GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   BREAKING! Stormy Daniels Suing Donald for Breach of Contract (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1296445)

MsCheyenne 03-08-2018 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22233905)

Regardless of how people feel about Trump, the petty shots at his wife or pretty lame.

SuckOnThis 03-08-2018 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MsCheyenne (Post 22234198)
If Trump had harassed or assaulted women there would be a serious issues. As it is, this guys is a horn dog who, by all accounts, compensates the women he sleeps with quite well. So, what if he had a consensual affair? What I don't understand is why Daniels needed hush money? Is she looking to profit from writing a book? Does she want the lime light? None of the information out there makes sense. Did he piss her off in some way and, she feels wronged? Before people get too excited, more information needs to be presented.


Ever heard of John Edwards? No?

Do you know campaign contribution laws most likely were broken? No?

Ever paid attention to the world before? No?

NewNick 03-08-2018 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MsCheyenne (Post 22234198)
If Trump had harassed or assaulted women there would be a serious issues. .

Did you really say that ???????


"You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful... I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything."

"Whatever you want."

"Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."

ruff 03-08-2018 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22234144)
And who's fault is it that CNN is obsessed with Stormy Daniels?

And what is Trump diverting from? The fact that the police were called to the shooter's house 50 times and did nothing? The fact that the FBI had a credible threat posted with the guy's real name and the FBI claimed they couldn't figure out who it was? The fact that the police were hiding in the bushes? The fact that EMTs were prevented from going inside to save lives?

But Trump is "diverting from gun control?" He literally said take the guns first.

But don't let the facts trigger your Trump Derangement Syndrome.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:cool-smil

With every post you prove that you are pointless and irrelevant. Keep on trucking, moron.

Robbie 03-08-2018 09:37 AM

I wonder if we will ever have even one conversation with disagreements that doesn't just devolve into everybody personally attacking each other. lol

We could probably start a discussion on how great it would be to all be courteous to each other and professional...and we'd be calling each other names by the third reply. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Rochard 03-08-2018 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234259)
I wonder if we will ever have even one conversation with disagreements that doesn't just devolve into everybody personally attacking each other. lol

I never attack anyone. People disagree on things, doesn't mean we cannot be civil and be friends.

JFK 03-08-2018 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22233613)
Clearly very few people care that he fucked her. They do care if he broke the law paying her off so she would stay quiet.

there you have it ! :2 cents: :thumbsup

Robbie 03-08-2018 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 22234281)
there you have it ! :2 cents: :thumbsup

Except that it's NOT breaking the law to pay someone to not blab about having an "affair".

Also...anyone in the adult industry knows this was not an "affair". This was Stormy Daniels escorting and being the regular for Trump.

Most guys with money are that way. They find a particular escort that they really like and they see her regularly. Guarantee you that Stormy Daniels was paid well each and every time.

Also hope for her sake that she does get that big book deal and make a lot of money...because her high dollar escorting days are over. Nobody with money is going to hire a girl who isn't discrete.

So kind of a gamble on her part.
I guess she is thinking that with Trump as President for possibly 7 more years + his age...she probably wouldn't be able to see him ever again to get paid.
So she's obviously calculating that she needs to hit the bank now while the gettin' is good.

We will see if that gambit pays off. Or if the media treats her like everyone else. She's today's "flavor of the week". She could be next week's "David Hogg" as far as the media goes (remember, last week that teenager was a Constitutional expert and the ONLY voice that mattered on gun violence and was on the news 24 hours a day...this week: he doesn't even exist in the media at all).

directfiesta 03-08-2018 11:13 AM

Flashback to 2008 :

May. 17, 2012, 7:15 AM
Quote:

Does no one else find the very fact of John Edwards being on trial curious? Does no one else wonder about the criminal basis for the prosecution? About who in politics does and does not end up being destroyed by matters related to sexual behavior?
Let me preface my take on the Edwards trial with one general observation: Not all politicians are created equal. And not all are treated equally. Therein lies an issue deserving a much, much closer look: whether vulnerable Democrats, chiefly of the liberal persuasion, are targeted for destruction. Or at least helped along to their doom by a double standard.

***

But first, the specifics of the Edwards case. He faces a potential $1.5 million fine, but, far more seriously, up to thirty years imprisonment. Thirty years. His crime? Not murder, not torture, not armed robbery, not stealing money from clients. No, his crime was his failure to report campaign contributions. While preparing for his second presidential bid, in 2006, he got caught up in an extramarital affair that produced a child. And, not exactly able to announce that fact or ask his sick wife to sign off, the wealthy Edwards turned to some wealthy backers to take care of the woman and the baby and hide the whole thing from Elizabeth Edwards and presumably everyone else. Two people gave him a total of $900,000.

When someone running for office receives money, or the benefit of money or services, that's a contribution, and it must both be reported and be subject to restrictions on amount. Unless of course it has nothing to do with the campaign itself. Certainly, candidates receive ordinary income (such as fees for lawyering) that is not subject to those limits. And if someone gives a candidate a gift that is not used for the campaign, it is similarly not subject to campaign finance laws.

So, what's the ill intent here—and the consequence for the public interest? If this were a bribe by someone seeking to influence Edwards as an office-holder, that would be one thing. If the money were intended to help sway voters to support Edwards, that might be valid cause for pursuing the case aggressively. But nothing about the two donors, both elderly (one has since died), suggests an attempt to gain illegal influence. In reality, both donors -the billionaires Rachel "Bunny" Mellon and Fred Baron—apparently liked and believed in Edwards and, when asked, were quick to aid him in a tough spot.

....

.....
Something Stinks About The Whole John Edwards Criminal Trial - Business Insider

Rochard 03-08-2018 02:25 PM

Robbie is ignoring me but I'm bored.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234288)
Except that it's NOT breaking the law to pay someone to not blab about having an "affair".

It might be.

This happened during the campaign, right before the election, and this payoff and the campaign itself are directly related. Was this money paid for by the campaign? Was this money from the campaign? Where did this money come from? Was the attorney involved paid for by Trump, or the campaign? Did anyone involved in this work on the campaign, and were they paid for by the campaign?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234288)
Also...anyone in the adult industry knows this was not an "affair". This was Stormy Daniels escorting and being the regular for Trump.

I've been wondering this myself. If so, this is illegal.

2MuchMark 03-08-2018 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22234144)
And who's fault is it that CNN is obsessed with Stormy Daniels?

It's not Stormy Daniels per se - its that Chump lied about her. To you. To his wife and to his family.

beerptrol 03-08-2018 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22234344)
It's not Stormy Daniels per se - its that Chump lied about her. To you. To his wife and to his family.

Chumpanzees love to be lied to

Robbie 03-08-2018 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22234344)
It's not Stormy Daniels per se - its that Chump lied about her. To you. To his wife and to his family.

Hey, if you were hiring a high dollar escort on a regular basis...that's something that is kept close to the vest.
Stormy Daniels SHOULD have been 100% discreet.

Would you tell YOUR wife and family if you were fucking around? I know I wouldn't! lol

Acepimp 03-08-2018 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 22234206)
Did you really say that ???????


"You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful... I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything."

That's called conssent. Did Bill Clinton get consent from the women he raped? (Hint- he didn't)

beerptrol 03-08-2018 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22234401)
That's called conssent. Did Bill Clinton get consent from the women he raped? (Hint- he didn't)

lol spin and deflect ....... Boris

Tasty1 03-08-2018 08:55 PM

what a whore

2MuchMark 03-08-2018 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234367)
Hey, if you were hiring a high dollar escort on a regular basis...that's something that is kept close to the vest.
Stormy Daniels SHOULD have been 100% discreet.

Would you tell YOUR wife and family if you were fucking around? I know I wouldn't! lol

Here's the thing: I actually don't care at all about Trump's sex life. Even if the Russian pee-girl thing turns out to be true, I'm like... meh. To each their own. I think that a politician's personal sex life should never have anything to do with their ability to do their job. Unless of course, some anti gay-rights douchebag is secretly gay himself. Otherwise, bugger who you want and have fun!


Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22234401)
Did Bill Clinton get consent from the women he raped? (Hint- he didn't)

"Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument, which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

Acepimp 03-08-2018 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22234424)
"Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument, which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

https://i.redd.it/8tt5vly8eazz.png

Rochard 03-08-2018 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22234424)
Here's the thing: I actually don't care at all about Trump's sex life. Even if the Russian pee-girl thing turns out to be true, I'm like... meh. To each their own. I think that a politician's personal sex life should never have anything to do with their ability to do their job. Unless of course, some anti gay-rights douchebag is secretly gay himself. Otherwise, bugger who you want and have fun!

A man who cheats on his wife cannot be trusted.

beerptrol 03-09-2018 05:59 AM

The chumpanzees out in full force deflecting in order to protect their masters

ruff 03-09-2018 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234259)
I wonder if we will ever have even one conversation with disagreements that doesn't just devolve into everybody personally attacking each other. lol

We could probably start a discussion on how great it would be to all be courteous to each other and professional...and we'd be calling each other names by the third reply. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You know, Robbie, emotions run high concerning this president. It's not whether he gets anything done or whatever, it's the quality and integrity of the man. tRump has none and the fact that people elected him and support him is an insult to our country. It's fine to pontificate about manners and civility, but even his supporters acknowledge that he is a scumbag. So who's next? What other fuckleberry can we find for a president? The bar is so low now that any asshat now qualifies to be elected. Doesn't any of that speak to you? You'll accept any bozo like tRump? Some of us are not ready to accept this kind of faux leadership.

Busty2 03-09-2018 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruff (Post 22234516)
You know, Robbie, emotions run high concerning this president. It's not whether he gets anything done or whatever, it's the quality and integrity of the man. tRump has none and the fact that people elected him and support him is an insult to our country. It's fine to pontificate about manners and civility, but even his supporters acknowledge that he is a scumbag. So who's next? What other fuckleberry can we find for a president? The bar is so low now that any asshat now qualifies to be elected. Doesn't any of that speak to you? You'll accept any bozo like tRump? Some of us are not ready to accept this kind of faux leadership.

Well said and you didn't have to resort to calling people names like some do on this forum :thumbsup

Robbie 03-09-2018 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruff (Post 22234516)
You know, Robbie, emotions run high concerning this president. It's not whether he gets anything done or whatever, it's the quality and integrity of the man. tRump has none and the fact that people elected him and support him is an insult to our country. It's fine to pontificate about manners and civility, but even his supporters acknowledge that he is a scumbag. So who's next? What other fuckleberry can we find for a president? The bar is so low now that any asshat now qualifies to be elected. Doesn't any of that speak to you? You'll accept any bozo like tRump? Some of us are not ready to accept this kind of faux leadership.

I felt like this: The plastic politicians who ACT like their shit doesn't stink (pretty much ALL politicians including past Presidents) have failed our country.

My vote went to Trump because he straight up said that he is what he is. And he has a plan for our economy and foreign policy that I agree with 100%

I really don't care about what Democrats and "never-Trump" Republicans think about him as a person.

Sure, they prance around Washington pretending to be pure as driven snow...until they get caught fucking page boys (remember that in the 1990's), or having gay sex in public bathrooms.

Meanwhile, they never got anything done for the American people.

I could argue with you that JFK was the biggest "scumbag" President of all times...but the reality is...we really don't know. These politicians all lead double lives. Just like many "normal" citizens do. For all we know Reagan might have been having sex and drug orgys late night in the White House. lol

I think that the Evangelical leaders actually got it right (though I think they are all superstitious nut cases) when they said: "We aren't voting for a 'Pastor In Chief', we are voting for a President to LEAD".

And that's the bottom line for me.
I AGREE 100% with what he is doing with the economy. I understand his negotiating tactics as well.

And I HATED what the fake politicians have done to the country over decades and decades.

Right now we have a roaring economy. A miracle in North Korea. Jobs coming back to the U.S. (even though the "experts" claimed during the campaign that it was "impossible")

And yet...here you are complaining that you don't like Trump as a person.

Me? I could give a shit about whether or not he likes to fuck a lot of bitches. So do I.
I don't give a fuck if he likes to make money by any means neccessary. So do I.

I don't need another guy in the WhiteHouse pretending to be a "polite" and "gentile" little mouse. Meanwhile they drove the country into the ground.

I feel that Trump's election SAVED our country.

Now you don't have to agree with me (and you don't).

But I WILL agree with you: Trump is an asshole.
And that's EXACTLY what we needed.

Somebody who doesn't give a fuck what the Establishment wants and who will stand up for the USA in negotiations.

Just look at the contrast:
Obama "negotiates" with Iran. Sends them a pallet full of cash via a military plane. And then Iran takes that cash and funds terrorism in Syria.
What a fucking idiot.

Trump gives North Korea nothing. Berates Kim Jung Un in public. Shows strength in every way.
And they come to the table with their hat in their hands.

And the economy?
Remember the "Summer of Recovery" in 2009 that NEVER happened?

Then Trump is elected and the economy immediately took off.

I would suggest to you that maybe you should stop being "outraged" and "offended" by the way Trump speaks and acts. I'm sure you aren't as weak in real life as you sound when you complain about Trump being a "scumbag". So why act that way in your political views and postings on GFY?

Take an honest look at what he is doing and don't listen to CNN's "experts" or MSNBC's pundits. They were WRONG on EVERYTHING they have said about Trump since day one.

Rochard 03-09-2018 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234562)
My vote went to Trump because he straight up said that he is what he is. And he has a plan for our economy and foreign policy that I agree with 100%

You voted for someone who is completely unqualified and has the temper of a four year old.

Thank good the guy before him got our unemployment down to 4%.

Acepimp 03-09-2018 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22234567)
You voted for someone who is completely unqualified and has the temper of a four year old.

Thank good the guy before him got our unemployment down to 4%.

Yeah, with minimum wage temp jobs. People were working 3 jobs to get by. Yay jobs!

Facts Are Facts=> Obama Owns Worst Economic Numbers in 80 Years, Since 1932

Bladewire 03-09-2018 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22234567)
You voted for someone who is completely unqualified and has the temper of a four year old.

Thank good the guy before him got our unemployment down to 4%.

But Robbie has the temper & comprehension of a 4 year old as well :helpme

ruff 03-10-2018 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234562)
I felt like this: The plastic politicians who ACT like their shit doesn't stink (pretty much ALL politicians including past Presidents) have failed our country.

My vote went to Trump because he straight up said that he is what he is. And he has a plan for our economy and foreign policy that I agree with 100%

I really don't care about what Democrats and "never-Trump" Republicans think about him as a person.

Sure, they prance around Washington pretending to be pure as driven snow...until they get caught fucking page boys (remember that in the 1990's), or having gay sex in public bathrooms.

Meanwhile, they never got anything done for the American people.

I could argue with you that JFK was the biggest "scumbag" President of all times...but the reality is...we really don't know. These politicians all lead double lives. Just like many "normal" citizens do. For all we know Reagan might have been having sex and drug orgys late night in the White House. lol

I think that the Evangelical leaders actually got it right (though I think they are all superstitious nut cases) when they said: "We aren't voting for a 'Pastor In Chief', we are voting for a President to LEAD".

And that's the bottom line for me.
I AGREE 100% with what he is doing with the economy. I understand his negotiating tactics as well.

And I HATED what the fake politicians have done to the country over decades and decades.

Right now we have a roaring economy. A miracle in North Korea. Jobs coming back to the U.S. (even though the "experts" claimed during the campaign that it was "impossible")

And yet...here you are complaining that you don't like Trump as a person.

Me? I could give a shit about whether or not he likes to fuck a lot of bitches. So do I.
I don't give a fuck if he likes to make money by any means neccessary. So do I.

I don't need another guy in the WhiteHouse pretending to be a "polite" and "gentile" little mouse. Meanwhile they drove the country into the ground.

