Linda Jenness (1972)

While Chisholm and Mink attempted to top the ticket for a major party in ‘72, Linda Jenness ran for election that same year on the Socialist Workers Party ticket. Her political career was largely focused on challenging laws and constitutional requirements that make it difficult for third parties to become true contenders in presidential elections, including state ballot access laws, requirements for equal media coverage of third-party candidates, and the ability to distribute third-party campaign literature on army bases.

Jenness received over 80,000 votes in the ‘72 election

Jesus fuck man. All you have to do is read the original article to see how decisions were made (which aren't final).

As per usual. You have nothing but a headline... you know no facts at all and the headline triggered you as it was designed to... so you're running around in hysterics. You can't even be bothered to use a single fact to argue a point.

Does it seriously never occur to fuckwits like you crocket that facts should be part of the discussion?

Trump appreciates your daily dumbassness. With people like you campaigning for him with your daily hysterics and stupidity, he's definitely going to win in 2020.

They can vote as like. Hillary will remain a legend.

DynaMo you are going through as much trouble as Squeeler does to get out of saying Nazis are bad, just to claim Hillary isnt significant. If she wasnt significant then why are Republicans always crying about her?

again, twisting facts to fit your narrative. I've stated probably >6x that this is a time issue. Sure, I've pointed out how outrageously dumb it is to elevate a loser criminal like hillary to historical significance and make it mandatory to teach losing and criminality to our children.

it's very telling that you skip right over the 12 women who preceded hillary and ran for potus and how history neglects them but but but teaching hillary is mandatory. hellen keller, she's not even close to hillary either, hillary precedes her in significance.

i mean really.

It's not his fault. This is the end product of political correctness, not keeping score, participation trophies and making sure everyone feels like they're a winner.

He has no idea at all what grades this is for or what the appropriate topics are for that grade
He has no idea at all what the current curriculum requires teachers to cover
He has no idea what the selection process was
He has no idea what the selection criteria was
He has no idea who made the choices
He has no idea even that these are recommendations of a private volunteer group to the Texas Board of Education... that hasn't even been voted on.

He just "feels" something so he argues that his feelings are correct and facts have yet to even come into the conversation. That is the new Left. Emotional hysterics.

I never said Hillary was more important than any of those women, I said she has a place in history and should not be written off because someone doesnt like her. She is certainly the only first lady to ever be elected to the senate as well as the SoS.

Also if its shown that Trump did actively rig the election then Hillary becomes a much bigger part of our history..

You're right and I don't disagree that she has a place in history.


that place is trivial though, not significant. And it has a very illicit side and certainly doesn't provide a positive message for winning, women, or America.

The clintons are war criminals...

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

https://i.imgur.com/3IHXlrK.gif

they are probably concerned a bunch of assholes like you will hang out if they don't dump mrs bill clinton

we are in complete agreement

what 2 years later and you still can't accept the fact that we didn't want mrs bill Clinton.... ???? you're at the point of delusional now... :2 cents:

we aren't crying about her and the name only comes up cause you guys are crying about it daily... what the fuck is wrong with you?