Like the Iranian nuclear deal?

I think we should talk about that deal. Who is interested?

Just checked. Still not on CNN.

He does look like he is sitting there thinking, "I'll have your job soon."

Jeez, not on MSNBC either. How surprising. John Kelly and Stormy seem to be the important "news"...

I'll quote myself since it's likely if it's not on CNN and the like, it's very possible you guys don't even know.

Netanyahu - 100,000 Secret Files Prove Iran ?Lied Big Time? About Nukes

TEL AVIV — In a dramatic press conference in Jerusalem aimed at the international community, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday unveiled a cache of secret files he says were obtained from inside a hidden Iranian site and clearly demonstrate that Tehran maintained a secret nuclear weapons program despite declarations to the contrary.

Netanyahu explained that the structure of the U.S.-led international nuclear agreement was in part based on deceptive Iranian descriptions of its previous nuclear work. He said Iran’s failure to disclose its secret program while misleading the world shows the nuclear deal is “based on lies based on Iranian deception.”

The Israeli leader presented evidence that Iran continued research for a nuclear weapons program even after signing the 2015 nuclear deal.

“Iran’s leaders repeatedly deny ever pursuing nuclear weapons,” Netanyahu began. “Tonight I’m here to tell you one thing: Iran lied.”

“After signing the nuclear deal in 2015, Iran intensified its efforts to hide its secret files,” he said. “In 2017 Iran moved its nuclear weapons files to a highly secret location in Tehran.”

Netanyahu said the secret nuclear files prove the following:

Iran lied about never having a secret nuclear program. Second, even after the deal it continued to expand its nuclear program for future use. Third, Iran lied by not coming clean to the IAEA. Finally, the nuclear deal is based on lies based on Iranian deception.

The prime minister’s speech was based on 55,000 pages of documents and 183 CDs that Netanyahu said were smuggled out of an “atomic archive” painstakingly preserving Iran’s secretive nuclear program so that the country would have the option of restarting its nuclear weapons activities after the nuclear deal expires or in the case of Tehran prematurely bolting the agreement. Israel’s ability to acquire the archive marks a massive intelligence coup for the Jewish state.

“Iran lied. Big time,” Netanyahu said of the half-ton of material obtained by Israel.

The trove, Netanyahu added, contains “incriminating documents, incriminating charts, incriminating presentations, incriminating blueprints, incriminating photos, incriminating videos and more.”

He said Israel shared the material with the U.S., and that “the United States can vouch for its authenticity.”

The “atomic archive” was compiled by Iran with the express purpose of preserving its secretive nuclear weapons plan known as Project Amad, which aimed to “design, produce and test… five warheads, each with a 10 kiloton TNT yield, for integration on a missile.”

“That is like five Hiroshima bombs to be put on ballistic missiles,” asserted Netanyahu.

Netanyahu outlined Project Amad as containing five key elements described by the Times of Israel thusly: “Designing nuclear weapons, developing nuclear cores, building nuclear implosion systems, preparing nuclear tests and integrating nuclear warheads on missiles.”

Netanyahu said that in 2003, Iran shut down the version of Project Amad that existed at the time and instead divided its nuclear program into both covert and overt components. Besides archiving the material for future use, Netanyahu said Iran continued to research nuclear weapons.

Netanyahu called on President Donald Trump to “do the right thing” as the May 12 deadline to recertify the nuclear agreement approaches.

“The right thing for the United States. The right thing for Israel. And the right thing for the peace of the world,” he concluded.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Click if you dare. Be careful, it's possible you will get exposed to thoughts you don't agree with.

Here, let me help the first hysterical nutjob:

"Breitbart? Fake alt-right news!"

Don't worry, your media will have to report it soon enough and I will be here to point out that you said it about this one.

He was the person being roasted in the famous bombing of jersey shore's ''the situation''

Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino Bombs at Donald Trump Roast - Funny Video | eBaum's World

It's widely believed this was the last straw that in the end caused him to run.

Bill Burr has a good bit, Donald Trump has the best bar story ever ''Yeah?? The president called me out and couple years later I took that guys job!!''

Why do you carry on conversations with your fake nicks?

Why do you lie? I got $500 bucks that says I have only 1 nic? Let's settle it once and for all.

I don't believe they think they are lying. That doesn't make any sense, as it's too easily proven once a wager is accepted.

They actually believe it. That is the battle being waged.

Joe Rogan had on Abby Martin the other day and she said something that made me think ''Jeez that sums up GFY these days'' Basically the Right tards seem to believe Trump can do no wrong (god knows we have a couple of those) and anyone ''on the left'' (I say left in quotes since they really aren't liberals). Basically call anyone who doesn't blindly agree with them, fake nics and russian trolls (god knows we got those too)

I'm sure this post will be more confirmation for them. I don't understand the argument, to be honest. Even if it were true - which it isn't - what does that have to do with the debate? I suppose I could run around agreeing with myself - but to what end? Who has been convinced by the same person saying the same thing under multiple id's? My only assumption would be that they can't accept multiple people disagreeing with what they think, so it HAS to be one person using multiple nics because there can't be that many people who don't see the world the way they do. More willful blindness.

I agree on the liberal comment as well. I need a better word, because technically I am a liberal on social issues and a cross between libertarian and anarchist on others. Definitely not a Republican - they get almost everything wrong. A common sense approach with the emphasis on the rights of the individual would be my preference. Republicans pretend that is their platform, but it's not true.

I posted this video a couple months back. It basically sums up my feelings about the left as of late. I am and have always been left, I like Rubin no longer believe the left is the left anymore. It's all people playing identity politics and shouting down anyone who doesn't join them in their echo chamber.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiVQ8vrGA_8

Okay, well we should understand why paranoid people afraid of actual debate might believe we are the same person. It sounds like we'd have a lot in common.

Michelle Wolf was the big winner of the WHCD, not Trump

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/29/opini...ion/index.html

"I'm 32, which is a weird age — 10 years too young to host this event, and 20 years too old for Roy Moore"

Bahahahahahahaha...

"[Trump] loves white nationalists, which is a weird term for a Nazi. Calling a Nazi a white nationalist is like calling a pedophile a 'kid friend.' Or Harvey Weinstein a 'ladies man.'"

Bahahahahahahahahahahaha...

I'd tend to mostly agree with you, but I try to look at everyone individually. I'm a lefty, but I have a few friends that are righties, including my brother who is a Gun-Totin' Truck Drivin' Hoot-n-Hollarin' Trump-Lovin' Rightie. It's is great to talk with people you may disagree with.

LOL. Yeah, not bad.

And actually, amazingly relevant.