GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News This is how rocket systems should work in emergency situations (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1304488)

Constant Phil 10-11-2018 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22348108)
Can you tell me which tour this was on? I have been to Nasa twice. The first time I took a short tour which was about an hour long, and the last time I was there I took a 4 hour tour which was freaking interesting as hell. I want to go back again next spring and would love to see something like what you saw up close and personal too. Do you know the name of the tour or the package?

It was the Kennedy Space Center tour...about 4 hours. Private and completely segregated from the cattle like herding of the free tours. We were on a bus with maybe 20-30 people.

There is also a Cape Canaveral Tour but thats more about the history/launch pad visiting/older buildings, etc. Still very cool but we wanted the new stuff! Amazing trip I cant wait to go back.

This is a photo of the saftey system/nose cone of the Orion. The rocket was still being assembled in the Kennedy building

https://i.postimg.cc/76GvMmGD/Nasa.jpg

just a punk 10-12-2018 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348121)
ruski piece of shit liar


Russian Space Station Cargo Ship Crashes in Failed Rocket Launch

https://www.space.com/12715-russia-r...ship-lost.html

How many people died? Zero, as usually? Oh yes it was not Colombia or Challenger...

Clown, that was a cargo rocket. It doesn't has people on board and course it has no lifesaver systems. The unmanned satellites can be launched to the orbit even with (guess what?) ballistic rockets from cars. Because it's Russia, babe.



Yes, it's a commercial satellite (less than 1 minute for all). Just try to glue these phrases in your stupid american head: a car, a launch pad, an ICBM that can deliver a commercial satellite to the Earth's orbit (it may deliver a nuke, of course to every city on Earth).

You must be real stupid to underestimate Russian rocket technologies. They are the best in the world.

astronaut x 10-12-2018 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22347880)
No, it's not a fail at all. Fail is when people die. This is just a technical incident. You know that everybody gets to the outer space with Russian rockets ONLY. Sometimes shit happens. But once again: the people are safe and alive. If it was the US shuttle, both were dead already. This is why Americans use Russian rockets instead their own ones.

hmm... did the rocket make it to space?

No?

FAIL

I tried looking up this launch but couldn't find it due to too many results of failures. :(:helpme

just a punk 10-12-2018 02:24 AM

No it doesn't. But the crew is alive. Next rocket will send them to the space station. No problem at all. This is not a car driving. This is a rocket technology and course there are incidents. The main thing there that the crew is safe.

astronaut x 10-12-2018 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348348)
How many people died? Zero, as usually? Oh yes it was not Colombia or Challenger...

Clown, that was a cargo rocket. It doesn't has people on board and course it has no lifesaver systems. The unmanned satellites can be launched to the orbit even with (guess what?) ballistic rockets from cars. Because it's Russia, babe.



Yes, it's a commercial satellite (less than 1 minute for all). Just try to glue these phrases in your stupid american head: a car, a launch pad, an ICBM that can deliver a commercial satellite to the Earth's orbit (it may deliver a nuke, of course to every city on Earth).

You must be real stupid to underestimate Russian rocket technologies. They are the best in the world.

Your astronauts are pussies and want to live while on earth. Our astronauts go out like warriors and live forever!!

just a punk 10-12-2018 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astronaut x (Post 22348370)
Your astronauts are pussies and want to live while on earth. Our astronauts go out like warriors and live forever!!

Allahu Akbar!

dyna mo 10-12-2018 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348113)
As I said above it's a second time of the rocket failure.

lying piece of shit ruski.

Bladewire 10-12-2018 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348369)
No it doesn't. But the crew is alive. Next rocket will send them to the space station. No problem at all. This is not a car driving. This is a rocket technology and course there are incidents. The main thing there that the crew is safe.


just a punk 10-12-2018 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aidswire (Post 22348469)

So the American astronaut is "dead". Should I put here a requiem? :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348467)
lying piece of shit ruski.

https://demotivatorium.ru/sstorage/3...0423106909.jpg

dyna mo 10-12-2018 09:19 AM

it's not a rocket failure if nobody dies!

jtfc fucking ruskis.

King Mark 10-12-2018 09:25 AM

If this dude took the amount of effort he puts into American business, and diverted that energy towards his script...

50 cyber scripts that seo

just a punk 10-12-2018 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22348523)
If this dude took the amount of effort he puts into American business, and diverted that energy towards his script...

50 cyber scripts that seo

Man, I'm doing it right now :winkwink:

just a punk 10-12-2018 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348519)
it's not a rocket failure if nobody dies!

jtfc fucking ruskis.

Colombia and Discovery were the ones. Russian rocket systems are made to save people lives. Yesterday it has saved a life of an American guy. Why do you hate America so much?

klinton 10-12-2018 09:47 AM

in Soviet Russia, Cosmos visits YOU !!!

https://cdni.rbth.com/rbthmedia/imag...4eab158324.jpg

crockett 10-12-2018 10:08 AM

So the last Russian capsule have mysterious holes in it and this one has major malfunction in flight causing a aborted mission mid flight...

Something dont seem right in Russia's space program..


Oh and to the OP cosmonut. There wouldn't even be a International Space Station with out the Shuttle program.. Nothing else could have carried it into space..

dyna mo 10-12-2018 10:15 AM

I don't see any ruski billionaires making rocket ships like American billionaires do.

just a punk 10-12-2018 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348571)
I don't see any ruski billionaires making rocket ships like American billionaires do.

So why Americans billionaires use Russian rockets to send their astronauts (astronauts, lol a funny word, actually :1orglaugh) to the outer space?


Constant Phil 10-12-2018 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348584)
So why Americans billionaires use Russian rockets to send their astronauts (astronauts, lol a funny word, actually :1orglaugh) to the outer space?


Space X designed their own rockets, they arent russian...

dyna mo 10-12-2018 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348584)
So why Americans billionaires use Russian rockets to send their astronauts (astronauts, lol a funny word, actually :1orglaugh) to the outer space?

\

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

ruski, that's what putin tells you on ruski tv.

Bladewire 10-12-2018 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22348567)
So the last Russian capsule have mysterious holes in it and this one has major malfunction in flight causing a aborted mission mid flight...

Something dont seem right in Russia's space program..


Oh and to the OP cosmonut. There wouldn't even be a International Space Station with out the Shuttle program.. Nothing else could have carried it into space..

Russia can't afford it so they're sabotaging it to get out of the joint international pact.

just a punk 10-12-2018 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Constant Phil (Post 22348589)
Space X designed their own rockets, they arent russian...

How many people were sent into space by the Space X program? What does Putin say you about it on Russian TV?

dyna mo 10-12-2018 11:44 AM

Dance ruski

Constant Phil 10-12-2018 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348606)
How many people were sent into space by the Space X program? What does Putin say you about it on Russian TV?

Its slated to happen very soon. :thumbsup

PR_Glen 10-12-2018 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348004)
Related with rocket lunches? Yes, zero.

One man has died because of the parachute failure (during landing). Yet 3 other also died in the capsule during the landing because of the demagnetization. That's all. Nobody has died in the Russian (soviet) rocket like it was with Challenger. I know about only two incidents (including the today's one). In both cases the cosmonauts were catapulted and survived.

We lost 4 cosmonauts (including 3 at once) and all of them during the landing. Nobody was killed during the start of the rocket.

BTW what's about the Canadian stats? How many rockets with people you have launched into the outer space?

how are those examples different again? What does our not having a rocket program have to do with cosmonauts deaths?

Stop drunk posting, you embarrass yourself when you do.

dyna mo 10-12-2018 12:10 PM

It's too bad the op had to weaponize a positive story and use it to attack Americans over the Shuttle tragedies.

just a punk 10-12-2018 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348621)
It's too bad the op had to weaponize a positive story and use it to attack Americans over the Shuttle tragedies.

You have attacked them. If you moron read my posts you will see that they were mentioned as examples of bad (to be honest absent) livesafe systems. The Russian rockets have them and your astronaut was saved. The guy is a alive and that made you mad. Why do you hate Americans, dude?

Constant Phil 10-12-2018 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348621)
It's too bad the op had to weaponize a positive story and use it to attack Americans over the Shuttle tragedies.

Just think - If it wasnt for the US tragedies none of the other programs would have the fail-safes and safety systems they have today.

just a punk 10-12-2018 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Constant Phil (Post 22348626)
Just think - If it wasnt for the US tragedies none of the other programs would have the fail-safes and safety systems they have today.

The Russian rockets had it many years before. The first case has accrued in 70s (about 10 years before the Challenger catastrophe) and the crew was successfully catapulted.

dyna mo 10-12-2018 12:40 PM

Dance ruski

just a punk 10-12-2018 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348632)
Dance ruski


just a punk 10-12-2018 01:00 PM

I'm a bit wrong it was in 1983: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_7K-ST_No._16L

But still it was 3 years before the Challenger case. The Russian rockets were already equipped with livesafe systems. And as you can see they work well today.

Constant Phil 10-12-2018 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348630)
The Russian rockets had it many years before. The first case has accrued in 70s (about 10 years before the Challenger catastrophe) and the crew was successfully catapulted.

Yes I'm sure neither country benefited in some way, shape, or form from these tragedies.

And the russians had 5 major accidents prior to the 71' on the "edge of space" which to me is close enough (330k ft)

dyna mo 10-12-2018 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348641)
I'm a bit wrong it was in 1983: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_7K-ST_No._16L

But still it was 3 years before the Challenger case. The Russian rockets were already equipped with livesafe systems. And as you can see they work well today.

ruski, we've had escape towers and other life saving systems on our rockets since Mercury.



https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4001/images/front.jpg

just a punk 10-12-2018 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348644)
ruski, we've had escape towers and other life saving systems on our rockets since Mercury

amerikansky, first of all you have no relation to them. These were made by Nazis, headed by Wernher von Braun (educate yourself). The second thing they didn't work in the real life. Nazis have used americans like monkeys in their space programs. And you have no "Mercury" or anythings today. Wernher von Braun is dead, so you have to use Russian technologies only. Don't you really can accept that only Russia can put your astronauts into the outer space?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Constant Phil (Post 22348642)
Yes I'm sure neither country benefited in some way, shape, or form from these tragedies.

And the russians had 5 major accidents prior to the 71' on the "edge of space" which to me is close enough (330k ft)

Only 2 fatal accidents during lauding.

Constant Phil 10-12-2018 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 22348645)
Only 2 fatal accidents during lauding.

5 fatal according to everyone else. One being a rapid decompression while in space.

dyna mo 10-12-2018 01:14 PM

here's the fucking math to settle this

Through the most recent mission, STS-130 in February 2010, the shuttle has taken 788 people to orbit. Fourteen astronauts lost their lives on Challenger and Columbia.

That's one shuttle fatality for every 56 people taken to orbit.

Soyuz has orbited 250 people, not including two successful aborts: Soyuz 18a in April 1975, which occurred late in a launch 90 miles high, and Soyuz T-10-1 in September 1983, on the launch pad. The program has suffered four fatalities: one on Soyuz 1 in April 1967, and the other three on Soyuz 11 in June 1971.

That’s one Soyuz fatality for every 63 people delivered to orbit.

that's not enough margin to use to attack Americans, ruski.

dyna mo 10-12-2018 01:16 PM

actually there were 5 more successful shuttle missions after that one. so that shuttle ratio drops

just a punk 10-12-2018 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Constant Phil (Post 22348646)
5 fatal according to everyone else. One being a rapid decompression while in space.

Please describe them (any links etc), because I know only 2. Don't shut your month up please - tell me about them all.

dyna mo 10-12-2018 01:22 PM

yup, so those flights add 35 more people so the ratio for the shuttle is

1 death for every 58 passengers

soyuz is

1 death for every 63 passengers.


eat shit ruski.

just a punk 10-12-2018 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 22348656)
yup, so those flights add 35 more people so the ratio for the shuttle is

1 death for every 58 passengers

soyuz is

1 death for every 63 passengers.


eat shit ruski.

I didn't get it, but keep posting.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123