GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Far-Left CA Professor/Political activist is the Kavanaugh accuser (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1303608)

Robbie 09-20-2018 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338007)
kavanaugh is that important to you eh. got it. why you guys don't demand an investigation clearing his name of attempted rape is beyond me. oh wait, because it will take 3 days. makes sense.

Because it wasn't "attempted rape". It was a teenage boy and girl drunk. We would be arresting about 95% of the adult and teenage population if what was described by this woman was "attempted rape".

beerptrol 09-20-2018 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22338095)
Because it wasn't "attempted rape". It was a teenage boy and girl drunk. We would be arresting about 95% of the adult and teenage population if what was described by this woman was "attempted rape".

I don't recall that I or any of my friends forced ourselves onto girls and groped them while holding them down when we were in high school. We must have ran in different crowds

kane 09-20-2018 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22338095)
Because it wasn't "attempted rape". It was a teenage boy and girl drunk. We would be arresting about 95% of the adult and teenage population if what was described by this woman was "attempted rape".

“Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help,” she said in the letter.

“Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with REDACTED, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh’s hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me.”

That sounds a like a little bit more than just two teenagers getting drunk.

RedFred 09-20-2018 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22338101)
I don't recall that I or any of my friends forced ourselves onto girls and groped them while holding them down when we were in high school. We must have ran in different crowds


Weird what Trump cultists think is normal behavior.

Robbie 09-20-2018 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22338101)
I don't recall that I or any of my friends forced ourselves onto girls and groped them while holding them down when we were in high school. We must have ran in different crowds

That is just stupid. Teenage boys try to get laid all the time (as do horny ass teenage girls). It's what they do.
This whole story sounds like teenage stupidity that has NOTHING to do with qualifications for the Supreme Court....or ANYTHING.

Do you really think people should be held accountable for stupid shit they did as teenagers? Not talking about actual criminality...but just stupid, awkward moments like this alleged incident implies happened.

That was my point.

TheSquealer 09-20-2018 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22338104)
“Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help,” she said in the letter.

“Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with REDACTED, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh’s hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me.”

That sounds a like a little bit more than just two teenagers getting drunk.

You're right. It's so egregious that a Senator had this information for 6-7 weeks only to use it for political currency in the last minute of a confirmation hearing to block a Trump picked judge for getting into the SCOTUS.

Rather than notify the authorities of a crime, she leaked it to the press for political gain.

Then the "victim" refuses to cooperate with a standard investigation of a crime. The only "witness" says it never happened. Feinstein didn't report this "heinous crime" to the authorities. And suddenly, at the last minute, there are all these reasons to stall a super court nominee.

Gee... what sane person could question the veracity of the claims given their politicization, their timing and the fact that no police agency would ever charge someone for... which are being used by the 3rd or 4th most insane Liberal Senator as capital to stall a supreme court nominee???

Robbie 09-20-2018 04:46 PM

Exactly...we are told over and over again about the horror stories of women telling their stories and then authorities doing nothing about it.

But when Sen. Feinstein did it...it's all good! Amazing hypocrisy.

kane 09-20-2018 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22338111)
You're right. It's so egregious that a Senator had this information for 6-7 weeks only to use it for political currency in the last minute of a confirmation hearing to block a Trump picked judge for getting into the SCOTUS.

Rather than notify the authorities of a crime, she leaked it to the press for political gain.

Then the "victim" refuses to cooperate with a standard investigation of a crime. The only "witness" says it never happened. Feinstein didn't report this "heinous crime" to the authorities. And suddenly, at the last minute, there are all these reasons to stall a super court nominee.

Gee... what sane person could question the veracity of the claims given their politicization, their timing and the fact that no police agency would ever charge someone for... which are being used by the 3rd or 4th most insane Liberal Senator as capital to stall a supreme court nominee???

The Dems played this one for political leverage, no doubt.

The Republican stole one of Obama's nominations.

let's call it almost, but not really, even.

Now, get over the political crap. The question is: Is she telling the truth? As I have said, I think there should be an investigation and she should appear before the committee. If she refuses, then all of this should be dropped.

RedFred 09-20-2018 05:14 PM

Attempted rape = trying to get laid in Robbie land.

dyna mo 09-20-2018 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22338111)
You're right. It's so egregious that a Senator had this information for 6-7 weeks only to use it for political currency in the last minute of a confirmation hearing to block a Trump picked judge for getting into the SCOTUS.

Rather than notify the authorities of a crime, she leaked it to the press for political gain.

Then the "victim" refuses to cooperate with a standard investigation of a crime. The only "witness" says it never happened. Feinstein didn't report this "heinous crime" to the authorities. And suddenly, at the last minute, there are all these reasons to stall a super court nominee.

Gee... what sane person could question the veracity of the claims given their politicization, their timing and the fact that no police agency would ever charge someone for... which are being used by the 3rd or 4th most insane Liberal Senator as capital to stall a supreme court nominee???

so no attempted rape then? Since Feinstein shit the bed.

onwebcam 09-20-2018 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22338119)
The Dems played this one for political leverage, no doubt.

The Republican stole one of Obama's nominations.

let's call it almost, but not really, even.

Now, get over the political crap. The question is: Is she telling the truth? As I have said, I think there should be an investigation and she should appear before the committee. If she refuses, then all of this should be dropped.

Now that this Garret guy has been inserted.. The first thing I would do is have her identify him with a picture of Garrett.. Case closed...

dyna mo 09-20-2018 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22338095)
Because it wasn't "attempted rape". It was a teenage boy and girl drunk. We would be arresting about 95% of the adult and teenage population if what was described by this woman was "attempted rape".

so no attempted rape then? because they were teens and booze was involved.

dyna mo 09-20-2018 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22338130)
Now that this Garret guy has been inserted.. The first thing I would do is have her identify him with a picture of Garrett.. Case closed...

how would you do that? that's not possible.

onwebcam 09-20-2018 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338132)
how would you do that? that's not possible.

Easy, "Is this the man who assaulted you that night?" You don't think they have evidence in these hearings? The person who put that together didn't just make it up.. Obvious tip... He looks just like Kavanaugh, he's good friends with Judge, he lived in a home in the coordinates described and the home is laid out EXACTLY as described.. If she is presented with that, there is NO WAY she could positively identify Kavanaugh as the person.. Especially admitting being drunk...

This is over...

BaldBastard 09-20-2018 06:21 PM

Do you Americans really want to give a lifetime appointment to somebody who was just one of the guys or someone who was making the correct moral judgements all their life. It doesn't mean they're a prude, they still went to the party, maybe even picked up a girl, but they said" do you mind if I kiss you, I find you beautiful"... not threw them on the bed and grabbed them by the pussy. The people I know from school with the highest character.. were like it all their lives, if they were a fucking jerk in school, there still jerks now.

And sure some people change, but the fact they have changed would be reason enough to deny a lifetime appointment. You want someone whose been stable their whole lives, when considering a lifetime appointment, you want the most exceptional of the exceptional and with a population of 300 million +.. their out there.

Guilty or not Kavanaugh can not continue with this shadow of doubt over his head, and yep Dems pulled one on you, but you can't continue until this is fully looked at, for the sake of Kavanaugh, for the sake of justice and for the sake of the country.

Its not something you rush through because you know your going to be kicked out of a job in 2 months.

onwebcam 09-20-2018 07:06 PM

Crazy Cunt wants Kavanaugh to testify first.. How does that work? He predicts what he's being accused of?

dyna mo 09-20-2018 07:11 PM

No wonder yall don't want an investigation.

"Further complicating Kavanaugh’s testimony is the fact that Maryland, where Ford says the party was held, does not have a statute of limitations for felonies. In theory, Kavanaugh could be criminally prosecuted now or in the future, and the risk to him at the hearing includes potential criminal jeopardy. Although he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged assault, attempted rape is a crime for which a juvenile defendant in Maryland may be tried as an adult."

TheSquealer 09-20-2018 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22338119)
The question is: Is she telling the truth? As I have said, I think there should be an investigation and she should appear before the committee. If she refuses, then all of this should be dropped.

Personally, I don't care. It would be different if there was proof, evidence, witnesses or some sort of fact pattern to give it credibility.

Not talking politics or Supreme Court nominees now...

I mean I just don't care about a woman who materializes with some sort of vague complaint and life destroying accusation at a career ending moment and one of national importance with a kinda, sorta possible assault that by her own account, describes nothing serious at all by her own words and fingers a sole witness that says it didn't happen.

It's like Bill Cosby to me. Of course it seems he did some horrible shit. But the first couple complaints were from young girls, at the playboy mansion, drinking and willingly in a celebrities bed - tryin to say 50 years later that they didn't consent or whatever. Obviously rape is not ok. But at the same time, young girls, partying with celebs at the playboy mansion in 1975 weren't there for bible study.

I hate that people can even decades later, destroy someones life and career with vague and unsubstantiated claims. Some of that to me is the victims fault. IF you get hit by a car, it doesn't look good for you to come forward 35 years later pointing fingers and making unsupported claims - particularly when you didn't' feel that way when it happened.

I'm also deeply tired of the constant feigned moral outrage.

onwebcam 09-20-2018 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338163)
No wonder yall don't want an investigation.

"Further complicating Kavanaugh’s testimony is the fact that Maryland, where Ford says the party was held, does not have a statute of limitations for felonies. In theory, Kavanaugh could be criminally prosecuted now or in the future, and the risk to him at the hearing includes potential criminal jeopardy. Although he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged assault, attempted rape is a crime for which a juvenile defendant in Maryland may be tried as an adult."

I doesn't matter if there's an investigation.. There are no witnesses or evidence.. Just a claim. And now a more likely suspect.

dyna mo 09-20-2018 07:34 PM

Yes yes we know. She's a cunt, how dare she. and even if she's right an investigation couldn't turn up jack shit so why waste 3 days. This guy's our guy.

onwebcam 09-20-2018 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338172)
Yes yes we know. She's a cunt, how dare she. and even if she's right an investigation couldn't turn up jack shit so why waste 3 days. This guy's our guy.

You have what you want.. She got the wrong guy.. /End Story

directfiesta 09-21-2018 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22338104)
“Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help,” she said in the letter.

“Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with REDACTED, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh’s hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me.”

That sounds a like a little bit more than just two teenagers getting drunk.


Not to Robbie ....

Just plain old locker room fun , boys being boys ....

An even if they had raped her , she probably wanted it , right Robbie ?

bronco67 09-21-2018 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22338101)
I don't recall that I or any of my friends forced ourselves onto girls and groped them while holding them down when we were in high school. We must have ran in different crowds

He has no idea what an asshole he is.

And the women he knows run in different crowds too. I don't know one woman who would automatically not believe Ford, like he says of all the women he knows.

He's a fucking piece of shit. It's why he has the opinions he has.

RedFred 09-21-2018 06:55 AM

If someone in their 50's thinks it's just 'someone trying to get laid' and it's normal for drunk guys to grope women and cover their mouths when they scream and sees nothing wrong with it you have to wonder how many times in their own life they have done this.

crockett 09-21-2018 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22338101)
I don't recall that I or any of my friends forced ourselves onto girls and groped them while holding them down when we were in high school. We must have ran in different crowds

Robbie is ok with anything so long as it's a Republican doing it...

crockett 09-21-2018 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22338286)
Not to Robbie ....

Just plain old locker room fun , boys being boys ....

An even if they had raped her , she probably wanted it , right Robbie ?


Imagine if it was Bill Clinton.. the outrage Robbie would be in.. such a piece of shit he is.

Of course this isn't the only one . Robbie made excuses for Trump as well with Stormy and the half dozen others..

Basically if the accused has a R on their chest everyone else is lying in Robbie's world.

Matt-ADX 09-21-2018 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22338079)
Someone with nothing to hide would want the incident investigated in order to clear their name. How about Kavanaugh take a lie detector test about said incident!

why? I love how everyone thinks Lie detectors mean anything. They are not admissible in court because they aren't worth a shit. Also her lie detector that you guys like to talk about was not about the incident. It was asking if her story that she told and was repeated to her was what she said.

If I tell a lie, then you read me my lie and ask me if that's what I told you. I say it is, I pass the test. It doesn't make my lie true. They didn't ask her if what happened at that party was true. That's another question

Matt-ADX 09-21-2018 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22338118)
Exactly...we are told over and over again about the horror stories of women telling their stories and then authorities doing nothing about it.

But when Sen. Feinstein did it...it's all good! Amazing hypocrisy.

Also I haven't seen it mentioned. But what makes this an FBI matter? If anything this incident is not a federal crime, it would be investigated by state authorities no?

PR_Glen 09-21-2018 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt-ADX (Post 22338382)
Also I haven't seen it mentioned. But what makes this an FBI matter? If anything this incident is not a federal crime, it would be investigated by state authorities no?

The FBI is involved directly with any and all investigations when confirming prominent positions like these.

For the record, I think its extremely dangerous to weaponize this stuff for political gain. Especially without very convincing evidence given the time that has gone by. But it doesn't mean it should be dismissed without proper investigation either. The problem with this is any candidate going forward that needs to be confirmed or even win an election can be 'outed' for some last minute bullshit whether it is true or not. If it was just for the matter of getting the truth out i would be all for it, nobody wants assholes like that to be given any power. But what if someone was a victim? Will they now be ignored because of how often this is played out?

Rochard 09-21-2018 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22338095)
Because it wasn't "attempted rape". It was a teenage boy and girl drunk. We would be arresting about 95% of the adult and teenage population if what was described by this woman was "attempted rape".

I have a teenage daughter Robbie. If any boy pinned her to the bed and fondled her and tried to undress her against her will I would beat the living crap out of him before I called the police.

This is fucking disgusting. This man is already the least popular nomination for Supreme Court ever, more people oppose him then approve of him, he's been charged with sexual assault - a felony - and has been accused of lying under oath four times. The only reason the Republicans want this man in office is protect the President after the midterms when it comes to impeach him. They are going to put a bad person that no one ones onto the Supreme Court for a lifetime appointment for the short term game of potentially protecting a corrupt President.

This is disgusting. This is despicable. This is deplorable.

onwebcam 09-21-2018 09:20 AM

So much for your Women's vote Dyna


dyna mo 09-21-2018 09:47 AM

youre risking women votes so you don't upset evangelicals on this appt.

congrats you're on the same side as religious psychos giving an alleged attempted rapist a free pass


she lies that little slut!

kane 09-21-2018 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338421)
youre risking women votes so you don't upset evangelicals on this appt.

congrats you're on the same side as religious psychos giving an alleged attempted rapist a free pass


she lies that little slut!

I don't think they care. I have a feeling if you made Mitch McConnell a deal that went: You will lose the House and Senate in the midterms and the White House in 2020 but you get Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, I think he would take that deal because he knows the loss of the House, Senate, and White House are likely just temporary whereas Kavanaugh can be on the bench for 30+ years.

Robbie 09-21-2018 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22338409)
So much for your Women's vote Dyna


Also a new poll came out saying that more men believe Ford than women do.

I'm not sure why anyone could ever look at historical data on women and not see that they always hold other women more accountable.

Men, on the other hand, always have a big percentage of guys who don't want to be seen as "anti-woman" so they throw out common sense and just side with whatever a woman says every time.

https://dailycaller.com/wp-content/u...25.51-PM-1.png

This isn't going to cost the Republicans any so-called "women's vote". Women aren't robots. They each think independently.
The ones who are Republican will vote Republican. The ones who are Democrat will vote Democrat.
And the Independent ones will more likely vote for their representatives based on local needs and the campaign that the candidates ran locally.

According to the Democrats and media...women are all just sheep who vote in one big block.
So sexist.

dyna mo 09-21-2018 11:46 AM

Actually, most people aren't so politicized that they cling to a particular party in spite of attempted rape. You'll have a hard time proving most people will look the other way on approving an alleged attempted rapist as an SC judge.

Its called a Moral compass.

kane 09-21-2018 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22338466)
Also a new poll came out saying that more men believe Ford than women do.

I'm not sure why anyone could ever look at historical data on women and not see that they always hold other women more accountable.

Men, on the other hand, always have a big percentage of guys who don't want to be seen as "anti-woman" so they throw out common sense and just side with whatever a woman says every time.

https://dailycaller.com/wp-content/u...25.51-PM-1.png

This isn't going to cost the Republicans any so-called "women's vote". Women aren't robots. They each think independently.
The ones who are Republican will vote Republican. The ones who are Democrat will vote Democrat.
And the Independent ones will more likely vote for their representatives based on local needs and the campaign that the candidates ran locally.

According to the Democrats and media...women are all just sheep who vote in one big block.
So sexist.

So, polls are accurate and trustworthy now?

dyna mo 09-21-2018 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 22338466)

According to the Democrats and media...women are all just sheep who vote in one big block.
So sexist.

Exclaims the guy who victim shames an alleged attempted rape victim AND exclaims rape is ok when a teen attempts it.

Matt-ADX 09-21-2018 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338482)
Actually, most people aren't so politicized that they cling to a particular party in spite of attempted rape. You'll have a hard time proving most people will look the other way on approving an alleged attempted rapist as an SC judge.

Its called a Moral compass.

You used to be a pretty reasonable and logical person. Not sure what happened to you but you seem to have joined the cult of Bladewire. Sad stuff.

dyna mo 09-21-2018 11:58 AM

Fuck off shitstain. You're very very lucky I was talked out of wasting resources on you.

dyna mo 09-21-2018 11:59 AM

Gut check: am I siding with an attempted rapist?

Fuck no.

I can sleep good knowing I'm on the right side of this.

dyna mo 09-21-2018 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 22338409)
So much for your Women's vote Dyna


weird how you clowns run around here squealing about how biased CNN is right up until it's convenient for you to use CNN to try and prove your point.

and did you actually watch those women saying shit like "what high school boy hasn't done that?"

high school date rape is not ok, jtfc.


it's fucking mind blowing I even need to iterate and reiterate that here.

Acepimp 09-21-2018 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338492)
Gut check: am I siding with an attempted rapist?

Fuck no.

I can sleep good knowing I'm on the right side of this.

You're falsely stating he's an attempted rapist. That's false as he is merely 'accused'.

It's possible that she's mistaken or lying. True or false?

dyna mo 09-21-2018 12:13 PM

FTR: i never had to brute force a drunk girl into bed and cover her mouth up to keep her from screaming when I tried to tear her clothes off... in high school or ever.

dyna mo 09-21-2018 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22338499)
You're falsely stating he's an attempted rapist. That's false as he is merely 'accused'.

It's possible that she's mistaken or lying. True or false?

give it a fucking break. i've stated "alleged" plenty of time. I'm not going to waste even more time proof reading my shit for a bunch of nitwits who support a fucking ALLEGED attempted rapist for the supreme court.

one thing i do know for certain- you are an alleged rapist supporter and a victim shamer that also agrees with extreme evangelicals. congrats on that.

crockett 09-21-2018 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338131)
so no attempted rape then? because they were teens and booze was involved.

No its "no attempt at rape because a Republican was involved"...

Acepimp 09-21-2018 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338503)
give it a fucking break. i've stated "alleged" plenty of time. I'm not going to waste even more time proof reading my shit for a bunch of nitwits who support a fucking ALLEGED attempted rapist for the supreme court.

one thing i do know for certain- you are an alleged rapist supporter and a victim shamer that also agrees with extreme evangelicals. congrats on that.

You seem hysterical. I simply go with the facts. Feinstein knew about this months ago. Their other delay tactics didn't work so they bring this out last minute. Not suspicious at all! :1orglaugh

The accuser can't give any details.. Her witness says it didn't happen.. and she's refusing to go and testify on Monday.. "Not suspicious at all!" - Except that it is suspicious. This could be real, yes, but the evidence is weighing in the other direction.

dyna mo 09-21-2018 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22338508)
You seem hysterical. I simply go with the facts. Feinstein knew about this months ago. Their other delay tactics didn't work so they bring this out last minute. Not suspicious at all! :1orglaugh

The accuser can't give any details.. Her witness says it didn't happen.. and she's refusing to go and testify on Monday.. "Not suspicious at all!" - Except that it is suspicious. This could be real, yes, but the evidence is weighing in the other direction.

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. you wax right past your nitwit bros attacking me and my business for giving this woman the benefit of the doubt but you call me hysterical. you support an alleged attempted rapist using excuse after excuse, but I'm hysterical. I'm sure that makes sense to you.

I'm actually comforted by the fact people like you think I'm the hysterical one for giving this woman the benefit of the doubt and not attacking her or supporting an attempted rapist. for the fucking SC of all things.

you're the one who doesn't have a problem with an ALLEGED attempted rapist on the SC, not me. I have way more integrity than that. yeah sure, I'm hysterical about that.

RedFred 09-21-2018 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22338499)
You're falsely stating he's an attempted rapist. That's false as he is merely 'accused'.

It's possible that she's mistaken or lying. True or false?

No it's not possible.

If she was going to make this shit up she sure as fuck wouldn't say his friend was there as a witness. Does that make any goddamn sense to you?

This whole thing shows once again just how fucked up Trump idiots are.

Acepimp 09-21-2018 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22338511)
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. you call me hysterical. you support an alleged attempted rapist using excuse after excuse, but I'm hysterical. I'm sure that makes sense to you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22338514)
No it's not possible.

If she was going to make this shit up she sure as fuck wouldn't say his friend was there as a witness. Does that make any goddamn sense to you?

So it's not possible that a far-left liberal anti-Trumper is making this up?

You people are hysterical and delusional.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Bladewire 09-21-2018 12:46 PM

Trump lies on a daily basis.

Trump stood on Air Force One and lied to the American people about knowing about the Stormy Daniels payment.

Trump supporters don't care that Trump lies.

The fake nics in this thread DEFENDING a conservative anti porn supreme Court Justice nominee shows you're non industry alt-right trolls.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc