with the president’s case and told senior White House officials that firing Mr. Mueller would have a catastrophic effect on Mr. Trump’s presidency. Mr. McGahn also told White House officials that Mr. Trump would not follow through on the dismissal on his own. The president then backed off
(because he's a fucking coward hiding behind others)

The New York Times, "according to 4 people??" Really?? What 4 people??? Sorry, they got caught posting fake news and are not credible.

Trump slams report he tried to fire Robert Mueller as ‘fake news’

“Fake news, fake news. Typical New York Times. Fake stories,” Trump told reporters. “I haven’t given it any thought. I mean, I’ve been reading about it from you people, you say, ‘Oh, I’m gonna dismiss him.’ No, I’m not dismissing anybody,” Trump said.

I prefer facts. Let us know when you have some :1orglaugh

:rasta


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc