GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Texas needs it's safe spaces... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1303580)

crockett 09-16-2018 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22335971)
the only person mentioning white washing is crockett. no one else is claiming that. this is about mandatory learning topics. if some politicized feminist psycho history teacher wants to teach her students about hillary, the cheating female loser who threw other females under the bus when her husband was a sexual predator, she is still free to do so.

What else would you call it by the same state that whitewashed slavery? You act as if Texas doesn't have history doing this kind of thing..


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.3d7c4499a987

slapass 09-16-2018 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22335813)
I think you are combining issues. none of that has anything to do with making it mandatory that students learn about hillary. mandatory. she's a blip on the history radar.

How can you remove her? Wtf? You don’t think this is as weird as fuck? Donald Trump won by defeating Jane Doe. Leave Richard Nixon or other political scum but remove her? Lol. Conservatives have jumped the shark.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22335988)
What else would you call it by the same state that whitewashed slavery? You act as if Texas doesn't have history doing this kind of thing..


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.3d7c4499a987

you really don't get the difference between white washing and mandatory?

really?

slapass 09-16-2018 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22335908)
These days, when anyone on the left posts anything here, all you have to do is ask "why is this absurd", do a cursory search online and the answers pour onto the screen. In a history class where time and days are limited, they have a mandatory curriculum to follow as mandated by the state. A 1 second of searching is all you need to find the the lengthy process process for determining who/what should be mandatory in social studies but of course, you have no clue what that process is or how these decisions come about or how many figures are cut or added, how many total are considered etc or what the process is at all because you don't care.

As usual, a dying news source blew the Liberal Emotional Dog Whistle For Page Views and you come on cue, salivating and jumping around like an excited retard.

Although you should get some credit for not calling them Racist or Nazi. That's nice for a change.

So you think knowing some facts about a Medici is going to influence a child more than knowing a woman ran for president of the US just a few years ago? Come on. The news is sort of fake but you can’t ignore that she is historical for US students today.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 22335994)
How can you remove her? Wtf? You don’t think this is as weird as fuck? Donald Trump won by defeating Jane Doe. Leave Richard Nixon or other political scum but remove her? Lol. Conservatives have jumped the shark.

you really don't get the difference between white washing and mandatory?

really?



somehow hillary clinton is important because she's a female loser and it should be mandatory that we teach our children about her. let's giver her a participation award too.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 22335998)
So you think knowing some facts about a Medici is going to influence a child more than knowing a woman ran for president of the US just a few years ago? Come on. The news is sort of fake but you can’t ignore that she is historical for US students today.

she cheated and she lost. you want to make that mandatory learning because she's a woman. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


jesus titty fucking christ that's fucked up.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:22 PM

Victoria Woodhull (1872)

Victoria Woodhull was the first woman to run for President of the United States as the candidate for the Equal Rights Party. She was a suffragette, a champion for equal rights (as her party’s name suggests), and an advocate for “free love,” which she meant as the freedom for people to marry, divorce, and bear children without government interference.

Woodhull’s groundbreaking run for the presidency is even more impressive when its full context is considered: She ran for president in a time when women did not even have the legal right to vote.

but but but it should be mandatory to teach children about hillary, a cheater who covered for her husband being a sexual predator.


jtfc.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:24 PM

Margaret Chase Smith (1964)

Margaret Chase Smith ran for the Republican ticket in 1964 against Barry Goldwater, and became the first woman ever to receive more than one vote at a major party convention. (In fact, she received a whopping 27...out of 1,308.) She lost every primary in the election, but did make positive headlines when she secured 25-percent of the vote in Illinois.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:24 PM

Shirley Chisholm (1972)

Shirley Chisolm was the first black woman elected to Congress in the United States. In 1972 she announced her bid for the presidency under the Democratic Party and took her campaign all the way to the DNC.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:25 PM

Patsy Matsu Takemoto Mink (1972)

In 1965, Patsy Mink became the the first woman elected to Congress for the state of Hawaii, as well as the first elected female of an ethnic minority from any state. Mink ran in the Oregon primary for the 1972 election as an anti-Vietnam War candidate for the Democratic ticket, but received only two-percent of the votes. She dropped out of the race soon after, and went on to support the campaign of Democratic nominee George McGovern (alongside Shirley Chisholm).

Mink was a principal author and sponsor of the Title IX Amendment of the Higher Education Act, which prohibits gender discrimination by federally funded institutions. She also authored and introduced the Early Childhood Education Act and Women’s Education Equality Act.

President George W. Bush renamed the Higher Education Act to the Patsy T. Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act in 2002. In 2014, President Obama awarded her a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom for her lifetime of contributions to the country.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:26 PM

Linda Jenness (1972)

While Chisholm and Mink attempted to top the ticket for a major party in ‘72, Linda Jenness ran for election that same year on the Socialist Workers Party ticket. Her political career was largely focused on challenging laws and constitutional requirements that make it difficult for third parties to become true contenders in presidential elections, including state ballot access laws, requirements for equal media coverage of third-party candidates, and the ability to distribute third-party campaign literature on army bases.

