DOJ says the sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh “does not involve any potential federal crime” for the FBI to investigate.” The department says “It’s not the job of the FBI to judge the significance or the credibility of an accusation.”

ON THE RUN: Kavanaugh’s Accuser Goes Underground, Blows Off Senate Invite to Testify
https://truepundit.com/on-the-run-ka...te-to-testify/

Or call you out as the two-faced little bitch you are.

yeah, you sure look like a winner now.

I'm at 100% on my 2 predictions for this week in Marks thread..

https://gfy.com/22336087-post2.html

How's that Russia collusion doing?

You liberals are lashing out all over the internet today because YOU KNOW your fraud is about to be exposed.

i'm not shocked you measure you life success on whether or not you think you won an argument on GFY.

I put the measuring tape away a few year back. :thumbsup

Was that before or after she burst out in hysterical laughter?

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...F2yT0xRMPSEoAY

sure ya did.

And there is no argument as far as I'm concerned. You're wrong and always have been.

again a fact: you had a choice on how to handle that attack on me and my business in your fucking thread. you chose to jump in on attacking. like the fucking nitwit loser you are.

this thread really highlights the shitty positions nitwits take. not only is it Ok to attack this woman because, you know, she's a woman, but it's also OK to gang up and attack my business for pointing that out.

fuck you nitwits.

Yes, we should believe every woman's claim.. Especially some pussy hat wearing card carrying liberal psychologist who's "i thought he would kill me" claim came out in a marriage counseling session where they apparently put her under "hypnotic" state and dove into the deep recesses of her mind to dig up this bullshit ass claim.. Then they give her the fucking therapy session notes.. To top that fucking hunk of bullshit off there were apparently no names in these notes.. Pile on to that huge fucking pile of garbage this is 30+ years after the fact.. Bury that stinking pile of shit with the fact that the crazy cunt had already been through a number of actual real evaluations for her fucking career prior to this.. But this "marriage counseling" was the one that brought it out..

Dear offended one, go find me when it was that she "discovered" who her "near death" assailant was..

Manage your threads better. And ganging on isn't a good look for you.

Both..... or neither.. I don't know.. Because I don't even know who in the hell that is.

Some interesting, fact filled information on the chain of events here....


https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-met...ush-1537197395




I know it's more fun to just type insults at each other here on the board, but in the interest of a grown up discussion, perhaps we could go over the points raised in this article....





.

I"m definitely not a big fan of Kavanaugh, particularly when it comes to his record on the 4th amendment, but this article raises good points regarding this whole accusation:


"The woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of a drunken assault when both were teenagers has now come forward publicly, and on Monday it caused Republicans to delay a confirmation vote and schedule another public hearing. Yet there is no way to confirm her story after 36 years, and to let it stop Mr. Kavanaugh’s confirmation would ratify what has all the earmarks of a calculated political ambush.

This is not to say Christine Blasey Ford isn’t sincere in what she remembers. In an interview published in the Washington Post on Sunday, Ms. Ford offered a few more details of the story she told anonymously starting in July. She says she was 15 when Mr. Kavanaugh, who would have been 17, and a male friend pushed her into a bedroom at a drinking party, held her down, and pawed her until the male friend jumped on them both and she escaped to a bathroom until the two boys left the room.

Mr. Kavanaugh denies all this “categorically and unequivocally,” and there is simply no way to prove it. The only witness to the event is Mr. Kavanaugh’s high school male friend, Mark Judge, who also says he recalls no such event. Ms. Ford concedes she told no one about it—not even a high school girl friend or family member—until 2012 when she told the story as part of couples therapy with her husband.

The vagaries of memory are well known, all the more so when they emerge in the cauldron of a therapy session to rescue a marriage. Experts know that human beings can come to believe firmly over the years that something happened when it never did or is based on partial truth. Mistaken identity is also possible.

The Post reports that the therapist’s notes from 2012 say there were four male assailants, but Ms. Ford says that was a mistake. Ms. Ford also can’t recall in whose home the alleged assault took place, how she got there, or how she got home that evening.

This is simply too distant and uncorroborated a story to warrant a new hearing or to delay a vote. We’ve heard from all three principals, and there are no other witnesses to call. Democrats will use Monday’s hearing as a political spectacle to coax Mr. Kavanaugh into looking defensive or angry, and to portray Republicans as anti-women. Odds are it will be a circus.

The timing and details of how Ms. Ford came forward, and how her name was coaxed into public view, should also raise red flags about the partisan motives at play. The Post says Ms. Ford contacted the paper via a tip line in July but wanted to remain anonymous. She then brought her story to a Democratic official while still hoping to stay anonymous.

Yet she also then retained a lawyer, Debra Katz, who has a history of Democratic activism and spoke in public defense of Bill Clinton against the accusations by Paula Jones. Ms. Katz urged Ms. Ford to take a polygraph test. The Post says she passed the polygraph, though a polygraph merely shows that she believes the story she is telling.

The more relevant question is why go to such lengths if Ms. Ford really wanted her name to stay a secret? Even this weekend she could have chosen to remain anonymous. These are the actions of someone who was prepared to go public from the beginning if she had to.

The role of Senator Dianne Feinstein is also highly irregular and transparently political. The ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee knew about Ms. Ford’s accusations in late July or early August yet kept quiet. If she took it seriously, she had multiple opportunities to ask Judge Kavanaugh or have committee staff interview the principals. But in that event the details would have been vetted and Senators would have had time to assess their credibility.

Instead Ms. Feinstein waited until the day before a committee markup on the nomination to release a statement that she had “information” about the accusation and had sent it to the FBI. Her statement was a political stunt.

She was seeking to insulate herself from liberal charges that she sat on the letter. Or—and this seems increasingly likely given the course of events—Senator Feinstein was holding the story to spring at the last minute in the hope that events would play out as they have. Surely she knew that once word of the accusation was public, the press would pursue the story and Ms. Ford would be identified by name one way or another.


Democrats waited until Ms. Ford went public to make public statements. But clearly some were feeding the names of Ms. Ford and her lawyer to the press, and now they are piling on what they hope will be an election-eve #MeToo conflagration.


“Senator [and Judiciary Chairman] Grassley must postpone the vote until, at a very minimum, these serious and credible allegations are thoroughly investigated,” declared Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Sunday. “For too long, when women have made serious allegations of abuse, they have been ignored. That cannot happen in this case.”

His obvious political goal is to delay the confirmation vote past the election, fan the #MeToo political furies until then, and hope that at least two GOP Senators wilt under political pressure. If Republican Senators Jeff Flake and Bob Corker think a hearing will satisfy Mr. Schumer, they are right to retire from politics.

GOP Senators should understand that the political cost of defeating Mr. Kavanaugh will likely include the loss of the Senate. Democrats are already motivated to vote against Donald Trump, and if Republicans panic now their own voters will rightly be furious. They would be letting Democrats get away with the same dirty trick they tried and failed to pull off against Clarence Thomas.

It would also be a serious injustice to a man who has by all accounts other than Ms. Ford’s led a life of respect for women and the law. Every #MeToo miscreant is a repeat offender. The accusation against Mr. Kavanaugh is behavior manifested nowhere else in his life.

No one, including Donald Trump, needs to attack Ms. Ford. She believes what she believes. This is not he said-she said. This is a case of an alleged teenage encounter, partially recalled 30 years later without corroboration, and brought forward to ruin Mr. Kavanaugh’s reputation for partisan purposes.

Letting an accusation that is this old, this unsubstantiated and this procedurally irregular defeat Mr. Kavanaugh would also mean weaponizing every sexual assault allegation no matter the evidence. It will tarnish the #MeToo cause with the smear of partisanship, and it will unleash even greater polarizing furies."

This is an even better piece. Likely even an award winner if the "awarders" weren't all foaming at the mouth liberals


Democrats, Kavanaugh, and ‘The End of Civilization’
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...ough-evidence/

There are legit questions surrounding her and this whole ordeal, but they need to be looked into and taken seriously. If she wishes to testify, she should be allowed to.

Also, Republicans don't get to bitch about shitty tactics by the Democrats after they straight up stole one of Obama's appointments.

An opinion piece from Rupert Murdcocks Wall St Journal definitely convinced me.

:1orglaugh

Feinstein "I can't say everything is truthful"

Translation: BUSTED

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...thful-n2520256

translated by an adult who can think:

feinstein's not going to say everything the woman says is truthful simply because she doesn't know.

And neither does the woman. She doesn't know where, when or how but she apparently knows who...

