Originally Posted by StefanG (Post 22341336)

All politics aside I see this as the main suspicious point: if he has nothing to hide and is 100% sure his version is true: why not say yes?

Cause even if he somehow gets confirmed, these allegations will never go away without investigation and you have a lifetime SC judge with the lingering reputation of being a rapist.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341347)

The good news is it is an impeachable appointment.

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22341353)

How long would that take? Where to begin? She can't remember a single relevant detail. All of the witnesses that she named say it did't happen. He's already passed FBI background checks 6 times. The Demorats have likely hired this woman to try to delay the confirmation long enough to keep him off the next session of the Supreme Court, then delay it until 2020. They've pretty much stated this is the goal.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341362)

all you people saying he should just submit to an investigation by the FBI because some girl who cant recall all the details is pretty sure he did something 36 years ago..

line up and have your papers ready...cause that is the slippery slope.

pulled over? we are searching your car...why not...something to hide...now you are guilty sucka


or hey we are coming to your home and searching your ocmputer because someone thought you might be someone who possibly did something on a computer in this area.

or hey...you are 6 ft dark complexion...you fit the bill..lets see your pockets now

The FBI was notified, they saw that there was no proof and it was a she said he said, so they closed the file and passed


it is the same shit

Originally Posted by SleepWalker (Post 22341365)

I would put him on a polygraph, I would already bet a lot of money he has nothing to do with what happened to Ford. If he was to pass a polygraph then I would be 100% sure.

Some people here are so anti rep it is crazy. Who do you think found Ford? Who convinced her to go public, offer her protection, support? This is just a political game. It is a shame. The politic is a shame, think about it, 50% of Americans now hate they other half. Some are now extreme enough they would have no problem killing someone in the street just because of different political views. Humans are still very related to animals.

Originally Posted by StefanG (Post 22341363)

So they hired her in 2012 after she told this her husband and her therapist in couples counseling because the Democrats knew that in 2018 they would need her cause Trump would appoint Kavanaugh ...

Man, that is really some proper planning. Genius.

Originally Posted by StefanG (Post 22341363)

So they hired her in 2012 after she told this her husband and her therapist in couples counseling because the Democrats knew that in 2018 they would need her cause Trump would appoint Kavanaugh ...

Man, that is really some proper planning. Genius.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22341359)

:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341211)

it was coach...he said coach

Originally Posted by Busty2 (Post 22341218)

He just can't stop crying, as if that will get him any sympathy ?

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22341231)

I noticed he threw in conspiracy theory and mentioned the Clintons

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 22341236)

Completely different conclusions of the first part by FOX and MSNBC.

MSNBC is presenting it like he's done. FOX thinks this helps him.

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 22341249)

Wow... Graham comes in swinging for Kavanaugh.

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22341266)

Are you serious? This guy is a conspiracy nutter as well? Jesus fuck what is wrong with the Republican party.. They are all bat shit crazy.

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22341284)

Oh shit...

...
Chuck Grassley being asked by multiple groups to step down from his office after today's unhinged performance.. will have to wait and see if this picks up..

Originally Posted by StefanG (Post 22341293)

What is obvious: 2/3 of those senators asking questions are so old and frail that they should be sitting in a rocking chair in a retirement home and not in that hearing.

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22341330)

Manbaby snowflake can't control his emotions.

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22341369)

^^ This is actually a good point. Well, it's possible that she was preparing her smear campaign in case Mitt Romney had won in 2012 because Romney was considering Kavanaugh for the SC. Why didn't she report this when he was appointed to the nation's 2nd highest court in DC? No one mentioned this during the lengthy confirmation hearings even though Feinstein had the info. Seems like a ploy to cause major delays

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22341305)

I don't like to discuss this on GFY, but I have a teenage daughter. What am I supposed to tell her? If someone pins her up against a bed and fondles her and gropes her and tried to undress them that she should keep her mouth shut? Because no one would believe her?

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341228)

Repubs still lose due to risk of his being impeached. Not to mention this broadcasted shitstorm is energizing women voters just 5 weeks before mids.

Originally Posted by k0nr4d (Post 22341257)

She doesn't remember where she was, who was there, doesn't even remember how she got home, but she remembers she had EXACTLY one beer? She remembers Judge jumping on the bed exactly twice, 36 years ago?

She said she was pushed from behind, KNOWS it was Kavanaugh somehow, but doesn't know if Judge also pushed her, because she was pushed from behind, and couldn't see. If she couldn't see, she couldn't know if it was Kavanaugh.

The number of people at the house and in the room has also changed several times.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22341278)

This is a no win situation for the Republican party. If they have a vote and he is nominated, the rallying cry for the midterms will be "A President accused of sexual assault put another man accused of sexual assault on the Supreme Court".

The problem the Republicans are having with the midterms is white women from the suburbs. This hearing today looks horrible for the Republican party, and if he gets nominated this will continue to look bad for the Republican party.

Originally Posted by StefanG (Post 22341336)

All politics aside I see this as the main suspicious point: if he has nothing to hide and is 100% sure his version is true: why not say yes?

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341364)

why wouldn't he want an investigation?


why is he even unwilling to take a polygraph?

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341362)

all you people saying he should just submit to an investigation by the FBI because some girl who cant recall all the details is pretty sure he did something 36 years ago..

line up and have your papers ready...cause that is the slippery slope.

pulled over? we are searching your car...why not...something to hide...now you are guilty sucka


or hey we are coming to your home and searching your ocmputer because someone thought you might be someone who possibly did something on a computer in this area.

or hey...you are 6 ft dark complexion...you fit the bill..lets see your pockets now

The FBI was notified, they saw that there was no proof and it was a she said he said, so they closed the file and passed


it is the same shit

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 22341553)

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 22341482)

Not sure how you arrived at that conclusion. I am driving around the country and females calling in to radio don't seem to agree with you.


Yep


When was the last time one of your predictions came true?



polygraphs are not admissible evidence

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341572)

I arrived at it the same way you think you are refuting it, from women saying so.

Polygraphs aren't admissable in the court of public opinion? Since when?

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22341322)

he was asked more than once if he would ask the white house to open an fbi investigation into these allegations, yes or no, he never answered. He has something to hide

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 22341598)

If he didn´t do this, I so feel for the poor guy...

the woman said he was at this party and forced her, but then, his simple answer was, you can´t mean me, I wasn´t at that party.

Shit, this is easy proven, ask everyone, if he wasn´t there, it´s all BS :(

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22341601)

There were 6 done by the FBI on Kavanaugh already.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341578)

there is no court of public opinion...it is just public opinion and that is not to be trusted because the results are read by Anderson cooper..lol

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341362)

all you people saying he should just submit to an investigation by the FBI because some girl who cant recall all the details is pretty sure he did something 36 years ago..

line up and have your papers ready...cause that is the slippery slope.

pulled over? we are searching your car...why not...something to hide...now you are guilty sucka


or hey we are coming to your home and searching your computer because someone thought you might be someone who possibly did something on a computer in this area.

or hey...you are 6 ft dark complexion...you fit the bill..lets see your pockets now

The FBI was notified, they saw that there was no proof and it was a she said he said, so they closed the file and passed


it is the same shit

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22341611)

To put this in a perspective that people on here will understand. Every male who has attended any of the industry shows could now be fair game.

All some porn whore has to do is say that so and so tried to cop a feel of me. I can't remember what show it was. I can't remember what year it was. I can't remember who was their but I know it was so and so sexually violated me. No witness. No one to back up the story. No means to verify the story. Nothing!. Using the Libby logic, you are guilty until you can prove your innocent. It doesn't matter if some of the porn whore's 'friends' can't back up her story. It doesn't matter if your friends back you up. It doesn't matter if you have proof that her story has more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese. YOU ARE STILL GUILTY!. Everything you have worked for your whole life. GONE. Your family, Destroyed. Your business, closed down. Game over.

Let this sink in. If you have ever attended an industry show, Some porn whore can make an accusation against you, with no proof. No nothing. Using the Libby logic, you are guilty. Your life is destroyed. End of story.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341622)

that only makes sense in bizarro world.

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22341625)

That is pretty much what just happened.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341628)

it's not at all what just happened.

moreover, you seem to think that no woman has ever made a false accusation ever. in fact, people are falsely accused of crimes every fucking day.

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22341639)

She provided no proof. No police report. No Nothing. For 35 fucking years!. Even her 'friends' couldn't back up her story. You Libs are fuckin mind boggling.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341362)

all you people saying he should just submit to an investigation by the FBI because some girl who cant recall all the details is pretty sure he did something 36 years ago..

line up and have your papers ready...cause that is the slippery slope.

pulled over? we are searching your car...why not...something to hide...now you are guilty sucka


or hey we are coming to your home and searching your ocmputer because someone thought you might be someone who possibly did something on a computer in this area.

or hey...you are 6 ft dark complexion...you fit the bill..lets see your pockets now

The FBI was notified, they saw that there was no proof and it was a she said he said, so they closed the file and passed


it is the same shit

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341602)

They did ask everyone...everyone backs him.
Even her best friend said it is BS

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 22341686)

A poll was done, 54 percent of republicans said he should go thru whether he did it or not. That says it all.

They see him as their savior to destroying Roe vrs Wade. They wouldnt care if he was anally raping babies. I think he was a drunk and blackout alot which is why, they arent bringing his buddy in.

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22341691)

Why are you lying...

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341719)

Phoenix, in Ford's testimony, she laid out the timeline of her coming forward. It revealed she did so BEFORE kavanaugh was nominated by trump. This isn't a dem hit job and it's not an attempt to obstruct kavanaugh specifically from becoming an SCJ.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341753)

So a lady has a hard on for a guy she probably never met.

happens all the time....there is probably some nut job lady who likes you, at the place you buy bagels or whatever.

What she claims happened, and the witnesses and people she puts there, say it never happened. And one of them is her friend.

Think about that.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341753)

So a lady has a hard on for a guy she probably never met.

happens all the time....there is probably some nut job lady who likes you, at the place you buy bagels or whatever.

What she claims happened, and the witnesses and people she puts there, say it never happened. And one of them is her friend.

Think about that.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341602)

They did ask everyone...everyone backs him.
Even her best friend said it is BS

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22341762)

1 where does it say it never happened in her statement. So no recollection means it never happened in your eyes.
_______________________________
Leland Ingham Keyser, said in a statement: “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, without, Dr. Ford.”
____________________________________________

2 This same friend says she believes her.

__________________________________________________ __________________
Despite saying she hadn’t met Kavanaugh and doesn’t remember the party, Keyser told The Washington Post that she believes Ford.
__________________________________________________ _______

3 Where in this statement does it say it never happened!

__________________________________________________ ____________
In another statement, Patrick J. Smyth, identified by Ford as being among those downstairs at the party, says “I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”




Show me where in her statement she said it was BS!

Even Mark Judge, who Ford says was in the bedroom when Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, has not denied that such an episode took place. His sworn statement to the committee says, “I have no memory of this alleged incident,” “do not recall the party” and “never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”


The three swore they had no recollection of the party, providing no support for Ford’s accusations laid out to the Senate Judiciary Committee. But their statements do not disprove the allegations, either.