![]() |
Quote:
There is also a Cape Canaveral Tour but thats more about the history/launch pad visiting/older buildings, etc. Still very cool but we wanted the new stuff! Amazing trip I cant wait to go back. This is a photo of the saftey system/nose cone of the Orion. The rocket was still being assembled in the Kennedy building https://i.postimg.cc/76GvMmGD/Nasa.jpg |
Quote:
Clown, that was a cargo rocket. It doesn't has people on board and course it has no lifesaver systems. The unmanned satellites can be launched to the orbit even with (guess what?) ballistic rockets from cars. Because it's Russia, babe. Yes, it's a commercial satellite (less than 1 minute for all). Just try to glue these phrases in your stupid american head: a car, a launch pad, an ICBM that can deliver a commercial satellite to the Earth's orbit (it may deliver a nuke, of course to every city on Earth). You must be real stupid to underestimate Russian rocket technologies. They are the best in the world. |
Quote:
No? FAIL I tried looking up this launch but couldn't find it due to too many results of failures. :(:helpme |
No it doesn't. But the crew is alive. Next rocket will send them to the space station. No problem at all. This is not a car driving. This is a rocket technology and course there are incidents. The main thing there that the crew is safe.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
it's not a rocket failure if nobody dies!
jtfc fucking ruskis. |
If this dude took the amount of effort he puts into American business, and diverted that energy towards his script...
50 cyber scripts that seo |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
So the last Russian capsule have mysterious holes in it and this one has major malfunction in flight causing a aborted mission mid flight...
Something dont seem right in Russia's space program.. Oh and to the OP cosmonut. There wouldn't even be a International Space Station with out the Shuttle program.. Nothing else could have carried it into space.. |
I don't see any ruski billionaires making rocket ships like American billionaires do.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh ruski, that's what putin tells you on ruski tv. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Dance ruski
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Stop drunk posting, you embarrass yourself when you do. |
It's too bad the op had to weaponize a positive story and use it to attack Americans over the Shuttle tragedies.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Dance ruski
|
Quote:
|
I'm a bit wrong it was in 1983: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_7K-ST_No._16L
But still it was 3 years before the Challenger case. The Russian rockets were already equipped with livesafe systems. And as you can see they work well today. |
Quote:
And the russians had 5 major accidents prior to the 71' on the "edge of space" which to me is close enough (330k ft) |
Quote:
https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4001/images/front.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
here's the fucking math to settle this
Through the most recent mission, STS-130 in February 2010, the shuttle has taken 788 people to orbit. Fourteen astronauts lost their lives on Challenger and Columbia. That's one shuttle fatality for every 56 people taken to orbit. Soyuz has orbited 250 people, not including two successful aborts: Soyuz 18a in April 1975, which occurred late in a launch 90 miles high, and Soyuz T-10-1 in September 1983, on the launch pad. The program has suffered four fatalities: one on Soyuz 1 in April 1967, and the other three on Soyuz 11 in June 1971. That’s one Soyuz fatality for every 63 people delivered to orbit. that's not enough margin to use to attack Americans, ruski. |
actually there were 5 more successful shuttle missions after that one. so that shuttle ratio drops
|
Quote:
|
yup, so those flights add 35 more people so the ratio for the shuttle is
1 death for every 58 passengers soyuz is 1 death for every 63 passengers. eat shit ruski. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123