GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Obama and Hillary's secret "spy" / weasel / traitor revealed (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1298836)

Acepimp 05-20-2018 12:24 PM

Records Show FBI ‘Informant’ Stefan Halper Was Paid $282,000 in 2016 For Spying on Trump — And Another $129,280 in 2017

"HUGE! Federal Records reveal that Obama, Clapper and Brennan Paid Stefan Halper $282,295 to SPY ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN!" Another Twitter sleuth identified a second payment to Halper in the amount of $129,280 making the total payments to Halper more than $400,000 from President Obama’s Administration to spy on the future President of the United States.

^^ This is criminal. Obama & Comey have some 'splainin to do

:rasta

bronco67 05-20-2018 01:20 PM

Looks like Devin Nines accomplished what he set out to do...which is to compromise FBI sources and methods. He should be in jail.

TheSquealer 05-20-2018 05:23 PM


crockett 05-20-2018 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273126)

There is no Obama investigation.. you live in a fanasty land..

TheSquealer 05-20-2018 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273136)
There is no Obama investigation.. you live in a fantasy land..


Donald J. Trump
‏@realDonaldTrump

I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or survielled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!
but but but ... Muh Russia!!

Since you guys are all about ensuring the integrity of our elections, you'll obviously have no problems whatsoever with Hillary getting busted for cheating in the primaries or Obama for using the FBI / DOJ to spy on political opponents.

but then again, you guys are also the racists who argue that Blacks and Mexicans shouldn't have to get ID's because its just "too difficult" for them.

crockett 05-20-2018 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273146)

Donald J. Trump
‏@realDonaldTrump

I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or survielled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!
but but but ... Muh Russia!!

Since you guys are all about ensuring the integrity of our elections, you'll obviously have no problems whatsoever with Hillary getting busted for cheating in the primaries or Obama for using the FBI / DOJ to spy on political opponents.

but then again, you guys are also the racists who argue that Blacks and Mexicans shouldn't have to get ID's because its just "too difficult" for them.

Oh look Trump tweeted something... all hail the orange jesus god.


Let me give you a clue... If a complaint is made to the FBI the FBI will have a investigation to see if any wrong doing took place. So now there will of course be a investigating because a complaint was made..

When no wrong doing is found you will once again cry about its not fair..

Meanwhile Hillary is not in jail, no one associated to Obama or Hillary has gone to jail, but we have 22 inditements of people with Trump ties and more are coming...

...but go ahead keep chanting "lock her up" like brainless bafoons..

TheSquealer 05-20-2018 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273150)
When no wrong doing is found you will once again cry about its not fair..

When it comes to Trump, you've been wrong. along with 99.9999% of all Democrats about absolutely every single thing to do with Trump since he announced his candidacy. I seriously doubt you're going to start being right all of the sudden.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

onwebcam 05-20-2018 07:23 PM

My local news just said the claim now is that the FBI sent Halper in after they found out about papodopous and page.. A few problems with that claim.. Both were questioned because of their meeting and arrangements with Halper. As well as the fact that Carter Page was a FBI informant himself at the time.

crockett 05-20-2018 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273157)
When it comes to Trump, you've been wrong. along with 99.9999% of all Democrats about absolutely every single thing to do with Trump since he announced his candidacy. I seriously doubt you're going to start being right all of the sudden.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Umm no I was not wrong about Trump.. Hillary had more votes.. she won the popular vote.. Trump was anointed POTUS because Repulicans managed to cheat the system with illegal gerrymandering to steal enough electoral votes and win the election.

crockett 05-20-2018 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22273158)
My local news just said the claim now is that the FBI sent Halper in after they found out about papodopous and page.. A few problems with that claim.. Both were questioned because of their meeting and arrangements with Halper. As well as the fact that Carter Page was a FBI informant himself at the time.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/i5GVvXt7E34/maxresdefault.jpg


Onwebcam's local news cast..

TheSquealer 05-20-2018 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273159)
Umm no I was not wrong about Trump.. Hillary had more votes.. she won the popular vote.. Trump was anointed POTUS because Repulicans managed to cheat the system with illegal gerrymandering to steal enough electoral votes and win the election.

ah yes. the "popular vote" where voter fraud has been documented in nearly all 50 states. good thing for Trump, his election didn't rely on a rigged system. of course Hillary tried to cheat and still lost... but paid no real price for cheating in this nations most sacred process.... and the guy who didn't cheat at all is being hounded all day long every day for well over a year and at the cost o over $20,000,000.00 for cheating even though there is zero proof whatsoever that he did. But... you're not a hypocrite. Not you. You like to expose hypocrisy.. thats how you justify your daily insane ranting.... I mean you really need to step back and check yourself when you find yourself constantly agreeing with and quoting Bladeliar.

educate yourself on "the popular vote"
http://thf-legal.s3.amazonaws.com/VoterFraudCases.pdf

Major (Tom) 05-20-2018 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273146)

Donald J. Trump
‏@realDonaldTrump

I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or survielled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!
but but but ... Muh Russia!!

Since you guys are all about ensuring the integrity of our elections, you'll obviously have no problems whatsoever with Hillary getting busted for cheating in the primaries or Obama for using the FBI / DOJ to spy on political opponents.

but then again, you guys are also the racists who argue that Blacks and Mexicans shouldn't have to get ID's because its just "too difficult" for them.


Very good point

crockett 05-20-2018 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273164)
ah yes. the "popular vote" where voter fraud has been documented in nearly all 50 states. good thing for Trump, his election didn't rely on a rigged system. of course Hillary tried to cheat and still lost... but paid no real price for cheating in this nations most sacred process.

educate yourself on "the popular vote"
http://thf-legal.s3.amazonaws.com/VoterFraudCases.pdf


"Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally"

Yes those millions of illegal votes!!!

Oh wait.. no its one thousand cases ranging back to the 90s maybe further back and it was everything from local mayor races to state elections..

You fail again Sherlock, this is why you right wing nuts are so easy to beat in arguments because you just post links to shit with out ever reading it..

crockett 05-20-2018 07:53 PM

In fact, from the 2016 election and using google I can only find 3 cases of voter fraud convictions....

2 were people who voted as felons and claimed they didnt realize they couldn't vote. The 3rd was a Colorado state congressman a Republican who forged a ballot with his ex wife's name on it..


Clearly if there were millions of illegal votes Trump investigation would have found them.. oh wait he quietly shut that down and doesnt talk or tweet about it.. oh yeah..

Must be the deep state winning again.... or there is next to no fraud...

TheSquealer 05-20-2018 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273175)
In fact, from the 2016 election and using google I can only find 3 cases of voter fraud convictions....
.

uh huh. i just gave you a link documenting almost 1000 voter fraud convictions. but yeah... you found 3 cases. maybe your example right here is the problem of finding "russian collusion"... and to use your logic, "if it's there, surely you'd find it"... but that of course hasn't happened.

TheSquealer 05-20-2018 08:27 PM


onwebcam 05-20-2018 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273146)

Donald J. Trump
‏@realDonaldTrump

I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or survielled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!
but but but ... Muh Russia!!

Since you guys are all about ensuring the integrity of our elections, you'll obviously have no problems whatsoever with Hillary getting busted for cheating in the primaries or Obama for using the FBI / DOJ to spy on political opponents.

but then again, you guys are also the racists who argue that Blacks and Mexicans shouldn't have to get ID's because its just "too difficult" for them.

Trump has this thing planned out like a skyscraper building project. He knows the IG report will drop Friday. He also knows there's been an investigation going on by that very same IG since pretty much day 1 of his Presidency. He's been playing the media all along.. Even covfefe was playing them... Here's why

"Most people think he meant to write “coverage” and they have had quite a bit of fun with it, but actually it is a real word of Yiddish origin, meaning “a futile search” or “a pointless and false quest.” It was originally transliterated from the Hebrew as “kabfefe,” whose etymology is “kab”—relating to the mystical Qabalah—and “fefe,” which is a word for “butterfly.” What Trump was actually saying in Yiddish tweet-speak was, “We are doing great things despite the press’s negative and pointless search, aka fake news.”

For those who are interested, the idea of “covfefe” comes from an old Yiddish tale about a foolish Sephardi rabbi who believed he was called to find and destroy the mythical and rare butterfly known as Benshariza, or “Lucifer butterfly”—a name that comes from “Helel ben Shahar,” meaning “shining star” (see Isaiah 14:12; also see Ephesians 2:2, where Satan is called the “prince of the power of the air”). The rabbi claimed that the Benshariza was recognizable by a unique and disturbing pattern on its huge wings, which looked like the moon and star symbol of the god Ba’al-Hadad. He was convinced that this ominous creature housed “the spirit of Satan” and that if he could destroy it, he would free the world of evil.