I feel that Trump's election SAVED our country.

Now you don't have to agree with me (and you don't).

But I WILL agree with you: Trump is an asshole.
And that's EXACTLY what we needed.

Somebody who doesn't give a fuck what the Establishment wants and who will stand up for the USA in negotiations.

Just look at the contrast:
Obama "negotiates" with Iran. Sends them a pallet full of cash via a military plane. And then Iran takes that cash and funds terrorism in Syria.
What a fucking idiot.

Trump gives North Korea nothing. Berates Kim Jung Un in public. Shows strength in every way.
And they come to the table with their hat in their hands.

And the economy?
Remember the "Summer of Recovery" in 2009 that NEVER happened?

Then Trump is elected and the economy immediately took off.

I would suggest to you that maybe you should stop being "outraged" and "offended" by the way Trump speaks and acts. I'm sure you aren't as weak in real life as you sound when you complain about Trump being a "scumbag". So why act that way in your political views and postings on GFY?

Take an honest look at what he is doing and don't listen to CNN's "experts" or MSNBC's pundits. They were WRONG on EVERYTHING they have said about Trump since day one.

It takes years to get the US economy moving in the right direction. tRump takes credit for Obama's hard work. tRump cannot get out of his own way. He has not managed to do anything but disrupt and divide this country. So far he's is responsible for nothing constructive in this country. He has spent the last year un-doing regulations put into place to protect the citizens of this country. A tax cut only for the rich and so far producing nothing tangible for the citizens, but the corporations love it. Health is projected to start going up and out of reach for most people. Basically every week of this administration is spent defending some fuck up or another. Nothing on gun control, nothing on immigration, nothing on DACA, nothing on infrastructure, nothing on anything.

That fucked up little dictator in North Korea is going to eat tRump's lunch. He's about ten times smarter than tRump and is going to set the orange moron up for some old fashioned humiliation. That's if there is even a meeting, doubtful because tRump will sabotage it.

Get the facts on the Iran money, it was no give-away.

So no, Robbie, this poor excuse for a president doesn't get to take credit for what he hasn't done. What did you think he did, take the office and wave a magic wand and everything is suddenly better and nicer? I'm afraid not.

Meanwhile, try and remember the Republicans during the Obama years, especially regarding the deficit. They have run up a debt now way beyond anything rational and for what? Certainly not infrastructure, but to build up the world's largest military even more. As if we need it. Who's going to pay for all that debt? The corporations are off the hook, they just got a free ride. It's going to be us, Robbie, and our children. We'll be paying this off the rest of our lives. And spare me the voodoo economics, business isn't going to provide anything to increase our manufacturing capacity. We are a service economy now and most of the jobs produced monthly are at the minimum wage level. So yay for that. If that's what you call "winning" then you know nothing.

It doesn't take a genius to see what is happening, just someone with an open mind not clouded by a huckster. This week's over, let's see what kind of bullshit we have to deal with regarding tRump next week. Because there is always something and it sure as hell won't be anything that benefits the country.

RedFred 03-10-2018 11:56 AM

https://scontent.fapa1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...af&oe=5B0562FF

Rochard 03-10-2018 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22234583)
But Robbie has the temper & comprehension of a 4 year old as well :helpme

I wouldn't say that about Robbie. I've met him a few times and he is very nice. I have him on Facebook too - he is just a normal person. Some people just believe in their politics like a religion. He just refuses to see the truth.

I don't subscribe to political sites, nothing on Facebook, etc etc etc. I stay completely away from politics on Facebook. I get my news from a news feed - I don't go to CNN or any particular news site. I went an entire month avoiding CNN just to make sure I wasn't being improperly influenced and nothing in my world changed.

But I wouldn't say Robbie has the temper & comprehension of a four year old. He is a smart man.

thommy 03-10-2018 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22234562)
And the economy?
Remember the "Summer of Recovery" in 2009 that NEVER happened?

