GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Initial feelings on the Ford testimony? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1303955)

Martin 09-27-2018 07:05 PM

She's a another left wing crack pot working for the Dems. This is a Political hit job.

HairyChick 09-27-2018 08:07 PM

I watched until 2:00 then had a doctor appointment. She was credible, seemingly honest and had patience. I know from personal experience you don't always remember every detail of a horrific trauma. She has nothing to gain but a lot to lose. She and her husband and kids had to move. Her parents had to move. If he's appointed, she's going to be looked at as a liar.

Anita Hill was credible yet Thomas was elected.

The thing is that he may have been a drunk molestor at 16 and then grew up and became a decent, moral citizen. Should he be given a chance to prove he's changed or do we judge him on three known mistakes thirty-five years ago? Maybe there are others ..

Or, do we believe people don't change and he's still immoral? Do we forgive drunk actions or do we disbelieve women too embarrassed to report sexual assault?

This isn't simple. Some people want him prosecuted for sexual abuse and underaged drinking. Imagine if he's headed to jail instead of the Supreme Court ...

onwebcam 09-27-2018 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341141)
she did state she is 100% certain her assailant was kavanaugh

She wasn't so sure according friends just a week ago. Took some convincing I hear..

Acepimp 09-27-2018 09:35 PM

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...d4&oe=5C1E76FC

baddog 09-27-2018 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StefanG (Post 22341137)
do you remember everything or nothing?

I remember dramatic incidents from very early childhood days but i really can't tell what i ate last Monday for breakfast.

that being said: I have no reason to believe that she goes through this painful ordeal just for fun and giggles

The facts that she couldn't remember that surprised the fuck out of me (and should you) were: How she got to the party and how she got home.

I am going to visit a friend I met in 1971, and even though I was definitely blackout drunk, I know EXACTLY how I met her and how I got in the situation. So that in of itself causes me to doubt her.

Kind of like how I heard a guy testify that his buddy bought a Coors, then a Budweiser. Didn't happen.

baddog 09-27-2018 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22341255)
How about immediately?

He did

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341200)
if you were kavanaugh, at what point would you have demanded an FBI investigation into 3 women's claims that you are a serial sex criminal? in order to clear your good name?

He immediately asked for an investigation after the first one; the second and third were such bullshit (wasn't the 3rd a 4chan hoax?)

baddog 09-27-2018 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341402)
Do you understand all you know about victim memory? Can you recall the most traumatic event of your teens and fill in all the blanks avout it people on the internet point out that you left out, etc? Assuming you had a truly traumatic event happen to you during your teens.

You haven't figured out that Gene is going for Troll of the Year?

PornDiscounts-V 09-27-2018 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 22341465)
He did



He immediately asked for an investigation after the first one; the second and third were such bullshit (wasn't the 3rd a 4chan hoax?)

Fox news...

How about this... She didn't want to come forward. She just wanted to let them know anonymously, hey, this dude tried to rape me and ran with a crowd of idiots.

But then everything got leaked. Then she figured, fuck it, my name and story are already out there. I should just testify.

So who leaked it? Not the Republicans. They would have rather bought her off. Diane Feinstein? I'm pretty sure it was her or one of her aids who knew, if I leak this, she'll end up testifying. If I don't, he's a shoe in for the Supreme Court.

Bladewire 09-27-2018 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornDiscounts-V (Post 22341494)
So who leaked it? Not the Republicans.

Republicans leaked it to make her pay dearly for telling the truth. Just like Republicans tried to make her pay today for telling the truth. There's a pattern of Republicans trying to destroy women that come forward. Nothing new. They did it with Anita Hill too

k0nr4d 09-27-2018 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341151)
Is so weird to see the back and forth between D and R

Really? It just looked like a live-action version of GFY to me :1orglaugh

american pervert 09-28-2018 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22341182)
No. I'm saying it's insane that multiple women have come forward claiming he had sexually assaulted them and for some reason we aren't stopping to have an investigation. How is that possible? What is the hurry? With the last nomination the Republicans demanded we wait an entire year before we even considered a confirmation hearing for a nominee, but now suddenly there is this huge urgency.

Again, if this was a school board trying to hire a high school principal and such accusations suddenly came to light, they would stop everything and have an investigation.

Why is the President telling us the FBI cannot do an investigation when we know they can - they did with Anita Hill. It's routine for the FBI to re-open an background investigation when new information comes forward. Why aren't they holding an investigation?

Do you know why they aren't interested in an investigation? With this new information coming forward people are claiming Kavanaugh was a party animal and intoxicated more often than he was sober. A new investigation into Kavanaugh will make him look very bad, and when this new information comes out in an investigation he won't be confirmed.

The Republican party demanded dozens of investigations into Hillary Clinton for no reason. Now they don't want to have any investigations. It doesn't work this way. You cannot demand investigations for no reason other than political purposes for a witch hunt, and then deny investigations when someone accuses a nominee of sexual assault.

Hold an investigation. It's just that simple.


and 2 of those women are not credible in the least. Ford, maybe she was gropped, I wasn't there, and you weren't there.

did you hear about the 2 guys that came forward to claimed they were the ones who groped her?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...rd/1439569002/

are we allowed to believe them??


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc