Typical idiot defending pedos...

not only that but it's a massive fail. talk about backfire. wow.

The writing has been on the wall in the UK for some time now. Let's see if the people can learn from it.

Forget "versions" of the story designed to make you choose sides - those are distractions.

What happened and continues to happen? That is what is important.

No idea why Tommy's trial had a media ban. I was referring to the media ban on the trial for the other sick fucks.

Here’s how media works

Here's the actual interview I've been referring to, saw longer time ago, it's from February 2016 from The Rubin Report:



Some of the early talking points:

- are you "anti Muslim"..
etc.

The interview itself starts at 4:00

in case anyone would be intrigued what this is all about and has an option to listen to this while working etc. feel free to make a mind on your own. There are some solid points he makes.

Of course you may need to overcome the mental block of listening to someone who the mass media non stop label as "far right".

All of this is just a sign of the times... Many Caribbean emigrants invited to England to help rebuilding after the war and their descendants are now being deported and ISIS fighters coming back to UK are getting a social support, so why would not the idiots and the "aparatchicks" jail a guy who speaks the truth....go figure !

...the end of the civilisation as we know it is getting nearer.. :2 cents:

... but do not forget to talk about Stormy, Roseanne, Russian meddling...while the Rome burns..;)

so what do you consider a reputable trustworthy source? I'm curious...

First up, there was the so-called media blackout. Robinson’s supporters screamed about a “media blackout” and “secret courts”. There was indeed a temporary reporting restriction in place over his imprisonment.

But this was to protect the trial Robinson was live streaming from, not to hush up the fact of his arrest. As one lawyer pointed out, contempt laws exist to ensure defendants have fair trials.

So let’s be clear. This is not an attack on free speech. This is not an attack on freedom of the press. Tommy Robinson is not a martyr. And there are no grand conspiracies regarding his imprisonment.

:thumbsup:2 cents::2 cents:...

Do you also deny that the media in the UK is turning a blind eye to massive rape problem?

I am glad here people are still able to film on a public road.
Wonder how long that will last, a black out seem to work for 'the system'.
It worked about 10 years to look the other way. Just like they did with the pedo priest.

I can't think of any... none really. Local media are a disaster, international as well most of the time. I prefer to read books instead or watch / listen to whoever is in question directly, media merely act as a filter, to remove or spin the information that wouldn't suit their narrative.

What one may find shocking though is I don't see that something like Breitbart would be in any way worse or more biased than say NYT or Washington Post.

Only one side is presented with all those, some issues are never discussed or spoken about. One sided, emotionally appealing, often semi-fake narratives presented non stop.

The power of Breitbart is that most of the other media make it way too easy for them, as they are blind and deaf to anything politically incorrect, and do not report reality.

Labeling is present in all these PC media (everyone not in our team is immediately a "populist" "far right" etc.) - this is absolutely reminiscent of the old socialist censorship and journalism btw. as everybody from the other side of the barricade was "imperialist" "diversant" etc. There are hit pieces, character assassinations, straight up lies.

The McCarthy era returned except we don't hunt for communists but for all kinds of "-ists" and anybody who prefers their own culture as opposed to surrendering it to the mandated "diversity" is immediately labeled as "far-right".

And anytime I quote something from a news source I have to now state something like "if the reported is true" because they were all caught, if not straight up lying, then fabricating and spinning facts, and routinely using all kinds of "expert opinions" to fill the rest of the space in order to suit their narrative.