Did not happen?

https://editorial.azureedge.net/misc...8728328543.PNG

Quote:

Then Trump is elected and the economy immediately took off.
aha and in 2000 the economists already knew that trump will be elected in 2016 and this is why they could precisely forcast it already than, right ?

https://asia.nikkei.com/var/site_cac...middle_280.png


I do not blame you for not knowing about economics, but the fact that the US economy was considered "overheated" by the end of 2015 should also make it clear to you that you can easily pour oil into a blazing fire.

this is what trump did and this is what all americans will pay for.

he gave you a tax cutt for a few years and in the same time he starts a trading war what will eat all this "saved money" again.

please never use the word trump in connection with economy. This man has come to his wealth by finding ways not to pay his bills. It is a dumbass and has less knowledge about economics than a domestic cat.
all people he has brought into his illustrious circle (BECAUSE THEY KNOW MORE ABOUT ECONOMY AS HE DOES) have thrown the towel because they CAN SEE where it leads to.

when he will be history he will be MUCH richer than before and all of you much poorer.

Rochard 03-10-2018 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruff (Post 22235094)
It takes years to get the US economy moving in the right direction. tRump takes credit for Obama's hard work. tRump cannot get out of his own way. He has not managed to do anything but disrupt and divide this country. So far he's is responsible for nothing constructive in this country. He has spent the last year un-doing regulations put into place to protect the citizens of this country. A tax cut only for the rich and so far producing nothing tangible for the citizens, but the corporations love it. Health is projected to start going up and out of reach for most people. Basically every week of this administration is spent defending some fuck up or another. Nothing on gun control, nothing on immigration, nothing on DACA, nothing on infrastructure, nothing on anything.

That fucked up little dictator in North Korea is going to eat tRump's lunch. He's about ten times smarter than tRump and is going to set the orange moron up for some old fashioned humiliation. That's if there is even a meeting, doubtful because tRump will sabotage it.

Get the facts on the Iran money, it was no give-away.

So no, Robbie, this poor excuse for a president doesn't get to take credit for what he hasn't done. What did you think he did, take the office and wave a magic wand and everything is suddenly better and nicer? I'm afraid not.

Meanwhile, try and remember the Republicans during the Obama years, especially regarding the deficit. They have run up a debt now way beyond anything rational and for what? Certainly not infrastructure, but to build up the world's largest military even more. As if we need it. Who's going to pay for all that debt? The corporations are off the hook, they just got a free ride. It's going to be us, Robbie, and our children. We'll be paying this off the rest of our lives. And spare me the voodoo economics, business isn't going to provide anything to increase our manufacturing capacity. We are a service economy now and most of the jobs produced monthly are at the minimum wage level. So yay for that. If that's what you call "winning" then you know nothing.

It doesn't take a genius to see what is happening, just someone with an open mind not clouded by a huckster. This week's over, let's see what kind of bullshit we have to deal with regarding tRump next week. Because there is always something and it sure as hell won't be anything that benefits the country.

I couldn't agree more.

Trump hasn't done anything for the economy. Not one damn thing. The "tax cut" I got is a few dollars every two weeks. Depending on how the rest of taxes change with deductions, the average person will stand to lose money. In the meantime big companies will rake in huge bucks - the rich get richer.

Obama did wonders with our economy. He took over when unemployment was over 10%, and and cut unemployment by half. When he left office unemployment was 4.8% and dropping fast like a huge bag of bricks. Trump just rode what was handed to him.

In the mean time Trump removed all of the regulations preventing this from happening again.

NatalieK 03-10-2018 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22233595)
So a rich business man was having consensual sex with an adult star 12 years ago?

OMG Impeach!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

No one cares.


:rasta

I bet his mrs does :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


You have to get your head out of your ass one day :pimp

Acepimp 03-10-2018 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 22235201)
I bet his mrs does :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


You have to get your head out of your ass one day :pimp

None of it's been confirmed. And maybe he and the Mrs had an open relationship at the time. None of this matters, Trump won because he was the only viable candidate and is doing a great job (and donating his salary).

:rasta

Bladewire 03-10-2018 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22235107)
I couldn't agree more.

Trump hasn't done anything for the economy. Not one damn thing. The "tax cut" I got is a few dollars every two weeks. Depending on how the rest of taxes change with deductions, the average person will stand to lose money. In the meantime big companies will rake in huge bucks - the rich get richer.

Obama did wonders with our economy. He took over when unemployment was over 10%, and and cut unemployment by half. When he left office unemployment was 4.8% and dropping fast like a huge bag of bricks. Trump just rode what was handed to him.

In the mean time Trump removed all of the regulations preventing this from happening again.

The only thing that Trump did to help the economy short-term was removing all the regulations from Dodd-Frank that protected us from going into another economic crash. Typical Republican strategy distract the masses with a bunch of drama while you rob the treasury and economically enslave the masses for another generation.

MsCheyenne 03-11-2018 05:15 AM

It seems pretty classless for Daniels to kiss and, ten years later when Trump is running for office, decide to tell unless she gets 130k. She did a CNN interview in which she said is getting offered 6 times the money dancing as she used to and, her phone is ringing off the hook with job opportunities. If Trump had assaulted her, hit her, ect, I'd feel differently about it...but as it looks right now, she makes women in our industry look like opportunists. In all fairness, not all of the facts have come out but, so far, I am disappointed that someone in the porn business would cash in on nothing more than an National Enquirer story. We've all got a bad, stereo typed image as it is.

Then, there is Jessica Drake who, along with Daniels was invited to Trump's hotel for dinner and, drinks. They went and, according to Drake, he greeted her with a kiss. How is that an unusual thing when you are joining a man for drinks in his hotel room? Then, after hiring Glorida Allred, Drake said that he offered her 10k to spend the night and, use of his private jet to get back to LA the next day because she has a porn shoot. She was signed with Wicked at the time. She declined and, that was that. How is any of this harassment? That was probably at least twice as much money as she makes shooting for Wicked, without the private jet. To top if off, this was 10 years ago.

I just don't understand why any of this is news. Obviously, Trump and, his must have had some time of agreement. Trump was obviously pretty open as a playboy. When the accounts like this come out, it is Trump wining, dining, offering generous gifts, ect. There hasn't been any credible allegations of abuse.

So, the guy is a horn dog? Big deal. What makes me sad is the behavior of the ladies in our business looking like opportunists.

thommy 03-11-2018 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MsCheyenne (Post 22235338)
So, the guy is a horn dog? Big deal. What makes me sad is the behavior of the ladies in our business looking like opportunists.

it´s not the problem that he is fucking around.
If he would be this straight guy who says all he think he would stand for it and good.

clinton was also not really blamed for his affairs - he was blamed for the lie.
and if he get blamed for it why should that be different on trump?

regarding the biz-bitches: it is an old story and nothing new.
it just shows how stupid and short seeing donald dumb is not to know it.

and this did not happen when he was a 18-year old idiot it happens when he was already an over 60 year old idiot. do you really think that a character can change in this late days of life?

Robbie 03-11-2018 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruff (Post 22235094)
It takes years to get the US economy moving in the right direction. tRump takes credit for Obama's hard work.
tRump cannot get out of his own way. He has not managed to do anything but disrupt and divide this country.

I completely disagree.

Pres. Obama came into a destroyed economy due to the housing market collapsing. All the banks were holding billions of dollars in underwater mortgages. Complete liability.

Bush bailed them out with $1 trillion of taxpayer money.
Pres. Obama did it again a few months later.

Then the economy just sat there for 8 long years.

The EXPERTS were on CNN, The New York Times, MSNBC, and the Washington Post during the campaign saying that IF Trump were somehow elected it would INSTANTLY crash the economy and put us in a deep recession. Do you not remember that?

Let me remind you...this was the mainstream media just days before the election:
A Trump win would sink stocks. What about Clinton? - Oct. 24, 2016

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/b...rump-wins.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/02/this...rump-wins.html

I could keep on posting them because it was a big media anti-Trump blitz that week when they started getting scared that he was going to win.

Now according to you...the economy "takes years" to change.

But according to the "Experts" it was going to crash immediately "IF" Trump won.

Instead it took off immediately.

And once Trump took office he removed all traces of Pres. Obama's economic policys.
Obama didn't pass any legislation with Congress for 6 long years. He did EVERYTHING by Executive Order. Remember when he said "I don't need Congress, I have a phone and a pen".

Well, that means it wasn't the "law of the land" (only Congress can do that). So Pres. Trump removed HUNDREDS of biz killing regulations that Pres. Obama put in place. Took us out of the Paris accords. Got tax reform and made companies in the U.S. competitive with foreign country's.

And you hate Pres. Trump so badly that you refuse to see how that revved up the economy and instead now try to claim that Obama's policys are responsible...but wait, ALL of his economic policys have been rescinded by Trump.

So that means that NONE of Obama's brilliant ideas are still in play. They are ALL gone.
This is Trump's economy 100%.

I don't really know what the heck caused you and about half the country to hate Trump. But it's now been well over a year since he won.

It just seems that the media is loving "fighting" with him all the time. It gives them ratings.
And trust me...no matter how sincere Anderson Cooper or Rachel Maddow appear...they don't give a damn about you or me. They only care about ratings.

Bladewire 03-11-2018 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MsCheyenne (Post 22235338)
It seems pretty classless for Daniels to kiss and, ten years later when Trump is running for office, decide to tell unless she gets 130k....

I just don't understand why any of this is news.

Pay attention.

She kiss & told in an article in 2011.

Trump paid her in 2016 to make sure she didn't keep talking.

In my country there's a thing called freedom of speech.

Am I country rich people try to use illegal contracts to steal the freedom of speech from law abiding American citizens Stormy Daniels is fighting that legally as is her Birthright as an American citizen.

It's News because Stormy Daniels gave her interview in 2011 after she had her baby. She had her baby less than a year after she stopped seeing Trump. Her baby looks just like the Trump babies.

MsCheyenne 03-11-2018 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22235389)
Pay attention.

She kiss & told in an article in 2011.

Trump paid her in 2016 to make sure she didn't keep talking.

In my country there's a thing called freedom of speech.

Am I country rich people try to use illegal contracts to steal the freedom of speech from law abiding American citizens Stormy Daniels is fighting that legally as is her Birthright as an American citizen.

It's News because Stormy Daniels gave her interview in 2011 after she had her baby. She had her baby less than a year after she stopped seeing Trump. Her baby looks just like the Trump babies.


Yes, I am aware. In fact, the story was in In Touch magazine some years back. I find the timing of the 130k suspicious. There must have been something that prompted this hush or, even blackmail deal just before the election. I find her cashing in on a consensual relationship incredibly petty. When Gennifer Flowers went public with her consensual relationship with Clinton, I found it equally petty. Can you imagine having an affair with someone and, then, long after it is over, doing something for financial gain, at the potential harm of your former lover? It is classless.

MsCheyenne 03-11-2018 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thommy (Post 22235358)
it´s not the problem that he is fucking around.
If he would be this straight guy who says all he think he would stand for it and good.

clinton was also not really blamed for his affairs - he was blamed for the lie.
and if he get blamed for it why should that be different on trump?

regarding the biz-bitches: it is an old story and nothing new.
it just shows how stupid and short seeing donald dumb is not to know it.

and this did not happen when he was a 18-year old idiot it happens when he was already an over 60 year old idiot. do you really think that a character can change in this late days of life?

It isn't the same as Clinton's exploits. In the situation with Gennifer Flowers, it was similar. I found it pretty classless that Flowers went public in something that could have hurt her former lover's career to gain public attention. I find Stormy cashing in on an affair with Trump classless too. Clinton's behavior with Jones was workplace sexual harassment and, then, his camp went on a public smear campaign against her. The situation with Jones was also not consensual. I won't even get into the Lewinsky deal with Clinton. All of these situations are not the same. Flowers and, Daniels comes the closest in similarities. I can't begin to imagine, regardless of sour grapes or, perhaps even greed, stabbing a former lover in the back like that.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc