GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Kavanaugh is pissed (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1303962)

tfto 09-28-2018 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341362)
all you people saying he should just submit to an investigation by the FBI because some girl who cant recall all the details is pretty sure he did something 36 years ago..

line up and have your papers ready...cause that is the slippery slope.

pulled over? we are searching your car...why not...something to hide...now you are guilty sucka


or hey we are coming to your home and searching your computer because someone thought you might be someone who possibly did something on a computer in this area.

or hey...you are 6 ft dark complexion...you fit the bill..lets see your pockets now

The FBI was notified, they saw that there was no proof and it was a she said he said, so they closed the file and passed


it is the same shit

To put this in a perspective that people on here will understand. Every male who has attended any of the industry shows could now be fair game.

All some porn whore has to do is say that so and so tried to cop a feel of me. I can't remember what show it was. I can't remember what year it was. I can't remember who was their but I know it was so and so sexually violated me. No witness. No one to back up the story. No means to verify the story. Nothing!. Using the Libby logic, you are guilty until you can prove your innocent. It doesn't matter if some of the porn whore's 'friends' can't back up her story. It doesn't matter if your friends back you up. It doesn't matter if you have proof that her story has more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese. YOU ARE STILL GUILTY!. Everything you have worked for your whole life. GONE. Your family, Destroyed. Your business, closed down. Game over.

Let this sink in. If you have ever attended an industry show, Some porn whore can make an accusation against you, with no proof. No nothing. Using the Libby logic, you are guilty. Your life is destroyed. End of story.

dyna mo 09-28-2018 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22341611)
To put this in a perspective that people on here will understand. Every male who has attended any of the industry shows could now be fair game.

All some porn whore has to do is say that so and so tried to cop a feel of me. I can't remember what show it was. I can't remember what year it was. I can't remember who was their but I know it was so and so sexually violated me. No witness. No one to back up the story. No means to verify the story. Nothing!. Using the Libby logic, you are guilty until you can prove your innocent. It doesn't matter if some of the porn whore's 'friends' can't back up her story. It doesn't matter if your friends back you up. It doesn't matter if you have proof that her story has more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese. YOU ARE STILL GUILTY!. Everything you have worked for your whole life. GONE. Your family, Destroyed. Your business, closed down. Game over.

Let this sink in. If you have ever attended an industry show, Some porn whore can make an accusation against you, with no proof. No nothing. Using the Libby logic, you are guilty. Your life is destroyed. End of story.

that only makes sense in bizarro world.

tfto 09-28-2018 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341622)
that only makes sense in bizarro world.

That is pretty much what just happened.

dyna mo 09-28-2018 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22341625)
That is pretty much what just happened.

it's not at all what just happened.

moreover, you seem to think that no woman has ever made a false accusation ever. in fact, people are falsely accused of crimes every fucking day. we have a system to sort that out, it's called the judicial system.

tfto 09-28-2018 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341628)
it's not at all what just happened.

moreover, you seem to think that no woman has ever made a false accusation ever. in fact, people are falsely accused of crimes every fucking day.

She provided no proof. No police report. No Nothing. For 35 fucking years!. Even her 'friends' couldn't back up her story. You Libs are fuckin mind boggling.

dyna mo 09-28-2018 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tfto (Post 22341639)
She provided no proof. No police report. No Nothing. For 35 fucking years!. Even her 'friends' couldn't back up her story. You Libs are fuckin mind boggling.

I understand it's mind boggling to you. you seem to not realize this is a job interview, not a trial. heck, even trump stated that there should be "zero doubt" about kavanaugh. but for some reason, you're clinging to kavanaugh. why? what is so special to you about kavanaugh?

it's not like there's dozens and dozens and dozens of other conservative and qualified judges.

and there's a lot more to victim memory you're not understanding. especially when it comes to sex crimes. expecting 100% perfect recollection of every point someone on the internet expects, otherwise she's a lying whore, is unrealistic.

jsmih 09-28-2018 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341362)
all you people saying he should just submit to an investigation by the FBI because some girl who cant recall all the details is pretty sure he did something 36 years ago..

line up and have your papers ready...cause that is the slippery slope.

pulled over? we are searching your car...why not...something to hide...now you are guilty sucka


or hey we are coming to your home and searching your ocmputer because someone thought you might be someone who possibly did something on a computer in this area.

or hey...you are 6 ft dark complexion...you fit the bill..lets see your pockets now

The FBI was notified, they saw that there was no proof and it was a she said he said, so they closed the file and passed


it is the same shit

Different standards for applying for a job and for legal actions.

tony286 09-28-2018 10:08 AM

A poll was done, 54 percent of republicans said he should go thru whether he did it or not. That says it all.

They see him as their savior to destroying Roe vrs Wade. They wouldnt care if he was anally raping babies. I think he was a drunk and blackout alot which is why, they arent bringing his buddy in.

crockett 09-28-2018 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341602)
They did ask everyone...everyone backs him.
Even her best friend said it is BS

Why are you lying...

crockett 09-28-2018 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 22341686)
A poll was done, 54 percent of republicans said he should go thru whether he did it or not. That says it all.

They see him as their savior to destroying Roe vrs Wade. They wouldnt care if he was anally raping babies. I think he was a drunk and blackout alot which is why, they arent bringing his buddy in.

We are talking about the party who thinks a convicted felon who sold weapons to terrorists is a hero (ollie north).

Phoenix 09-28-2018 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22341691)
Why are you lying...

it was just last night where these facts were read aloud...their official statements given under oath and under threat of perjury.

lol you can't retain facts for a day? what are you a goldfish?

dyna mo 09-28-2018 10:44 AM

Phoenix, in Ford's testimony, she laid out the timeline of her coming forward. It revealed she did so BEFORE kavanaugh was nominated by trump. This isn't a dem hit job and it's not an attempt to obstruct kavanaugh specifically from becoming an SCJ.

Phoenix 09-28-2018 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22341719)
Phoenix, in Ford's testimony, she laid out the timeline of her coming forward. It revealed she did so BEFORE kavanaugh was nominated by trump. This isn't a dem hit job and it's not an attempt to obstruct kavanaugh specifically from becoming an SCJ.

So a lady has a hard on for a guy she probably never met.

happens all the time....there is probably some nut job lady who likes you, at the place you buy bagels or whatever.

What she claims happened, and the witnesses and people she puts there, say it never happened. And one of them is her friend.

Think about that.

dyna mo 09-28-2018 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341753)
So a lady has a hard on for a guy she probably never met.

happens all the time....there is probably some nut job lady who likes you, at the place you buy bagels or whatever.

What she claims happened, and the witnesses and people she puts there, say it never happened. And one of them is her friend.

Think about that.

I have considered things similar. again, this is a job interview that even the president trump said there should be zero doubt about things. but both of them provided believable testimony, imo. and not believable testimony too. That means there's doubt.

beerptrol 09-28-2018 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341753)
So a lady has a hard on for a guy she probably never met.

happens all the time....there is probably some nut job lady who likes you, at the place you buy bagels or whatever.

What she claims happened, and the witnesses and people she puts there, say it never happened. And one of them is her friend.

Think about that.

1 where does it say it never happened in her statement. So no recollection means it never happened in your eyes.
_______________________________
Leland Ingham Keyser, said in a statement: “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, without, Dr. Ford.”
____________________________________________

2 This same friend says she believes her.

__________________________________________________ __________________
Despite saying she hadn’t met Kavanaugh and doesn’t remember the party, Keyser told The Washington Post that she believes Ford.
__________________________________________________ _______

3 Where in this statement does it say it never happened!

__________________________________________________ ____________
In another statement, Patrick J. Smyth, identified by Ford as being among those downstairs at the party, says “I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”


Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 22341602)
They did ask everyone...everyone backs him.
Even her best friend said it is BS

Show me where in her statement she said it was BS!

Even Mark Judge, who Ford says was in the bedroom when Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, has not denied that such an episode took place. His sworn statement to the committee says, “I have no memory of this alleged incident,” “do not recall the party” and “never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”


The three swore they had no recollection of the party, providing no support for Ford’s accusations laid out to the Senate Judiciary Committee. But their statements do not disprove the allegations, either.

Phoenix 09-28-2018 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 22341762)
1 where does it say it never happened in her statement. So no recollection means it never happened in your eyes.
_______________________________
Leland Ingham Keyser, said in a statement: “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, without, Dr. Ford.”
____________________________________________

2 This same friend says she believes her.

__________________________________________________ __________________
Despite saying she hadn’t met Kavanaugh and doesn’t remember the party, Keyser told The Washington Post that she believes Ford.
__________________________________________________ _______

3 Where in this statement does it say it never happened!

__________________________________________________ ____________
In another statement, Patrick J. Smyth, identified by Ford as being among those downstairs at the party, says “I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”




Show me where in her statement she said it was BS!

Even Mark Judge, who Ford says was in the bedroom when Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, has not denied that such an episode took place. His sworn statement to the committee says, “I have no memory of this alleged incident,” “do not recall the party” and “never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”


The three swore they had no recollection of the party, providing no support for Ford’s accusations laid out to the Senate Judiciary Committee. But their statements do not disprove the allegations, either.

She was probably assaulted and i think worse than she remembers because she got off lucky the way she paints it. Harsh but true.
I just think she has the wrong people in her mind


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123