Jenness received over 80,000 votes in the ‘72 election

TheSquealer 09-16-2018 04:29 PM

Jesus fuck man. All you have to do is read the original article to see how decisions were made (which aren't final).

As per usual. You have nothing but a headline... you know no facts at all and the headline triggered you as it was designed to... so you're running around in hysterics. You can't even be bothered to use a single fact to argue a point.

Does it seriously never occur to fuckwits like you crocket that facts should be part of the discussion?

Trump appreciates your daily dumbassness. With people like you campaigning for him with your daily hysterics and stupidity, he's definitely going to win in 2020.

Tinalid 09-16-2018 04:38 PM

They can vote as like. Hillary will remain a legend.

crockett 09-16-2018 04:50 PM

DynaMo you are going through as much trouble as Squeeler does to get out of saying Nazis are bad, just to claim Hillary isnt significant. If she wasnt significant then why are Republicans always crying about her?

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22336019)
DynaMo you are going through as much trouble as Squeeler does to get out of saying Nazis are bad, just to claim Hillary isnt significant. If she wasnt significant then why are Republicans always crying about her?

again, twisting facts to fit your narrative. I've stated probably >6x that this is a time issue. Sure, I've pointed out how outrageously dumb it is to elevate a loser criminal like hillary to historical significance and make it mandatory to teach losing and criminality to our children.

dyna mo 09-16-2018 04:58 PM

it's very telling that you skip right over the 12 women who preceded hillary and ran for potus and how history neglects them but but but teaching hillary is mandatory. hellen keller, she's not even close to hillary either, hillary precedes her in significance.

i mean really.

TheSquealer 09-16-2018 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22336024)
it's very telling that you skip right over the 12 women who preceded hillary and ran for potus and how history neglects them but but but teaching hillary is mandatory. hellen keller, she's not even close to hillary either, hillary precedes her in significance.

i mean really.

It's not his fault. This is the end product of political correctness, not keeping score, participation trophies and making sure everyone feels like they're a winner.

He has no idea at all what grades this is for or what the appropriate topics are for that grade
He has no idea at all what the current curriculum requires teachers to cover
He has no idea what the selection process was
He has no idea what the selection criteria was
He has no idea who made the choices
He has no idea even that these are recommendations of a private volunteer group to the Texas Board of Education... that hasn't even been voted on.

He just "feels" something so he argues that his feelings are correct and facts have yet to even come into the conversation. That is the new Left. Emotional hysterics.

crockett 09-16-2018 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22336024)
it's very telling that you skip right over the 12 women who preceded hillary and ran for potus and how history neglects them but but but teaching hillary is mandatory. hellen keller, she's not even close to hillary either, hillary precedes her in significance.

i mean really.

I never said Hillary was more important than any of those women, I said she has a place in history and should not be written off because someone doesnt like her. She is certainly the only first lady to ever be elected to the senate as well as the SoS.

Also if its shown that Trump did actively rig the election then Hillary becomes a much bigger part of our history..

dyna mo 09-16-2018 07:34 PM

You're right and I don't disagree that she has a place in history.


that place is trivial though, not significant. And it has a very illicit side and certainly doesn't provide a positive message for winning, women, or America.

pimpmaster9000 09-16-2018 07:43 PM

The clintons are war criminals...

ghjghj 09-16-2018 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22336079)
The clintons are war criminals...

https://i.imgur.com/qAxdRXa.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/IzZBiQA.gif

OneHungLo 09-16-2018 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghjghj (Post 22336084)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

https://i.imgur.com/3IHXlrK.gif

Grapesoda 09-16-2018 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22335520)
Texas Republicans have voted to remove Hillary Clinton and Helen Keller from their school curriculum history classes.

Apparently they're scared their little girls might one day want to grow up and run for president or try to do something important..

This is the same state that voted to teach abstinence for sex education then had a crisis of teen pregnancy afterwards..


The dumbs will be dumbs..

they are probably concerned a bunch of assholes like you will hang out if they don't dump mrs bill clinton

Grapesoda 09-16-2018 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22336077)
You're right and I don't disagree that she has a place in history.


that place is trivial though, not significant. And it has a very illicit side and certainly doesn't provide a positive message for winning, women, or America.

we are in complete agreement

Grapesoda 09-16-2018 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22336073)
I never said Hillary was more important than any of those women, I said she has a place in history and should not be written off because someone doesnt like her. She is certainly the only first lady to ever be elected to the senate as well as the SoS.

Also if its shown that Trump did actively rig the election then Hillary becomes a much bigger part of our history..

what 2 years later and you still can't accept the fact that we didn't want mrs bill Clinton.... ???? you're at the point of delusional now... :2 cents:

Grapesoda 09-16-2018 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22336019)
DynaMo you are going through as much trouble as Squeeler does to get out of saying Nazis are bad, just to claim Hillary isnt significant. If she wasnt significant then why are Republicans always crying about her?

we aren't crying about her and the name only comes up cause you guys are crying about it daily... what the fuck is wrong with you?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc