What assumption? It's been stated about 50 times today that there were in fact hundreds of thousands of Clinton's emails on his laptop and not one person including Strzok denied that.

read your own thread topic if you want to know what your own assumption is.

You're arguing with me about something you claim to know so much about when you aren't even watching the testimony.... Which I still am btw..

Rochard of all people confirmed my post topic.....

you think I'm arguing with you?

I was initially open to what you were exclaiming and inquired about it.

richard backing you up on something only confirms you have no idea what you are talking about.

Your first response is "No, they weren't"

How is that "open?"

You sound like Strzok... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

During the hearing it was stated the emails were "being copied to a country that is not Russia" which is a bit vague. If any of this was true, why wouldn't he disclose which country or who the emails were being copied to?

Because he wanted to insert the fact but not finger the likely "ally" foreign entity? Strzok didn't deny the actual fact.. He argued his actions on them. Or at least he tried but Dems went all crazy in interruptions.

Since it was brought out.. It means it will eventually be revealed... Can't put the genie back in the bottle.

why shouldn't I be skeptical of your claims? you've not been right one single time. skepticism doesn't preclude being open to facts.

thanks, i can't sit through nonsensical congressional inquiries.

There appears to be no limit to your gullibility..

50 thousand emails that were actually hundreds of thousands.

Here's the exchange.. Watch how smug he gets when he's saved by a Democrat

Another bullshit thread from a chumpanzee. Keep suckin that dick

stupid fucking post. cry me a fucking river

Notice that all libs in this thread don't give a shit the SOS emails were being sent to a foreign party but they all care lots about a fake dossier provided by that same person.

This is extremely granular level information that only people that are watching closely understand. It is not reasonable to expect those unfamiliar with the situation to comprehend the importance of each loophole-closing piece of testimony, and completely unreasonable to expect those opposed to Trump to pay any attention at all.

Thread title is correct and has been proven - but so far, means nothing.

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok."

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added."

It should be pretty obvious to ANYONE with half a brain that all of Hillary's emails should not have been CC'ed to a foreign entity.... Whether it was done on purpose or maliciously by a foreign agency the fact remains that it would not have occurred if she didn't decided to try a keep her government communications out of public record.. In doing so she exposed them to foreign agency records....

WE don't have the emails but apparently some foreign entity does........ They knew what Obama's alias was... They knew what Lynch's alias was.... Who's to say her home brew server didn't expose everyone she communicated with? What if that was it's EXACT purpose? Who put it there??? Lot's of question's that should be answered...

So do we know who the "foreign country" involved was?

Why not?

Classified.

I am all for any dirt on the Clinton's. I search yesterday and today and couldn't find one document or a single hint on Hillary's emails being sent to a foreign country.

Let's say they did discover the country and let's say it's all true, can she be arrested for violating National Security ? Highly doubtful. If so, place your bets Trump will Pardon her.

Why would it be classified? If Hillary Clinton was sending classified information to a third party outside of the country, she should be arrested and sent to trial.

We had a dozen investigations into Hillary Clinton, yet somehow this has never come to light before. Why?

These are some very serious accusations during a Congressional hearing. We should investigate to see if this is true. If they are true, someone needs to be arrested.

See the video above... It's not out there because that discussion is the first time it has been brought to light... Many have said the server was accessed by foreign entities but that's as far as they have went...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

It was likely a hack... But this is EXACTLY why she should not have been doing what she was doing... She exposed everyone she communicated with because of it.. Including the President and his alias..

Why is it just now coming out? Because Democrats were trying to bury it all? And that's what those you've been railing against are trying to expose? The only way they can do so is by these hearings?