His search became an obsession, driving him across Europe to catch countless butterflies, but all he really caught were rounds of derision. His travels took him from Iberia to Bucharest, then up to Moscow, and finally back to Europe again, where he met his doom in the Palatinate (southwestern Germany), in a little town called Cagelenstat.* There he came across a baron who led him to believe that he had the beautiful butterfly in his possession but retorted, “Why, in the name of all things holy, would I hand it over to a little flitting fly-catcher on some stupid kabfefe!” The rabbi, exhausted and frustrated by his long travels, flew into a rage and lunged at the baron, who promptly drove a battle-axe into his skull and ended the meaningless quest. From that point on the word covfefe has been used to laugh at idiots in search of nothing.

*NOTE: It is likely mere coincidence that Cagelenstat is the original name of Kallstadt, Germany, which happens to be the birthplace of Friedrich Drumpf, the grandfather of Donald J. Trump. Friedrich, or Frederick, who became an American citizen in 1896, often advised his children, “Know what you want and follow your dream, but never get distracted by covfefe!”

Trump is about to drop the battle axe.

crockett 05-20-2018 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273187)
uh huh. i just gave you a link documenting almost 1000 voter fraud convictions. but yeah... you found 3 cases. maybe your example right here is the problem of finding "russian collusion"... and to use your logic, "if it's there, surely you'd find it"... but that of course hasn't happened.

As I said you didnt read shit of the link you posted.. That was not 1000 convictions of voter fraud in the 2016 election.. That was any case of fraud from the last 20 or 30 years maybe further back, from any election in the US. City mayors elections state ballots.. it was not 1000 cases of federal election fraud..

The mere fact that all they have is 900 convicted cases from elections ranging from the 90s till now from city, state and federal elections is proof there is no serious amounts of fraud..

I guess you are not smart enough to realize that you proved your own claim wrong..

I bet you cant even dig through that link and find 5 cases from the 2016 presidential election. Go ahead prove me wrong... Ill be waiting..for the excuses..

TheSquealer 05-20-2018 08:59 PM

10's of 1000's of fake votes. 2016
http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uplo...Appendix-1.pdf

that took all of 3 seconds...

Acepimp 05-20-2018 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273169)
"Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally"

^^ Finally! Crockette posts something that's accurate! :1orglaugh

crockett 05-21-2018 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273196)
10's of 1000's of fake votes. 2016
http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uplo...Appendix-1.pdf

that took all of 3 seconds...

Dude that is so full of shit and would never stand up in a court of law as proof. They are trying to compare birthdays and names and use that as proof..

I can tell you stright up that even Id make that list with just those qualifiers.. When I lived in MA there was another guy with my exact same name including middle name. He was born the same day and year as me. My fucking insurance company even mixed us up because I started getting his medical bills in the mail, thats how I found out about him..

People with tne same names/birthday is pretty fucking common when you are looking at millions of people. That is proof of nothing hence why no one was charged..


I told you to prove 5 cases with convictions not bullshit.. you cant do it and neither could Trump its why he quietly dropped his investigation because he knew it was gonna prove there was no wide spread fraud.. you are just a sucker for bullshit.

crockett 05-21-2018 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22273223)
^^ Finally! Crockette posts something that's accurate! :1orglaugh

Another sucker for bullshit..

dyna mo 05-21-2018 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273146)

Donald J. Trump
‏@realDonaldTrump

I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or survielled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!

it's an interesting comment, while the president is within his rights as chief exec to tell his employees what to do, it's my understanding the FBI doesn't just launch investigations willy-nilly, they need to see a need to investigate. I'm curious to see how it unfolds.

telling the fbi to investigate something purely based on political motivations doesn't square with the FBI's operational protocols. not that i trust the FBI 100% either.

Bladewire 05-21-2018 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22272929)
The alt right weasels are still at it. Keep sucking that Chump dick!

It's actually just ONE weasel with multiple nics :winkwink:

TheSquealer 05-21-2018 08:04 AM

one of the bigger fear among Democrats... straightening out voting so that there is no more fraud. funny how they have all these super strong opinions about something that "doesn't exist".

https://i.redd.it/s7liy2cqc6z01.jpg

beerptrol 05-21-2018 08:10 AM

Judicial Watch lol. You alt right dingbats and your fake news bullshit

Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group[1] and self-styled[disputed – discuss] watchdog group[2][3] that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate alleged misconduct by government officials.

