Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22301719)

Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2017 Report
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/stud...in-canada-2017

"Everyone has access to free medical care that is ‘good enough.’ If you want to pay for better health care, you can’t,” he said. “That’s why those who can afford to, tend to go down to the U.S. for care if they have anything serious happen to them. You can have the greatest doctors in the world, but if the bureaucrats that run the system are making them treat patients with one hand tied behind their back, are they going to be delivering the best possible care?”
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b0db570d3778ff

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22301968)

This is why he chose him
In a 2009 Minnesota Law Review article, Kavanaugh wrote, “Even in the absence of congressionally conferred immunity, a serious constitutional question exists regarding whether a president can be criminally indicted and tried while in office.” He added that the indictment and trial of a president “would cripple the federal government, rendering it unable to function with credibility in either the international or domestic arenas.”

Any justice nominated by Chump should recuse themselves if anything pertaining to Chump and the Mueller investigation reaches the court

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22301981)

Trumpers don't care about this, they actually embrace it. .

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22302090)

Bingo.



And yet they still call themselves patriots, still claim to love the laws that the forefathers put into writing, etc etc.

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22302124)

Montreal... so hip. So cool. So sensitive. Who cares that the symbol symbolizes the death of 10s of millions of people and the attempted extermination of an entire race of people?

http://www.proswastika.org/e107_imag...montreal_3.jpg

Originally Posted by xClips Jim (Post 22302716)

Very little chance that McCain will vote against Trump on this choice.

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22302726)

When we discuss McCain doing something, we should use quotes. He isn't all there. Can you believe he ran in 2008?

You think Flake will vote with him?

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22302726)

When we discuss McCain doing something, we should use quotes. He isn't all there. Can you believe he ran in 2008?

You think Flake will vote with him?

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 22302759)

Any American who's afraid of a supreme court that closely adheres to the constitution should probably rethink his American citizenship. :1orglaugh

The idiot left has lost. The pendulum will now swing back, as it always does.

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22302769)

Until the pendulum hits you square in the ass, then you snowflakes cry!

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 22302759)

Any American who's afraid of a supreme court that closely adheres to the constitution should probably rethink his American citizenship. :1orglaugh

The idiot left has lost. The pendulum will now swing back, as it always does.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22302807)

The constitution doesn't define a business as a person, but the "conservative" SCOTUS did.

The constitution doesn't say you can funnel unlimited money into elections anonymously, but the "conservative" SCOTUS did.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22302807)

The constitution doesn't define a business as a person, but the "conservative" SCOTUS did.

The constitution doesn't say you can funnel unlimited money into American elections from all around the world anonymously, but the "conservative" SCOTUS did.

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 22302831)

incorrect on both counts.

your first point is nothing more than liberal drivel. a corporation was ALWAYS considered a legal person.

cor·po·ra·tion
ˌkôrpəˈrāSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
a company or group of people authorized to act as a single entity (legally a person) and recognized as such in law.
synonyms: company, firm, business, concern, operation, house, organization, agency, trust, partnership; More
a group of people elected to govern a city, town, or borough.
noun: municipal corporation; plural noun: municipal corporations

your second point is nonsensical fiction.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22302843)

Seriously?

That's all you got? No links to back up what you say? Why not? Because your opinion is not fact, and you know it. Nice try though stud :thumbsup

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 22302847)

google "what is a corporation?"

I thought I'd save you the embarrassment of treating you like a 5yr old but if you need the hand holding, here you go.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22302852)

The U.S. constitution was created in 1797.

No American corporations existed in America in 1797.

I have multiple registered corps., for decades now. I'm good on knowing what a corporation is thanks :winkwink:

We're talking about corporation personhood & the Constitution and you're diverting off topic. Weak! :1orglaugh. I don't blame you it is a boring topic.

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22303037)

They did, they began in the 1780s and 1790s. Some people quote the first important one as Boston Manufacturing Company, founded in 1813 but there were numerous companies founded in the US with shares and corporate structures.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverl...on_Manufactory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown%27s_Brewery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston...turing_Company

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22303040)

Your links are all companies founded in the 1800's, not 1780s and 1790s, but for the first link founded in 1789 in Massachusetts and is the first example of corporate charity feeding off the government, as it failed they gave tax breaks to the companies and the state loaned them money and they eventually went out of business. Good find though! Well done, you found one :thumbsup

Originally Posted by ilnjscb (Post 22303044)

"The brewery, which for a while was known as The Baltimore Strong Beer Brewery, was founded in 1783 by Thomas Peters"

The brewery was too, read the 2nd paragraph, don't just skim. Both the examples I provided (I haven't got the time to post all day - you must tell me how you do it) were founded in the 1790s or earlier.

The manufacturing firm I listed was the first "large scale" company, and I provided it for your edification.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22302852)

The U.S. constitution was created in 1797.

No American corporations existed in America in 1797.

I have multiple registered corps., for decades now. I'm good on knowing what a corporation is thanks :winkwink:

We're talking about corporation personhood & the Constitution and you're diverting off topic. Weak! :1orglaugh. I don't blame you it is a boring topic.