What a fucking joke

Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/polit...fbi/index.html

I'm pretty sure the FBI doesn't "investigate" a 36 year old story of teenagers trying to fuck. :(

I think this is bad for actual victims of sexual abuse, and is completely being done for political purposes.

Which goes to show liberals really don't give a fuck. The FBI has already stated they are done with the matter..

Grassley answers back, they'll have it with or without her...

Grassley: No reason to delay Kavanaugh hearing
https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...anaugh-hearing

No surprise ...

Republicans always support molesters, rapist, abusers and sexual harrassement .... unless it is Al Franken .....

What is the rush ( aside from political ) to confirm him ? You had a year with only 8 judges and that didn't not seem to cause any problems .....

Now attempted rape is 'just some teenagers trying to fuck'. How pathetic.

Where's Robbies statement that the Bill Cosby fiasco were 'just some people trying to fuck'?

Example: https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-p...rats-hate.html ( onwebcam post ... )

Democrats always launch a false smear campaign. It's so predictable. Only the gullible would buy into this crap. It's obviously a ploy to delay the confirmation.

PS- Due process and presumption of innoncence. Look into it.

this isn't a trial. it's a lifetime appt that makes decisions impacting millions of people.

the simple fact is that if the allegations are true, they would be enough to withdraw the nomination. and the only way to determine if the allegations are true is to reopen the FBA background check on kavanaugh and investigate this.

Funny how you see that as the complete opposite of what it is.. Ellison's accuser has witnesses and evidence.. The DNC is trying to bury her... Ellison is still #2 man at DNC... Zero discussion of him stepping down.. AND he's running for Attorney General.. Zero discussion of him dropping out...


‘Emotional And Physical Abuse’: Ellison Accuser Posts Doctor’s Report Naming Congressman As Alleged Abuser
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/19/k...ellison-abuse/


Where is your anger?

It all boils down to evidence and witnesses.... There's no evidence and the only witness says it didn't happen.. There's NOTHING to investigate.. She said, he said.. That's it... No one is going to be investigating anything.. It's a total smear job / stall tactic.

If you want a gauge of what most people think.. Have a look at this poll by "Stop Trump" twitter


Do you believe that Christine Blasey Ford was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh?

Please vote and then RT. Let's show @realdonaldtrump what #America thinks about these accusations.

29%Yes
71%No
110,357 votes•6 hours left
https://twitter.com/StopTrump2020/st...62143778455553

The majority think she's a fucking lying liberal scumbag.. Case closed...

I'm not so sure that drunkenly groping a girl when you are in high school means much of anything.

Also saw on the news today that Sen. Grassley has now even offered to go to California personally to get her testimony.

Her original writing in the Washington Post just a few days ago had her saying that she wanted to be able to come to Congress and tell her story.

Now she doesn't.

This is purely political and rather disgusting.

I have a hard time believing this woman destroyed her life and her family's lives just to lie about him sexually assaulting her in order to derail an SC appt.

On the other hand, I very much can see him lying about it never happened so he can get the SC spot.

From my point of view you have to believe one of two things. Either you believe that several years ago this woman concocted a story about an attempted rape, went on the record with it with a therapist, convinced herself it was true so she could pass a polygraph and then sat on the information all in the event that Kavenaugh would some time in the future be nominated to the SC then when he did she came forward with the lie, putting herself, her career, and her family in the eye of this storm. Or you can believe that a guy whose own best friend wrote a book about how they regularly got black out drunk at parties in high school got drunk and tried to force himself on a girl.

In most situations, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.

I do think Feinstein's handling of this and how it played out has been very political, but I have a feeling there is a lot of truth to what she is saying.

She did it for the "party." She took one for the team..

She's also likely getting a large sum of cash.. Don't you remember Soros org offering $750k to anyone accusing Trump?

You're trying to rationalize the mind of an obviously fucking in the head woman.. Who's head fuckedness is exacerbated by TDS..


Why haven't you asked yourself why did Feinstein not only wait until after the hearings but apparently she sat on the "letter" for months prior?

Because it was a last minute hail mary...

Your people don't give a shit about her.. They only care about getting their way no matter who's life they destroy.. That should be painfully obvious now...

riiiiiiiiiiight. sure she did. then let an investigation blow the lid off the sucker.

What is anyone going to investigate?

you are a voice of reason around here kane. please keep it up.