Founded in 1994, JW has primarily targeted Democrats, in particular the Clinton administration, the Obama administration, and Hillary Clinton, although it has sued Republicans as well including the administration of George W. Bush. It has also filed lawsuits against government climate scientists;

TheSquealer 05-21-2018 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273321)
it's an interesting comment, while the president is within his rights as chief exec to tell his employees what to do, it's my understanding the FBI doesn't just launch investigations willy-nilly, they need to see a need to investigate. I'm curious to see how it unfolds.

telling the fbi to investigate something purely based on political motivations doesn't square with the FBI's operational protocols. not that i trust the FBI 100% either.

I'm not really cool with demanding investigations - however, i'm super cool with this stuff being called out daily in a very "in your face" manner.

It's about fucking time in my opinion.

The government of the USA is largely a bunch of self serving parasites.

TheSquealer 05-21-2018 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273311)
Dude that is so full of shit and would never stand up in a court of law as proof. They are trying to compare birthdays and names and use that as proof..

I can tell you stright up that even Id make that list with just those qualifiers.. When I lived in MA there was another guy with my exact same name including middle name. He was born the same day and year as me. My fucking insurance company even mixed us up because I started getting his medical bills in the mail, thats how I found out about him..

People with tne same names/birthday is pretty fucking common when you are looking at millions of people. That is proof of nothing hence why no one was charged..


I told you to prove 5 cases with convictions not bullshit.. you cant do it and neither could Trump its why he quietly dropped his investigation because he knew it was gonna prove there was no wide spread fraud.. you are just a sucker for bullshit.

i see where you get the 5 number. its a bullshit number thrown out by luberal news sources. of course when you look elsewhere they number swells to 1000s. Here's more than 5 from one state alone you fucking dumbass.

it literally takes 2 seconds to prove you wrong and i'm working at the same time.

Texas2017
Tyron Davis
Criminal Conviction
Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots

Texas2017
Jeanene Johnson
Criminal Conviction
Impersonation Fraud at the Polls

Texas2017
Latunia Thomas
Criminal Conviction
Impersonation Fraud at the Polls

Texas 2017
Noe Olvera
Criminal Conviction
Miscellaneous

Texas 2017
Rosa Maria Ortega
Criminal Conviction
Ineligible Voting

Texas 2016
Graciela Sanchez
Criminal Conviction
Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots

Texas 2016
Guadalupe Rivera
Criminal Conviction
Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots

we get it crockettscience. this thing that only gives a positive boost to Democrats is not a problem or a thing at all for people like you.

we understand. blacks and mexicans can't get voter id's because its too tough for them to do. you guys have made that exceedingly clear.

the integrity of our elections does not need to be protected (the most sacred institution of all in this nation), is not a big deal at all... because its democrats that benefit from 30 MILLION Illegals in the country who will or eventually will vote democrat.

the obvious point, whether its investigated or not (it almost never is), prosecuted or not (your idiotic semantic caveat) is that it is a real problem that really exists (which you and libs deny) that needs to be dealt with.

stop hating the United States of America. demand clean and fair elections. i'd think that would be a priority coming from a party who can only claim the other guy cheated every time they lose.

here's a list of 1000 criminal cases that the liberal media wont talk about.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

and use your fucking head for once. if there is 1000 criminal convictions for something that is never investigated, and for something which is always covered up and where evidence is quickly destroyed,... how many actual occurrences are there?

crockett 05-21-2018 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273321)
it's an interesting comment, while the president is within his rights as chief exec to tell his employees what to do, it's my understanding the FBI doesn't just launch investigations willy-nilly, they need to see a need to investigate. I'm curious to see how it unfolds.

telling the fbi to investigate something purely based on political motivations doesn't square with the FBI's operational protocols. not that i trust the FBI 100% either.

DOJ will let the inspector general look at it. Im pretty sure the FBI will also do a internal review due to it being a compliant from a high ranking asshole. They wont just jump because Trump ordered them, but Im pretty sure basic protocol requires them to at least look to see if it maybe a viable complaint. If they find there is a issue at that point theyd open a investigation but I dont think the FBI can investigate themself. My guess is it has to be the IG just like they did with the other stuff.

Trump is just wasting tax dollars for his own political gain. He will cause another year long investigation for his ego.. He will then claim the results are fake and its a deep state cover up.

beerptrol 05-21-2018 08:31 AM

Chumpanzees love to cry voter fraud, but leave out the number of republican voters busted for voter fraud.

heritage.org lol You alt right nutjobs love your alt right fake news

After the 2016 election of Donald Trump as U.S. President, Heritage board member Rebekah Mercer played a major role in shaping his transition team.[5]

crockett 05-21-2018 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273337)
i see where you get the 5 number. its a bullshit number thrown out by luberal news sources. of course when you look elsewhere they number swells to 1000s. Here's more than 5 from one state alone you fucking dumbass.

it literally takes 2 seconds to prove you wrong and i'm working at the same time.

Texas2017
Tyron Davis
Criminal Conviction
Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots

Texas2017
Jeanene Johnson
Criminal Conviction
Impersonation Fraud at the Polls

Texas2017
Latunia Thomas
Criminal Conviction
Impersonation Fraud at the Polls

Texas 2017
Noe Olvera
Criminal Conviction
Miscellaneous

Texas 2017
Rosa Maria Ortega
Criminal Conviction
Ineligible Voting

Texas 2016
Graciela Sanchez
Criminal Conviction
Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots

Texas 2016
Guadalupe Rivera
Criminal Conviction
Fraudulent Use of Absentee Ballots

we get it crockettscience. this thing that only gives a positive boost to Democrats is not a problem or a thing at all for people like you.

we understand. blacks and mexicans can't get voter id's because its too tough for them to do. you guys have made that exceedingly clear.

the integrity of our elections does not need to be protected (the most sacred institution of all in this nation), is not a big deal at all... because its democrats that benefit from 30 MILLION Illegals in the country who will or eventually will vote democrat.

the obvious point, whether its investigated or not (it almost never is), prosecuted or not (your idiotic semantic caveat) is that it is a real problem that really exists (which you and libs deny) that needs to be dealt with.

stop hating the United States of America. demand clean and fair elections. i'd think that would be a priority coming from a party who can only claim the other guy cheated every time they lose.

here's a list of 1000 criminal cases that the liberal media wont talk about.
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

and use your fucking head for once. if there is 1000 criminal convictions for something that is never investigated, and for something which is always covered up and where evidence is quickly destroyed,... how many actual occurrences are there?



Dude you are full of shit.. you picked random names off that list which were not convictions from a federal election.. That list was almost entirely state and local elections..

This is why you conveniently left out the election they were charged with fraud for.. That info was provided on your list and you of course left it out because none of those were from the presidential election.


Im not wasting my time with all the names, because what I said is exactly what you did.. This is the last name on your list.. a city level election not federal.


Guadalupe Rivera, a former Weslaco city commissioner, pleaded guilty to one count of providing illegal "assistance" to a voter by filling out an absentee ballot "in a way other than the way the voter directed or without direction from the voter." The fraud took place during Rivera's 2013 re-election bid, which he won by a scant 16 votes. His challenger sued alleging fraud, and a judge determined that 30 ballots had been illegally cast, enough to alter the outcome of the election. A new election was subsequently held, and Rivera lost. Rivera originally faced 16 election-related charges, 15 of which were dropped as part of his plea deal. He was sentenced to one year of probation and ordered to pay a $500

It was a local election not a federal election.. you are full of shit..

dyna mo 05-21-2018 08:35 AM

seems odd John Brennan got so spooked by Trump's tweet that he went on the offensive.

onwebcam 05-21-2018 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273348)
seems odd John Brennan got so spooked by Trump's tweet that he went on the offensive.

He's been a basket case. Looking forward to his perp walk.

onwebcam 05-21-2018 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273321)
it's an interesting comment, while the president is within his rights as chief exec to tell his employees what to do, it's my understanding the FBI doesn't just launch investigations willy-nilly, they need to see a need to investigate. I'm curious to see how it unfolds.

telling the fbi to investigate something purely based on political motivations doesn't square with the FBI's operational protocols. not that i trust the FBI 100% either.

That's funny because they launched a "Russia investigation" and even obtained a FISA warrant via what they knew to be false evidence.

dyna mo 05-21-2018 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22273381)
That's funny because they launched a "Russia investigation" and even obtained a FISA warrant via what they knew to be false evidence.

then they'll fabricate a reason here too right?

onwebcam 05-21-2018 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273384)
then they'll fabricate a reason here too right?

No, because the investigation has already been going on outside of the FBI since pretty much day 1 of Trump's Presidency... Horowitz and his 500+ employees investigating and John Huber's team as prosecution.

Notice this statement refers to "Jan 2017"

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQDyeS2X0AA9BUl.jpg

Again, when the DOJ and FBI claimed they didn't have Strzok and Page's text messages it was IG Horowitz who jumped in and said something along the lines of "Don't worry, I have them. I'll get those right to ya."

Also something to keep in mind.. Trump had a 4 hour long meeting with Mueller the day before his appointment... For a "job interview" that he couldn't even do because he had already served 12 years of a 10 year limit. Obama requested a special extension for the additional 2 years.

crockett 05-21-2018 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22273477)
No, because the investigation has already been going on outside of the FBI since pretty much day 1 of Trump's Presidency... Horowitz and his 500+ employees investigating and John Huber's team as prosecution.

Notice this statement refers to "Jan 2017"

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQDyeS2X0AA9BUl.jpg

Again, when the DOJ and FBI claimed they didn't have Strzok and Page's text messages it was IG Horowitz who jumped in and said something along the lines of "Don't worry, I have them. I'll get those right to ya."

Also something to keep in mind.. Trump had a 4 hour long meeting with Mueller the day before his appointment... For a "job interview" that he couldn't even do because he had already served 12 years of a 10 year limit. Obama requested a special extension for the additional 2 years.


A review is not a investigation and they dont have 500 people working on it.. This is a letter responding to complaints and stating they would review the complaints. This isnt a letter stating they have launched a investigation into anything.

xClips Jim 05-21-2018 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22273477)
Again, when the DOJ and FBI claimed they didn't have Strzok and Page's text messages it was IG Horowitz who jumped in and said something along the lines of "Don't worry, I have them. I'll get those right to ya."


Yeah, amazing how those were found after much lying and stonewalling by those that don't want them out. And then the redacting begins. And then we see what was being redacted. Little by little, what was actually happening takes shape. Can people be bothered to look? Not really. You won't get a reply, you'll get called names. They can't read an indictment, they just call you names. Trump derangement syndrome doesn't care about facts.

I've asked Rochard what he thinks about Strzok and Page when he told me the government just doesn't work that way - got back crickets. And this was before he was afraid to face me. It's like he doesn't know - or doesn't care - that the truth is coming out. The insurance policy failed.

Brennan is standing on Ground Zero - he doesn't have any choice but to freak out.

Enter John Huber. Get to know that name, people. :)

dyna mo 05-21-2018 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22273477)
No, because the investigation has already been going on outside of the FBI since pretty much day 1 of Trump's Presidency... Horowitz and his 500+ employees investigating and John Huber's team as prosecution.

Notice this statement refers to "Jan 2017"

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQDyeS2X0AA9BUl.jpg

Again, when the DOJ and FBI claimed they didn't have Strzok and Page's text messages it was IG Horowitz who jumped in and said something along the lines of "Don't worry, I have them. I'll get those right to ya."

Also something to keep in mind.. Trump had a 4 hour long meeting with Mueller the day before his appointment... For a "job interview" that he couldn't even do because he had already served 12 years of a 10 year limit. Obama requested a special extension for the additional 2 years.


how does that disprove the investigation could have been initiated based on false evidence?

crockett 05-21-2018 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22273328)
one of the bigger fear among Democrats... straightening out voting so that there is no more fraud. funny how they have all these super strong opinions about something that "doesn't exist".

https://i.redd.it/s7liy2cqc6z01.jpg


So you give up when I called out your bull shit and now post more bullshit.. trying to ignore how I destroyed your no sense argument..

Bladewire 05-21-2018 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273347)
Dude you are full of shit.. you picked random names off that list which were not convictions from a federal election.. That list was almost entirely state and local elections..

This is why you conveniently left out the election they were charged with fraud for.. That info was provided on your list and you of course left it out because none of those were from the presidential election.


No honor and no integrity with Trump supporters. They're so insecure and ashamed for picking such a loser they'd sell their little sister into prostitution to support Trump they'd lie to a priest on their deathbed to support Trump they'd lick clean a homeless black man's ass with hemorrhoids in the gutter if Trump told them it would please him & Putin :disgust

Bladewire 05-21-2018 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273503)
So you give up when I called out your bull shit and now post more bullshit.. trying to ignore how I destroyed your no sense argument..

Like I said, they are cowards with no honor and no integrity.

xClips Jim 05-21-2018 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273497)
how does that disprove the investigation could have been initiated based on false evidence?

It doesn't. I don't think he understood exactly what you were positing.

Right now, I can only assume onwebcam is posting for bragging rights when it turns out he's correct - which he will be. The obvious problem I see is that he's too far ahead of the curve and misses some steps in making the case. You can't just tell people "HERE! and HERE again!" - especially at GFY where the troll farm projects it's weakness onto others.

The OIG report is going to come out and it's going to be almost as ugly as Mrs. Bladewire. The crockett's will be forced to shift their narrative. Then the criminal referrals will start happening - and they will shift again. Then the indictments, courtesy of John Huber - and by that time, most of the sane will understand what has happened. However, the hopelessly lost will still be yelling, "But muh Trump sucks!" - while the voters tell them what they think.

dyna mo 05-21-2018 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xClips Jim (Post 22273518)
It doesn't. I don't think he understood exactly what you were positing.

Right now, I can only assume onwebcam is posting for bragging rights when it turns out he's correct - which he will be. The obvious problem I see is that he's too far ahead of the curve and misses some steps in making the case. You can't just tell people "HERE! and HERE again!" - especially at GFY where the troll farm projects it's weakness onto others.

The OIG report is going to come out and it's going to be almost as ugly as Mrs. Bladewire. The crockett's will be forced to shift their narrative. Then the criminal referrals will start happening - and they will shift again. Then the indictments, courtesy of John Huber - and by that time, most of the sane will understand what has happened. However, the hopelessly lost will still be yelling, "But muh Trump sucks!" - while the voters tell them what they think.

And the gauntlet is laid!

we'll all know starting in Sept, according to Rudy. ~90+ days.........

onwebcam 05-21-2018 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22273493)
A review is not a investigation and they dont have 500 people working on it.. This is a letter responding to complaints and stating they would review the complaints. This isnt a letter stating they have launched a investigation into anything.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Ok Get back with me this weekend after you see the Clinton email "review"

onwebcam 05-21-2018 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273497)
how does that disprove the investigation could have been initiated based on false evidence?

The evidence is already before us... It is admitted the Obama admin ran a secret operation on Trump.. And they lied about it. And are still trying to cover it up... Watergate on steroids...

Remember the texts "Obama want's to know everything"

Remember this video come Friday


"I can deny it" there is no FISA court order......

xClips Jim 05-21-2018 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22273520)
And the gauntlet is laid!

we'll all know starting in Sept, according to Rudy. ~90+ days.........

I have a hard time fathoming it can take that long, but I saw the same claim. There is only one reason I can see for that kind of delay, and I don't like it. Still, the plan is amazing so if that's when they want it to happen, I have to go with it.

Still, that gives us 90 days of daily name-calling to have fun with - so it's not all bad. :1orglaugh

TheSquealer 05-21-2018 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22273507)
Like I said, they are cowards with no honor and no integrity.

or... we are busy actually working while you guys are busy being a bunch of psychotic, unemployable lunatics who clearly have absolutely nothing to do.


crockett 05-21-2018 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22273381)
That's funny because they launched a "Russia investigation" and even obtained a FISA warrant via what they knew to be false evidence.

So what info was false? You dont know what info was used to obtain the warrant. The dossier much of which has been proven to be accurate was just one part of the info used. They publicly stated that they had more than just tne dossier and the warrant was not based on it alone..

So tell me what is this inside i fo you have of all tne other fake stuff.

dyna mo 05-21-2018 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22273526)
The evidence is already before us... It is admitted the Obama admin ran a secret operation on Trump.. And they lied about it. And are still trying to cover it up... Watergate on steroids...

Remember the texts "Obama want's to know everything"

Remember this video come Friday



How do these connect to that statement you posted above that was released in 2017? That statement doesn't include which review it was referring. It just states it's re: a review of "allegations involving communications between certain individuals".

not claiming you're wrong, but I haven't found a connection between that doc and the vids.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc