![]() |
yes, it's totally possible that an established, published, and peer recognized, and esteemed research psychologist plotted to destroy her life, her career, her husband's life, and children's lives over 6 years ago when she started her diabolical plan KNOWING kavanaugh was going to get an SC nomination, by telling her therapist about his attempted rape of her.
that's your explanation eh, this woman's 6 year plan to keep kavanaugh from becoming an SC judge by destroying her own life. and you call me hysterical. sure ya do. |
I think I'll make up a story that Asspimp broke into my house and stole all my shit and to make it sound more believable I'll also say his friend watched the whole thing.
Fucking retards. |
Quote:
You litterally change your whole world view at Trump's whim. |
If Romney had won in 2012, he was considering Kavanaugh. She knew this then and had the story ready to go at the time. Why didn't she come out then? Oh right, it wouldn't help the Democrats obstruct the president since Romney lost
:pimp |
Quote:
Like I said yesterday, THEY DON'T CARE if it happened. You got Robbie saying its what guys do. There's no point in debating these Neanderthals. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
that helps explain your ignorance on the other matters like victim shaming and weaponizing shame. And your ignorance of traumatic events and your ignorance of justifying *boys will be boys* thinking when it comes to rape. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In America, people are to be presumed innocent until proven guilty of a crime. Kavanaugh testified in front of Diane Feinstein for at least 8 hours so... why didn't she ask him about this then? The woman's yearbook shows her at the center of black-out drunk parties, where they glorify being promiscuous and not being able to remember anything. Her "witness" says it didn't happen. And she won't agree to go testify. Facts are facts, guys. It seems like a ploy to delay the confirmation :pimp |
You guys say "innocent until proven guilty" for Kavanaugh as you accuse her of being a 15 year old drunk slut at parties. Such mindless cucks
|
Quote:
|
Now she's claiming she's scared to fly.. She must have swam to her internship at University of Hawaii
|
Quote:
The idea is that accusations without evidence should not put the burden of proof on the accused but the person who made the accusations. |
No presumption of innocence.
Political grandstanding. Senator holds on to sexual assault allegations until the very last second, before a vote in spite of having it for 7 weeks. Sounds legit. Sounds like genuine concern. Senator never reports a crime. Never alerts the authorities... but somehow managed to alert every possible media outlet that would cover her. Kavanaugh denies it emphatically and is anxious for any kind of questioning or testimony to address it... the accuser is doing everything to stall. Interesting. Then she puts nutty conditions on being questioned. She dictates the conditions for testifying. Claims she's afraid to fly... rejects offers for people to come to her. Everyone on the left calling her a "survivor of sexual abuse" and "rape victim" with an accuser who is doing everything in her power in conjunction with a US Senator to not cooperate and drag it out as long as possible. She says there's a witness... witness said he has no clue what she's talking about. She says he grabbed her and pushed her down on a bed and she was afraid for her life - in a crowded house, full of people, with people right outside the door.... which in itself is obviously not a very credible claim. But yeah. I wonder where we'd be if someone on the Left was accused of rape? Multiple times. I wonder what that would look like? What would you say when one of the alleged victims, a pregnant mother (from one of the rapes), kills herself by shooting herself in the back of her own head THREE TIMES according to her death certificate in the tiny town of ShitFuck Arkansas. I mean if someone like Bill Clinton was accused of rape by multiple women, surely you people aren't hypocrites right? You'd lose your shit and demand him being hung and start calling him "rapist" right? And clearly you all think Hillary is a viscous cunt for calling every single rape accuser names and attacking them? Right?.... No? Not so much? I see... shocker. |
Kavanaugh says there is no chance that he was at a party like that which she describes.
So... slam dunk right? Surely plenty of witnesses can place him there.... Right? |
Juanita Broaddrick
@atensnut I’m not afraid to fly. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh Grassley gave her ANOTHER extension. |
Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyer Rejects Senate Hearing, Claims It Would Be ‘Contrary To Discovering The Truth’
https://truepundit.com/kavanaugh-acc...ing-the-truth/ "Contrary to discovering the truth" because it would expose the lie |
Quote:
I think we're seeing why Republicans withheld information at the hearings. They don't want anyone but themselves snooping into his records because there are things to hide...and this attack was probably one of those things. |
|
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not cooperating ? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45615854 |
Quote:
|
BREAKING: Christine Blasey Ford's Female Witness Doesn't Remember Anything
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DnvjnYaW4AAS1qB.jpg https://www.themaven.net/theresurgen...UWdX_jSGdb7mA/ Party of 1? #walkaway |
|
|
Quote:
It's now pretty obvious why she just hired a $1200 hour attorney (McCabe's attorney no less) she's about to get sent to the poor house in lawsuits. EDIT: Now apparently there's a "legal team" so he's just one $1200 an hour lawyer Edit Part Deux: Now an email has surfaced which is what started this all. Leland IS suppose to have been the one at the party.. And she wasn't a friend.. WAPO changed the details in the email..... Which is where the 4 boy confusion came in.. Now her lawyers are saying it's "obvious" she wouldn't remember because nothing happened to her... WTF???? |
"Marriage counseling"
"conjured up rape" She was killing 2 birds with 1 stone back in 2012.. Saving her marriage by coming up with an excuse as to why she did something and/or wasn't doing something in her marriage.. And secondly, plotting to take out Kavanaugh...She didn't have any need for going after Kavanaugh since Obama got re-elected but she kept up the marriage saving charade.. Since her family knew about this charade she had no other choice but to write the letter.. But ask that it be "non-public." The claim is they discussed leaving the country over his appointment so the whole family knew and believed her lie.. They just kept it in the family.. Feinstein tossed her in front of the freight train and here we are.. Many lives destroyed because Democrats can't accept what fucking lowlifes they've become. |
Poor old right wingers heads must be exploding:
Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination | Fox News Ronald Reagan's daughter, defending Kavanaugh's accuser Patti Davis, Ronald Reagan's daughter, says she's sexual assault survivor in op-ed defending Kavanaugh's accuser | Fox News |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think that's more about how they listen in to every phone call made in the usa from here in aus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Gap take good note of where it says "transmissions intended for communications satellites" microwave emissions, such as long-distance telephone calls.".. then google , project echelon "Margaret Newsham, a Lockheed employee under NSA contract, disclosed the ECHELON surveillance system to members of congress. Newsham told a member of the U.S. Congress that the telephone calls of Strom Thurmond, a Republican U.S. senator, were being collected by the NSA. Congressional investigators determined that "targeting of U.S. political figures would not occur by accident, but was designed into the system from the start." Let this sink in.. "targeting of U.S. political figures would not occur by accident, but was designed into the system from the start" I've said a few times on this board... They had Trump all along, problem is they cant use military evidence in a civil case, 5 eyes secret stuff.. so its up to Mueller to connect the dots. because of American laws, project Echelon was moved to Australia |
Quote:
You might want to read Popadopoulos' tweets. He's obviously been given the ok to start singing. He's directly implicating Downer in spying on Trump as early as April 2016... Which contradicts previous claims. The Queen was trying her best to reclaim "her" territory it seems UK Begged Trump Not To Declassify Russia Docs; Cited "Grave Concerns" Over Steele Involvement https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ns-over-steele Explains what's going on with Canada as well eh? |
So at the end of it all... Ford says she "will testify" that 4 people were at the same party and know what happened, can identify kavanaugh etc.
Those 4 "witnesses" have all said now under penalty of perjury they have no clue what she's talking about, what party shes talking about or even a recollection as to who she or Kavanaugh is. But yeah... no politics here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
there is absofuckinglutely nothing wrong with investigating and everything right. don't worry, either way, we know you support teen rape now so this thread is a win for you. |
Quote:
I see her future Female blogger is ordered to pay US Army colonel she accused of rape $8.4million in damages after he claimed the false allegations cost him a sparkling military career https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-4million.html It's becoming quite possible now that Ford didn't write the initial letter.. This may be why Feinstein is refusing to give it to Republican's unredacted.. Rumor is that it was written by someone else who "heard the story" problem is Ford claims she told no one.. |
Another sham of a hearing held by the republicans. They don't want to investigate so it remains a he said she said. Plus most if not all have already made up their minds and are putting on this show so not to piss off to many women!
|
This must be a contest as to which GFY poster is the most vile and disgusting POS. :1orglaugh
|
Her whole story is collapsing. But yeah, let's make sure.
Just 2 questions: Why didn't Feinstein just bring it up during the confirmation hearings? Why won't she let anyone see the unredacted letter from the accuser? Feinstein could be charged with contempt, and the woman could be charged with perjury IF this turns out to be fabricated :pimp |
Quote:
Democrats: Let her be heard Also Democrats: Hearing her is a sham Another liberal "fraud" is exposed.. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
What we are seeing is the establishment trying to regain control of the narratives.. It's just not possible any longer... They either give up the game or they are going to flip the game board over... The problem is... The World is the game board... |
Quote:
Feinstein had the "letter" for 7 weeks and only waited until just before Kavanaugh was to be confirmed before going public in an attempt to delay/derail the process. No one is "erring on the side of caution". The woman herself came forward, teamed up with a Senator, hired a high power legal team... make a very dubious allegation which was 100% unsubstantiated or uncorroborated and then continually derailed any attempt to get her to testify.... started going to the media etc etc etc etc. Further, she cited 4 witnesses to her claim all of which have already said they have no clue what she's talking about or even who she or Kavanaugh is. You don't have to "hate women" to have a problem with how this was handled and how this looks and to be extremely skeptical given the timing, circumstances and vague nature of her claims. You don't have to be a misogynist to be a little concerned that some woman can say 36 years later "this underage minor did this thing" and see him instantly convicted in the media and by the Left. It's no less reasonable for someone to be about about politicians weaponizing of a far left leaning attorney teaming up with a far left leaning Senator it to derail a SCOTUS nominee which is EXACTLY what they did than it is to presume she might be telling the truth. |
You should reread some of the caustic toxic hate the op has spewed about the alleged victim and reconsider defending that misogynistic dumbfuck.
The fact is my conscience is clear about there being enough reason to warrant an investigation into a potential lifetime SC judge due to legitimate rape allegations. There's absolutely zero reason not to investigate thoroughly. That's just reasonable common sense and concern. No one can argue that kavanaugh is some sort of judicial Einstein and we all owe him a lifetime SC seat. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc